A Phase 3 interventional study of rTMS in Stroke, sponsored by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-11.
Sponsored by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
To use repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat stroke patients is getting a popular idea. Previous studies seemed to support its effects on facilitating motor recovery after stroke. This study focuses on the motor recovery of lower extremities. Investigators conducted the study to evaluate the treatment effect of rTMS on the functional performance of lower extremities in terms of postural control, balance, and mobility in stroke patients. Investigators hypothesized that these performances could be improved through the better motor control of lower extremities caused by rTMS.
Protocol:
Blinding
Measurements.
Clinical assessments.
7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.
Browse Stroke studies →Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital is the lead sponsor of 196 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Experimental included the a daily real rTMS session for 15 mins followed by a physical therapy for 45 mins.
Device: rTMS
the control interventions included a daily sham rTMS session for 15 minutes followed by a physical therapy for 45 minutes.
Device: rTMS
Interventions started on the next weekday after pretest and were performed once a day for 15 consecutive weekdays. Participants in the E and C groups received rTMS (either real or sham, 1 Hz, 15 minutes), followed by a session of physical therapy for 45 minutes.
Also known as: Magstim Rapid2
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time frame: Up to 3 months after interventions completed
the lower extremity subscale of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-LE)
Time frame: up to 3 months after the intervention completed
The balance and gait subscales of Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA-b and POMA-g)
Time frame: up to 3 months after the interventions completed
Barthel Index (BI)
Time frame: Up to 3 months after interventions completed
Postural control was assessed by Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS)
PASS which examines the patient's ability to maintain or change a given posture and is applicable to patients with very poor postural performance. This instrument has been reported to have a good validity and reliability at different recovery stages after stroke, minimal floor and ceiling effect, and be sensitive to changes in severe stroke patients at early stage after stroke.
Time frame: up to 3 months after the intervention completed
modified Rankin Scale (MRS)
Time frame: Up to 3 months after interventions completed
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital