ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02008877Updated May 15, 2019Results posted

SARC023: Ganetespib and Sirolimus in Patients With MPNST (Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors)

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of ganetespib and Sirolimus in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors (MPNST) and Sarcoma, sponsored by Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-15.

Sponsored by Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Phase 1: To assess the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/ recommended dose of ganetespib when administered in combination with sirolimus in patients with refractory or relapsed sarcomas including unresectable or metastatic sporadic or neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated MPNST. Phase I enrollment has been closed.

Phase 2: To determine the clinical benefit of ganetespib in combination with sirolimus for patients with unresectable or metastatic sporadic or NF1 associated MPNST.

Read the detailed description

Previously, no targeted agents have been able to cause tumor regression in a genetically engineered MPNST mouse model or human MPNST. Recently published data from Dr. Cichowski's laboratory demonstrated using Hsp90 inhibitors to enhance endoplasmic reticulum stress coupled with the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor sirolimus led to dramatic tumor shrinkage in a transgenic MPNST mouse model, which correlated with profound damage to the endoplasmic reticulum and cell death. Ganetespib is a novel, injectable, small molecule inhibitor of Hsp90 and is currently being investigated in adults with a broad range of tumor types with a favorable safety profile and promising early results. Ganetespib has been studied in preclinical in vivo models with a variety of targeted agents with no marked apparent pharmacological interactions. Sirolimus is a commercially available orally administered mTOR inhibitor and is the active metabolite of temsirolimus, which is FDA approved agent for advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Sirolimus has been studied and tolerated in combination with multiple cytotoxic and targeted agents in a variety of tumor types. Based on strong preclinical rationale, the investigators hypothesize that ganetespib in combination with sirolimus will cause tumor regression in patients with refractory MPNSTs.

The investigators propose a multi-institutional open label phase I/II trial of ganetespib in combination with sirolimus in patients with refractory sarcoma including MPNST. Hsp90 inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors have also both demonstrated benefit in a variety of preclinical bone and soft tissue sarcoma models. The investigators hypothesize that these agents that work on separate and potentially synergistic pathways will also be beneficial for other refractory bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Thus, the phase I component will be open to patients with refractory sarcomas, which will also expedite enrollment. Upon determination of the recommended dosing, a phase II study will be conducted. The phase II study population will be limited to patients with a diagnosis of MPNST.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors (MPNST)
  • Sarcoma

Keywords

  • Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors
  • MPNST
  • Sarcoma
  • Ganetespib
  • Sirolimus
  • mTOR inhibitor
  • Heat shock protein
  • Hsp90
03

In context

Neurofibrosarcoma

71 studies on the registry are indexed under Neurofibrosarcoma; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 44 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Neurofibrosarcoma.

Browse Neurofibrosarcoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients ≥ 16 years old
  • Patients with unresectable or metastatic histologically confirmed sporadic or NF1 associated high grade MPNST
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2
  • Patients must have at least 1 measurable tumor
  • Patients must have fully recovered from the acute toxic effects of all prior anti-cancer therapy (toxicity \< grade 2)
  • Must be able to swallow whole pills
  • Adequate organ function
  • Normal fasting cholesterol and triglycerides
  • May be on cholesterol medications

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving current treatment with corticosteroids or another immunosuppressive. Topical or inhaled corticosteroids are allowed.
  • Uncontrolled brain or leptomeningeal metastases, including patients who continue to require glucocorticoids for brain or leptomeningeal metastases
  • Symptomatic congestive heart failure
  • Severely impaired lung function
  • Significant vascular disease
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Active (acute or chronic) or uncontrolled severe infections hepatitis
  • Impairment of gastrointestinal function
  • Patients with an active, bleeding diathesis or significant coagulopathy
  • Use of cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4 (CYP3A4)/ CYP2C19 substrates
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ganetespib / sirolimus

    28-day cycles of ganetespib + sirolimus

    Drug: ganetespib · Drug: Sirolimus

Interventions

  • Phase 1 Dose 1: 150 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8, and 15 intravenously over 1 hour; Phase 1 Dose 2: 200 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8, and 15 intravenously over 1 hour; Phase 2: 200 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8, and 15 intravenously over 1 hour

    Also known as: STA-9090

  • 4mg taken orally once daily on a continuous dosing schedule; Loading dose 12 mg on cycle 1 day 1 only.

    Also known as: Rapamycin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Ganetespib When Administered in Combination With Sirolimus.

    To assess the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated/ recommended dose of ganetespib when administered in combination with sirolimus in patients with refractory sarcomas or unresectable or metastatic sporadic or neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated MPNST. Toxicities observed during the first cycle will be used to define the MTD/Recommended dose. Toxicity will be graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. DLT will be defined as any of the following events that are possibly, probably, or definitely attributable to ganetespib or sirolimus. The DLT observation period for the purposes of dose escalation will be the first cycle of therapy.

    Time frame: Toxicities will be evaluated over the first treatment cycle (each cycle=28 days)

  2. Clinical Benefit of Ganetespib in Combination With Sirolimus

    Assessed using the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Tumor assessments will be obtained every 2 cycles. Clinical benefit is defined as stable disease, Partial Response (PR), Complete Response (CR). For patients who experience progression by WHO but in the opinion of the treating investigator are deriving benefit from therapy and have not otherwise met off treatment or off study criteria, may continue on treatment as long as patient has not met progression by RECIST 1.1.

    Time frame: Response evaluations will be performed after every 2 treatment cycles (each cycle=28 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Plasma Pharmacokinetic Profile of Ganetespib and Sirolimus When Administered in Combination-Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

    To describe the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of ganetespib and sirolimus when administered in combination therapy.

    Time frame: Pre-therapy levels drawn at baseline and pharmacokinetic analysis occurs on Cycle 1 Day 15

  2. Changes in Pharmacodynamic Parameters in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

    To explore changes in pharmacodynamic parameters in peripheral blood mononuclear cells performed on day 1 prior to ganetespib and sirolimus administration, and on day 15, 6 hours post drug administration. Hsp inhibition (Hsp70), mTOR inhibition (phospho-S6 and Akt Phosphorylation), UPR activation (EIF2alpha phosphorylation) will be explored. Western blot analyses were performed for phospho (p)-Akt, p-eIF2α, p-S6, and Hsp70. The absorbance of each phosphoprotein lane was recorded and protein levels were determined after normalizing for levels of corresponding total protein.

    Time frame: Baseline and Cycle 1 Day 15

  3. Patient-reported Pain Severity and the Impact of Pain on Daily Activities

    To assess patient-reported pain severity and the impact of pain on daily activities before and during treatment with ganetespib and sirolimus. The Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) will be used to assess pain severity. The NRS-11 is a self-report segmented 11-point numeric scale that assesses pain severity. It consists of a horizontal line with 0 representing "no pain" at the right end of the line and 10 representing "worst pain you can imagine" at the left end.The Brief Pain Inventory is a 7-item self-report questionnaire that measures the extent to which pain interferes with daily functioning. Patients are asked to indicate how much pain interfered with various activities in the past week, with scores ranging from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). A total score is obtained by taking the mean of the scores for all 7 items; thus, the total pain interference score can range from 0 to 10.

    Time frame: Baseline and prior to Cycle 3

  4. Utility of Three-dimensional MRI (3D-MRI) Analysis in Comparison to 1-dimensional and 2-dimensional Measurements

    To evaluate the utility of three-dimensional MRI (3D-MRI) analysis in comparison to 1-dimensional and 2-dimensional measurements as a method to more sensitively monitor response.

    Time frame: 4 months

  5. Plasma Pharmacokinetic Profile of Ganetespib When Administered in Combination With Sirolimus

    To describe the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of ganetespib in terms of half life.

    Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 15

  6. Determine Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)/Recommended Dose (RD) of Ganetespib

    A conventional 3+3 dose escalation design was used for phase 1. All patients in phase 2 were treated with the recommended dose.

    Time frame: Phase 1 of study

07

Results

Posted May 2, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhase 1 Dose 1Phase 1 Dose 2Phase 2
Started3710
Completed3610
Not completed010
Withdrew: Inevaluable010

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Ganetespib When Administered in Combination With Sirolimus.

To assess the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated/ recommended dose of ganetespib when administered in combination with sirolimus in patients with refractory sarcomas or unresectable or metastatic sporadic or neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated MPNST. Toxicities observed during the first cycle will be used to define the MTD/Recommended dose. Toxicity will be graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. DLT will be defined as any of the following events that are possibly, probably, or definitely attributable to ganetespib or sirolimus. The DLT observation period for the purposes of dose escalation will be the first cycle of therapy.

Time frame:
Toxicities will be evaluated over the first treatment cycle (each cycle=28 days)
Reported as:
Number · DLTs
Number of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Ganetespib When Administered in Combination With Sirolimus.
DLTsGanetespib / Sirolimus
Dose Level 10
Dose Level 21
PrimaryClinical Benefit of Ganetespib in Combination With Sirolimus

Assessed using the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Tumor assessments will be obtained every 2 cycles. Clinical benefit is defined as stable disease, Partial Response (PR), Complete Response (CR). For patients who experience progression by WHO but in the opinion of the treating investigator are deriving benefit from therapy and have not otherwise met off treatment or off study criteria, may continue on treatment as long as patient has not met progression by RECIST 1.1.

Time frame:
Response evaluations will be performed after every 2 treatment cycles (each cycle=28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Benefit of Ganetespib in Combination With Sirolimus
ParticipantsGanetespib / Sirolimus
Phase 11
Phase 20
SecondaryChange in Plasma Pharmacokinetic Profile of Ganetespib and Sirolimus When Administered in Combination-Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

To describe the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of ganetespib and sirolimus when administered in combination therapy.

Time frame:
Pre-therapy levels drawn at baseline and pharmacokinetic analysis occurs on Cycle 1 Day 15
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Change in Plasma Pharmacokinetic Profile of Ganetespib and Sirolimus When Administered in Combination-Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
ng/mLGanetespib / Sirolimus
Dose Level 1- Sirolimus trough12.1 ± 3.6
Dose Level 2- Sirolimus trough12.5 ± 8.9
SecondaryChanges in Pharmacodynamic Parameters in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

To explore changes in pharmacodynamic parameters in peripheral blood mononuclear cells performed on day 1 prior to ganetespib and sirolimus administration, and on day 15, 6 hours post drug administration. Hsp inhibition (Hsp70), mTOR inhibition (phospho-S6 and Akt Phosphorylation), UPR activation (EIF2alpha phosphorylation) will be explored. Western blot analyses were performed for phospho (p)-Akt, p-eIF2α, p-S6, and Hsp70. The absorbance of each phosphoprotein lane was recorded and protein levels were determined after normalizing for levels of corresponding total protein.

Time frame:
Baseline and Cycle 1 Day 15
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Changes in Pharmacodynamic Parameters in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells
ratioGanetespib / Sirolimus
Hsp70 at Baseline0.81 ± 0.39
Hsp70 at Cycle 1 Day 150.84 ± 0.56
pAKT at Baseline1.20 ± 0.70
pAKT at Cycle 1 Day 151.44 ± 1.00
p-S6 at Baseline1.25 ± 0.40
p-S6 at Cycle 1 Day 150.54 ± 0.24
p-eiF2alpha at Baseline1.02 ± 0.26
p-eiF2alpha at Cycle 1 Day 150.49 ± 0.22
SecondaryPatient-reported Pain Severity and the Impact of Pain on Daily Activities

To assess patient-reported pain severity and the impact of pain on daily activities before and during treatment with ganetespib and sirolimus. The Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) will be used to assess pain severity. The NRS-11 is a self-report segmented 11-point numeric scale that assesses pain severity. It consists of a horizontal line with 0 representing "no pain" at the right end of the line and 10 representing "worst pain you can imagine" at the left end.The Brief Pain Inventory is a 7-item self-report questionnaire that measures the extent to which pain interferes with daily functioning. Patients are asked to indicate how much pain interfered with various activities in the past week, with scores ranging from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). A total score is obtained by taking the mean of the scores for all 7 items; thus, the total pain interference score can range from 0 to 10.

Time frame:
Baseline and prior to Cycle 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient-reported Pain Severity and the Impact of Pain on Daily Activities
units on a scaleGanetespib / Sirolimus
Baseline- Overall pain intensity7.5 (0 to 10)
Baseline- Tumor pain intensity7.5 (0 to 10)
Baseline- Pain interference6.49 (0 to 10)
Prior to Cycle 3- Overall pain intensity5 (0 to 10)
Prior to Cycle 3- Tumor pain intensity4.75 (0 to 10)
Prior to Cycle 3- Pain interference3.14 (0 to 10)
SecondaryUtility of Three-dimensional MRI (3D-MRI) Analysis in Comparison to 1-dimensional and 2-dimensional Measurements

To evaluate the utility of three-dimensional MRI (3D-MRI) analysis in comparison to 1-dimensional and 2-dimensional measurements as a method to more sensitively monitor response.

Time frame:
4 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPlasma Pharmacokinetic Profile of Ganetespib When Administered in Combination With Sirolimus

To describe the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of ganetespib in terms of half life.

Time frame:
Cycle 1 Day 15
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Plasma Pharmacokinetic Profile of Ganetespib When Administered in Combination With Sirolimus
hoursGanetespib / Sirolimus
Ganetespib half life for dose level 16.4 ± 2.1
Ganetespib half life for dose level 26.0 ± 0.9
SecondaryDetermine Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)/Recommended Dose (RD) of Ganetespib

A conventional 3+3 dose escalation design was used for phase 1. All patients in phase 2 were treated with the recommended dose.

Time frame:
Phase 1 of study
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Determine Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)/Recommended Dose (RD) of Ganetespib
ParticipantsPhase 1 Dose Level 1Phase 1 Dose Level 2Phase 2
Determine Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)/Recommended Dose (RD) of Ganetespib3610

Adverse events

Collected over 3 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phase 1 Dose 10/3 (0%)1/3 (33.3%)3/3 (100%)
Phase 1 Dose 21/7 (14.3%)2/7 (28.6%)7/7 (100%)
Phase 21/10 (10%)6/10 (60%)10/10 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent serious events
EventPhase 1 Dose 1Phase 1 Dose 2Phase 2
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/30/70/10
HypoglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/30/70/10
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders0/31/71/10
FeverGeneral disorders0/31/70/10
Infusion related reactionGeneral disorders0/31/70/10
Gastrointestinal disorders- otherGastrointestinal disorders0/30/71/10
Alanine Aminotransferase increasedInvestigations0/30/71/10
Aspartate Aminotransferase increasedInvestigations0/30/71/10
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/30/71/10
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders0/30/71/10
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 91
Most frequent other events
EventPhase 1 Dose 1Phase 1 Dose 2Phase 2
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders2/37/78/10
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/33/77/10
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/30/71/10
Aspartate Aminotransferase increasedInvestigations2/31/73/10
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/30/71/10
FatigueGeneral disorders2/31/76/10
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/33/70/10
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/32/72/10
HypophosphatemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/31/71/10
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations2/33/74/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Ganetespib / Sirolimus
Phase I26 (16 to 89)
Phase 238 (24 to 61)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Ganetespib / Sirolimus
Phase I — Female2
Phase I — Male8
Phase 2 — Female4
Phase 2 — Male6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Ganetespib / Sirolimus
Hispanic or Latino4
Not Hispanic or Latino16
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Ganetespib / Sirolimus
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian2
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White14
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported2
Sarcoma subtype
Sarcoma subtype(Participants)Ganetespib / Sirolimus
Phase I — Alveolar soft part sarcoma1
Phase I — Ewing sarcoma1
Phase I — Leiomyosarcoma2
Phase I — Liposarcoma3
Phase I — MPNST NF1 Associated3
Phase I — MPNST Sporadic0
Phase 2 — Alveolar soft part sarcoma0
Phase 2 — Ewing sarcoma0
Phase 2 — Leiomyosarcoma0
Phase 2 — Liposarcoma0
Phase 2 — MPNST NF1 Associated5
Phase 2 — MPNST Sporadic5
Tumor location at diagnosis
Tumor location at diagnosis(Participants)Ganetespib / Sirolimus
Phase I — Abdomen1
Phase I — Extremity1
Phase I — Head1
Phase I — Lung0
Phase I — Mediastinum1
Phase I — Peritoneum1
Phase I — Skin1
Phase I — Spine1
Phase I — Other3
Phase 2 — Abdomen1
Phase 2 — Extremity4
Phase 2 — Head0
Phase 2 — Lung1
Phase 2 — Mediastinum0
Phase 2 — Peritoneum0
Phase 2 — Skin0
Phase 2 — Spine2
Phase 2 — Other2
History of metastatic disease
History of metastatic disease(Participants)Ganetespib / Sirolimus
Phase 19
Phase 29
Prior chemotherapy regimen
Prior chemotherapy regimen(Participants)Ganetespib / Sirolimus
Phase 110
Phase 28

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Sarcoma Oncology Center
    Santa Monica, California 90403, United States
  • Children's National Medical Center
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • University of Iowa
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • National Cancer Institute
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Washington University
    St Louis, Missouri 63130, United States
  • Huntsman Cancer Institute
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kim A, Lu Y, Okuno SH, Reinke D, Maertens O, Perentesis J, Basu M, Wolters PL, De Raedt T, Chawla S, Chugh R, Van Tine BA, O'Sullivan G, Chen A, Cichowski K, Widemann BC. Targeting Refractory Sarcomas and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in a Phase I/II Study of Sirolimus in Combination with Ganetespib (SARC023). Sarcoma. 2020 Jan 30;2020:5784876. doi: 10.1155/2020/5784876. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32089640 ↗

Related links

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 13, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Dec 2013, a primary completion of Apr 2018 and a completion of Jul 2018. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in May 2019, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 25, 2013
First posted
Dec 11, 2013
Start
Dec 2013
Primary completionActual
Apr 2018
CompletionActual
Jul 2018
Results first posted
May 2, 2019
Last update
May 15, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02008877
Lead sponsor
Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration
Collaborators
Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp., United States Department of Defense
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 11, 2013
Start date
Dec 2013
Primary completion
Apr 2018
Completion
Jul 2018
Results posted
May 2, 2019
Last update
May 15, 2019

Study contacts

AeRang Kim, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Children's National Research Institute
Brigitte Widemann, MD
principal investigator · National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: STA 9090 · Sirolimus

Start the discussion