CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02006875Updated Dec 11, 2015

rTMS Study to Improve Functional Performance for Patients With Stroke

A Phase 3 interventional study of rTMS in Stroke, sponsored by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-11.

Sponsored by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To use repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat stroke patients is getting a popular idea. Previous studies seemed to support its effects on facilitating motor recovery after stroke. This study focuses on the motor recovery of lower extremities. Investigators conducted the study to evaluate the treatment effect of rTMS on the functional performance of lower extremities in terms of postural control, balance, and mobility in stroke patients. Investigators hypothesized that these performances could be improved through the better motor control of lower extremities caused by rTMS.

Read the detailed description

Protocol:

  1. Setting: inpatient rehabilitation department of Shuang-Ho Hospital.
  2. Study population: Patients received inpatient treatment or rehabilitation for stroke in Shuang-Ho Hospital (SHH).
  3. Eligibility. Screening for eligibility was done by the 2 physiatrists from rehabilitation department of SHH.
  4. Study design: controlled trial with stratified randomization
  5. Blinding

    1. The patients were blinded by the real or sham coil of rTMS
    2. The assessors who performed the outcome measurements were blinded to the assignment of treatment.
  6. Measurements.

    1. Baseline demographic records. The stroke severity was measured by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Modified Rankin Scale (MRS), Brunnstrum stage, and Manual muscle test (MMT) before intervention.
    2. Clinical assessments.

      • Postural control was assessed by Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS)
      • The motor recovery of lower extremities was assessed by the lower extremity subscale of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-LE)
      • The balance and gait subscales of Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA-b and POMA-g)
      • Timed Up and Go (TUG) test was used to assess the gross mobility.
      • Barthel Index (BI) for the ADL independence
      • modified Rankin Scale (MRS) for disability classification were also collected.
    3. These measurements (including the clinical and corticomotor excitability assessments) are performed by one researcher who are responsible for the measurements.
  7. Compliance and side effect. The compliance of interventions were investigated. The attendance of treatments (including rTMS sessions and physical therapy sessions) and possible side effect/discomfort were recorded during the interventions by a researcher. He also tries to understand the reason of drop-out from the study.
02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • postural
  • balance
  • mobility
  • leg
  • stroke
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital is the lead sponsor of 196 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • unilateral hemiplegia caused by the stroke,
  • first ever stroke,
  • time since stroke: 10-90 days,
  • age: 18-80 y/o,
  • Functional ambulation classification (FAC): 0-2,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication to TMS (eg, pacemaker, seizure history, pregnancy),
  • cranial metal implants
  • intracranial hemorrhage associated with tumor or arteriovenous malformation, craniotomy
  • able to complete Timed Up and Go (TUG) test within 2 minutes
  • unable to walk normally before the stroke
  • those whose motor evoked potentials (MEP) of M1-UH were absent in the pretest
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    real rTMS

    Experimental included the a daily real rTMS session for 15 mins followed by a physical therapy for 45 mins.

    Device: rTMS

  • Sham comparator
    sham rTMS

    the control interventions included a daily sham rTMS session for 15 minutes followed by a physical therapy for 45 minutes.

    Device: rTMS

Interventions

  • DevicerTMS

    Interventions started on the next weekday after pretest and were performed once a day for 15 consecutive weekdays. Participants in the E and C groups received rTMS (either real or sham, 1 Hz, 15 minutes), followed by a session of physical therapy for 45 minutes.

    Also known as: Magstim Rapid2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Timed Up and Go (TUG)

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after interventions completed

Secondary outcomes

  1. the lower extremity subscale of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-LE)

    Time frame: up to 3 months after the intervention completed

  2. The balance and gait subscales of Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA-b and POMA-g)

    Time frame: up to 3 months after the interventions completed

  3. Barthel Index (BI)

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after interventions completed

  4. Postural control was assessed by Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS)

    PASS which examines the patient's ability to maintain or change a given posture and is applicable to patients with very poor postural performance. This instrument has been reported to have a good validity and reliability at different recovery stages after stroke, minimal floor and ceiling effect, and be sensitive to changes in severe stroke patients at early stage after stroke.

    Time frame: up to 3 months after the intervention completed

  5. modified Rankin Scale (MRS)

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after interventions completed

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Shuang Ho Hospital
    New Taipei City, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lin YN, Hu CJ, Chi JY, Lin LF, Yen TH, Lin YK, Liou TH. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere leg motor area in patients with subacute stroke and substantial leg impairment: A pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2015 Apr;47(4):305-10. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1943. PubMed 25679340 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02006875
Lead sponsor
Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital
Responsible party
Yen-Nung Lin (Medical doctor of Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 10, 2013
Start date
Jan 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Last update
Dec 11, 2015

Study contacts

Yen-Nung Lin, MD, MS
principal investigator · Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion