ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01951885Updated Sep 11, 2023Results posted

Tac, Mini-MTX, MMF Versus Tac, MTX for GVHD Prevention

A Phase 3 interventional study of tacrolimus and methotrexate in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia, sponsored by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-11.

Sponsored by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center · Phase 3, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
101
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical trial studies standard GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus and methotrexate compared to tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and a reduced-dose methotrexate in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Both mycophenolate mofetil and reduced-dose methotrexate, in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, have been shown to be safe and effective in GVHD prevention with less toxicity than standard dose methotrexate. It is not yet known, however, whether this combination of mycophenolate mofetil and reduced-dose methotrexate with tacrolimus is more effective than tacrolimus and standard dose methotrexate in preventing GVHD.

Read the detailed description

Study Design This is a prospective randomized trial to determine the effectiveness of different doses of GVHD prophylaxis on mucositis, engraftment and aGVHD. Study consists of two study groups of 50 subjects each.

Group A will receive Tac and MTX (15 mg/m2 day +1, 10 mg/m2 day +3, +6, +11). Group B will receive Tac, Mini-dose MTX (5 mg/m2 on day +1, +3, +6) and MMF.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  • Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia
  • Myelodysplastic Syndrome
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
  • Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Hodgkins Disease
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Multiple Myeloma
03

In context

Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive

982 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; 109 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 101 is above the median of 43 across 755 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive.

Browse Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive studies →

Lead sponsor

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 493 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Of its 75 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 46 (61%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must have one of the following documented diseases:

    • Chronic myelogenous leukemia
    • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
    • Multiple myeloma
    • Myelodysplasia
    • Myeloproliferative disorder
    • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
    • Hodgkin's disease
    • Acute myelogenous leukemia
    • Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
    • Acute biphenotypic leukemia
  • Patients must be undergoing a myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant with one of the following conditioning regimens:

    • Busulfan (≥ 12.8 mg/kg IV or PO) and cyclophosphamide (≥ 120 mg/kg)

      --- Busulfan dose may be adjusted according to pharmacokinetics targeting a daily AUC of 5000 μmol-min/L, per institution standard of practice.

    • Total body irradiation (TBI) (≥ 1200 cGy) and etoposide (60 mg/kg)
    • TBI (≥ 1200 cGy) and cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg)
  • Patient must have achieved and be in complete morphologic remission prior to starting conditioning regimen
  • Patient's donor must be a related or unrelated human leukocyte antigen (HLA) 8/8 allele-level match (HLA-A, B, C and DRB1)
  • Adult patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1; pediatric patients must have Lansky score ≥ 60%
  • Patients must have a life expectancy of 100 days
  • Patients must sign written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have undergone any prior transplant
  • Patients who are seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Patients with any medical illness or concurrent psychiatric illness which, in the investigators' opinion, cannot be adequately controlled with appropriate therapy
  • Patients who are pregnant or lactating
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A (tacrolimus, methotrexate)

    Participants receive tacrolimus IV over 24 hours beginning on day -1 (or tacrolimus orally beginning on day -3) and then PO BID after engraftment with a taper from day 100 to day 180 (in the absence of GVHD). Patients also receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11.

    Drug: tacrolimus · Drug: methotrexate

  • Experimental
    Group B (tacrolimus, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil)

    Patients receive tacrolimus as in group A and methotrexate (low dose) IV on days 1, 3, and 6. Patients also receive oral mycophenolate mofetil BID beginning on day 1, with a taper from day 45 to day 100 (in the absence of GVHD).

    Drug: tacrolimus · Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil · Drug: Methotrexate (low dose)

Interventions

  • Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day beginning day -1 or tacrolimus 0.03mg/kg/dose BID orally beginning on day -3. If Tac is administered intravenously, it will be given over 24 hours and will be converted to oral administration 2 times a day when the patient has engrafted and/or can tolerate oral medication. Levels of Tac will be obtained to maintain a recommended target serum level of 5-12 ng/mL

    Also known as: FK 506, Prograf

  • MTX 15mg/m2 IV on day +1, followed by 10mg/m2 on day +3, +6, +11. If patient \< 10 kg then MTX will be given at 0.5 mg/kg IV on day +1. Then MTX will be given at 0.33 mg/kg on days +3, +6 and +11.

    Also known as: amethopterin, Folex, methylaminopterin, Mexate, MTX

  • Patients will receive Mycophenolate beginning on day +1. Patients \>40 kg will receive Mycophenolate 1000 mg twice a day. Mycophenolate should be given orally twice a day. IV formulation may be used if the patient cannot tolerate oral route. Patients \< 40 kg will receive MMF 45 mg/kg/day (15 mg/kg three times a day). MMF may be given orally or intravenously as per institutional protocol

    Also known as: Cellcept, MMF

  • MTX 5mg/m2 IV on day +1, +3, +6. If patient\<10 kg MTX will be given at 0.17 mg/kg on day +1, +3, and +6.

