CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01972841SYNERGYUpdated Oct 31, 2024Results posted

This Was a Multinational Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Two Medicines , Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Taken Together, or Separately, or a Mock Treatment (Placebo) in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

A Phase 3 interventional study of Solifenacin succinate and Mirabegron in Urinary Bladder Overactive, Urinary Bladder Diseases\Urologic Diseases and Overactive Bladder, sponsored by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.. Completed at 435 sites in 42 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-31.

Sponsored by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,527
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to examine how well two medicines (solifenacin succinate and mirabegron) combined work compared to each medicine alone in the treatment of bladder problems.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Bladder Overactive
  • Urinary Bladder Diseases\Urologic Diseases
  • Overactive Bladder
  • Urgency Incontinence

Keywords

  • Combination Therapy
  • Mirabegron
  • Overactive Bladder
  • Urgency
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Nocturia
  • Solifenacin Succinate
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject was willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly and able to measure his/her vital signs at home at stipulated time points, using the device provided by the study personnel, and to adequately record the readings;
  • Subject had symptoms of "wet" OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for at least 3 months;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject had significant PVR volume (> 150 mL);
  • Subject had a neurological cause for detrusor overactivity (e.g. neurogenic bladder, diabetic neuropathy with autonomic component or bladder involvement, or systemic or central neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease with autonomic component or bladder involvement). An autonomic component could be inferred when autonomic functions were affected, including heart rate, blood pressure, perspiration and digestion.
  • Subject had an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self catheterization.
  • Subject had chronic inflammation such as bladder pain syndrome /interstitial cystitis, symptomatic bladder stones or any previous or current radiation cystitis.
  • Subject had received intravesical treatment in the past 12 months with e.g., botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, capsaicin.
  • Subject had moderate to severe hepatic impairment
  • Subject had severe renal impairment
  • Subject had a clinically significant abnormal ECG
  • Subject had a concurrent malignancy or history of cancer (except noninvasive skin cancer) within the last 5 years prior to screening.
  • Subject had an average QTcF interval > 450 ms for males or > 470 ms for females based on the triplicate ECGs completed at Screening or is at risk of QT prolongation (e.g., family history of long QT syndrome, hypokalaemia).
  • Subject had severe hypertension, which is defined as a sitting average systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg and/or average diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
3,527 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1: Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg

    Participants who received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg once a day for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Solifenacin succinate · Drug: Mirabegron · Drug: Placebo to match mirabegron

  • Experimental
    2: Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg

    Participants who received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 50 mg once a day for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Solifenacin succinate · Drug: Mirabegron · Drug: Placebo to match mirabegron

  • Placebo comparator
    3: Placebo

    Participants who received matching placebo once a day for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo to match solifenacin succinate · Drug: Placebo to match mirabegron

  • Active comparator
    4: Solifenacin 5 mg

    Participants who received solifenacin 5 mg once a day for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Solifenacin succinate · Drug: Placebo to match mirabegron

  • Active comparator
    5:Mirabegron 25 mg

    Participants who received mirabegron 25 mg once a day for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Mirabegron · Drug: Placebo to match solifenacin succinate · Drug: Placebo to match mirabegron

  • Active comparator
    6: Mirabegron 50 mg

    Participants who received mirabegron 50 mg once a day for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Mirabegron · Drug: Placebo to match solifenacin succinate · Drug: Placebo to match mirabegron

Interventions

  • DrugSolifenacin succinate

    Oral tablet

    Also known as: Vesikur, Vesitrim, YM905, Vesicare

  • DrugMirabegron

    Oral tablet

    Also known as: YM178, Betmiga, Betanis, Myrbetriq

  • DrugPlacebo to match solifenacin succinate

    Oral tablet

  • DrugPlacebo to match mirabegron

    Oral tablet

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period.

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  2. Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    A micturition was defined as any voluntary micturition (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period.

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

    The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from the data recorded by the participant during 3 consecutive days with volume measurements during the 7-day micturition diary period.

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  2. Change From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score

    The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consisted of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  3. Change From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)

    The TS-VAS was a visual analogue scale which asked participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  4. Number of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The number of incontinence episodes was calculated as the total number of incontinence episodes on valid diary days recorded during the 7-day micturition diary period.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  5. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence Episodes

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  6. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  7. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  8. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  9. Change From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency

    Corrected micturition frequency was defined as the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours that participants had at end of treatment if their fluid intake had remained unchanged since baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  10. Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    An urgency incontinence episode was defined as the involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. The number of urgency incontinence episodes was the number of times a participant recorded an urgency incontinence episode on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  11. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  12. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  13. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours

    An urgency episode was a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which was difficult to defer; it was recorded when a micturition or incontinence episode was recorded and the severity of urinary urgency recorded was 3 (severe urgency) or 4 (urgency incontinence) according to the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS). The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  14. Number of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant went to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the patients got up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The number of nocturia episodes was the number of times a participant recorded a nocturia episode on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  15. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia Episodes

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  16. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The mean number of nocturia episodes per 24hr was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  17. Number of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The number of pads used was the number of times a participant recorded a new pad used on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (up to 12 weeks)

  18. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads Used

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EOT (up to 12 weeks)

  19. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours

    The mean number of pads used per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 (up to 12 weeks)

  20. Number of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The number of incontinence-free days was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with no incontinence episodes recorded.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  21. Number of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The number of days with \< 8 micturitions was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with less than 8 micturitions per day.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8,12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  22. Number of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The number of incontinence-free days with \< 8 micturitions per day was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with no incontinence episodes recorded and with \< 8 micturitions per day.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  23. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)

    The PPBC was a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  24. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score

    The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion in the OAB-q (seen in this outcome measure) consisted of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  25. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total Score

    The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion in the OAB-q (seen in this outcome measure) consisted of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), scored 1-6. The total HRQoL score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  26. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Coping

    The Coping score was calculated by adding 8 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  27. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Concern

    The Concern score was calculated by adding 7 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  28. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Sleep

    The Sleep score was calculated by adding 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  29. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Social

    The Social score was calculated by adding 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  30. Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoT

    The PGIC was a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).

    Time frame: Week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  31. PGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoT

    The PGIC was a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).

    Time frame: Week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  32. Change From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: Mobility

    The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  33. Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-Care

    The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  34. Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual Activities

    The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  35. Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/Discomfort

    The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  36. Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/Depression

    The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  37. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time Missed

    The WPAI:SHP was a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes were expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  38. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While Working

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  39. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work Impairment

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  40. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity Impairment

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  41. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VAS

    The TS-VAS was a visual analogue scale which asked participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 4, 8 and 12

  42. Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants with zero incontinence episodes per 24 hours postbaseline in the last 3 days prior to weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  43. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants with ≥ 10 points improvement from baseline to each visit (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  44. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants with ≥ 10 points improvement from baseline to each visit (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  45. Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants with ≥ 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours at each time point (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  46. Percentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants with micturition frequency normalization was defined as any participant who had ≥ 8 micturitions/24 hours at baseline and \< 8 micturitions/24 h postbaseline at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 , 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  47. Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants with zero incontinence episodes per 24 hours postbaseline in the last 7 days prior to weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  48. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants with ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  49. Percentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants with a major (≥ 2 points) improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  50. Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q Symptom Bother score at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  51. Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q HRQL total score at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  52. Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  53. Percentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants considered as triple responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline, minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q Symptom Bother score, and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  54. Percentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

    The percentage of participants considered as triple responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per24 hours compared to baseline, minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the HRQL total score, and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  55. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    A TEAE refered to an adverse event (AE; defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug or who had undergone study procedures and did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment) which started or worsened in the period from first double-blind medication intake until 14 days after the last double-blind medication intake. Serious TEAEs with a start date reported until 30 days after the last double-blind medication intake were also summarized as TEAEs, and also included serious TEAEs upgraded by the sponsor based on review of the sponsor's list of Always Serious terms if any upgrade was done. Drug-related TEAEs may be possible or probable, as assessed by the investigator, or records where relationship is missing.

    Time frame: From first dose of double-blind study drug up to 30 days after last dose of double-blind study drug (up to 16 weeks)

  56. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume

    PVR volume was assessed by ultrasonography or a bladder scanner.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  57. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  58. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  59. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  60. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) Window

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax (time to maximum concentration) window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  61. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax Window

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  62. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax Window

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  63. Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  64. Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  65. Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  66. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough Difference

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  67. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough Difference

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

  68. Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough Difference

    Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)

06

Results

Posted Jun 12, 2018
Limitations and caveats
Due to lack of data integrity, one site's data was not included in the efficacy and safety analysis.

Participant flow

Patients who had symptoms of "wet" overactive bladder (OAB) (urgency, urinary frequency and urgency incontinence) for ≥ 3 months were enrolled at 435 centers in 42 countries. Eligible participants went into a single-blind, 4-week placebo run-in period and completed a micturition diary the last 7 days prior to each study visit.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Started447441437434885883
Completed404397387397802798
Not completed434450378385
Withdrew: Randomized but never received treatment2542613
Withdrew: Adverse event1381292126
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy100241
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up424293
Withdrew: Protocol violation223594
Withdrew: Withdrawal by participants212723163334
Withdrew: Miscellaneous004104
Withdrew: Did not have end of treatment page000010

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period.

Time frame:
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · incontinence episodes
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
incontinence episodesPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.34 ± 0.10-1.70 ± 0.10-1.76 ± 0.10-1.79 ± 0.10-2.04 ± 0.07-1.98 ± 0.07
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.072 (Nominal p-value) · Least squares mean difference: -0.25 · 95% CI -0.49 to -0.01Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.033 (Nominal p-value) · Least squares mean difference: -0.20 · 95% CI -0.44 to 0.04Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -0.34 · 95% CI -0.58 to -0.10Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.052 · Least squares mean difference: -0.23 · 95% CI -0.47 to 0.01Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

A micturition was defined as any voluntary micturition (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period.

