ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02218372SUNSHINEUpdated Nov 26, 2024Results posted

A Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Fidaxomicin (Oral Suspension or Tablets) and Vancomycin (Oral Liquid or Capsules) in Pediatric Subjects With Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea (CDAD)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Fidaxomicin oral suspension and Fidaxomicin tablets in Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea (CDAD), sponsored by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.. Completed at 44 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-26.

Sponsored by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. (part of Astellas Pharma Inc) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
148
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical response to fidaxomicin oral suspension or tablets and vancomycin oral liquid or capsules in pediatric participants with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD). It also investigated the recurrence/sustained clinical response to and safety of fidaxomicin and vancomycin, as well as acceptance of the fidaxomicin oral suspension formulation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea (CDAD)

Keywords

  • Clostridium difficile-associated Diarrhea (CDAD)
  • vancomycin
  • Clostridium difficile infection
  • fidaxomicin
03

In context

Clostridium Infections

251 studies on the registry are indexed under Clostridium Infections; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 148 is above the median of 64 across 185 interventional studies indexed under Clostridium Infections.

Browse Clostridium Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is diagnosed with CDAD according to local diagnostic criteria. As a minimum there must be positive detection, within 72 hours prior to randomization, of either toxin A and/or toxin B in stool or positive detection of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and:

    • Subject from Birth to \< 2 years: watery diarrhea in the 24 hours prior to screening.
    • Subject ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years: ≥ 3 unformed bowel movements in the 24 hours prior to screening.
    • Male and female subjects aged from birth to \< 18 years: Note that in the United States of America subjects can only be included if aged ≥ 6 months to \< 18 years.
  • For subjects \< 5 years: Negative rotavirus test.
  • Female subject of :

    • must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening, and
    • must abstain from sexual activity for the duration of the study, or
    • must use two forms of (at least one of which must be a barrier method) starting at Screening and throughout the study period and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Female subject must not be breastfeeding at Screening or during the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Female subject must not donate ova starting at Screening and throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study while in the study (with the exception of studies as described in exclusion criteria below).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent use of metronidazole, oral vancomycin or any other antibiotic treatments for CDAD. If the investigator feels the clinical imperative is to begin treatment before knowing the laboratory result for toxigenic C. difficile, up to four doses but no more than 24 hours of treatment with metronidazole, oral vancomycin or any other effective treatment for CDAD are allowed.
  • Subject has pseudomembranous colitis, fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon or ileus.
  • Subject has a history of inflammatory bowel disease (e.g., ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease etc.).
  • Subject has diarrhea caused by an agent other than C. difficile (e.g. infections, infestations, drugs etc.).
  • Subject has known to fidaxomicin, vancomycin or their or to teicoplanin.
  • Subject has received an therapy within 28 days, prior to Screening, with the exception of studies with primary treatment for cancer without novel Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) and which do not affect the assessment of diarrhea.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
148 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fidaxomicin

    Participants from birth to \< 6 years of age received weight based doses of fidaxomicin oral suspension (32 mg/kg/day with a maximum dose of 400 mg/day divided in 2 doses) 2 times daily for 10 days. Participants aged ≥ 6 years to \< 18 years of age received a 200 mg fidaxomicin tablet 2 times daily for 10 days.

    Drug: Fidaxomicin oral suspension · Drug: Fidaxomicin tablets

  • Active comparator
    Vancomycin

    Participants from birth to \< 6 years of age received weight based doses of vancomycin oral liquid (40 mg/kg/day with a maximum dose of 500 mg/day divided in 4 doses) 4 times daily for 10 days. Participants aged ≥ 6 years to \< 18 years of age received a 125 mg vancomycin capsule 4 times daily for 10 days.

    Drug: Vancomycin oral liquid · Drug: Vancomycin capsules

Interventions

  • Participants from birth to \< 6 years of age received weight based doses of fidaxomicin oral suspension (32 mg/kg/day with a maximum dose of 400 mg/day divided in 2 doses) 2 times daily for 10 days.

    Also known as: Dificid, Dificlir

  • Participants aged ≥ 6 years to \< 18 years of age received a 200 mg fidaxomicin tablet 2 times daily for 10 days.