    Also known as: amethopterin, Folex, methylaminopterin, Mexate, MTX

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Severe (Grade 3-4) Mucositis Graded According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Grading Scale

    Participants (percentage of) will be graded three times per week through day 28 of the study. Incidence will be compared through Wilcoxon rank sum tests. The WHO grading scale for mucositis is scaled depending on the severity of mucositis symptoms, with a lower stage associated with a better outcome and greater stages associated with worse outcomes. The staging is as follows: Stage 0: None Stage 1 (mild): Oral soreness, erythema Stage 2 (moderate): Oral erythema, ulcers, solid diet tolerated Stage 3 (severe): Oral ulcers, liquid diet only Stage 4 (life-threatening): Oral alimentation impossible

    Time frame: Up to day 28

  2. Time to Neutrophil Engraftment

    The number of days to reach a neutrophil count of greater than or equal to 500/ul for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days. The day of engraftment will be the first day of the three consecutive laboratory values.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

  3. Time to Platelet Engraftment

    The number of days to reach a platelet count of greater than or equal to 20,000/ul for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days, independent of platelet transfusions the prior 7 days. The day of engraftment will be the first day of the three consecutive laboratory values. For cases of delayed engraftment beyond 28 days, results will be recorded once the participant engrafts.

    Time frame: The date the participant engrafts, up to 28 days

  4. Cumulative Incidence of Participants With Acute GVHD

    Acute GVHD by grade will be estimated using cumulative incidence methods and compared using the Gray test. A lower clinical grade and/or stage of GVHD corresponds to a better participant outcome and a higher grade corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows: Grade 0: No stage 1-4 of any organ Grade 1: Stage 1-2 skin without liver, upper GI, or lower GI involvement. Grade 2: Stage 3 rash and/or stage 1 liver and/or stage 1 upper GI and/or stage 1 lower GI. Grade 3: Stage 2-3 liver and/or stage 2-3 lower GI, with stage 0-3 skin and/or stage 0-1 upper GI. Grade 4: Stage 4 skin, liver, or lower GI involvement, with stage 0-1 upper GI. A greater stage of GVHD involves worsening end-organ involvement and worse participant outcomes based on the skin, liver, lower GI, and upper GI.

    Time frame: Day 7- Day 100

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Hospitalization

    Hospital stay will be compared between patients in groups A and B using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

    Time frame: Date of transplant to date of discharge, assessed up to 1 year

  2. Percentage of Participants Using Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) Within 100 Days

    TPN use will be compared using the Chi-square test.

    Time frame: Up to day 100

  3. Overall Survival

    Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the 2 groups using the log-rank test.

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  4. Progression-free Survival

    Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the 2 groups using the log-rank test.

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  5. Incidence of Chronic GVHD

    Chronic GVHD will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project. The type and duration of immunosuppressive treatment given for cGVHD will be recorded. Mild grades are associated with a better participant outcome and severe corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows: Mild: 1 or 2 organs involved with no more than score 1 plus Lung score 0 Moderate: 3 or more organs involved with no more than score 1 OR At least 1 organ (not lung) with a score of 2 OR Lung score 1 Severe: At least 1 organ with a score of 3 OR Lung score of 2 or 3 Organ scores can range from 0 to 3, with 0 being no symptoms on the target organ and a better participant outcome while a score of 3 correlates to severe symptoms on the target organ and worse participant outcomes. Potential target organs include: skin, mouth, eyes, GI tract, liver, lungs, joint /fascia, and genital tract

    Time frame: at 6 months

  6. Incidence of Chronic GVHD

    Chronic GVHD will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project. The type and duration of immunosuppressive treatment given for cGVHD will be recorded. Mild grades are associated with a better participant outcome and severe corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows: Mild: 1 or 2 organs involved with no more than score 1 plus Lung score 0 Moderate: 3 or more organs involved with no more than score 1 OR At least 1 organ (not lung) with a score of 2 OR Lung score 1 Severe: At least 1 organ with a score of 3 OR Lung score of 2 or 3 Organ scores can range from 0 to 3, with 0 being no symptoms on the target organ and a better participant outcome while a score of 3 correlates to severe symptoms on the target organ and worse participant outcomes. Potential target organs include: skin, mouth, eyes, GI tract, liver, lungs, joint /fascia, and genital tract

    Time frame: at 12 months

  7. Length of Time on Continuous Infusion Narcotics

    Start and stop dates for the need of continuous IV infusion of narcotics for severe mucositis pain will be recorded. Time on IV infusion will be compared between patients in groups A and B using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

    Time frame: up to +28 day

  8. Incidence of Infection

    100-day incidence of infection will be compared using a the Gray test.