Time frame:
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · micturitions
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
micturitionsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-1.64 ± 0.12-2.00 ± 0.12-2.03 ± 0.12-2.20 ± 0.12-2.49 ± 0.08-2.59 ± 0.08
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.040 (Nominal p-value) · Least squares mean difference: -0.29 · 95% CI -0.57 to -0.01Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.006 (Nominal p-value) · Least squares mean difference: -0.39 · 95% CI -0.67 to -0.11Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.001 (Nominal p-value) · Least squares mean difference: -0.48 · 95% CI -0.76 to -0.21Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Nominal p-value) · Least squares mean difference: -0.56 · 95% CI -0.84 to -0.28Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from the data recorded by the participant during 3 consecutive days with volume measurements during the 7-day micturition diary period.

Time frame:
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mL
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
mLPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition8.44 ± 2.5513.32 ± 2.5721.99 ± 2.5730.99 ± 2.5634.84 ± 1.8139.73 ± 1.81
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.219 (Nominal p-value) · Least squares mean difference: 3.85 · 95% CI -2.29 to 10.00Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.005 (Nominal p-value) · Least squares mean difference: 8.75 · 95% CI 2.61 to 14.89Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Nominal p-value) · Least squares mean difference: 21.52 · 95% CI 15.35 to 27.68Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 (Nominal p-value) · Least squares mean difference: 17.74 · 95% CI 11.58 to 23.90Adjustment for multiplicity across primary and the first secondary endpoint as well as across the 2 combination doses was made using a sequential Bonferroni-based testing procedure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score

The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consisted of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score
units on a scalePlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Change From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score-19.45 ± 0.98-23.93 ± 0.99-26.14 ± 0.98-26.44 ± 0.98-31.06 ± 0.69-32.24 ± 0.70
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -4.63 · 95% CI -6.98 to -2.27No adjustment for multiplicity was made for this comparison.
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -5.80 · 95% CI -8.17 to -3.44No adjustment for multiplicity was made for this comparison.
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -7.13 · 95% CI -9.50 to -4.76No adjustment for multiplicity was made for this comparison.
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -6.10 · 95% CI -8.46 to -3.74No adjustment for multiplicity was made for this comparison.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)

The TS-VAS was a visual analogue scale which asked participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)
units on a scalePlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Change From Baseline to EoT in Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)1.42 ± 0.112.16 ± 0.112.18 ± 0.112.28 ± 0.112.53 ± 0.082.55 ± 0.08
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.077 · Least squares mean difference: 0.25 · 95% CI -0.03 to 0.52No adjustment for multiplicity was made for this comparison.
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.050 · Least squares mean difference: 0.27 · 95% CI 0.00 to 0.55No adjustment for multiplicity was made for this comparison.
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.008 · Least squares mean difference: 0.37 · 95% CI 0.10 to 0.65No adjustment for multiplicity was made for this comparison.
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.007 · Least squares mean difference: 0.37 · 95% CI 0.10 to 0.65No adjustment for multiplicity was made for this comparison.
SecondaryNumber of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The number of incontinence episodes was calculated as the total number of incontinence episodes on valid diary days recorded during the 7-day micturition diary period.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · incontinence episodes
Number of Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
incontinence episodesPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 418.09 ± 1.1715.65 ± 1.0812.90 ± 1.0615.31 ± 1.1112.51 ± 0.6711.44 ± 0.70
Week 814.45 ± 1.1212.84 ± 1.0511.31 ± 1.0912.19 ± 1.069.70 ± 0.659.33 ± 0.68
Week 1214.06 ± 1.1710.60 ± 0.989.50 ± 0.9811.25 ± 1.037.62 ± 0.578.21 ± 0.68
End of treatment13.70 ± 1.0811.19 ± 0.959.79 ± 0.9411.21 ± 0.988.02 ± 0.558.18 ± 0.64
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.135 · Rate ratio: 0.87 · 95% CI 0.72 to 1.04
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.282 · Rate ratio: 0.90 · 95% CI 0.75 to 1.09
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = <0.001 · Rate ratio: 0.71 · 95% CI 0.59 to 0.85
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.172 · Rate ratio: 0.88 · 95% CI 0.73 to 1.06
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence Episodes
Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · incontinence episodes
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence Episodes
incontinence episodesPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-5.23 ± 0.66-7.59 ± 0.66-8.99 ± 0.67-8.92 ± 0.67-9.62 ± 0.47-10.51 ± 0.47
Week 8-8.79 ± 0.71-10.57 ± 0.72-10.97 ± 0.72-11.89 ± 0.72-12.53 ± 0.50-12.78 ± 0.51
Week 12-9.05 ± 0.72-12.33 ± 0.72-12.58 ± 0.72-12.75 ± 0.71-14.50 ± 0.51-13.94 ± 0.51
End of treatment-9.42 ± 0.68-11.93 ± 0.68-12.39 ± 0.68-12.65 ± 0.68-14.29 ± 0.48-13.98 ± 0.48
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.074 · Least squares mean difference: -1.64 · 95% CI -3.27 to -0.01
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.025 · Least squares mean difference: -1.33 · 95% CI -2.96 to 0.30
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least square mean difference: -2.36 · 95% CI -4.00 to -0.73
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.024 · Least squares mean difference: -1.59 · 95% CI -3.23 to 0.05
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · incontinence episodes
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
incontinence episodesPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-0.74 ± 0.10-1.07 ± 0.10-1.24 ± 0.10-1.24 ± 0.10-1.38 ± 0.07-1.50 ± 0.07
Week 8-1.20 ± 0.10-1.51 ± 0.10-1.57 ± 0.10-1.66 ± 0.10-1.79 ± 0.07-1.84 ± 0.07
Week 12-1.30 ± 0.11-1.76 ± 0.11-1.81 ± 0.11-1.80 ± 0.10-2.08 ± 0.07-1.98 ± 0.07
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · micturitions
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
micturitionsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-1.02 ± 0.11-1.46 ± 0.11-1.44 ± 0.11-1.39 ± 0.11-1.67 ± 0.08-1.91 ± 0.08
Week 8-1.43 ± 0.11-1.95 ± 0.12-1.89 ± 0.12-1.84 ± 0.12-2.23 ± 0.08-2.42 ± 0.08
Week 12-1.51 ± 0.12-2.01 ± 0.12-2.03 ± 0.12-2.22 ± 0.12-2.47 ± 0.08-2.60 ± 0.08
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mL
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
mLPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 46.95 ± 2.1310.08 ± 2.1415.52 ± 2.1424.23 ± 2.1525.54 ± 1.5128.99 ± 1.51
Week 89.00 ± 2.4810.96 ± 2.5217.73 ± 2.5327.55 ± 2.5032.94 ± 1.7836.51 ± 1.77
Week 128.70 ± 2.7012.88 ± 2.7422.40 ± 2.7331.89 ± 2.6835.52 ± 1.9041.28 ± 1.90
SecondaryChange From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency

Corrected micturition frequency was defined as the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours that participants had at end of treatment if their fluid intake had remained unchanged since baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · micturitions
Change From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency
micturitionsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Change From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency0.15 ± 0.24-0.17 ± 0.24-0.97 ± 0.24-1.28 ± 0.24-1.10 ± 0.17-1.52 ± 0.17
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.520 · Least squares mean difference: 0.19 · 95% CI -0.39 to 0.76
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.413 · Least squares mean difference: -0.24 · 95% CI -0.82 to 0.34
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.002 · Least squares mean difference: -0.92 · 95% CI -1.50 to -0.34
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.060 · Least squares mean diffrence: -0.56 · 95% CI -1.13 to 0.02
SecondaryNumber of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

An urgency incontinence episode was defined as the involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. The number of urgency incontinence episodes was the number of times a participant recorded an urgency incontinence episode on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · urgency incontinence episodes
Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
urgency incontinence episodesPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 415.76 ± 1.1013.36 ± 0.9911.46 ± 1.0013.19 ± 1.0610.22 ± 0.589.33 ± 0.58
Week 812.77 ± 1.0710.65 ± 0.9410.09 ± 1.0210.41 ± 1.007.58 ± 0.537.31 ± 0.54
Week 1212.00 ± 1.098.84 ± 0.898.32 ± 0.949.29 ± 0.965.86 ± 0.466.27 ± 0.49
End of treatment11.69 ± 1.009.37 ± 0.868.63 ± 0.899.29 ± 0.916.25 ± 0.456.15 ± 0.47
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.110 · Rate ratio: 0.85 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.04
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.288 · Rate ratio: 0.90 · 95% CI 0.73 to 1.10
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = <0.001 · Rate ratio: 0.65 · 95% CI 0.53 to 0.79
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.084 · Rate ratio: 0.84 · 95% CI 0.68 to 1.02
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes
Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · urgency incontinence episodes
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes
urgency incontinence episodesPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-5.49 ± 0.63-7.07 ± 0.63-8.39 ± 0.63-8.53 ± 0.63-9.44 ± 0.44-10.23 ± 0.44
Week 8-8.30 ± 0.66-9.93 ± 0.67-10.07 ± 0.67-11.10 ± 0.67-12.18 ± 0.47-12.18 ± 0.47
Week 12-8.96 ± 0.65-11.39 ± 0.66-11.66 ± 0.66-12.10 ± 0.65-13.87 ± 0.46-13.53 ± 0.46
End of treatment-9.26 ± 0.62-11.03 ± 0.62-11.44 ± 0.62-12.03 ± 0.62-13.64 ± 0.44-13.64 ± 0.44
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.114 · Least squares mean difference: -1.61 · 95% CI -3.09 to -0.13
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.034 · Least squares mean difference: -1.62 · 95% CI -3.10 to -0.13
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -2.61 · 95% CI -4.09 to -1.12
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.012 · Least squares mean difference: -2.21 · 95% CI -3.70 to -0.71
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · urgency incontinence episodes
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
urgency incontinence episodesPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-0.78 ± 0.09-1.00 ± 0.09-1.15 ± 0.09-1.19 ± 0.09-1.35 ± 0.06-1.47 ± 0.06
Week 8-1.15 ± 0.10-1.43 ± 0.10-1.44 ± 0.10-1.56 ± 0.10-1.74 ± 0.07-1.79 ± 0.07
Week 12-1.29 ± 0.10-1.63 ± 0.10-1.67 ± 0.10-1.72 ± 0.10-1.99 ± 0.07-1.93 ± 0.07
End of treatment-1.33 ± 0.09-1.58 ± 0.09-1.62 ± 0.09-1.71 ± 0.09-1.95 ± 0.06-1.94 ± 0.06
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.134 · Least squares mean difference: -0.24 · 95% CI -0.46 to -0.02
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.043 · Least squares mean difference: -0.23 · 95% CI -0.45 to -0.02
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean diffeence: -0.37 · 95% CI -0.59 to -0.15
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Stratified rank ANCOVA · p = 0.019 · Standard error of the mean: -0.32 · 05% CI -0.54 to -0.10
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours

An urgency episode was a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which was difficult to defer; it was recorded when a micturition or incontinence episode was recorded and the severity of urinary urgency recorded was 3 (severe urgency) or 4 (urgency incontinence) according to the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS). The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · urgency episodes
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
urgency episodesPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-1.34 ± 0.15-1.95 ± 0.14-1.91 ± 0.15-2.14 ± 0.15-2.42 ± 0.10-2.66 ± 0.10
Week 8-1.85 ± 0.15-2.54 ± 0.15-2.43 ± 0.15-2.90 ± 0.15-3.13 ± 0.11-3.28 ± 0.11
Week 12-2.05 ± 0.16-2.85 ± 0.16-2.70 ± 0.16-3.11 ± 0.16-3.45 ± 0.11-3.50 ± 0.11
End of treatment-2.06 ± 0.15-2.74 ± 0.15-2.63 ± 0.15-3.05 ± 0.15-3.38 ± 0.11-3.51 ± 0.11
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.074 · Least squares mean difference: -0.33 · 95% CI -0.69 to 0.03
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.014 · Least squares mean difference: -0.45 · 95% CI -0.82 to -0.09
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -0.65 · 95% CI -1.01 to -0.28
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -0.87 · 95% CI -1.24 to 0.51
SecondaryNumber of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant went to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the patients got up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The number of nocturia episodes was the number of times a participant recorded a nocturia episode on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · nocturia episodes
Number of Nocturia Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
nocturia episodesPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 49.62 ± 0.438.46 ± 0.369.11 ± 0.479.22 ± 0.428.40 ± 0.258.09 ± 0.25
Week 88.99 ± 0.448.07 ± 0.348.61 ± 0.458.37 ± 0.387.63 ± 0.257.11 ± 0.24
Week 128.91 ± 0.437.99 ± 0.378.34 ± 0.488.17 ± 0.397.26 ± 0.246.67 ± 0.23
End of treatment8.83 ± 0.427.79 ± 0.358.14 ± 0.458.12 ± 0.377.33 ± 0.246.67 ± 0.22
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.006 · Rate ratio: 0.88 · 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = <0.001 · Rate ratio: 0.81 · 95% CI 0.74 to 0.88
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.049 · Rate ratio: 0.91 · 95% CI 0.84 to 1.00
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.001 · Rate ratio: 0.86 · 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia Episodes
Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · nocturia episodes
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia Episodes
nocturia episodesPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-1.27 ± 0.27-2.25 ± 0.28-1.80 ± 0.27-1.79 ± 0.28-2.39 ± 0.19-2.50 ± 0.19
Week 8-1.94 ± 0.27-2.70 ± 0.28-2.41 ± 0.28-2.60 ± 0.28-3.13 ± 0.20-3.48 ± 0.20
Week 12-1.95 ± 0.29-2.77 ± 0.30-2.73 ± 0.29-2.89 ± 0.29-3.49 ± 0.21-3.96 ± 0.21
End of treatment-2.05 ± 0.27-2.91 ± 0.28-2.75 ± 0.28-2.81 ± 0.28-3.42 ± 0.20-3.96 ± 0.20
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.073 · Least squares mean difference: -0.61 · 95% CI -1.28 to 0.06
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -1.16 · 95% CI -1.83 to -0.48
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.140 · Least squares mean difference: -0.51 · 95% CI -1.18 to 0.17
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -1.21 · 95% CI -1.88 to -0.54
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours

The mean number of nocturia episodes per 24hr was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · nocturia episodes
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
nocturia episodesPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-0.17 ± 0.04-0.31 ± 0.04-0.25 ± 0.04-0.24 ± 0.04-0.33 ± 0.03-0.35 ± 0.03
Week 8-0.27 ± 0.04-0.37 ± 0.04-0.35 ± 0.04-0.36 ± 0.04-0.44 ± 0.03-0.50 ± 0.03
Week 12-0.26 ± 0.04-0.38 ± 0.04-0.39 ± 0.04-0.41 ± 0.04-0.49 ± 0.03-0.56 ± 0.03
End of treatmemt-0.27 ± 0.04-0.40 ± 0.04-0.39 ± 0.04-0.39 ± 0.04-0.48 ± 0.03-0.56 ± 0.03
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.065 · Least squares mean difference: -0.09 · 95% CI -0.19 to 0.01
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -0.17 · 95% CI -0.26 to -0.07
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.100 · Least squares mean difference: -0.08 · 95% CI -0.18 to 0.02
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -0.17 · 95% CI -0.26 to -0.07
SecondaryNumber of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The number of pads used was the number of times a participant recorded a new pad used on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · pads
Number of Pads Used at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
padsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 415.62 ± 1.3313.46 ± 1.2410.05 ± 1.2111.41 ± 1.239.71 ± 0.709.34 ± 0.68
Week 812.75 ± 1.2210.79 ± 1.059.53 ± 1.398.45 ± 1.038.07 ± 0.657.58 ± 0.62
Week 1212.62 ± 1.219.65 ± 1.008.44 ± 1.268.21 ± 0.956.60 ± 0.586.64 ± 0.61
End of treatment12.29 ± 1.1110.15 ± 0.978.16 ± 1.178.53 ± 0.947.04 ± 0.566.80 ± 0.59
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.938 · Rate ratio: 1.01 · 95% CI 0.80 to 1.27
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.967 · Rate ratio: 1.00 · 95% CI 0.79 to 1.25
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.008 · Standard error of the mean: 0.73 · 95% CI 0.58 to 0.92
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.069 · Rate ratio: 0.80 · 95% CI 0.64 to 1.02
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads Used
Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EOT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · pads
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads Used
padsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-3.69 ± 0.71-5.68 ± 0.71-7.83 ± 0.71-8.23 ± 0.70-7.61 ± 0.50-8.58 ± 0.50
Week 8-6.24 ± 0.77-8.44 ± 0.77-8.43 ± 0.76-10.67 ± 0.76-9.49 ± 0.54-10.59 ± 0.54
Week 12-6.29 ± 0.75-9.06 ± 0.75-9.41 ± 0.75-10.80 ± 0.73-10.66 ± 0.52-11.23 ± 0.53
End of treatment-6.60 ± 0.71-8.76 ± 0.71-9.80 ± 0.72-10.63 ± 0.70-10.67 ± 0.50-11.21 ± 0.50
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.958 · Least squares mean difference: -0.04 · 95% CI -1.73 to 1.64
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.500 · Least squares mean difference: -0.58 · 95% CI -2.27 to 1.11
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.028 · Least squares mean difference: -1.91 · 95% CI -3.62 to -0.20
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.108 · Least squares mean difference: -1.41 · 95% CI -3.13 to 0.31
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours

The mean number of pads used per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant per day on valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · pads
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
padsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-0.52 ± 0.10-0.81 ± 0.10-1.12 ± 0.10-1.19 ± 0.10-1.09 ± 0.07-1.23 ± 0.07
Week 8-0.82 ± 0.11-1.20 ± 0.11-1.24 ± 0.11-1.53 ± 0.11-1.36 ± 0.08-1.51 ± 0.08
Week 12-0.92 ± 0.11-1.30 ± 0.11-1.37 ± 0.11-1.56 ± 0.11-1.54 ± 0.08-1.59 ± 0.08
End of treatment-0.94 ± 0.10-1.26 ± 0.10-1.41 ± 0.10-1.53 ± 0.10-1.53 ± 0.07-1.58 ± 0.07
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.993 · Least squares mean difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.25 to 0.25
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.650 · Least squares mean difference: -0.06 · 95% CI -0.30 to 0.19
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.035 · Least squares mean difference: -0.27 · 95% CI -0.52 to -0.02
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.169 · Least squares mean difference: -0.18 · 95% CI -0.43 to 0.08
SecondaryNumber of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The number of incontinence-free days was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with no incontinence episodes recorded.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · incontinence-free days
Number of Incontinence-Free Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
incontinence-free daysPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 42.25 ± 0.132.48 ± 0.132.98 ± 0.132.74 ± 0.143.08 ± 0.103.37 ± 0.10
Week 82.92 ± 0.143.17 ± 0.143.63 ± 0.153.31 ± 0.143.88 ± 0.104.01 ± 0.10
Week 123.19 ± 0.153.69 ± 0.153.96 ± 0.153.68 ± 0.144.33 ± 0.104.25 ± 0.10
End of treatment3.16 ± 0.143.51 ± 0.143.89 ± 0.143.61 ± 0.144.20 ± 0.104.23 ± 0.10
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Overdispersed binomial regression · p = 0.003 · Odds ratio (or): 1.37 · 95% CI 1.11 to 1.68
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Overdispersed binomial regression · p = 0.004 · Odds ratio (or): 1.36 · 95% CI 1.11 to 1.68
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Overdispersed binomial regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.59 · 95% CI 1.29 to 1.95
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Overdispersed binomial regression · p = 0.004 · Odds ratio (or): 1.36 · 95% CI 1.10 to 1.68
SecondaryNumber of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The number of days with \< 8 micturitions was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with less than 8 micturitions per day.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8,12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · days
Number of Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
daysPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 41.49 ± 0.101.74 ± 0.101.55 ± 0.101.86 ± 0.112.07 ± 0.082.11 ± 0.08
Week 81.69 ± 0.102.08 ± 0.121.99 ± 0.112.22 ± 0.122.59 ± 0.092.70 ± 0.09
Week 121.76 ± 0.112.31 ± 0.132.25 ± 0.122.49 ± 0.132.87 ± 0.092.95 ± 0.10
End of treatment1.80 ± 0.112.28 ± 0.122.22 ± 0.122.49 ± 0.122.84 ± 0.092.92 ± 0.09
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Overdispersed binomial regression · p = 0.039 · Odds ratio (or): 1.23 · 95% CI 1.01 to 1.50
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Overdispersed binomial regression · p = 0.009 · Odds ratio (or): 1.30 · 95% CI 1.07 to 1.59
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · overdispersed binomial regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.45 · 95% CI 1.19 to 1.77
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Overdispersed binomial regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.50 · 95% CI 1.23 to 1.84
SecondaryNumber of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The number of incontinence-free days with \< 8 micturitions per day was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with no incontinence episodes recorded and with \< 8 micturitions per day.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · days
Number of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
daysPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 40.64 ± 0.070.84 ± 0.080.87 ± 0.080.91 ± 0.081.21 ± 0.071.32 ± 0.07
Week 80.85 ± 0.081.20 ± 0.101.23 ± 0.101.31 ± 0.101.75 ± 0.081.89 ± 0.08
Week 120.98 ± 0.091.47 ± 0.111.50 ± 0.111.60 ± 0.112.12 ± 0.092.15 ± 0.09
End of treatment1.01 ± 0.081.40 ± 0.101.47 ± 0.101.59 ± 0.102.04 ± 0.082.12 ± 0.09
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Overdispersed binomial regression · p = 0.011 · Odds ratio (or): 1.32 · 95% CI 1.07 to 1.64
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Overdispersed binomial regression · p = 0.002 · Odds ratio (or): 1.41 · 95% CI 1.14 to 1.75
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Overdispersed binomial regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.65 · 95% CI 1.32 to 2.06
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Overdispersed binomial regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.66 · 95% CI 1.33 to 2.07
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)

The PPBC was a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition Questionnaire (PPBC)
units on a scalePlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-0.54 ± 0.06-0.72 ± 0.06-0.83 ± 0.06-0.81 ± 0.06-0.99 ± 0.04-1.07 ± 0.04
Week 8-0.80 ± 0.06-1.07 ± 0.06-1.12 ± 0.06-1.18 ± 0.06-1.32 ± 0.04-1.48 ± 0.04
Week 12-0.95 ± 0.06-1.23 ± 0.06-1.34 ± 0.06-1.32 ± 0.06-1.57 ± 0.04-1.72 ± 0.04
End of treatment-0.91 ± 0.06-1.18 ± 0.06-1.31 ± 0.06-1.27 ± 0.06-1.53 ± 0.04-1.66 ± 0.04
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -0.26 · 95% CI -0.41 to -0.11
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -0.39 · 95% CI -0.54 to -0.25
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -0.35 · 95% CI -0.50 to -0.20
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: -0.35 · 95% CI -0.50 to -0.20
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score

The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion in the OAB-q (seen in this outcome measure) consisted of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score
units on a scalePlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-13.84 ± 0.92-17.05 ± 0.93-18.98 ± 0.93-19.53 ± 0.93-23.46 ± 0.65-25.19 ± 0.65
Week 8-17.35 ± 0.98-22.79 ± 0.99-23.54 ± 0.98-24.69 ± 0.97-29.10 ± 0.69-30.04 ± 0.69
Week 12-19.94 ± 1.01-24.44 ± 1.02-26.80 ± 1.02-26.72 ± 1.01-31.70 ± 0.72-33.15 ± 0.72
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total Score

The OAB-q was a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion in the OAB-q (seen in this outcome measure) consisted of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), scored 1-6. The total HRQoL score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) Total Score
units on a scalePlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 410.16 ± 0.8313.54 ± 0.8315.28 ± 0.8314.78 ± 0.8317.46 ± 0.5817.95 ± 0.59
Week 814.51 ± 0.8817.95 ± 0.8918.54 ± 0.8818.57 ± 0.8822.30 ± 0.6222.45 ± 0.62
Week 1215.76 ± 0.9219.59 ± 0.9321.48 ± 0.9220.54 ± 0.9124.63 ± 0.6524.93 ± 0.65
End of treatment15.37 ± 0.8818.94 ± 0.8921.00 ± 0.8920.15 ± 0.8923.96 ± 0.6324.30 ± 0.63
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 3.81 · 95% CI 1.69 to 5.94
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 4.16 · 95% CI 2.03 to 6.29
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 5.02 · 95% CI 2.88 to 7.15
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.002 · Least squares mean difference: 3.30 · 95% CI 1.17 to 5.43
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Coping

The Coping score was calculated by adding 8 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Coping
units on a scalePlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 411.74 ± 0.9914.87 ± 1.0017.68 ± 1.0016.52 ± 1.0019.31 ± 0.7020.36 ± 0.70
Week 816.13 ± 1.0420.64 ± 1.0521.52 ± 1.0421.69 ± 1.0325.49 ± 0.7425.85 ± 0.73
Week 1218.17 ± 1.0922.04 ± 1.1024.94 ± 1.1023.67 ± 1.0928.32 ± 0.7729.03 ± 0.78
End of treatment17.73 ± 1.0521.28 ± 1.0624.32 ± 1.0523.25 ± 1.0527.37 ± 0.7428.12 ± 0.75
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 4.12 · 95% CI 1.60 to 6.65
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Lest squares mean difference: 4.87 · 95% CI 2.34 to 7.40
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 6.09 · 95% CI 3.55 to 8.63
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.003 · Least squares mean difference: 3.80 · 95% CI 1.27 to 6.33
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Concern

The Concern score was calculated by adding 7 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Concern
units on a scalePlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 411.24 ± 0.9515.89 ± 0.9617.39 ± 0.9517.18 ± 0.9520.48 ± 0.6721.09 ± 0.67
Week 816.10 ± 0.9920.63 ± 1.0120.55 ± 1.0020.96 ± 0.9925.26 ± 0.7125.65 ± 0.70
Week 1217.53 ± 1.0322.37 ± 1.0423.62 ± 1.0423.19 ± 1.0327.53 ± 0.7328.24 ± 0.73
End of treatment16.98 ± 1.0021.55 ± 1.0123.07 ± 1.0022.65 ± 1.0026.89 ± 0.7127.47 ± 0.71
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 4.24 · 95% CI 1.84 to 6.63
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 4.82 · 95% CI 2.42 to 7.22
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 5.34 · 95% CI 2.93 to 7.75
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 4.41 · 95% CI 2.01 to 6.81
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Sleep

The Sleep score was calculated by adding 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Sleep
units on a scalePlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 49.28 ± 0.9512.70 ± 0.9613.80 ± 0.9613.08 ± 0.9615.97 ± 0.6816.66 ± 0.68
Week 813.58 ± 1.0316.39 ± 1.0517.33 ± 1.0316.43 ± 1.0320.29 ± 0.7320.49 ± 0.73
Week 1214.40 ± 1.0518.04 ± 1.0619.16 ± 1.0618.35 ± 1.0522.97 ± 0.7422.76 ± 0.75
End of treatment14.17 ± 1.0117.51 ± 1.0219.11 ± 1.0217.97 ± 1.0122.39 ± 0.7222.39 ± 0.72
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 4.42 · 95% CI 1.98 to 6.85
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 4.42 · 95% CI 1.98 to 6.86
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Least squares mean difference: 4.87 · 95% CI 2.42 to 7.32
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.008 · Least squares mean difference: 3.28 · 95% CI 0.84 to 5.72
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Social

The Social score was calculated by adding 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in OAB-q HRQL Subscale Score: Social
units on a scalePlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 47.07 ± 0.789.04 ± 0.7910.19 ± 0.789.89 ± 0.7811.55 ± 0.5511.25 ± 0.55
Week 810.65 ± 0.8211.50 ± 0.8312.34 ± 0.8212.02 ± 0.8114.89 ± 0.5814.73 ± 0.58
Week 1210.84 ± 0.8313.43 ± 0.8415.35 ± 0.8413.74 ± 0.8316.16 ± 0.5916.08 ± 0.59
End of treatment10.56 ± 0.8113.04 ± 0.8114.87 ± 0.8113.57 ± 0.8115.84 ± 0.5715.82 ± 0.57
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.022 · Least squares mean difference: 2.27 · 95% CI 0.33 to 4.21
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.023 · Least squares mean difference: 2.25 · 95% CI 0.31 to 4.19
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.005 · Least squares mean difference: 2.80 · 95% CI 0.85 to 4.74
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.337 · Least squares mean difference: 0.95 · 95% CI -0.99 to 2.89
SecondaryPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoT

The PGIC was a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).

Time frame:
Week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Week 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 12: Very much improved8.413.915.113.519.827.1
Week 12: Much improved29.732.934.840.539.834.0
Week 12: Minimally improved29.726.826.525.822.220.7
Week 12: No change17.512.99.78.97.77.3
Week 12: Minimally worse4.11.52.21.70.80.8
Week 12: Much worse1.01.01.20.50.20
Week 12: Very much worse0.50.50.70.50.20.5
EoT: Very much improved8.413.915.113.520.027.1
EoT: Much improved30.433.234.841.040.034.6
EoT: Minimally improved29.926.827.026.322.621.3
EoT: No change18.213.410.29.67.97.4
EoT: Minimally worse4.11.52.21.70.80.8
EoT: Much worse1.01.01.20.70.40
EoT: Very much worse0.50.50.70.50.20.6
SecondaryPGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoT

The PGIC was a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).