    Also known as: Dificlir, Dificid

  • DrugVancomycin oral liquid

    Participants from birth to \< 6 years of age received weight based doses of vancomycin oral liquid (40 mg/kg/day with a maximum dose of 500 mg/day divided in 4 doses) 4 times daily for 10 days.

  • Participants aged ≥ 6 years to \< 18 years of age received a 125 mg vancomycin capsule 4 times daily for 10 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Clinical Response (CCR) at End of Treatment (EOT) +2 Days

    Initial clinical response (ICR) for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as absence of watery diarrhea for 2 consecutive treatment days, remaining well until study drug discontinuation. ICR for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years was defined as improvement in number and character of bowel movements as determined by \< 3 unformed bowel movements (UBMs) per day for 2 consecutive treatment days, remaining well until study drug discontinuation. CCR was defined for both age groups as not requiring further CDAD therapy within 2 days after study drug completion, and was reported with a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome. Resolution of diarrhea was assessed during interviews of participant/parent/legal guardian, supplemented by review of personal records (if hospitalized) and checked for presence of watery diarrhea (ages from birth to \< 2 years) or number of UBMs (for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years).

    Time frame: Up to day 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Response (SCR) at EOT +9 Days

    SCR at EOT + 9 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT +9 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

    Time frame: Up to day 19

  2. Percentage of Participants With Global Cure (GC) at EOT +9 Days

    GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 9 days.

    Time frame: Up to day 19

  3. Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +9 Days

    Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

    Time frame: Up to day 19

  4. Percentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +16 Days

    SCR at EOT + 16 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT + 16 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

    Time frame: Up to day 26

  5. Percentage of Participants With GC at EOT +16 Days

    GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 16 days.

    Time frame: Up to day 26

  6. Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +16 Days

    Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

    Time frame: Up to day 26

  7. Percentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +23 Days

    SCR at EOT + 23 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT + 16 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

    Time frame: Up to day 33

  8. Percentage of Participants With GC at EOT +23 Days

    GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 23 days.

    Time frame: Up to day 33

  9. Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +23 Days

    Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

    Time frame: Up to day 33

  10. Percentage of Participants With SCR at End of Study (EOS) (EOT +30 Days)

    SCR at EOS was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOS (EOT + 30 days) during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

    Time frame: Up to day 40

  11. Percentage of Participants With GC at EOS (EOT +30 Days)

    GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. Global Cure at EOT +30 days was derived using MI in case ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed) following Rubin's multiple imputation method.

    Time frame: Up to day 40

  12. Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOS (EOT +30 Days)

    Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

    Time frame: Up to day 40

  13. Time to Resolution of Diarrhea (TTROD)

    TTROD for ages from birth \< 2 years was defined as time elapsing (hours rounded up from minutes \> 30) from treatment start (time of first study drug dose) to diarrhea resolution (time of last episode of watery diarrhea the day prior to the first of 2 consecutive days without watery diarrhea sustained through EOT). TTROD for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years was defined as time elapsing (hours rounded up from minutes \> 30) from treatment start (time of first dose) to diarrhea resolution (time of the last UBM the day prior to the first of 2 consecutive days of \< 3 UBMs sustained through EOT). TTROD by Kaplan-Meier Method. Those who completed treatment but did not show diarrhea resolution until EOT were censored at Day 10/240 hours. Those who did not complete treatment, discontinued earlier but did not show diarrhea resolution until disc. day were censored at disc. (days converted to hours). Those whose diarrhea did not continue after first dose were included with a TTROD of 1 hour.

    Time frame: Up to day 10

  14. Time to Recurrence of CDAD for Participants With CCR at EOT +2 Days

    Time to recurrence was defined as the time (days) from CCR until the onset of recurrence. Time to recurrence of CDAD by Kaplan-Meier Method. Data for median was estimated and the 95% CI could not be estimated due to low event rate. Data not estimable denoted as NA. Participants with CCR at EOT+2 days, who completed the follow-up period but did not experience a recurrence of CDAD were censored at EOT+30 days and those who did not complete the follow-up period and discontinued during this period and did not experience a recurrence of CDAD were censored at day of discontinuation.

    Time frame: Up to day 40

  15. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug or who had undergone study procedures which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. This included abnormal laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram data or physical examinations that were defined as AEs if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, required active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study drug or was clinically significant in the investigator's opinion. The following standard with 3 grades was used to measure the severity of AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values: ● Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities ● Moderate: Affected normal daily activities ● Severe: Inability to perform daily activities. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the test drug/comparative drug.

