ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01018511NeptuneUpdated Dec 3, 2024Results posted

Study of Solifenacin Succinate and Tamsulosin Hydrochloride OCAS in Males With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

A Phase 3 interventional study of Placebo tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg and Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, sponsored by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.. Completed at 118 sites in 13 countries. Open to male participants aged 45 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-03.

Sponsored by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. (part of Astellas Pharma Inc) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,334
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Clinical study to examine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of combination therapy of tamsulosin hydrochloride and solifenacin succinate compared to monotherapy of tamsulosin hydrochloride in the treatment of males with LUTS associated with BPH with a substantial storage component.

02

Conditions studied

  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Keywords

  • EC905
  • Solifenacin succinate
  • Tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS
  • Treatment
  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Vesomni
  • Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
03

In context

Prostatic Hyperplasia

827 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia; 179 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,334 is above the median of 92 across 626 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Browse Prostatic Hyperplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Voiding and storage symptoms diagnosed as LUTS associated with BPH for ≥ 3 months
  • A total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of ≥13
  • A maximum urinary flow rate of ≥4.0 mL/s and ≤12.0 mL/s, with voided volume of ≥120 mL during free flow
  • A micturition frequency of ≥8 and at least 2 episodes of urgency with Patient Perception of the Intensity of Urgency Scale grade 3 or 4 per day on average on the 3 day micturition diary (at randomization)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any significant Post Void Residual volume (>150 mL)
  • A prostate with estimated weight ≥75 ml as assessed by transvesical or transrectal ultrasound
  • Evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,334 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants received 3 tablets once a day for 12 weeks. Placebo tamsulosin hydrochloride oral controlled absorption system (OCAS) 0.4 mg tablet; Placebo fixed dose combination (FDC) tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg tablet; Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg tablet

    Drug: Placebo tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg · Drug: Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg · Drug: Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg

  • Active comparator
    TOCAS 0.4 mg

    Participants received 3 tablets once a day for 12 weeks. Tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS (TOCAS) 0.4 mg tablet; Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg tablet; Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg tablet

    Drug: Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg · Drug: Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg · Drug: tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg

  • Experimental
    FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg

    Participants received 3 tablets once a day for 12 weeks. Placebo TOCAS 0.4 mg tablet; FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg tablet; Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg tablet

    Drug: Placebo tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg · Drug: Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg · Drug: tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate fixed dose combination (0.4 mg/6 mg)

  • Experimental
    FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg

    Participants received 3 tablets once a day for 12 weeks. Placebo TOCAS 0.4 mg tablet; Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg tablet; FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg tablet

    Drug: Placebo tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg · Drug: Placebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg · Drug: tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate fixed dose combination (0.4 mg/9 mg)

Interventions

  • DrugPlacebo tamsulosin hydrochloride OCAS 0.4 mg

    tablet

  • DrugPlacebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/6 mg

    tablet

  • DrugPlacebo FDC tamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate 0.4 mg/9 mg

    tablet

  • tablet

    Also known as: Harnal ®, Omnic®, Flomax®, YM617

  • Drugtamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate fixed dose combination (0.4 mg/6 mg)

    Drug pages: Tamsulosin · Solifenacin

    tablet

    Also known as: Vesomni, EC905

  • Drugtamsulosin hydrochloride/solifenacin succinate fixed dose combination (0.4 mg/9 mg)

    Drug pages: Tamsulosin · Solifenacin

    tablet

    Also known as: EC905

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Total International Prostate Symptom Score

    The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated global questionnaire to assess the degree of urinary symptoms, based on answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms: •Incomplete emptying of the bladder •Intermittency •Weak stream •Hesitancy •Frequency •Urgency •Nocturia Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the symptom. Total score can range from 0 to 35 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Total Urgency Frequency Score (TUFS, Previously Known as Total Urgency Score [TUS])

    The Patient Perception of the Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) is a validated scale completed as part of the micturition diary. For each micturition and/or incontinence episode, the participant rated the degree of associated urgency according to the following 5-point categorical scale: - 0. No urgency; - 1. Mild urgency; - 2. Moderate urgency; - 3. Severe urgency; - 4. Urgency incontinence TUFS was calculated as the sum of the PPIUS gradings from the 3-day diary divided by the number of days on which urgency grading was recorded. Higher scores indicate more severe urgency.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    A micturition is any voluntary urination, excluding episodes of incontinence only.The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition

    A micturition is any voluntary urination, excluding episodes of incontinence only. The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  3. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Volume Voided Per Micturition

    A micturition is any voluntary urination, excluding episodes of incontinence only. The maximum volume voided per micturition was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  4. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (PPIUS Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours

    An urgency episode is defined as an episode of strong desire to void accompanied by fear of leakage or pain. The mean number of urgency episodes with PPIUS grade 3 (Severe urgency) or 4 (Urgency incontinence) per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  5. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    An urgency incontinence episode is defined as an episode with any involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes with PPIUS grade 3 (Severe incontinence) or 4 (Urgency incontinence) per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  6. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    An incontinence episode is defined as an episode with any involuntary loss of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  7. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours

    A nocturia episode is defined as waking up at night to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the patient gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The mean number of nocturia episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  8. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours

    The mean number of pads per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  9. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS Voiding Score

    The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire to assess the degree of urinary symptoms based on answers to 7 questions. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The voiding score is the sum of the responses to 4 voiding questions (incomplete emptying of the bladder, intermittency, weak stream, hesitancy) and ranges from 0 to 20 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  10. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS Storage Score

    The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire to assess the degree of urinary symptoms based on answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The storage symptom score is the sum of the responses to 3 storage questions (frequency, urgency and nocturia) and ranges from 0 to 15 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  11. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS QoL Score

    The QoL assessment was a single question asking the participant how he would feel about tolerating his current level of symptoms for the rest of his life. The answers ranged from 0 to 6 (delighted to terrible).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  12. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Individual IPSS Scores

