An observational study in Cancer and Tiredness, sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-11.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges · Observational
Many studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of Adapted Physical Activity (APA) in different cancer types.
It therefore seems necessary to assess spontaneous Physical Activity in order to integrate it to the overall calculation of physical activity in clinical practice.
To assess the AP, two types of methods are validated : the subjective method using a questionnaries and objective method using a pedometer , accelerometer or measures calorimetry .
Subjective method shows , good acceptability by patients and low cost but can sometimes lead to poor estimation of the level of activity.
Objective methods obviously increase the accuracy of assessments but are more difficult to use for epidemiological studies , less accepted by the patient and more expensive.
In this study the investigators will measure the spontaneous Daily Physical Activity by both methods andd evaluate the correclation.
1,860 studies on the registry are indexed under Fatigue; 376 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 100 across 367 observational studies indexed under Fatigue.
Browse Fatigue studies →University Hospital, Limoges is the lead sponsor of 255 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients with a breast cancer and are completing treatment
Patients with a breast cancer and are completing treatment
Other: Physical activity
Daily physical activity assessment at 3 months
Physical activity is measured by means of an Actigraph. Patients will measure their daily physical activity , three times during one week espaced by 1 month.
Time frame: Month 3
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Limoges