    Time frame: Up to day +100

  9. Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Bilirubin

    100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using a Gray test. Median and range of largest total bilirubin (mg/dL),

    Time frame: Up to day +100

  10. Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Elevated Liver Enzymes

    100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using a Gray test. Percentage of patients with elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase and a 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: Up to day +100

  11. Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)

    100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with VOD and 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: Up to day +100

  12. Incidence of Nephrotoxicity

    100-day incidence of nephrotoxicity will be compared using a Chi-squared test. Percentage of patients requiring dialysis and those with elevated creatinine using a 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: Up to day +100

  13. Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Hemorrhage

    180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with pulmonary hemorrhage and 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: Up to day +180

  14. Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Edema

    180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with pulmonary edema and 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: Up to day +180

  15. Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Respiratory Failure

    180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with respiratory failure and 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: Up to day +180

Other outcomes

  1. Chimerism Results

    Donor chimerism will be assessed by analysis of single-tandem repeats on whole marrow and in lymphocyte enriched or sorted CD3+ T cells and CD33+ granulocytes. Blood will be obtained for donor chimerism "Bone Marrow Engraftment analysis" at approximately 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months or as clinically indicated.

    Time frame: Up to one year

07

Results

Posted Jan 31, 2023

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from local hospital from July 2014 thru July 2020

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Started5051
Completed4947
Not completed14
Withdrew: Ineligible due to a change in conditioning regimen01
Withdrew: Adverse event10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Ineligible due to a change in donor01
Withdrew: Ineligible after experiencing cardiac issues01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Severe (Grade 3-4) Mucositis Graded According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Grading Scale

Participants (percentage of) will be graded three times per week through day 28 of the study. Incidence will be compared through Wilcoxon rank sum tests. The WHO grading scale for mucositis is scaled depending on the severity of mucositis symptoms, with a lower stage associated with a better outcome and greater stages associated with worse outcomes. The staging is as follows: Stage 0: None Stage 1 (mild): Oral soreness, erythema Stage 2 (moderate): Oral erythema, ulcers, solid diet tolerated Stage 3 (severe): Oral ulcers, liquid diet only Stage 4 (life-threatening): Oral alimentation impossible

Time frame:
Up to day 28
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Severe (Grade 3-4) Mucositis Graded According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Grading Scale
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Percentage of Severe (Grade 3-4) Mucositis Graded According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Grading Scale81.657.4
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0547 patients per arm were needed to detect a 25% improvement in mucositis based on a one-sided test with 5% significance and 80% power.
PrimaryTime to Neutrophil Engraftment

The number of days to reach a neutrophil count of greater than or equal to 500/ul for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days. The day of engraftment will be the first day of the three consecutive laboratory values.

Time frame:
Up to 28 days
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Neutrophil Engraftment
daysGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Time to Neutrophil Engraftment17 (11 to 27)15 (11 to 23)
PrimaryTime to Platelet Engraftment

The number of days to reach a platelet count of greater than or equal to 20,000/ul for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days, independent of platelet transfusions the prior 7 days. The day of engraftment will be the first day of the three consecutive laboratory values. For cases of delayed engraftment beyond 28 days, results will be recorded once the participant engrafts.

Time frame:
The date the participant engrafts, up to 28 days
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Platelet Engraftment
daysGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Time to Platelet Engraftment27 (16 to 131)23 (10 to 112)
PrimaryCumulative Incidence of Participants With Acute GVHD

Acute GVHD by grade will be estimated using cumulative incidence methods and compared using the Gray test. A lower clinical grade and/or stage of GVHD corresponds to a better participant outcome and a higher grade corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows: Grade 0: No stage 1-4 of any organ Grade 1: Stage 1-2 skin without liver, upper GI, or lower GI involvement. Grade 2: Stage 3 rash and/or stage 1 liver and/or stage 1 upper GI and/or stage 1 lower GI. Grade 3: Stage 2-3 liver and/or stage 2-3 lower GI, with stage 0-3 skin and/or stage 0-1 upper GI. Grade 4: Stage 4 skin, liver, or lower GI involvement, with stage 0-1 upper GI. A greater stage of GVHD involves worsening end-organ involvement and worse participant outcomes based on the skin, liver, lower GI, and upper GI.