    The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire to assess the degree of urinary symptoms, based on answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms: •Incomplete emptying of the bladder •Intermittency •Weak stream •Hesitancy •Frequency •Urgency •Nocturia Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the symptom.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  13. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Symptom Bother Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Symptom Bother portion consists of an 8-item scale scored from 1 to 6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  14. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Health Related QoL (HRQoL) Subscale: Coping Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of an 25-item HRQoL subscale containing the following domains scored from 1 to 6: - coping - concern - sleep - social interaction Coping score can range from 8 to 48 (none of the time to all of the time) and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  15. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Concern Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of an 25-item HRQoL subscale containing the following domains scored from 1 to 6: •coping •concern •sleep •social interaction Concern score can range from 8 to 48 (none of the time to all of the time) and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  16. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Sleep Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of an 25-item HRQoL subscale containing the following domains scored from 1 to 6: •coping •concern •sleep •social interaction Sleep score can range from 8 to 48 (none of the time to all of the time) and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  17. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Social Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of an 25-item HRQoL subscale containing the following domains scored from 1 to 6: •coping •concern •sleep •social interaction Social score can range from 8 to 48 (none of the time to all of the time) and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  18. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Total Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of an 25-item HRQoL subscale containing the following domains scored from 1 to 6: •coping •concern •sleep •social interaction Total score is calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  19. Percentage of Participants Who Were OAB-q Responders at End of Treatment

    A OAB-q responder was defined as a participant with an improvement from baseline in HRQoL subscale total score ≥ 10.

    Time frame: Week 12 (end of treatment)

  20. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Mobility Score

    The European quality of life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) is an international standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. The EQ5D has 5 domains: - mobility - self-care - usual activity - pain/discomfort - anxiety/depression Each domain has 3 response levels (1= no problem, 2= some problems, 3 = confined to bed).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  21. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Self-care Score

    The European quality of life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) is an international standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. The EQ5D has 5 domains: - mobility - self-care - usual activity - pain/discomfort - anxiety/depression Each domain has 3 response levels (1= no problem, 2= some problems, 3 = unable to wash/dress).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  22. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Usual Activities Score

    The European quality of life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) is an international standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. The EQ5D has 5 domains: - mobility - self-care - usual activity - pain/discomfort - anxiety/depression Each domain has 3 response levels (1= no problem, 2= some problems, 3 = unable to perform usual activities).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  23. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Pain/Discomfort Score

    The European quality of life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) is an international standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. The EQ5D has 5 domains: - mobility - self-care - usual activity - pain/discomfort - anxiety/depression Each domain has 3 response levels (1= no pain, 2= moderate pain, 3 = extreme pain).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  24. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Anxiety/Depression Score

    The European quality of life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) is an international standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. The EQ5D has 5 domains: - mobility - self-care - usual activity - pain/discomfort - anxiety/depression Each domain has 3 response levels (1= not anxious, 2= moderately anxious, 3 = extremely anxious).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  25. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is part of the EQ-5D questionnaire. The VAS is self-rated by the participant ranging from 0 to 100 (worst imaginable health state to best imaginable health state).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  26. Patient Global Impression Scale at End of Treatment: Overall Bladder Symptoms

    The Patient Global Impression (PGI) is a global questionnaire completed by the participant to assess both the change in the participants overall condition and the change in bladder symptoms since the start of the study. The questionnaire consists of 2 questions with 7 response levels ranging from 1 to 7 (very much improved to very much worse).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  27. Patient Global Impression Scale at End of Treatment: General Health

    The Patient Global Impression (PGI) is a global questionnaire completed by the participant to assess both the change in the participants overall condition and the change in bladder symptoms since the start of the study. The questionnaire consists of 2 questions with 7 response levels ranging from 1 to 7 (very much improved to very much worse).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  28. Clinician Global Impression Scale at End of Treatment: Overall Bladder Symptoms

    The Clinician Global Impression (CGI) is a questionnaire completed by the physician to assess change in the participants bladder symptoms since the start of the study. The questionnaire consists of 1 question with 7 response levels ranging from 1 to 7 (very much improved to very much worse).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  29. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Safety is monitored by collecting AEs, which include abnormal laboratory parameters, vital signs or ECG data if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, needed active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study medication or was clinically significant. A serious AE (SAE) was an event resulting in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly or birth defect, was life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization or was considered medically important. AEs were assessed by the Investigator for intensity as mild (no disruption of normal daily activities), moderate (affected normal daily activities) or severe (inability to perform daily activities) and for causal relationship to study drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that occurred after administration of the first dose of double-blind study drug until 14 days after the last dose of double-blind study drug.

    Time frame: From first dose of double-blind study drug up to 14 days of last dose of double-blind study drug (up to 14 weeks)

  30. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume

    PVR volume is the volume of urine retained after voiding. PVR volume was assessed by ultrasonography or bladder scan.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  31. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax)

    Qmax during a micturition (urination) was recorded using uroflowmetry.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  32. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Average Flow Rate (Qmean)

    Qmean during a micturition (urination) was recorded using uroflowmetry.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  33. Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Tamsulosin

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

  34. Maximum Concentration at Steady State (Cmaxss) of Tamsulosin

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

  35. Minimum Concentration at Steady State (Cminss) of Tamsulosin

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

  36. Time of Maximum Concentration at Steady State (Tmaxss) of Tamsulosin

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

  37. Area Under the Curve at Steady State (AUCss) of Tamsulosin

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 (collection time points: trough, 1-3 hours post dose, 4-5 hours post-dose and 7-10 hours post-dose)

  38. CL/F of Solifenacin

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

  39. Cmaxss of Solifenacin

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

  40. Cminss of Solifenacin

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

  41. Tmaxss of Solifenacin

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12

  42. AUCss of Solifenacin

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 (collection time points: trough, 1-3 hours post dose, 4-5 hours post-dose and 7-10 hours post-dose)

07

Results

Posted Dec 17, 2015
Limitations and caveats
Company makes no warranties or representations of any kind as to the posting, expressed or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not be liable for any damages.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Started341327339327
Randomized and treated341326338324
Completed315295299294
Not completed26324033
Withdrew: Not fulfilling eligibility criteria6773
Withdrew: Adverse event591310
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy4112
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject65119
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0010
Withdrew: Protocol violation5879
Withdrew: Miscellaneous0200

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Total International Prostate Symptom Score

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated global questionnaire to assess the degree of urinary symptoms, based on answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms: •Incomplete emptying of the bladder •Intermittency •Weak stream •Hesitancy •Frequency •Urgency •Nocturia Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the symptom. Total score can range from 0 to 35 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Total International Prostate Symptom Score
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Total International Prostate Symptom Score-5.4 ± 0.41-6.2 ± 0.42-7.0 ± 0.41-6.5 ± 0.42
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.001 (The primary analysis was adjusted for multiplicity for IPSS using the Hochberg procedure involving 2 stages: Stage 1, superiority to placebo and Stage 2: non-inferiority to tamsulosin alone, with a switch to superiority where applicable.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.8 · 97.5% CI -1.73 to 0.11A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.028 (The primary analysis was adjusted for multiplicity for IPSS using the Hochberg procedure involving 2 stages: Stage 1, superiority to placebo and Stage 2: non-inferiority to tamsulosin alone, with a switch to superiority where applicable.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.3 · 97.5% CI -1.22 to 0.64A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.048 (The primary analysis was adjusted for multiplicity for IPSS using the Hochberg procedure involving 2 stages: Stage 1, superiority to placebo and Stage 2: non-inferiority to tamsulosin alone, with a switch to superiority where applicable.)A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.483 (The primary analysis was adjusted for multiplicity for IPSS using the Hochberg procedure involving 2 stages: Stage 1, superiority to placebo and Stage 2: non-inferiority to tamsulosin alone, with a switch to superiority where applicable.)A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 (The primary analysis was adjusted for multiplicity for IPSS using the Hochberg procedure involving 2 stages: Stage 1, superiority to placebo and Stage 2: non-inferiority to tamsulosin alone, with a switch to superiority where applicable.) · Least squares mean difference: -1.6 · 95% CI -2.4 to -0.9A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.006 (The primary analysis was adjusted for multiplicity for IPSS using the Hochberg procedure involving 2 stages: Stage 1, superiority to placebo and Stage 2: non-inferiority to tamsulosin alone, with a switch to superiority where applicable.) · Least squares mean difference: -1.1 · 95% CI -1.9 to -0.3A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.039 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.8 · 95% CI -1.6 to -0.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Total Urgency Frequency Score (TUFS, Previously Known as Total Urgency Score [TUS])

The Patient Perception of the Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) is a validated scale completed as part of the micturition diary. For each micturition and/or incontinence episode, the participant rated the degree of associated urgency according to the following 5-point categorical scale: - 0. No urgency; - 1. Mild urgency; - 2. Moderate urgency; - 3. Severe urgency; - 4. Urgency incontinence TUFS was calculated as the sum of the PPIUS gradings from the 3-day diary divided by the number of days on which urgency grading was recorded. Higher scores indicate more severe urgency.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Total Urgency Frequency Score (TUFS, Previously Known as Total Urgency Score [TUS])
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Total Urgency Frequency Score (TUFS, Previously Known as Total Urgency Score [TUS])-4.4 ± 0.68-6.7 ± 0.69-8.1 ± 0.67-7.6 ± 0.69
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.025 (The primary analysis was adjusted for multiplicity for TUS using the Hochberg procedure.) · Least squares mean difference: -1.4 · 97.5% CI -2.9 to 0.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.162 (The primary analysis was adjusted for multiplicity for TUS using the Hochberg procedure.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.9 · 97.5% CI -2.3 to 0.5A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -3.7 · 95% CI -4.9 to -2.5A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -3.2 · 95% CI -4.4 to -1.9A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -2.3 · 95% CI -3.5 to -1.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

A micturition is any voluntary urination, excluding episodes of incontinence only.The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · micturitions
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
micturitionsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-1.1 ± 0.16-1.7 ± 0.16-2.3 ± 0.16-1.9 ± 0.16
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -1.0 to -0.3A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.223 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.6 to 0.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -1.2 · 95% CI -1.5 to -0.8A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.7 · 95% CI -1.1 to -0.4A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.002 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -0.9 to -0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition

A micturition is any voluntary urination, excluding episodes of incontinence only. The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mL
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition
mLPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition11.1 ± 2.9415.5 ± 3.0238.6 ± 2.9438.7 ± 3.01
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 23.1 · 95% CI 16.6 to 29.6A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 23.2 · 95% CI 16.6 to 29.8A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 27.4 · 95% CI 21.0 to 33.9A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 27.6 · 95% CI 21.1 to 34.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.189 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 4.4 · 95% CI -2.2 to 10.9A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Volume Voided Per Micturition

A micturition is any voluntary urination, excluding episodes of incontinence only. The maximum volume voided per micturition was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mL
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Volume Voided Per Micturition
mLPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Volume Voided Per Micturition-5.9 ± 6.43-1.8 ± 6.6212.7 ± 6.4512.9 ± 6.63
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.053 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 14.5 · 95% CI -0.2 to 29.3A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.053 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 14.7 · 95% CI -0.2 to 29.6A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.012 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 18.5 · 95% CI 4.1 to 33.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.012 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 18.7 · 95% CI 4.1 to 33.4A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.591 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 4.0 · 95% CI -10.7 to 18.7A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (PPIUS Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours

An urgency episode is defined as an episode of strong desire to void accompanied by fear of leakage or pain. The mean number of urgency episodes with PPIUS grade 3 (Severe urgency) or 4 (Urgency incontinence) per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · urgency episodes
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (PPIUS Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
urgency episodesPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg 9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (PPIUS Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours-1.6 ± 0.24-2.5 ± 0.25-2.6 ± 0.24-2.8 ± 0.25
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.616 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.6 to 0.4A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg 9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.319 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.7 to 0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -1.0 · 95% CI -1.5 to -0.6A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg 9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -1.2 · 95% CI -1.7 to -0.7A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made) · Least squares mean difference: -0.9 · 95% CI -1.4 to -0.4A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