Time frame:
Week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
PGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Week 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 12: Very much improved4.88.07.37.710.314.6
Week 12: Much improved23.928.029.231.833.430.2
Week 12: Minimally improved23.921.522.424.120.120.9
Week 12: No change31.827.827.525.323.921.6
Week 12: Minimally worse4.32.92.21.42.52.2
Week 12: Much worse1.70.71.20.50.50.1
Week 12: Very much worse0.20.50.50.50.20.6
End of treatment: Very much improved4.88.07.37.710.314.6
End of treatment: Much improved24.228.029.231.833.630.4
End of treatment: Minimally improved24.421.522.924.120.221.3
End of treatment:No change32.328.327.726.524.321.9
End of treatment: Minimally worse4.32.92.41.92.82.7
End of treatment: Much worse1.90.71.20.50.50.2
End of treatment: Very much worse0.50.70.50.70.20.7
SecondaryChange From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: Mobility

The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

Time frame:
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Life in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: Mobility
participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
No problems -> no problems204239225227449452
No problems -> slight problems162025224138
No problems -> moderate problems1112982010
No problems -> severe problems133112
No problems -> unable to walk about010001
No problems -> no data245469
Slight problems -> no problems333535307660
Slight problems -> slight problems272024194049
Slight problems -> moderate problems11646199
Slight problems -> severe problems503122
Slight problems -> unable to walk about000000
Slight problems -> no data230002
Moderate problems -> no problems17725183146
Moderate problems -> slight problems181010222425
Moderate problems -> moderate problems211210133335
Moderate problems -> severe problems10542810
Moderate problems -> unable to walk about000111
Moderate problems -> no data110102
Severe problems -> no problems35971217
Severe problems -> slight problems6734138
Severe problems -> moderate problems54881515
Severe problems -> severe problems85181113
Severe problems -> unable to walk about000000
Severe problems -> no data002110
Unable to walk about -> no problems000220
Unable to walk about -> slight problems100000
Unable to walk about -> moderate problems100001
Unable to walk about -> severe problems100000
Unable to walk about -> unable to walk about000000
Unable to walk about -> no data000000
No data -> no problems127361516
No data -> slight problems101242
No data -> moderate problems031002
No data -> severe problems010220
No data -> unable to walk about000000
No data -> no data101010
SecondaryChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-Care

The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

Time frame:
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-Care
participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
No problems -> no problems311324336319652647
No problems -> slight problems21179202226
No problems -> moderate problems9563124
No problems -> severe problems001111
No problems -> unable to wash/dress myself101000
No problems -> no data4865612
Slight problems -> no problems171316253533
Slight problems -> slight problems101012122226
Slight problems -> moderate problems241237
Slight problems -> severe problems200012
Slight problems -> unable to wash/dress myself000000
Slight problems -> no data100110
Moderate problems -> no problems68321718
Moderate problems -> slight problems318397
Moderate problems -> moderate problems912689
Moderate problems -> severe problems000021
Moderate problems -> unable to wash/dress myself000000
Moderate problems -> no data000001
Severe problems -> no problems222134
Severe problems -> slight problems100333
Severe problems -> moderate problems120073
Severe problems -> severe problems330110
Severe problems -> unable to wash/dress myself000000
Severe problems -> no data001000
Unable to wash/dress myself -> no problems011003
Unable to wash/dress myself -> slight problems000000
Unable to wash/dress myself -> moderate problems100000
Unable to wash/dress myself -> severe problems000000
Unable to wash/dress myself -> unable to w/d000100
Unable to wash/dress myself -> no data000000
No data -> no problems138382018
No data -> slight problems022110
No data -> moderate problems010102
No data -> severe problems000000
No data -> unable to wash/dress myself000000
No data -> no data101010
SecondaryChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual Activities

The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

Time frame:
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual Activities
participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
No problems -> No problems196228219223434451
No problems -> Slight problems372528253748
No problems -> Moderate problems95981311
No problems -> Severe problems201011
No problems -> unable to do usual activities000011
No problems -> no data254358
Slight problems -> no problems454152529895
Slight problems -> slight problems282923256456
Slight problems -> moderate problems159381812
Slight problems -> severe problems202023
Slight problems ->unable to do usual activities000000
Slight problems -> no data220324
Moderate problems -> no problems141315134426
Moderate problems -> slight problems12916142930
Moderate problems -> moderate problems15119122517
Moderate problems -> severe problems130133
Moderate problems ->unable to do usual activities000001
Moderate problems -> no data112001
Severe problems -> no problems7376711
Severe problems -> slight problems346288
Severe problems -> moderate problems675697
Severe problems -> severe problems411329
Severe problems -> unable to do usual activities010000
Severe problems -> no data001000
Unable to do usual activities -> no problems010002
Unable to do usual activities -> slight problems100011
Unable to do usual activities -> moderate problems211011
Unable to do usual activities -> severe problems001000
Unable to do usual activities -> unable to do usu.000110
Unable to do usual activities -> no data000000
No data -> no problems127271815
No data -> slight problems123113
No data -> moderate problems020222
No data -> severe problems000000
No data -> unable to do usual activities000000
No data -> no data101010
SecondaryChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/Discomfort

The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

Time frame:
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/Discomfort
participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
No pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort131175153154290317
No pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort382937337451
No pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort10917131920
No pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort003331
No pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort000010
No pain/discomfort -> no data234238
Slight pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort53514446117105
Slight pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort5449454794101
Slight pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort121114181519
Slight pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort302063
Slight pain/discomfort -> exteme pain/discomfort201000
Slight pain/discomfort -> no data252224
Moderate pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort201424234546
Moderate pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort231520224645
Moderate pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomf311316153440
Moderate pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort453146
Moderate pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomf000010
Moderate pain/discomfort -> no data100111
Severe pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort2431812
Severe pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort3464117
Severe pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discomfort846111511
Severe pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort431478
Severe pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort011010
Severe pain/discomfort -> no data001010
Extreme pain/discomfort -> no pain/discomfort000010
Extreme pain/discomfort -> slight pain/discomfort100211
Extreme pain/discomfort -> moderate pain/discom.021011
Extreme pain/discomfort -> severe pain/discomfort021230
Extreme pain/discomfort -> extreme pain/discomfort000010
Extreme pain/discomfort -> no data000100
No data -> no pain/discomfort115361414
No data -> slight pain/discomfort222263
No data -> moderate pain/discomfort040213
No data -> severe pain/discomfort000000
No data -> extreme pain/discomfort000000
No data -> no data101010
SecondaryChange From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/Depression

The EQ-5D questionnaire was an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).

Time frame:
Baseline and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/Depression
participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Not anxious -> not anxious157176187166360370
Not anxious -> slightly anxious422725294550
Not anxious -> moderately anxious76681311
Not anxious -> severely anxious025121
Not anxious -> extremely anxious001001
Not anxious -> no data232136
Slightly anxious -> not anxious42605459122134
Slightly anxious -> slightly anx494045407965
Slightly anxious -> moderately anxious171612171816
Slightly anxious -> severely anxious422255
Slightly anxious -> extremely anxious000010
Slightly anxious -> no data232534
Moderately anxious -> not anxious121312224235
Moderately anxious -> slightly anxious191719144341
Moderately anxious -> moderately anxious17711101823
Moderately anxious -> severely anxious230187
Moderately anxious -> extremely anxious010011
Moderately anxious -> no data112013
Severely anxious -> not anxious7566128
Severely anxious -> slightly anxious3345116
Severely anxious -> moderately anxious572667
Severely anxious -> severely anxious1012552
Severely anxious -> extremely anxious100103
Severely anxious -> no data011000
Extremely anxious -> not anxious210021
Extremely anxious -> slightly anxious221223
Extremely anxious -> moderately anxious111121
Extremely anxious -> severely anxious011301
Extremely anxious -> extremely anxious002112
Extremely anxious -> no data000000
No data -> not anxious98361314
No data -> slightly anxious412263
No data -> moderately anxious020212
No data -> severely anxious000001
No data -> extremely anxious000010
No data -> no data101010
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time Missed

The WPAI:SHP was a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes were expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of work time missed
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time Missed
percentage of work time missedPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 12-2.98 ± 21.70-0.33 ± 22.03-1.72 ± 18.70-2.47 ± 14.13-2.06 ± 20.93-2.59 ± 19.65
End of treatment-2.96 ± 21.61-0.33 ± 22.03-1.71 ± 18.64-2.44 ± 14.03-1.48 ± 21.95-2.55 ± 19.54
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While Working
Time frame:
Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of impairment while working
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While Working
percentage of impairment while workingPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 12-11.27 ± 25.36-14.96 ± 26.21-12.25 ± 25.06-10.85 ± 25.58-14.69 ± 26.99-13.07 ± 27.35
End of treatment-11.18 ± 25.28-14.96 ± 26.21-12.37 ± 25.01-10.98 ± 25.68-14.58 ± 26.92-12.87 ± 27.31
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work Impairment
Time frame:
Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of overall work impairment
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work Impairment
percentage of overall work impairmentPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 12-12.23 ± 25.66-15.70 ± 26.54-12.92 ± 26.71-12.31 ± 26.91-16.31 ± 29.06-13.97 ± 29.30
End of treatment-12.14 ± 25.58-15.70 ± 26.54-13.05 ± 26.65-12.42 ± 26.98-16.07 ± 29.12-13.76 ± 29.25
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity Impairment
Time frame:
Baseline and week 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of activity impairment
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity Impairment
percentage of activity impairmentPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 12-11.49 ± 27.31-16.89 ± 27.57-14.99 ± 27.81-16.19 ± 29.16-19.60 ± 28.80-18.92 ± 29.47
End of treatment-11.55 ± 27.19-16.72 ± 27.82-15.05 ± 27.95-16.05 ± 28.95-19.45 ± 28.80-18.76 ± 29.33
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VAS

The TS-VAS was a visual analogue scale which asked participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 in TS-VAS
units on a scalePlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 41.14 ± 0.121.68 ± 0.121.77 ± 0.121.82 ± 0.122.06 ± 0.082.13 ± 0.08
Week 81.50 ± 0.112.16 ± 0.122.09 ± 0.112.20 ± 0.112.48 ± 0.082.48 ± 0.08
Week 121.47 ± 0.122.24 ± 0.122.23 ± 0.122.32 ± 0.122.58 ± 0.082.63 ± 0.08
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with zero incontinence episodes per 24 hours postbaseline in the last 3 days prior to weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of particpants
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of particpantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 423.224.927.628.935.137.3
Week 828.735.340.738.345.348.2
Week 1238.042.547.442.752.352.7
End of treatment37.640.646.342.950.752.2
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.035 · Odds ratio (or): 1.31 · 95% CI 1.02 to 1.69
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.009 · Odds ratio (or): 1.40 · 95% CI 1.09 to 1.81
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.002 · Odds ratio (or): 1.50 · 95% CI 1.16 to 1.93
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.023 · Odds ratio (or): 1.34 · 95% CI 1.04 to 1.73
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with ≥ 10 points improvement from baseline to each visit (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 456.462.669.973.973.975.8
Week 862.271.673.479.283.982.8
Week 1266.072.178.482.483.585.1
End of treatment65.371.277.181.282.884.3
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.224 · Odds ratio (or): 1.22 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.69
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.037 · Odds ratio (or): 1.42 · 95% CI 1.02 to 1.96
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.98 · 95% CI 1.47 to 2.67
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.002 · Odds ratio (or): 1.65 · 95% CI 1.21 to 2.26
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with ≥ 10 points improvement from baseline to each visit (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQL Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 445.352.859.761.762.961.3
Week 851.262.265.366.271.569.3
Week 1257.762.469.171.776.371.8
End of treatment56.861.068.371.274.571.1
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.077 · Odds ratio (or): 1.29 · 95% CI 0.97 to 1.72
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.321 · Odds ratio (or): 1.15 · 95% CI 0.87 to 1.53
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.92 · 95% CI 1.46 to 2.53
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.294 · Odds ratio (or): 1.16 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.53
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with ≥ 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours at each time point (weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT).