    Time frame: From the first dose of study drug administration up to 30 days after EOT (up to day 40)

  16. Plasma Concentrations of Fidaxomicin

    Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.

    Time frame: Within 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10

  17. Plasma Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118

    Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.

    Time frame: Within 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10

  18. Metabolite-to-Parent Ratio (MPRconc)

    Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.

    Time frame: Within 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10

  19. Fecal Concentrations of Fidaxomicin

    Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10

  20. Fecal Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118

    Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10

  21. MPRconc Within 24 Hours of a Dose

    Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10

  22. Acceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7

    Acceptance of formulation was evaluated in all participants who received fidaxomicin oral suspension and vancomycin oral liquid (i.e., participants from birth to =\< 6 years and participants \> 6 years unable to swallow tablets) by means of a five-point rating scale (awful, poor, fair, good, excellent) by unblinded staff if hospitalized, and by the participant/parents/legal guardian when at home.

    Time frame: Days 1 and 7

07

Results

Posted Dec 7, 2018

Participant flow

Pediatric participants with clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) were enrolled in this multicenter study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFidaxomicinVancomycin
Started10048
Treated9844
Completed9542
Not completed56
Withdrew: Adverse event11
Withdrew: Miscellaneous21
Withdrew: Randomized but did not receive treatment23
Withdrew: Withdrawal by parent/guardian01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Confirmed Clinical Response (CCR) at End of Treatment (EOT) +2 Days

Initial clinical response (ICR) for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as absence of watery diarrhea for 2 consecutive treatment days, remaining well until study drug discontinuation. ICR for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years was defined as improvement in number and character of bowel movements as determined by \< 3 unformed bowel movements (UBMs) per day for 2 consecutive treatment days, remaining well until study drug discontinuation. CCR was defined for both age groups as not requiring further CDAD therapy within 2 days after study drug completion, and was reported with a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome. Resolution of diarrhea was assessed during interviews of participant/parent/legal guardian, supplemented by review of personal records (if hospitalized) and checked for presence of watery diarrhea (ages from birth to \< 2 years) or number of UBMs (for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years).

Time frame:
Up to day 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Clinical Response (CCR) at End of Treatment (EOT) +2 Days
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Clinical Response (CCR) at End of Treatment (EOT) +2 Days77.6 (68.0 to 85.4)70.5 (54.8 to 83.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: 7.5 · 95% CI -7.4 to 23.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Response (SCR) at EOT +9 Days

SCR at EOT + 9 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT +9 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame:
Up to day 19
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Response (SCR) at EOT +9 Days
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Response (SCR) at EOT +9 Days94.7 (87.1 to 98.5)77.4 (58.9 to 90.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: 16.3 · 95% CI 1.8 to 34.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Global Cure (GC) at EOT +9 Days

GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 9 days.

Time frame:
Up to day 19
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Cure (GC) at EOT +9 Days
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With Global Cure (GC) at EOT +9 Days75.5 (65.8 to 83.6)54.5 (38.8 to 69.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: 21.3 · 95% CI 4.5 to 37.7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +9 Days

Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame:
Up to day 19
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +9 Days
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +9 Days5.3 (1.5 to 12.9)22.6 (9.6 to 41.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: -16.3 · 95% CI -34.2 to -1.8
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +16 Days

SCR at EOT + 16 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT + 16 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame:
Up to day 26
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +16 Days
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +16 Days89.5 (80.3 to 95.3)71.0 (52.0 to 85.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: 17.2 · 95% CI 1.9 to 35.6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With GC at EOT +16 Days

GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 16 days.

Time frame:
Up to day 26
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With GC at EOT +16 Days
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With GC at EOT +16 Days71.4 (61.4 to 80.1)52.3 (36.7 to 67.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: 19.4 · 95% CI 2.3 to 35.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +16 Days

Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame:
Up to day 26
Reported as:
Median · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +16 Days
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +16 Days7.9 (3.0 to 16.4)25.8 (11.9 to 44.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: -17.2 · 95% CI -35.6 to -1.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +23 Days

SCR at EOT + 23 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT + 16 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame:
Up to day 33
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +23 Days
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +23 Days85.5 (75.6 to 92.5)71.0 (52.0 to 85.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: 15.8 · 95% CI -0.5 to 34.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With GC at EOT +23 Days

GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 23 days.

Time frame:
Up to day 33
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With GC at EOT +23 Days
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With GC at EOT +23 Days68.4 (58.2 to 77.4)50.0 (34.6 to 65.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: 18.8 · 95% CI 1.5 to 35.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +23 Days

Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame:
Up to day 33
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +23 Days
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +23 Days11.8 (5.6 to 21.3)29.0 (14.2 to 48.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: -15.8 · 95% CI -34.5 to 0.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With SCR at End of Study (EOS) (EOT +30 Days)

SCR at EOS was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOS (EOT + 30 days) during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame:
Up to day 40
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With SCR at End of Study (EOS) (EOT +30 Days)
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With SCR at End of Study (EOS) (EOT +30 Days)85.5 (75.6 to 92.5)71.0 (52.0 to 85.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: 15.8 · 95% CI -0.5 to 34.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With GC at EOS (EOT +30 Days)

GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. Global Cure at EOT +30 days was derived using MI in case ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed) following Rubin's multiple imputation method.

Time frame:
Up to day 40
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With GC at EOS (EOT +30 Days)
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With GC at EOS (EOT +30 Days)68.4 (58.2 to 77.4)50.0 (34.6 to 65.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: 18.8 · 95% CI 1.5 to 35.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOS (EOT +30 Days)

Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame:
Up to day 40
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOS (EOT +30 Days)
percentage of participantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOS (EOT +30 Days)11.8 (5.6 to 21.3)29.0 (14.2 to 48.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Adjusted treatment difference: -15.8 · 95% CI -34.5 to 0.5
SecondaryTime to Resolution of Diarrhea (TTROD)

TTROD for ages from birth \< 2 years was defined as time elapsing (hours rounded up from minutes \> 30) from treatment start (time of first study drug dose) to diarrhea resolution (time of last episode of watery diarrhea the day prior to the first of 2 consecutive days without watery diarrhea sustained through EOT). TTROD for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years was defined as time elapsing (hours rounded up from minutes \> 30) from treatment start (time of first dose) to diarrhea resolution (time of the last UBM the day prior to the first of 2 consecutive days of \< 3 UBMs sustained through EOT). TTROD by Kaplan-Meier Method. Those who completed treatment but did not show diarrhea resolution until EOT were censored at Day 10/240 hours. Those who did not complete treatment, discontinued earlier but did not show diarrhea resolution until disc. day were censored at disc. (days converted to hours). Those whose diarrhea did not continue after first dose were included with a TTROD of 1 hour.

Time frame:
Up to day 10
Reported as:
Median · hours
Time to Resolution of Diarrhea (TTROD)
hoursFidaxomicinVancomycin
Time to Resolution of Diarrhea (TTROD)58 (29.0 to 122.0)97 (42.0 to 146.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Log Rank · p = 0.579
SecondaryTime to Recurrence of CDAD for Participants With CCR at EOT +2 Days

Time to recurrence was defined as the time (days) from CCR until the onset of recurrence. Time to recurrence of CDAD by Kaplan-Meier Method. Data for median was estimated and the 95% CI could not be estimated due to low event rate. Data not estimable denoted as NA. Participants with CCR at EOT+2 days, who completed the follow-up period but did not experience a recurrence of CDAD were censored at EOT+30 days and those who did not complete the follow-up period and discontinued during this period and did not experience a recurrence of CDAD were censored at day of discontinuation.

Time frame:
Up to day 40
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Recurrence of CDAD for Participants With CCR at EOT +2 Days
daysFidaxomicinVancomycin
Time to Recurrence of CDAD for Participants With CCR at EOT +2 Days25 (NA to NA)26 (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin · Log Rank · p = 0.023
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug or who had undergone study procedures which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. This included abnormal laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram data or physical examinations that were defined as AEs if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, required active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study drug or was clinically significant in the investigator's opinion. The following standard with 3 grades was used to measure the severity of AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values: ● Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities ● Moderate: Affected normal daily activities ● Severe: Inability to perform daily activities. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the test drug/comparative drug.

Time frame:
From the first dose of study drug administration up to 30 days after EOT (up to day 40)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
ParticipantsFidaxomicinVancomycin
TEAE7233
Drug-related TEAE75
Serious TEAE2412
Drug-related Serious TEAE00
Moderate TEAE3914
Drug-related Moderate TEAE41
Mild TEAE5630
Drug-related Mild TEAE34
TEAE Leading to Death30
Drug-related TEAE Leading to Death00
TEAE leading to Withdrawal of Treatment (Tx)11
Drug-related TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Tx00
SecondaryPlasma Concentrations of Fidaxomicin

Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.

Time frame:
Within 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Plasma Concentrations of Fidaxomicin
ng/mLFidaxomin All FormulationsFidaxomicin Oral SuspensionFidaxomicin Tablets
Predose20.17 ± 40.1615.26 ± 20.4330.16 ± 63.27
Postdose39.41 ± 62.1534.60 ± 57.7948.53 ± 69.85
SecondaryPlasma Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118

Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.

Time frame:
Within 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Plasma Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118
ng/mLFidaxomin All FormulationsFidaxomicin Oral SuspensionFidaxomicin Tablets
Predose63.04 ± 171.9742.18 ± 76.76105.54 ± 277.67
Postdose116.64 ± 259.10102.38 ± 245.19143.63 ± 286.31
SecondaryMetabolite-to-Parent Ratio (MPRconc)

Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.

Time frame:
Within 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Metabolite-to-Parent Ratio (MPRconc)
ratioFidaxomin All FormulationsFidaxomicin Oral SuspensionFidaxomicin Tablets
Predose3.18 ± 1.423.24 ± 1.463.05 ± 1.35
Postdose2.86 ± 1.182.95 ± 1.232.69 ± 1.06
SecondaryFecal Concentrations of Fidaxomicin

Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.

Time frame:
Within 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10
Reported as:
Mean · μg/g
Fecal Concentrations of Fidaxomicin
μg/gFidaxomin All FormulationsFidaxomicin Oral SuspensionFidaxomicin Tablets
Fecal Concentrations of Fidaxomicin2685.56 ± 2476.922969.87 ± 2713.582190.63 ± 1948.68
SecondaryFecal Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118

Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.

Time frame:
Within 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10
Reported as:
Mean · μg/g
Fecal Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118
μg/gFidaxomin All FormulationsFidaxomicin Oral SuspensionFidaxomicin Tablets
Fecal Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118889.23 ± 817.83789.15 ± 728.581059.73 ± 941.04
SecondaryMPRconc Within 24 Hours of a Dose

Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.

Time frame:
Within 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
MPRconc Within 24 Hours of a Dose
ratioFidaxomin All FormulationsFidaxomicin Oral SuspensionFidaxomicin Tablets
MPRconc Within 24 Hours of a Dose0.43 ± 0.310.32 ± 0.190.63 ± 0.38
SecondaryAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7

Acceptance of formulation was evaluated in all participants who received fidaxomicin oral suspension and vancomycin oral liquid (i.e., participants from birth to =\< 6 years and participants \> 6 years unable to swallow tablets) by means of a five-point rating scale (awful, poor, fair, good, excellent) by unblinded staff if hospitalized, and by the participant/parents/legal guardian when at home.

Time frame:
Days 1 and 7
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Acceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7
ParticipantsFidaxomicin Oral SuspensionVancomycin Oral Liquid
Day 1 Awful45
Day 1 Poor63
Day 1 Fair136
Day 1 Good197
Day 1 Excellent134
Day 1 Missing125
Day 7 Awful23
Day 7 Poor55
Day 7 Fair85
Day 7 Good219
Day 7 Excellent163
Day 7 Missing155

Adverse events

Collected over From the first dose of study drug administration up to 30 days after EOT (up to day 40). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fidaxomicin3/98 (3.1%)24/98 (24.5%)36/98 (36.7%)
Vancomycin2/44 (4.5%)12/44 (27.3%)21/44 (47.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 47
Most frequent serious events
EventFidaxomicinVancomycin
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/982/44
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/981/44
ColitisGastrointestinal disorders0/981/44
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/981/44
Gastrointestinal necrosisGastrointestinal disorders0/981/44
Ileus paralyticGastrointestinal disorders0/981/44
Intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/981/44
Clostridium difficile colitisInfections and infestations0/981/44
Fungal sepsisInfections and infestations0/981/44
InfluenzaInfections and infestations0/981/44
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventFidaxomicinVancomycin
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders5/989/44
PyrexiaGeneral disorders11/988/44
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders7/986/44
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders7/984/44
HeadacheNervous system disorders8/980/44
Oral candidiasisInfections and infestations3/983/44
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/983/44
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders5/981/44