An urgency incontinence episode is defined as an episode with any involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes with PPIUS grade 3 (Severe incontinence) or 4 (Urgency incontinence) per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · urgency incontinence episodes
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
urgency incontinence episodesPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.0 ± 0.15-1.4 ± 0.18-1.3 ± 0.16-1.1 ± 0.16
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.591 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.5A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.102 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.3 · 95% CI -0.1 to 0.8A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.204 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.6 to 0.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.936 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.4A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.081 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

An incontinence episode is defined as an episode with any involuntary loss of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · incontinence episodes
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
incontinence episodesPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours0.1 ± 0.19-0.2 ± 0.220.0 ± 0.200.1 ± 0.19
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.511 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.2 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.6A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.182 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.3 · 95% CI -0.2 to 0.8A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.552 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.6 to 0.3A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.891 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.5A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.215 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours

A nocturia episode is defined as waking up at night to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the patient gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The mean number of nocturia episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · nocturia episodes
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
nocturia episodesPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours-0.3 ± 0.07-0.4 ± 0.08-0.5 ± 0.07-0.4 ± 0.07
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.383 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.2 to 0.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.402 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.1 to 0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.021 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.3 to -0.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.584 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.2 to 0.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.166 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours

The mean number of pads per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · pads
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
padsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours-0.7 ± 0.23-0.8 ± 0.27-1.2 ± 0.24-1.2 ± 0.24
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.187 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -1.0 to 0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.203 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -1.0 to 0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.090 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -1.1 to 0.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.098 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -1.1 to 0.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.772 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.7 to 0.5A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS Voiding Score

The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire to assess the degree of urinary symptoms based on answers to 7 questions. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The voiding score is the sum of the responses to 4 voiding questions (incomplete emptying of the bladder, intermittency, weak stream, hesitancy) and ranges from 0 to 20 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS Voiding Score
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS Voiding Score-3.0 ± 0.27-3.3 ± 0.28-3.7 ± 0.27-3.2 ± 0.28
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.210 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.9 to 0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.775 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.6A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.010 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.7 · 95% CI -1.2 to -0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.317 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.3A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.196 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -0.9 to 0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS Storage Score

The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire to assess the degree of urinary symptoms based on answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The storage symptom score is the sum of the responses to 3 storage questions (frequency, urgency and nocturia) and ranges from 0 to 15 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS Storage Score
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS Storage Score-2.4 ± 0.20-2.9 ± 0.20-3.5 ± 0.20-3.3 ± 0.21
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.009 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -0.9 to -0.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.045 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -0.8 to -0.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -1.1 · 95% CI -1.4 to -0.7A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.011 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -0.9 to -0.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares men difference: -0.9 · 95% CI -1.3 to -0.5A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS QoL Score

The QoL assessment was a single question asking the participant how he would feel about tolerating his current level of symptoms for the rest of his life. The answers ranged from 0 to 6 (delighted to terrible).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS QoL Score
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in IPSS QoL Score-0.9 ± 0.11-1.0 ± 0.11-1.3 ± 0.11-1.3 ± 0.11
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.008 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.5 to -0.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.021 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.4 to -0.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -0.6 to -0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -0.6 to -0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.139 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Individual IPSS Scores