Time frame:
Day 7- Day 100
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Cumulative Incidence of Participants With Acute GVHD
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Grade 1-437 (23 to 50)47 (32 to 60)
Grade 2-427 (15 to 39)28 (16 to 41)
Grade 3-44 (1 to 12)13 (5 to 24)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Log Rank · p = <0.05
SecondaryLength of Hospitalization

Hospital stay will be compared between patients in groups A and B using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Time frame:
Date of transplant to date of discharge, assessed up to 1 year
Reported as:
Median · days
Length of Hospitalization
daysGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Length of Hospitalization31 (22 to 89)27 (20 to 55)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.05
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Using Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) Within 100 Days

TPN use will be compared using the Chi-square test.

Time frame:
Up to day 100
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Using Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) Within 100 Days
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Percentage of Participants Using Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) Within 100 Days4138
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Chi-squared · p = <0.05
SecondaryOverall Survival

Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the 2 groups using the log-rank test.

Time frame:
Up to 1 year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Survival
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Overall Survival71 (56 to 82)72 (57 to 83)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Log Rank · p = <0.05
SecondaryProgression-free Survival

Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the 2 groups using the log-rank test.

Time frame:
Up to 1 year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Progression-free Survival
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Progression-free Survival59 (44 to 71)68 (53 to 79)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Log Rank · p = <0.05
SecondaryIncidence of Chronic GVHD

Chronic GVHD will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project. The type and duration of immunosuppressive treatment given for cGVHD will be recorded. Mild grades are associated with a better participant outcome and severe corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows: Mild: 1 or 2 organs involved with no more than score 1 plus Lung score 0 Moderate: 3 or more organs involved with no more than score 1 OR At least 1 organ (not lung) with a score of 2 OR Lung score 1 Severe: At least 1 organ with a score of 3 OR Lung score of 2 or 3 Organ scores can range from 0 to 3, with 0 being no symptoms on the target organ and a better participant outcome while a score of 3 correlates to severe symptoms on the target organ and worse participant outcomes. Potential target organs include: skin, mouth, eyes, GI tract, liver, lungs, joint /fascia, and genital tract

Time frame:
at 6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Chronic GVHD
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
any chronic GVHD16 (8 to 28)15 (6 to 27)
moderate-severe chronic GVHD12 (5 to 23)11 (4 to 21)
SecondaryIncidence of Chronic GVHD

Chronic GVHD will be graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project. The type and duration of immunosuppressive treatment given for cGVHD will be recorded. Mild grades are associated with a better participant outcome and severe corresponds to a worse participant outcome. Grading is as follows: Mild: 1 or 2 organs involved with no more than score 1 plus Lung score 0 Moderate: 3 or more organs involved with no more than score 1 OR At least 1 organ (not lung) with a score of 2 OR Lung score 1 Severe: At least 1 organ with a score of 3 OR Lung score of 2 or 3 Organ scores can range from 0 to 3, with 0 being no symptoms on the target organ and a better participant outcome while a score of 3 correlates to severe symptoms on the target organ and worse participant outcomes. Potential target organs include: skin, mouth, eyes, GI tract, liver, lungs, joint /fascia, and genital tract

Time frame:
at 12 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Chronic GVHD
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
any chronic GVHD25 (13 to 37)36 (23 to 50)
moderate-severe chronic GVHD20 (10 to 33)23 (12 to 36)
SecondaryLength of Time on Continuous Infusion Narcotics

Start and stop dates for the need of continuous IV infusion of narcotics for severe mucositis pain will be recorded. Time on IV infusion will be compared between patients in groups A and B using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Time frame:
up to +28 day
Reported as:
Median · days
Length of Time on Continuous Infusion Narcotics
daysGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Length of Time on Continuous Infusion Narcotics10 (1 to 19)9 (2 to 25)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.05
SecondaryIncidence of Infection

100-day incidence of infection will be compared using a the Gray test.

Time frame:
Up to day +100
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Infection
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Incidence of Infection63 (48 to 75)53 (38 to 66)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Gray Test · p = <0.05
SecondaryIncidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Bilirubin

100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using a Gray test. Median and range of largest total bilirubin (mg/dL),

Time frame:
Up to day +100
Reported as:
Median · mg/dL
Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Bilirubin
mg/dLGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Bilirubin1.5 (0.4 to 45.2)1.1 (0.4 to 43.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Gray Test · p = <0.05
SecondaryIncidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Elevated Liver Enzymes

100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using a Gray test. Percentage of patients with elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase and a 95% confidence interval

Time frame:
Up to day +100
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Elevated Liver Enzymes
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
AST29 (17 to 43)15 (6 to 28)
ALT33 (20 to 48)28 (16 to 43)
Alkaline Phosphatase2 (0 to 11)2 (0 to 11)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Chi-squared · p = <0.05
SecondaryIncidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)

100-day incidence of hepatotoxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with VOD and 95% confidence interval

Time frame:
Up to day +100
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Incidence of Hepatotoxicity as Measured by Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)8 (2 to 20)2 (0 to 11)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Gray Test · p = <0.05
SecondaryIncidence of Nephrotoxicity

100-day incidence of nephrotoxicity will be compared using a Chi-squared test. Percentage of patients requiring dialysis and those with elevated creatinine using a 95% confidence interval

Time frame:
Up to day +100
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Nephrotoxicity
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Participants requiring dialysis12 (5 to 25)4 (1 to 15)
Participants with elevated creatinine27 (15 to 41)2 (0 to 11)
SecondaryIncidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Hemorrhage

180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with pulmonary hemorrhage and 95% confidence interval

Time frame:
Up to day +180
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Hemorrhage
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Hemorrhage2 (0 to 11)2 (0 to 11)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Gray Test · p = <0.05
SecondaryIncidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Edema

180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with pulmonary edema and 95% confidence interval

Time frame:
Up to day +180
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Edema
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Pulmonary Edema14 (6 to 27)4 (1 to 15)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Gray Test · p = <0.05
SecondaryIncidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Respiratory Failure

180-day incidence of pulmonary toxicity will be compared using the Gray test. Percentage of patients with respiratory failure and 95% confidence interval

Time frame:
Up to day +180
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Respiratory Failure
percentage of participantsGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Incidence of Pulmonary Toxicity Measured by Respiratory Failure9 (4 to 15)6 (1 to 8)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate) vs Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil) · Gray Test · p = <0.05
Other pre-specifiedChimerism Results

Donor chimerism will be assessed by analysis of single-tandem repeats on whole marrow and in lymphocyte enriched or sorted CD3+ T cells and CD33+ granulocytes. Blood will be obtained for donor chimerism "Bone Marrow Engraftment analysis" at approximately 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months or as clinically indicated.

Time frame:
Up to one year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected through one year post transplant. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)25/50 (50%)13/50 (26%)49/50 (98%)
Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)15/51 (29.4%)3/51 (5.9%)47/51 (92.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent serious events
EventGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
Hepatic failureHepatobiliary disorders3/500/51
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders1/501/51
Adult respiratory distress syndromeRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/500/51
EncephalopathyHepatobiliary disorders1/500/51
Escherichia Coli (E-Coli)Infections and infestations1/500/51
Pulmonary hypertensionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/500/51
Idiopathic pneumonia syndromeRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/500/51
SeizureNervous system disorders1/500/51
SepsisInfections and infestations1/500/51
Upper respiratory infectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/500/51
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 324
Most frequent other events
EventGroup A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)
nauseaGastrointestinal disorders48/5044/51
vomitingGastrointestinal disorders43/5039/51
diarrheaGastrointestinal disorders41/5043/51
FATIGUEGeneral disorders40/5035/51
feverGeneral disorders33/5024/51
hypomagnesemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders26/5033/51
HEADACHENervous system disorders28/5030/51
abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders26/5024/51
constipationGastrointestinal disorders25/5023/51
RASHSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders17/5025/51

Baseline characteristics

All participants that went on study

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)Total
0-9 years old112
10-19 years old033
20-29 years old10717
30-39 years old9817
40-49 years old111223
50-59 years old191534
60-69 years old055
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)Total
Female281846
Male223355
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)Total
Hispanic or Latino224
Not Hispanic or Latino484896
Unknown or Not Reported011
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White475198
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported202
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Group A (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate)Group B (Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil)Total
United States5051101
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hamilton BK, Rybicki LA, Li H, Lucas T, Corrigan D, Kalaycio M, Sobecks R, Hanna R, Rotz SJ, Dean RM, Gerds AT, Jagadeesh D, Brunstein C, Sauter CS, Copelan EA, Majhail NS. Tacrolimus/methotrexate vs tacrolimus/reduced-dose methotrexate/mycophenolate for graft-versus-host disease prevention. Blood Adv. 2023 Aug 22;7(16):4505-4513. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010310. PubMed 37352262 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 28, 2022
  • Informed consent form · May 4, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01951885
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 27, 2013
Start date
Jul 7, 2014
Primary completion
Oct 9, 2020
Completion
Aug 11, 2021
Results posted
Jan 31, 2023
Last update
Sep 11, 2023

Study contacts

Betty Hamilton, MD
principal investigator · Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Mycophenolic Acid · Methotrexate

Start the discussion