Baseline characteristics

The baseline analysis set consisted of the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized participants, irrespective of a participant having received a study drug (fidaxomicin or vancomycin) or not.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(months)FidaxomicinVancomycinTotal
Mean79.7 ± 61.877.5 ± 59.279 ± 60.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)FidaxomicinVancomycinTotal
Female412162
Male592786
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)FidaxomicinVancomycinTotal
White8336119
Black or African American6511
Asian202
Other415
Missing5611
Ethnicity
Ethnicity(Participants)FidaxomicinVancomycinTotal
Hispanic or Latino12517
Not Hispanic or Latino8237119
Missing6612
08

Study locations

44 sites
  • Site US10015
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • Site US10010
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Site US10004
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Site US10025
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Site US10032
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
  • Site US10030
    Omaha, Nebraska 68114, United States
  • Site US10008
    Stony Brook, New York 11794-8111, United States
  • Site US10028
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Site US10027
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229-3039, United States
  • Site US10014
    Toledo, Ohio 43606, United States
  • Site US10034
    Johnson City, Tennessee 37604, United States
  • Site US10022
    Memphis, Tennessee 38105-2794, United States
  • Site US10038
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Site US10037
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84113, United States
  • Site BE32001
    Brussels, Flemish Brabant 1200, Belgium
  • Site BE32003
    Gent, 9000, Belgium
  • Site BE32002
    Liege, 4020, Belgium
  • Site CA15003
    Oshawa, Ontario L1G 2B9, Canada
  • Site FR33002
    La Tronche, 38700, France
  • Site FR33001
    Nice, 06200, France
  • Site FR33007
    Nice, 06200, France
  • Site FR33005
    Paris, 75012, France
  • Site FR33008
    Strasbourg cedex, 67098, France
  • Site DE49010
    Essen, 45122, Germany
  • Site DE49002
    Frankfurt am M., 60596, Germany
  • Site DE49006
    Freiburg, 79106, Germany
  • Site DE49004
    Mainz, 55131, Germany
  • Site DE49001
    Muenster, 48149, Germany
  • Site DE49003
    Saint Augustin, 53757, Germany
  • Site HU36006
    Budapest, 1097, Hungary
  • Site HU36004
    Szeged, 6720, Hungary
  • Site IT39004
    Milano, 20122, Italy
  • Site IT39001
    Roma, 165, Italy
  • Site PL48002
    Warszawa, Mazowieckie 04-730, Poland
  • Site PL48012
    Bialystok, 15 -274, Poland
  • Site PL48007
    Bydgoszcz, 85-030, Poland
  • Site PL48004
    Debica, 39-200, Poland
  • Site PL48014
    Rzeszow, 35-210, Poland
  • Site PL48006
    Tarnow, 33-100, Poland
  • Site RO40005
    Bucharest, Romania
  • Site ES34002
    Barcelona, 8950, Spain
  • Site ES34007
    Madrid, 28009, Spain
  • Site ES34004
    Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Site ES34003
    Valencia, 46026, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wolf J, Kalocsai K, Fortuny C, Lazar S, Bosis S, Korczowski B, Petit A, Bradford D, Croos-Dabrera R, Incera E, Melis J, van Maanen R. Safety and Efficacy of Fidaxomicin and Vancomycin in Children and Adolescents with Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind Clinical Trial (SUNSHINE). Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):2581-2588. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1149. PubMed 31773143 ↗
  • Borali E, De Giacomo C. Clostridium Difficile Infection in Children: A Review. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016 Dec;63(6):e130-e140. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001264. PubMed 27182626 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.

Access criteria: Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02218372
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2014
Start date
Jan 9, 2015
Primary completion
Mar 7, 2018
Completion
Mar 7, 2018
Results posted
Dec 7, 2018
Last update
Nov 26, 2024

Study contacts

Clinical Research Physician
study director · Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fidaxomicin

Start the discussion