The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire to assess the degree of urinary symptoms, based on answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms: •Incomplete emptying of the bladder •Intermittency •Weak stream •Hesitancy •Frequency •Urgency •Nocturia Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the symptom.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Individual IPSS Scores
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Incomplete emptying of the bladder-0.9 ± 1.54-0.9 ± 1.52-1.0 ± 1.63-1.0 ± 1.48
Frequency-1.0 ± 1.36-1.2 ± 1.42-1.3 ± 1.49-1.4 ± 1.41
Intermittency-0.9 ± 1.41-0.8 ± 1.35-1.0 ± 1.47-0.7 ± 1.34
Urgency-1.2 ± 1.55-1.3 ± 1.61-1.4 ± 1.51-1.6 ± 1.50
Weak stream-1.1 ± 1.54-1.3 ± 1.57-1.3 ± 1.51-1.3 ± 1.56
Hesitancy-0.5 ± 1.37-0.7 ± 1.26-0.8 ± 1.34-0.7 ± 1.29
Nocturia-0.5 ± 1.23-0.7 ± 1.08-0.8 ± 1.08-0.6 ± 1.15
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Symptom Bother Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Symptom Bother portion consists of an 8-item scale scored from 1 to 6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Symptom Bother Score
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Symptom Bother Score-11.8 ± 1.26-14.4 ± 1.28-16.5 ± 1.26-17.1 ± 1.28
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.068 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -2.1 · 95% CI -4.3 to 0.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.020 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -2.7 · 95% CI -4.9 to -0.4A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -4.7 · 95% CI -6.9 to -2.5A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -5.3 · 95% CI -7.5 to -3.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.022 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: -2.6 · 95% CI -4.8 to 0.4A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Health Related QoL (HRQoL) Subscale: Coping Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of an 25-item HRQoL subscale containing the following domains scored from 1 to 6: - coping - concern - sleep - social interaction Coping score can range from 8 to 48 (none of the time to all of the time) and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Health Related QoL (HRQoL) Subscale: Coping Score
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg 9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Health Related QoL (HRQoL) Subscale: Coping Score8.8 ± 1.2411.0 ± 1.2613.9 ± 1.2413.4 ± 1.26
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.011 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 3.0 · 95% CI 0.7 to 5.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg 9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.035 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 2.5 · 95% CI 0.2 to 4.8A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 5.1 · 95% CI 2.8 to 7.3A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg 9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 4.6 · 95% CI 2.3 to 6.8A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.068 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 2.1 · 95% CI -0.2 to 4.4A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Concern Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of an 25-item HRQoL subscale containing the following domains scored from 1 to 6: •coping •concern •sleep •social interaction Concern score can range from 8 to 48 (none of the time to all of the time) and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Concern Score
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Concern Score7.5 ± 1.199.3 ± 1.2112.0 ± 1.1911.5 ± 1.21
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.013 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 2.6 · 95% CI 0.5 to 4.7A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.043 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 2.2 · 95% CI 0.1 to 4.3A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 4.4 · 95% CI 2.4 to 6.5A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 4.0 · 95% CI 1.9 to 6.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.092 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 1.8 · 95% CI -0.3 to 3.9A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Sleep Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of an 25-item HRQoL subscale containing the following domains scored from 1 to 6: •coping •concern •sleep •social interaction Sleep score can range from 8 to 48 (none of the time to all of the time) and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Sleep Score
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Sleep Score8.3 ± 1.318.8 ± 1.3311.9 ± 1.3110.0 ± 1.33
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.011 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 3.1 · 95% CI 0.7 to 5.5A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.314 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 1.2 · 95% CI -1.2 to 3.6A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.003 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 3.6 · 95% CI 1.2 to 5.9A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.161 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 1.7 · 95% CI -0.7 to 4.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.708 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.5 · 95% CI -1.9 to 2.8A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Social Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of an 25-item HRQoL subscale containing the following domains scored from 1 to 6: •coping •concern •sleep •social interaction Social score can range from 8 to 48 (none of the time to all of the time) and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Social Score
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Social Score3.8 ± 0.964.5 ± 0.976.2 ± 0.955.8 ± 0.97
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.043 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 1.7 · 95% CI 0.1 to 3.3A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.120 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 1.3 · 95% CI -0.3 to 3.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.003 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 2.4 · 95% CI 0.8 to 4.0A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.014 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 2.0 · 95% CI 0.4 to 3.7A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.384 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 0.7 · 95% CI -0.9 to 2.4A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Total Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of an 25-item HRQoL subscale containing the following domains scored from 1 to 6: •coping •concern •sleep •social interaction Total score is calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Total Score
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in HRQoL Subscale: Total Score7.4 ± 1.068.8 ± 1.0811.4 ± 1.0610.7 ± 1.08
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.004 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 2.6 · 95% CI 0.8 to 4.4A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.035 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 2.0 · 95% CI 0.1 to 3.8A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 4.0 · 95% CI 2.2 to 5.8A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.001 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 3.3 · 95% CI 1.5 to 5.1A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.142 (No adjustments to multiplicity were made.) · Least squares mean difference: 1.4 · 95% CI -0.5 to 3.2A mixed model, including treatment group and country as fixed factors, center as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Were OAB-q Responders at End of Treatment

A OAB-q responder was defined as a participant with an improvement from baseline in HRQoL subscale total score ≥ 10.

Time frame:
Week 12 (end of treatment)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Were OAB-q Responders at End of Treatment
percentage of participantsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Percentage of Participants Who Were OAB-q Responders at End of Treatment40.842.945.547.5
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.874 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.240 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.324 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.043 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.407 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Mobility Score

The European quality of life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) is an international standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. The EQ5D has 5 domains: - mobility - self-care - usual activity - pain/discomfort - anxiety/depression Each domain has 3 response levels (1= no problem, 2= some problems, 3 = confined to bed).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Mobility Score
participantsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
No problem -> No problem240230255233
No problem -> Some problem16131013
No problem -> Confined to bed0100
No problem -> No data3113
Some problem -> No problem19211219
Some problem -> Some problem40313531
Some problem -> Confined to bed0000
Some problem -> No data0001
Confined to bed -> No problem0000
Confined to bed -> Some problem0000
Confined to bed -> Confined to bed0000
Confined to bed -> No data0000
No data -> No problem0101
No data -> Some problem0000
No data -> Confined to bed0000
No data -> No data0000
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Self-care Score

The European quality of life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) is an international standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. The EQ5D has 5 domains: - mobility - self-care - usual activity - pain/discomfort - anxiety/depression Each domain has 3 response levels (1= no problem, 2= some problems, 3 = unable to wash/dress).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Self-care Score
participantsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
No problem -> No problem295273293286
No problem -> Some problem8834
No problem -> Unable to wash/ dress0000
No problem -> No Data3114
Some problem -> No problem8683
Some problem -> Some problem3863
Some problem -> Unable to wash/ dress0000
Some problem -> No data0000
Unable to wash/ dress -> No problem0010
Unable to wash/ dress -> Some problem0000
Unable to wash/ dress -> Unable to wash/ dress0100
Unable to wash/ dress -> No data0000
No data -> No problem1111
No data -> Some problem0000
No data -> Unable to wash/ dress0000
No data -> No data0000
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Usual Activities Score

The European quality of life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) is an international standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. The EQ5D has 5 domains: - mobility - self-care - usual activity - pain/discomfort - anxiety/depression Each domain has 3 response levels (1= no problem, 2= some problems, 3 = unable to perform usual activities).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Usual Activities Score
participantsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
No problem -> No problem254228248235
No problem -> Some problem18131418
No problem -> Unable to perform usual activities0100
No problem -> No data3113
Some problem -> No problem21222627
Some problem -> Some problem22282217
Some problem -> Unable to perform usual activities0000
Some problem -> No data0001
Unable to perform usual activities -> No problem0120
Unable to perform usual activities -> Some problem0100
Unable to perform usual activities -> same status0100
Unable to perform usual activities -> No data0000
No data -> No problem0200
No data -> Some problem0000
No data -> Unable to perform usual activities0000
No data -> No data0000
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Pain/Discomfort Score

The European quality of life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) is an international standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. The EQ5D has 5 domains: - mobility - self-care - usual activity - pain/discomfort - anxiety/depression Each domain has 3 response levels (1= no pain, 2= moderate pain, 3 = extreme pain).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Pain/Discomfort Score
participantsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
No pain -> No pain162159153152
No pain -> Moderate pain14141924
No pain -> Extreme pain2110
No pain -> No data3012
Moderate pain-> No pain55416141
Moderate pain-> Moderate pain73727270
Moderate pain-> Extreme pain2211
Moderate pain-> No data0202
Extreme pain -> No pain0113
Extreme pain -> Moderate pain4224
Extreme pain -> Extreme pain1222
Extreme pain -> No data0000
No data -> No pain0200
No data -> Moderate pain2000
No data -> Extreme pain0000
No data -> No data0000
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Anxiety/Depression Score

The European quality of life-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) is an international standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status. The EQ5D has 5 domains: - mobility - self-care - usual activity - pain/discomfort - anxiety/depression Each domain has 3 response levels (1= not anxious, 2= moderately anxious, 3 = extremely anxious).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Anxiety/Depression Score
participantsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Not anxious -> Not anxious219213233214
Not anxious -> Moderately anxious16111618
Not anxious -> Extremely anxious0000
Not anxious -> No data3013
Moderately anxious -> Not anxious34252725
Moderately anxious -> Moderately anxious42433934
Moderately anxious -> Extremely anxious1211
Moderately anxious -> No data0101
Extremely anxious -> Not anxious2010
Extremely anxious -> Moderately anxious0013
Extremely anxious -> Extremely anxious1232
Extremely anxious -> No data0000
No data -> Not anxious0110
No data -> Moderately anxious0000
No data -> Extremely anxious0000
No data -> No data0000
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is part of the EQ-5D questionnaire. The VAS is self-rated by the participant ranging from 0 to 100 (worst imaginable health state to best imaginable health state).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
units on a scalePlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score4.0 ± 14.483.7 ± 12.695.5 ± 13.586.2 ± 15.52
SecondaryPatient Global Impression Scale at End of Treatment: Overall Bladder Symptoms

The Patient Global Impression (PGI) is a global questionnaire completed by the participant to assess both the change in the participants overall condition and the change in bladder symptoms since the start of the study. The questionnaire consists of 2 questions with 7 response levels ranging from 1 to 7 (very much improved to very much worse).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Global Impression Scale at End of Treatment: Overall Bladder Symptoms
participantsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Very Much Improved7142023
Much Improved758595105
Minimally Improved11399124105
No Change86684638
Minimally Worse121329
Much Worse5301
Very Much Worse0000
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Chi-squared · p = <.001 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Chi-squared · p = <.001 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Chi-squared · p = <.001 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Chi-squared · p = <.001 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.058 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
SecondaryPatient Global Impression Scale at End of Treatment: General Health

The Patient Global Impression (PGI) is a global questionnaire completed by the participant to assess both the change in the participants overall condition and the change in bladder symptoms since the start of the study. The questionnaire consists of 2 questions with 7 response levels ranging from 1 to 7 (very much improved to very much worse).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Global Impression Scale at End of Treatment: General Health
participantsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Very Much Improved59107
Much Improved43587275
Minimally Improved79778794
No Change15212611094
Minimally Worse159810
Much Worse2301
• Very Much Worse0000
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.053 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.031 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Chi-squared · p = <.001 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Chi-squared · p = <.001 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.018 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
SecondaryClinician Global Impression Scale at End of Treatment: Overall Bladder Symptoms

The Clinician Global Impression (CGI) is a questionnaire completed by the physician to assess change in the participants bladder symptoms since the start of the study. The questionnaire consists of 1 question with 7 response levels ranging from 1 to 7 (very much improved to very much worse).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Clinician Global Impression Scale at End of Treatment: Overall Bladder Symptoms
participantsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Very Much Improved9152220
Much Improved95106117124
Minimally Improved111989792
No Change72544837
Minimally Worse9523
Much Worse1114
Very Much Worse0000
Statistical analysis
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.110 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • TOCAS 0.4 mg vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.071 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg · Chi-squared · p = <.001 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg · Chi-squared · p = <.001 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
  • Placebo vs TOCAS 0.4 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.019 (No adjustments for multiplicity were made.)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Safety is monitored by collecting AEs, which include abnormal laboratory parameters, vital signs or ECG data if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, needed active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study medication or was clinically significant. A serious AE (SAE) was an event resulting in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly or birth defect, was life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization or was considered medically important. AEs were assessed by the Investigator for intensity as mild (no disruption of normal daily activities), moderate (affected normal daily activities) or severe (inability to perform daily activities) and for causal relationship to study drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that occurred after administration of the first dose of double-blind study drug until 14 days after the last dose of double-blind study drug.

Time frame:
From first dose of double-blind study drug up to 14 days of last dose of double-blind study drug (up to 14 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
participantsPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Total TEAEs877499100
Mild TEAEs59426868
Moderate TEAEs25292727
Severe TEAEs3345
Drug-related TEAEs30275765
SAEs31059
Deaths0110
AEs Leading to Discontin591310
Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontin3598
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume

PVR volume is the volume of urine retained after voiding. PVR volume was assessed by ultrasonography or bladder scan.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · mL
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume
mLPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume-6.1 ± 36.39-5.0 ± 38.223.8 ± 45.3912.3 ± 46.61
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax)

Qmax during a micturition (urination) was recorded using uroflowmetry.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · mL/s
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax)
mL/sPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax)3.3 ± 4.693.2 ± 4.623.8 ± 5.303.5 ± 5.35
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Average Flow Rate (Qmean)

Qmean during a micturition (urination) was recorded using uroflowmetry.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · mL/s
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Average Flow Rate (Qmean)
mL/sPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Average Flow Rate (Qmean)1.5 ± 2.611.3 ± 2.161.9 ± 2.751.7 ± 2.98
SecondaryApparent Clearance (CL/F) of Tamsulosin
Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · L/h
Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Tamsulosin
L/hTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Week 4 [N=263; 281; 274]2.78 ± 84.82.61 ± 85.82.53 ± 79.3
Week 8 [N=255; 259; 248]2.62 ± 79.02.41 ± 79.52.36 ± 93.3
Week 12 [N=163; 167; 166]2.52 ± 85.32.40 ± 74.12.46 ± 85.9
SecondaryMaximum Concentration at Steady State (Cmaxss) of Tamsulosin
Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Maximum Concentration at Steady State (Cmaxss) of Tamsulosin
ng/mLTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Week 4 [N= 263; 281; 274]7.38 ± 82.87.80 ± 94.38.00 ± 83.3
Week 8 [N= 255; 259; 248]7.69 ± 71.28.32 ± 73.48.46 ± 84.9
Week 12 [N= 163; 167; 166]7.97 ± 68.68.38 ± 69.08.16 ± 82.7
SecondaryMinimum Concentration at Steady State (Cminss) of Tamsulosin
Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Minimum Concentration at Steady State (Cminss) of Tamsulosin
ng/mLTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Week 4 [N= 263; 281; 274]4.19 ± 127.04.55 ± 146.04.75 ± 124.0
Week 8 [N= 255; 259; 248]4.63 ± 103.05.08 ± 106.05.19 ± 122.0
Week 12 [N= 163; 167; 166]4.84 ± 97.75.05 ± 96.24.94 ± 119.0
SecondaryTime of Maximum Concentration at Steady State (Tmaxss) of Tamsulosin
Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · h
Time of Maximum Concentration at Steady State (Tmaxss) of Tamsulosin
hTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Week 4 [N= 263; 281; 274]5.04 ± 4.15.06 ± 4.05.08 ± 3.6
Week 8 [N= 255; 259; 248]5.09 ± 3.45.10 ± 3.35.11 ± 3.4
Week 12 [N= 163; 167; 166]5.10 ± 3.65.09 ± 3.65.09 ± 3.3
SecondaryArea Under the Curve at Steady State (AUCss) of Tamsulosin
Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 (collection time points: trough, 1-3 hours post dose, 4-5 hours post-dose and 7-10 hours post-dose)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng.h/mL
Area Under the Curve at Steady State (AUCss) of Tamsulosin
ng.h/mLTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Week 4 [N= 263; 281; 274]144 ± 96.7153 ± 111.0158 ± 96.5
Week 8 [N= 255; 259; 248]153 ± 81.6166 ± 84.0169 ± 96.9
Week 12 [N= 163; 167; 166]159 ± 78.1167 ± 77.4162 ± 94.8
SecondaryCL/F of Solifenacin
Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · L/h
CL/F of Solifenacin
L/hFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Week 4 [N= 281;273]6.88 ± 53.67.00 ± 70.7
Week 8 [N= 258; 248]6.72 ± 51.76.67 ± 61.3
Week 12 [N= 166; 167]6.94 ± 59.36.87 ± 74.1
SecondaryCmaxss of Solifenacin
Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Cmaxss of Solifenacin
ng/mLFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Week 4 [N= 281; 273]29.4 ± 44.843.4 ± 51.4
Week 8 [N= 258; 248]30.0 ± 48.045.3 ± 48.5
Week 12 [N= 166; 167]29.1 ± 49.644.1 ± 50.7
SecondaryCminss of Solifenacin
Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Cminss of Solifenacin
ng/mLFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Week 4 [N= 281; 273]24.5 ± 50.536.1 ± 57.8
Week 8 [N= 258; 248]25.2 ± 54.138.2 ± 54.3
Week 12 [N= 166; 167]24.4 ± 55.637.0 ± 56.8
SecondaryTmaxss of Solifenacin
Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · h
Tmaxss of Solifenacin
hFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Week 4 [N= 281; 273]5.47 ± 1.415.47 ± 1.2
Week 8 [N= 258; 248]5.48 ± 0.95.48 ± 0.9
Week 12 [N= 166; 167]5.48 ± 0.95.48 ± 0.9
SecondaryAUCss of Solifenacin
Time frame:
Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 (collection time points: trough, 1-3 hours post dose, 4-5 hours post-dose and 7-10 hours post-dose)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng.h/mL
AUCss of Solifenacin
ng.h/mLFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Week 4 [N= 281; 273]657 ± 46.8970 ± 53.7
Week 8 [N= 258; 248]673 ± 50.31020 ± 50.7
Week 12 [N= 166; 167]652 ± 51.8988 ± 53.0

Adverse events

Collected over From the first dose of double-blind study drug until 14 days after the last dose of double-blind study drug, up to 14 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—3/341 (0.9%)5/341 (1.5%)
TOCAS 0.4 mg—10/326 (3.1%)3/326 (0.9%)
FDC 0.4 mg/6 mg—5/337 (1.5%)36/337 (10.7%)
FDC 0.4 mg/9 mg—9/324 (2.8%)43/324 (13.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 34
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Urinary retentionRenal and urinary disorders1/3411/3261/3373/324
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/3412/3260/3370/324
Coronary artery stenosisCardiac disorders0/3410/3260/3371/324
Sick sinus syndromeCardiac disorders0/3410/3260/3371/324
Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/3410/3260/3371/324
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders0/3410/3260/3371/324
SyncopeNervous system disorders0/3410/3260/3371/324
BronchiectasisInfections and infestations0/3410/3260/3371/324
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/3410/3260/3371/324
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders1/3411/3260/3370/324
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mg
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders4/3412/32629/33734/324
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/3411/32612/33718/324

Baseline characteristics

Safety Analysis Set (SAF): participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had any data reported after the first dose; For study-specific: Full Analysis Set (FAS): participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had either a total IPSS or TUS at baseline and at least 1 postbaseline total IPSS or TUS

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mgTotal
Mean65.6 ± 8.4165.1 ± 7.9865.3 ± 8.3965.5 ± 7.7165.4 ± 8.13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mgTotal
Female00000
Male3413263373241328
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)PlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mgTotal
White3373253343211317
Black01124
Asian30104
Other10113
Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)(units on a scale)PlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mgTotal
Mean19.0 ± 4.4818.7 ± 4.6318.3 ± 4.3118.6 ± 4.3118.6 ± 4.44
IPSS voiding score
IPSS voiding score(units on a scale)PlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mgTotal
Mean10.0 ± 3.539.8 ± 3.639.7 ± 3.619.7 ± 3.639.8 ± 3.60
IPSS storage score
IPSS storage score(units on a scale)PlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mgTotal
Mean9.0 ± 2.428.9 ± 2.338.6 ± 2.398.8 ± 2.368.8 ± 2.38
IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) score
IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) score(units on a scale)PlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mgTotal
Mean4.1 ± 1.124.1 ± 1.074.0 ± 1.154.1 ± 1.084.1 ± 1.11
Total Urgency Frequency Score (TUFS) (previously known as Total Urgency Score ([TUS])
Total Urgency Frequency Score (TUFS) (previously known as Total Urgency Score ([TUS])(units on a scale)PlaceboTOCAS 0.4 mgFDC 0.4 mg/6 mgFDC 0.4 mg/9 mgTotal
Mean27.15 ± 8.8027.85 ± 9.0226.97 ± 8.6626.39 ± 8.3427.09 ± 8.71

6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

118 sites
  • Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
  • Salzburg, 5020, Austria
  • Vienna, 1090, Austria
  • Minsk, 220036, Belarus
  • Minsk, 220114, Belarus
  • Minsk, 220119, Belarus
  • Antwerp, 2020, Belgium
  • Antwerp, 2030, Belgium
  • Assebroek, 8310, Belgium
  • Brussels, 1070, Belgium
  • Brussels, 1090, Belgium
  • Brussels, 1200, Belgium
  • Edegem, 2650, Belgium
  • Gent, 9000, Belgium
  • Kortrijk, 8500, Belgium
  • Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Liege 1, 4000, Belgium
  • Sint-Truiden, 3800, Belgium
  • Turnhout, 2300, Belgium
  • Hradec Kralove, 500 02, Czechia
  • Ostrava, 700 30, Czechia
  • Plzen, 301 24, Czechia
  • Prague, 180 81, Czechia
  • Roudnice nad Labem, 413 01, Czechia
  • Uherske Hradiste, 686 08, Czechia
  • Usti nad Labem, 40001, Czechia
  • Zdar nad Sazavou, 591 01, Czechia
  • Aix en Provence, 13616, France
  • Angers, 49033, France
  • Bordeaux Cedex, 33076, France
  • Colmar Cedex, 68024, France
  • Dijon, 21000, France
  • Dijon, 21079, France
  • Lyon Cedex 3, 69437, France
  • Montlucon, 03100, France
  • Orleans Cedex 2, 45067, France
  • Paris Cedex 10, 75020, France
  • Paris Cedex 14, 75679, France
  • Paris, 75010, France
  • Pierre Benite, 69495, France
  • Rennes, 35033, France
  • Tours Cedex, 37044, France
  • Bad Ems, 56130, Germany
  • Bautzen, 02625, Germany
  • Frankfurt, 65933, Germany
  • Hagenow, 19230, Germany
  • Halle Saale, 06132, Germany
  • Hamburg, 20253, Germany
  • Henningsdorf, 16761, Germany
  • Hettstedt, 06333, Germany
  • Koblenz, 56068, Germany
  • Leipzig, 04105, Germany
  • Leipzig, 04109, Germany
  • Lutherstadt Eisleben, 06295, Germany
  • Neustadt in Sachsen, 01844, Germany
  • Uetersen, 25436, Germany
  • Budapest, 1204, Hungary
  • Kormend, 9900, Hungary
  • Nyiregyhaza, 4400, Hungary
  • Sopron, 9400, Hungary
  • Szekszard, 7100, Hungary
  • Szentes, 6601, Hungary
  • Tatabanya, 2800, Hungary
  • Avellino, 83100, Italy
  • Bari, 70124, Italy
  • Bergamo, 24125, Italy
  • Catania, 95124, Italy
  • Catanzaro, 88100, Italy
  • Florence, 50139, Italy
  • Palermo, 90146, Italy
  • Treviglio, 24047, Italy
  • Turin, 10154, Italy
  • Amsterdam, 1100 AD, Netherlands
  • Apeldoorn, 7334 DZ, Netherlands
  • Doetinchem, 7009 BL, Netherlands
  • Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, Netherlands
  • Etten-Leur, 4872 LA, Netherlands
  • Maastricht, 6229 HX, Netherlands
  • Sneek, 8600 BA, Netherlands
  • Sneek, 8601 ZK, Netherlands
  • Tilburg, 5022 GC, Netherlands
  • Winterswijk, 7101 BN, Netherlands
  • Bielsko Biala, 43-300, Poland
  • Bydgoszcz, 85-094, Poland
  • Krakow, 31-530, Poland
  • Pulawy, 24-100, Poland
  • Warsaw, 02-005, Poland
  • Wiecbork, 89-410, Poland
  • Moscow, 111020, Russian Federation
  • Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
  • Moscow, 119435, Russian Federation
  • Moscow, 125206, Russian Federation
  • St. Petersburg, 197089, Russian Federation
  • St. Petersburg, 198013, Russian Federation
  • Nitra, 949 01, Slovakia
  • Piestany, 921 01, Slovakia
  • Presov, 080 01, Slovakia
  • Skalica, 909 82, Slovakia
  • Trencin, 911 01, Slovakia
  • Zilina, Slovakia

Showing the first 100 of 118 sites across 13 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • van Kerrebroeck P, Chapple C, Drogendijk T, Klaver M, Sokol R, Speakman M, Traudtner K, Drake MJ; NEPTUNE Study Group. Combination therapy with solifenacin and tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system in a single tablet for lower urinary tract symptoms in men: efficacy and safety results from the randomised controlled NEPTUNE trial. Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):1003-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.034. Epub 2013 Aug 3. PubMed 23932438 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.

Access criteria: Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01018511
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 23, 2009
Start date
Jan 11, 2010
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2011
Completion
Mar 1, 2011
Results posted
Dec 17, 2015
Last update
Dec 3, 2024

Study contacts

Use Central Contact
study chair · Astellas Pharma Global Development

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Tamsulosin · Solifenacin

Start the discussion