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 441.145.356.753.257.260.6
Week 854.961.863.765.369.870.6
Week 1258.666.470.271.075.976.1
End of treatment59.564.569.070.574.575.7
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.251 · Odds ratio (or): 1.17 · 95% CI 0.89 to 1.53
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.107 · Odds ratio (or): 1.25 · 95% CI 0.95 to 1.64
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.59 · 95% CI 1.23 to 2.07
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.012 · Odds ratio (or): 1.41 · 95% CI 1.08 to 1.85
SecondaryPercentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with micturition frequency normalization was defined as any participant who had ≥ 8 micturitions/24 hours at baseline and \< 8 micturitions/24 h postbaseline at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8 , 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants for Micturition Frequency Normalization at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 424.130.825.431.136.037.7
Week 828.737.934.537.045.349.0
Week 1229.742.340.744.950.853.1
End of treatment31.142.140.145.051.352.6
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.044 · Odds ratio (or): 1.30 · 95% CI 1.01 to 1.67
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.006 · Odds ratio (or): 1.43 · 95% CI 1.11 to 1.84
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.004 · Odds ratio (or): 1.47 · 95% CI 1.13 to 1.90
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.60 · 95% CI 1.23 to 2.08
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with zero incontinence episodes per 24 hours postbaseline in the last 7 days prior to weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 412.813.116.717.723.926.0
Week 819.124.429.828.236.638.4
Week 1229.132.235.031.942.443.7
End of treatment28.630.634.031.540.943.1
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.004 · Odds ratio (or): 1.47 · 95% CI 1.13 to 1.92
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.62 · 95% CI 1.24 to 2.11
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.59 · 95% CI 1.22 to 2.07
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.57 · 95% CI 1.21 to 2.04
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 448.952.860.358.163.162.7
Week 856.465.369.772.771.675.4
Week 1259.866.973.874.176.680.0
End of treaetment59.865.472.471.975.778.4
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.065 · Odds ratio (or): 1.32 · 95% CI 0.98 to 1.78
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.68 · 95% CI 1.24 to 2.27
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.76 · 95% CI 1.32 to 2.36
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.007 · Odds ratio (or): 1.51 · 95% CI 1.12 to 2.04
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants with a major (≥ 2 points) improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 415.920.622.427.431.131.1
Week 827.033.335.040.542.746.4
Week 1229.639.042.344.550.752.9
End of treatment29.537.240.742.649.751.2
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.007 · Odds ratio (or): 1.44 · 95% CI 1.11 to 1.87
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.67 · 95% CI 1.28 to 2.17
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.76 · 95% CI 1.34 to 2.30
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.68 · 95% CI 1.29 to 2.19
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q Symptom Bother score at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 428.634.845.744.947.852.3
Week 839.850.051.556.563.163.5
Week 1245.055.759.463.166.769.5
End of treatment45.254.058.262.665.268.2
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.381 · Odds ratio (or): 1.12 · 95% CI 0.87 to 1.45
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.040 · Odds ratio (or): 1.31 · 95% CI 1.01 to 1.70
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.56 · 95% CI 1.21 to 2.00
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.57 · 95% CI 1.21 to 2.03
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q HRQL total score at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 423.228.339.837.740.440.5
Week 832.943.246.148.454.153.0
Week 1239.248.353.554.861.659.2
End of treatment39.146.052.954.059.058.2
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.095 · Odds ratio (or): 1.24 · 95% CI 0.96 to 1.59
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.073 · Odds ratio (or): 1.26 · 95% CI 0.98 to 1.62
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.66 · 95% CI 1.29 to 2.13
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.067 · Odds ratio (or): 1.27 · 95% CI 0.98 to 1.63
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants considered as double responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 423.227.937.734.539.942.9
Week 835.644.750.151.353.857.7
Week 1240.651.754.956.962.065.4
End of treatment40.948.553.956.059.963.8
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.210 · Odds ratio (or): 1.18 · 95% CI 0.91 to 1.52
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.004 · Odds ratio (or): 1.46 · 95% CI 1.13 to 1.89
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.59 · 95% CI 1.23 to 2.06
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.59 · 95% CI 1.23 to 2.05
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants considered as triple responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to baseline, minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the OAB-q Symptom Bother score, and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 417.824.033.631.437.540.2
Week 829.741.343.247.851.654.7
Week 1235.847.749.654.558.262.0
End of treatment36.145.048.453.356.360.3
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.335 · Odds ratio (or): 1.13 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.46
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.009 · Odds ratio (or): 1.40 · 95% CI 1.09 to 1.81
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.56 · 95% CI 1.21 to 2.02
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.71 · 95% CI 1.33 to 2.21
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT

The percentage of participants considered as triple responders, defined as participants with 50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes per24 hours compared to baseline, minimal important difference reached (improvement by ≥ 10 points) on the HRQL total score, and ≥ 1 point improvement from baseline in PPBC at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT
percentage of participantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 415.220.630.028.632.733.4
Week 824.936.938.943.046.346.8
Week 1233.342.045.649.954.554.2
End of treatment33.339.144.849.251.652.8
Statistical analysis
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.416 · Odds ratio (or): 1.11 · 95% CI 0.86 to 1.43
  • Solifenacin 5 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.105 · Odds ratio (or): 1.23 · 95% CI 0.96 to 1.59
  • Mirabegron 25 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg · Logistic regression · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.66 · 95% CI 1.28 to 2.16
  • Mirabegron 50 mg vs Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg · Logistic regression · p = 0.005 · Odds ratio (or): 1.45 · 95% CI 1.12 to 1.87
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE refered to an adverse event (AE; defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug or who had undergone study procedures and did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment) which started or worsened in the period from first double-blind medication intake until 14 days after the last double-blind medication intake. Serious TEAEs with a start date reported until 30 days after the last double-blind medication intake were also summarized as TEAEs, and also included serious TEAEs upgraded by the sponsor based on review of the sponsor's list of Always Serious terms if any upgrade was done. Drug-related TEAEs may be possible or probable, as assessed by the investigator, or records where relationship is missing.

Time frame:
From first dose of double-blind study drug up to 30 days after last dose of double-blind study drug (up to 16 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Any TEAE145135147149345314
Drug-related TEAEs45375263157150
Deaths000000
Serious TEAEs86531219
Drug-related serious TEAEs011023
TEAEs leading to discontinuation971072022
Drug-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation74651719
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume

PVR volume was assessed by ultrasonography or a bladder scanner.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · mL
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
mLPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-0.8 ± 29.91.6 ± 28.0-2.1 ± 29.75.8 ± 35.67.2 ± 47.710.6 ± 51.1
Week 8-1.9 ± 28.6-0.4 ± 29.8-0.6 ± 34.45.4 ± 35.27.0 ± 37.49.9 ± 46.0
Week 12-1.0 ± 29.91.0 ± 29.80.0 ± 30.14.7 ± 33.17.9 ± 44.49.6 ± 50.1
End of treatment-1.0 ± 29.40.7 ± 29.1-0.8 ± 30.04.8 ± 33.39.0 ± 55.011.0 ± 54.9
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
mmHgPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4: 24-hour mean-1.00 ± 1.22-2.04 ± 1.310.96 ± 1.301.03 ± 1.26-0.85 ± 0.900.31 ± 0.85
Week 4: mean daytime-1.55 ± 1.22-1.19 ± 1.33-0.67 ± 1.31-1.13 ± 1.34-1.63 ± 0.91-0.53 ± 0.85
Week 4: mean nighttime-0.51 ± 1.38-1.14 ± 1.461.42 ± 1.440.41 ± 1.471.14 ± 1.030.54 ± 0.98
Week 12: 24-hour mean-1.97 ± 1.37-2.70 ± 1.42-1.75 ± 1.410.40 ± 1.45-0.71 ± 1.020.40 ± 0.95
Week 12: mean daytime-2.22 ± 1.37-2.53 ± 1.46-2.14 ± 1.48-2.09 ± 1.50-0.39 ± 1.06-0.71 ± 1.02
Week 12: mean nighttime-1.03 ± 1.64-2.81 ± 1.77-0.77 ± 1.681.31 ± 1.760.11 ± 1.230.79 ± 1.17
End of treatment: 24-hour mean-1.73 ± 1.24-3.44 ± 1.29-1.14 ± 1.270.37 ± 1.25-0.52 ± 0.90-0.08 ± 0.85
End of treatment: mean daytime-2.01 ± 1.22-3.29 ± 1.31-1.92 ± 1.30-2.17 ± 1.30-0.68 ± 0.92-1.28 ± 0.87
End of treatment: mean nighttime-1.00 ± 1.47-3.48 ± 1.54-0.60 ± 1.521.42 ± 1.520.41 ± 1.090.91 ± 1.04
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
mmHgPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4: 24-hour mean-0.70 ± 0.50-0.86 ± 0.540.22 ± 0.540.25 ± 0.520.03 ± 0.370.38 ± 0.35
Week 4: mean daytime-1.25 ± 0.53-0.36 ± 0.58-0.33 ± 0.57-0.77 ± 0.58-0.40 ± 0.400.07 ± 0.37
Week 4: mean nighttime-0.12 ± 0.59-0.97 ± 0.620.40 ± 0.620.48 ± 0.630.93 ± 0.440.47 ± 0.42
Week 12: 24-hour mean-0.80 ± 0.56-0.93 ± 0.58-0.19 ± 0.570.43 ± 0.59-0.37 ± 0.410.31 ± 0.39
Week 12: mean daytime-0.85 ± 0.60-0.54 ± 0.64-0.40 ± 0.65-0.33 ± 0.66-0.06 ± 0.46-0.18 ± 0.44
Week 12: mean nighttime-0.49 ± 0.66-1.39 ± 0.71-0.03 ± 0.680.92 ± 0.710.23 ± 0.490.49 ± 0.47
End of treatment: 24-hour mean-0.96 ± 0.51-1.41 ± 0.53-0.11 ± 0.520.05 ± 0.52-0.02 ± 0.370.25 ± 0.35
End of treatment: mean daytime-1.17 ± 0.53-0.98 ± 0.58-0.69 ± 0.57-0.79 ± 0.57-0.18 ± 0.40-0.36 ± 0.38
End of treatment: mean nighttime-0.41 ± 0.60-2.00 ± 0.630.08 ± 0.630.71 ± 0.630.56 ± 0.450.61 ± 0.43
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · beats per minute (bpm)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean 24-h, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Pulse Rate (PR)
beats per minute (bpm)PlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4: 24-hour mean-0.83 ± 0.631.14 ± 0.682.32 ± 0.670.36 ± 0.650.40 ± 0.460.69 ± 0.44
Week 4: mean daytime-0.70 ± 0.731.19 ± 0.793.52 ± 0.780.37 ± 0.80-0.05 ± 0.540.61 ± 0.51
Week 4: mean nighttime-0.72 ± 0.680.98 ± 0.711.77 ± 0.701.09 ± 0.720.86 ± 0.500.86 ± 0.48
Week 12: 24-hour mean0.70 ± 0.720.38 ± 0.741.19 ± 0.740.12 ± 0.760.94 ± 0.531.44 ± 0.50
Week 12: mean daytime0.89 ± 0.820.25 ± 0.882.12 ± 0.89-0.13 ± 0.900.84 ± 0.641.36 ± 0.61
Week 12: mean nighttime0.34 ± 0.710.21 ± 0.770.19 ± 0.730.06 ± 0.760.76 ± 0.531.52 ± 0.51
End of treatment: 24-hour mean0.41 ± 0.650.63 ± 0.681.67 ± 0.670.02 ± 0.660.85 ± 0.471.52 ± 0.45
End of treatment: mean daytime0.45 ± 0.740.37 ± 0.802.64 ± 0.79-0.07 ± 0.790.32 ± 0.561.24 ± 0.53
End of treatment: mean nighttime0.39 ± 0.660.82 ± 0.690.75 ± 0.680.45 ± 0.681.21 ± 0.491.64 ± 0.47
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) Window

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax (time to maximum concentration) window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean SBP in the Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) Window
mmHgPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-2.71 ± 1.680.34 ± 1.86-1.03 ± 1.72-1.77 ± 1.74-1.55 ± 1.23-1.47 ± 1.17
Week 12-4.86 ± 1.78-2.13 ± 1.95-1.64 ± 1.88-3.15 ± 1.96-0.26 ± 1.320.60 ± 1.32
End of treatment-4.40 ± 1.60-2.19 ± 1.68-1.94 ± 1.64-3.64 ± 1.65-0.61 ± 1.16-0.98 ± 1.12
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax Window

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean DBP in the Tmax Window
mmHgPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-1.24 ± 0.840.09 ± 0.93-0.65 ± 0.86-0.48 ± 0.87-0.22 ± 0.62-0.71 ± 0.58
Week 12-1.74 ± 0.92-0.45 ± 1.00-0.31 ± 0.97-1.49 ± 1.010.48 ± 0.68-0.03 ± 0.68
End of treatment-1.85 ± 0.84-0.71 ± 0.88-0.71 ± 0.85-1.22 ± 0.860.44 ± 0.61-0.80 ± 0.59
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax Window

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · bpm
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in Mean PR in the Tmax Window
bpmPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 40.02 ± 1.082.39 ± 1.193.68 ± 1.100.47 ± 1.11-0.91 ± 0.790.67 ± 0.75
Week 120.10 ± 1.101.22 ± 1.201.87 ± 1.160.37 ± 1.210.15 ± 0.811.39 ± 0.81
End of treatment-0.43 ± 1.050.82 ± 1.103.41 ± 1.07-1.25 ± 1.080.34 ± 0.761.25 ± 0.73
SecondaryMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in SBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT
mmHgPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 434.05 ± 2.0631.14 ± 2.2038.20 ± 2.1935.16 ± 2.1132.88 ± 1.5132.80 ± 1.43
Week 1233.21 ± 2.3030.68 ± 2.3832.88 ± 2.3635.11 ± 2.4233.53 ± 1.7032.82 ± 1.59
End of treatment34.98 ± 2.1130.65 ± 2.2033.53 ± 2.1634.95 ± 2.1434.70 ± 1.5432.55 ± 1.45
SecondaryMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in DBP at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT
mmHgPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 418.78 ± 1.2719.15 ± 1.3620.41 ± 1.3520.02 ± 1.3120.74 ± 0.9320.27 ± 0.88
Week 1219.68 ± 1.2319.52 ± 1.2820.41 ± 1.2721.18 ± 1.3019.26 ± 0.9220.01 ± 0.85
End of treatment20.29 ± 1.1619.29 ± 1.2220.71 ± 1.1920.47 ± 1.1820.29 ± 0.8520.36 ± 0.80
SecondaryMaximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Tmax window of mirabegron and solifenacin was from 4-6 hours postdose. The maximum 1 hour change from time-matched baseline was calculated as the maximum difference between the post-baseline hourly means and the time-matched baseline hourly means.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · bpm
Maximum 1-hour Change From Time-matched Baseline in PR at Weeks 4, 12 and EoT
bpmPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 422.34 ± 1.3523.86 ± 1.4425.12 ± 1.4324.28 ± 1.3821.48 ± 0.9921.80 ± 0.94
Week 1222.63 ± 1.4223.54 ± 1.4726.03 ± 1.4623.52 ± 1.5022.60 ± 1.0524.08 ± 0.98
End of treatment23.01 ± 1.3124.12 ± 1.3726.23 ± 1.3423.33 ± 1.3322.66 ± 0.9624.14 ± 0.90
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough Difference

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmHg
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in SBP Peak/Trough Difference
mmHgPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-0.71 ± 1.860.14 ± 1.99-0.69 ± 1.980.85 ± 1.91-1.61 ± 1.360.41 ± 1.29
Week 121.18 ± 1.98-2.45 ± 2.05-4.55 ± 2.03-1.63 ± 2.080.68 ± 1.470.62 ± 1.37
End of treatment1.15 ± 1.83-1.38 ± 1.91-2.30 ± 1.87-0.97 ± 1.850.25 ± 1.330.68 ± 1.26
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough Difference

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · nnHg
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in DBP Peak/Trough Difference
nnHgPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 4-0.76 ± 1.31-1.08 ± 1.40-0.20 ± 1.39-1.60 ± 1.340.39 ± 0.96-0.56 ± 0.91
Week 120.53 ± 1.300.15 ± 1.34-1.90 ± 1.33-0.66 ± 1.36-1.24 ± 0.960.46 ± 0.90
End of treatment0.87 ± 1.230.27 ± 1.28-0.96 ± 1.26-1.67 ± 1.24-0.98 ± 0.890.52 ± 0.85
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough Difference

Vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate) were monitored using an ABPM device placed on the upper arm followed by intake of the double-blind study medication and worn for at least 24 hours. Peak/trough difference was defined as the difference between the highest 1-h to lowest 1-h average per participant per visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and weeks 4, 12 and EoT (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · bpm
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 12 and EoT in PR Peak/Trough Difference
bpmPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Week 41.16 ± 1.380.46 ± 1.481.54 ± 1.460.78 ± 1.41-0.68 ± 1.01-0.51 ± 0.96
Week 123.35 ± 1.45-0.04 ± 1.501.15 ± 1.493.49 ± 1.53-0.53 ± 1.071.48 ± 1.00
End of treatment2.48 ± 1.320.45 ± 1.371.14 ± 1.353.16 ± 1.33-0.02 ± 0.961.80 ± 0.91

Adverse events

Collected over From first dose of double-blind study drug up to 30 days after last dose of double-blind study drug (up to 16 weeks).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/429 (0%)8/429 (1.9%)8/429 (1.9%)
Mirabegron 25 mg0/423 (0%)6/423 (1.4%)17/423 (4%)
Mirabegron 50 mg0/422 (0%)5/422 (1.2%)14/422 (3.3%)
Solifenacin 5 mg0/423 (0%)3/423 (0.7%)25/423 (5.9%)
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mg0/853 (0%)12/853 (1.4%)72/853 (8.4%)
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg0/848 (0%)19/848 (2.2%)60/848 (7.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 54
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/4290/4231/4220/4230/8531/848
Grand mal convulsionNervous system disorders0/4290/4231/4220/4230/8530/848
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/4290/4231/4220/4230/8530/848
Hypovolaemic shockVascular disorders0/4290/4231/4220/4230/8530/848
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders0/4290/4231/4220/4230/8530/848
PyelonephritisInfections and infestations0/4291/4230/4220/4230/8530/848
Scrub typhusInfections and infestations0/4290/4230/4221/4230/8530/848
Septic shockInfections and infestations0/4291/4230/4220/4230/8530/848
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders0/4291/4230/4220/4230/8530/848
Lower limb fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/4291/4230/4220/4230/8530/848
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders8/42917/42314/42225/42372/85360/848

Baseline characteristics

Randomized analysis set (RAS), comprised all randomized patients.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Year)PlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgTotal
Mean57.46 ± 13.256.77 ± 13.4656.69 ± 13.2857.88 ± 12.9256.94 ± 13.7857.3 ± 13.4657.16 ± 13.42
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgTotal
Female3453433383426866842738
Male102989992199199789
Mean number of incontinence episodes/24 h
Mean number of incontinence episodes/24 h(incontinence episodes)PlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgTotal
Mean3.41 ± 3.373.42 ± 3.403.18 ± 3.473.58 ± 3.513.22 ± 3.173.16 ± 3.083.29 ± 3.29
Mean number of micturitions/24 h
Mean number of micturitions/24 h(micturitions)PlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgTotal
Mean10.97 ± 2.8610.81 ± 2.6311.19 ± 3.2710.76 ± 2.4710.73 ± 2.8810.74 ± 2.3610.84 ± 2.73
Mean volume voided per micturition
Mean volume voided per micturition(mL)PlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgTotal
Least squares mean157.94 ± 58.78152.46 ± 60.96155.31 ± 60.78151.94 ± 59.29159.32 ± 58.29153.57 ± 59.67155.43 ± 59.49
Number of incontinence episodes/week
Number of incontinence episodes/week(incontinence episodes)PlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgTotal
Mean23.6 ± 23.623.5 ± 23.621.7 ± 23.824.8 ± 24.522.1 ± 21.721.7 ± 21.322.7 ± 22.7
Mean number of urgency incontinence episodes/24 h
Mean number of urgency incontinence episodes/24 h(urgency incontinence episodes)PlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgTotal
Mean3.14 ± 3.233.00 ± 3.092.89 ± 3.313.23 ± 3.342.85 ± 2.812.80 ± 2.642.94 ± 3.00
Number of urgency incontinence episodes/week
Number of urgency incontinence episodes/week(urgency incontinence episodes)PlaceboMirabegron 25 mgMirabegron 50 mgSolifenacin 5 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 25 mgSolifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mgTotal
Mean21.7 ± 22.620.6 ± 21.419.8 ± 22.722.4 ± 23.319.5 ± 19.319.2 ± 18.220.3 ± 20.7

5 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

435 sites
  • Site US10049 Coastal Clinical Research, Inc.
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Site US10112 TFI, LLC
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Site US10104 Clinical Research Advantage, Inc.
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Site US10021 Beach Clinical Studies
    Phoenix, Arizona 85051, United States
  • Site US10122 Orange County Research Institute
    Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • Site US10098 Skyline Research
    Cerritos, California 90703, United States
  • Site US10539 Citrus Valley Medical Research
    Glendora, California 91741, United States
  • Site US10082 American Clinical Trials
    Hawaiian Gardens, California 90716, United States
  • Site US10132 Axis Clinical Trials
    Los Angeles, California 90017, United States
  • Site US10133 Axis Clinical Trials
    Los Angeles, California 90036, United States
  • Site US10536 Stanford School of Medicine
    Palo Alto, California 93404, United States
  • Site US10149 Bayview Research Group
    Paramount, California 90723, United States
  • Site US10559 UC Davis Medical Center
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • Site US10003 San Diego Clinical Trials
    San Diego, California 92120, United States
  • Site US10545 San Diego Institute for Sexual Medicine
    San Diego, California 92120, United States
  • Site US10106 West Coast Clinical Research
    Tarzana, California 91356, United States
  • Site US10595 Bayview Research Group
    Valley Village, California 91607, United States
  • Site US10034 Urology Center of Colorado
    Denver, Colorado 80211, United States
  • Site US10070 Physicians' Research Options/Red Rocks OB/GYN
    Lakewood, Colorado 80228, United States
  • Site US10053 Western Clinical Research, Inc.
    Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033, United States
  • Site US10128 Clinical Research Center of CT
    Danbury, Connecticut 06810, United States
  • Site US10018 Grove Hill Clinical Research
    New Britain, Connecticut 06052, United States
  • Site US10170 Yale - New Haven Hospital West Haven VAMC
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
  • Site US10123 Chase Medical Research, LLC
    Waterbury, Connecticut 06708, United States
  • Site US10060 Meridien Research
    Bradenton, Florida 34208, United States
  • Site US10097 A.G.A. Clinical Trials DBA Neostart Group
    Hialeah, Florida 33012, United States
  • Site US10148 Best Quality Research, Inc.
    Hialeah, Florida 33016, United States
  • Site US10153 Palmetto Professional Research
    Hialeah, Florida 33016, United States
  • Site US10159 Urological Research Network
    Hialeah, Florida 33016, United States
  • Site US10534 South Florida Medical Research
    Hialeah, Florida 33016, United States
  • Site US10535 South Florida Medical Research
    Homestead, Florida 33030, United States
  • Site US10165 East Coast Institute for Research
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Site US10091 Health Awareness
    Jupiter, Florida 33458, United States
  • Site US10150 Suncoast Clinical Research, Inc.
    New Port Richey, Florida 34652, United States
  • Site US10158 Renstar Medical Research
    Ocala, Florida 34471, United States
  • Site US10124 Winter Park Urology Associates
    Orlando, Florida 32803, United States
  • Site US10134 Compass Research, LLC
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Site US10009 South Broward Research
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33027, United States
  • Site US10540 Demaur Clinical Research, INC
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33028, United States
  • Site US10554 Private Practice
    Plantation, Florida 33317, United States
  • Site US10095 Florida Urology Specialists
    Sarasota, Florida 34237, United States
  • Site US10010 Southeastern Research Group, Inc
    Tallahassee, Florida 32308, United States
  • Site US10014 Private Practice
    Wellington, Florida 33449, United States
  • Site US10037 Atlanta Medical Research Institute
    Alpharetta, Georgia 30005, United States
  • Site US10127 Perimeter North Medical Research, Inc.
    Roswell, Georgia 30076, United States
  • Site US10120 WR-Mount Vernon Clinical Research
    Sandy Springs, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Site US10024 GTC Research
    Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66218, United States
  • Site US10078 Heartland Research Associates, LLC
    Wichita, Kansas 67205, United States
  • Site US10088 Centex Studies, Inc.
    Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601, United States
  • Site US10074 Medpharmics, LLC
    Metairie, Louisiana 70006, United States
  • Site US10025 Regional Urology, LLC
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71106, United States
  • Site US10558 Chesapeake Urology Research Associates
    Glen Burnie, Maryland 21061, United States
  • Site US10560 Chesapeake Urology Research Associates
    Owings Mills, Maryland 21117, United States
  • Site US10282 Boston Clinical Trials
    Boston, Massachusetts 02131, United States
  • Site US10114 Bay State Clinical Trials, Inc.
    Watertown, Massachusetts 02472, United States
  • Site US10152 Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogynecology Institute
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • Site US10542 Adult & Pediatric Urology Group
    Sartell, Minnesota 56377, United States
  • Site US10110 Montana Health Research Institute, Inc.
    Billings, Montana 59102, United States
  • Site US10154 Montana Medical Research Inc
    Missoula, Montana 59801, United States
  • Site US10553 Women's Clinic of Lincoln
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68510, United States
  • Site US10140 IVCTLV
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89106, United States
  • Site US10002 Urology Center Research Institute
    Englewood, New Jersey 07631, United States
  • Site US10051 AdvancedMed Research
    Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648, United States
  • Site US10047 Lawrence OBGYN Associates
    Lawrenceville, New Jersey 86480, United States
  • Site US10162 Phoenix OB-GYN Associates, LLC
    Moorestown, New Jersey 08057, United States
  • Site US10011 Albuquerque Clinical Trials, Inc.
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, United States
  • Site US10015 Urology Group of New Mexico
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109, United States
  • Site US10077 Northeast Urogynecology
    Albany, New York 12205, United States
  • Site US10089 Maimonides Medical Center
    Brooklyn, New York 11220, United States
  • Site US10026 AccuMed Research Associates
    Garden City, New York 11530, United States
  • Site US10040 Premier Medical Group Of The Hudson Valley
    Kingston, New York 12401, United States
  • Site US10073 Manhattan Medical Research Practice, PLLC
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Site US10249 New York Clinical Trials
    New York, New York 10018, United States
  • Site US10168 Weill Cornell Medical College
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Site US10126 Premier Medical Group
    Newburgh, New York 12550, United States
  • Site US10028 Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley
    Poughkeepsie, New York 12601, United States
  • Site US10593 Upstate Clinical Research Associates LLC
    Williamsville, New York 14221, United States
  • Site US10076 Carolina Clinical Trials
    Concord, North Carolina 28025, United States
  • Site US10129 PMG Research of Raleigh
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27609, United States
  • Site US10549 Associated Urologists of North Carolina
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, United States
  • Site US10062 Piedmont Medical Research
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Site US10050 Rapid Medical Research, Inc.
    Cleveland, Ohio 44122, United States
  • Site US10033 Ohio Clinical Research
    Lyndhurst, Ohio 44124, United States
  • Site US10067 Family Practice Center of Wadsworth
    Wadsworth, Ohio 44281, United States
  • Site US10551 The Christ Hospital
    West Chester, Ohio 45069, United States
  • Site US10109 Lynn Health Science Institute
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, United States
  • Site US10541 Sunstone Medical Research
    Medford, Oregon 97504, United States
  • Site US10008 Urologic Consultants of Southeastern Pennsylvania
    Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004, United States
  • Site US10045 Lancaster Urology
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604, United States
  • Site US10017 Philadelphia Clinical Research, LLC
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19114, United States
  • Site US10167 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Site US10250 Preferred Primary Care Physicians Inc.
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236, United States
  • Site US10248 Preferred Primary Care Physicians, Inc
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15243, United States
  • Site US10063 Preferred Primary Care Physician Research
    Uniontown, Pennsylvania 15401, United States
  • Site US10012 Advanced Clinical Concepts
    West Reading, Pennsylvania 19611, United States
  • Site US10166 Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Site US10094 University Medical Group
    Greer, South Carolina 29650, United States
  • Site US10046 Coastal Carolina Research Center
    Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • Site US10079 PMG Research of Charleston, LLC
    Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • Site US10117 Carolina Urologic Research Center
    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 29572, United States

Showing the first 100 of 435 sites across 42 countries.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01972841
Lead sponsor
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 31, 2013
Start date
Nov 5, 2013
Primary completion
Oct 22, 2015
Completion
Oct 22, 2015
Results posted
Jun 12, 2018
Last update
Oct 31, 2024

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion