CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01941030CLARITY IUpdated Jul 18, 2023Results posted

Complete Lesion Assessment With ffR and IVUS TechnologY

An interventional study of Orbital Atherectomy System and Balloon Angioplasty in Peripheral Artery Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia, sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices. Completed at 8 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-18.

Sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

CLARITY I is a pilot study to identify the clinically appropriate endpoint(s) of a larger, statistically powered pivotal trial for treatment of patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI).

Read the detailed description

This prospective, randomized, multi-center, post-market study of approximately 50 subjects randomized 1:1 to Orbital Atherectomy (OA) performed with Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.'s Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) followed by adjunctive balloon angioplasty (BA) vs. BA alone for treatment of tibial vessel disease, defined as ≥ 50 % stenosis of the anterior tibial (AT), posterior tibial (PT), tibial peroneal trunk (TPT), or peroneal (PR) arteries by angiography. All subjects will have a corresponding wound being fed by the target vessel which will be assessed during the study. Subjects will be followed to one year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peripheral Artery Disease
  • Critical Limb Ischemia

Keywords

  • Peripheral Artery Disease
  • Critical Limb Ischemia
  • Orbital Atherectomy
  • Balloon Angioplasty
  • Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)
  • Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
03

In context

Peripheral Arterial Disease

1,542 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease; 282 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 74 across 1,066 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Browse Peripheral Arterial Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Abbott Medical Devices is the lead sponsor of 525 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Of its 52 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 43 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

General Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject's age ≥ 18 years.
  2. Subject is an acceptable candidate for percutaneous intervention with the Sponsor's OAS and BA in accordance with their labeled indications and instructions for use.
  3. Subject is willing and able to sign an approved informed consent form (ICF).
  4. Subject is willing and able to attend follow-up and wound care visits.

General Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is pregnant or planning to become pregnant within the study period.
  2. Subject is currently participating in an investigational drug or other device study that can clinically interfere with the endpoints of this trial.
  3. Subject has a known sensitivity to contrast media and the sensitivity cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
  4. Uncontrolled allergy to nitinol, stainless steel, or other stent materials.
  5. Subject has known allergy to atherectomy lubricant components such as soybean oil, egg yolk phospholipids, glycerin or sodium hydroxide.
  6. Subject has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions.
  7. Subject has been diagnosed with chronic renal failure or has a creatinine level > 2.5, unless on dialysis, prior to the index treatment.
  8. Subject has evidence of intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding within 90 days.
  9. Subject has a history of trauma, fracture, major surgery (includes major amputation), or biopsy of a parenchymal organ within past 14 days, or patient has not healed from a previous medical intervention occurring more than 14 days.
  10. Subject has a history of stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) within 90 days prior to enrollment in the study.
  11. Subject has a planned major surgery (includes major amputation) scheduled within 60 days after treatment of the index limb.
  12. Subject has a planned interventional treatment to address stenosis of the contralateral limb scheduled within 60 days after the index treatment.
  13. Subject has a planned interventional treatment to address inflow stenosis of the ipsilateral limb scheduled within 60 days after the index treatment.
  14. Inflow or bilateral PAD requiring treatment prior to enrollment was not successfully treated, defined as > 50% residual stenosis and/or occurrence of procedural angiographic complications, excluding dissection types A and B.
  15. Subject has previously had their other limb treated as part of the study.

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Target lesion(s) located in the anterior tibial (AT), posterior tibial (PT), tibial peroneal trunk (TPT) or peroneal (PR) arteries.
  2. Target lesion has ≥ 50 % stenosis by angiography.
  3. Subject has a corresponding wound being fed by the target vessel.

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Target limb does not have any visual flow to the foot confirmed via distal selective angiography.
  2. Thrombus is present or suspected in the target treatment vessel.
  3. Target lesion is within a bypass graft or near a previously placed stent.
  4. The guide wire cannot be passed across the target lesion.
  5. Anterograde access of the lesion is not possible.
  6. Subject has angiographic evidence of significant dissection at or near the treatment site.
  7. Interventional treatment is intended for in-stent restenosis at the peripheral vascular site.
  8. Subject's wound(s) involve multiple angiosomes.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Orbital Atherectomy System

    Orbital Atherectomy (OA) is performed prior to adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty (BA)

    Device: Orbital Atherectomy System · Device: Balloon Angioplasty

  • Active comparator
    Balloon Angioplasty

    Balloon Angioplasty (BA) alone

    Device: Balloon Angioplasty

Interventions

  • DeviceOrbital Atherectomy System

    Orbital atherectomy (OA) is performed prior to adjunctive balloon angioplasty (BA)

  • DeviceBalloon Angioplasty

    Type of balloon selected is driven by preference of the operator.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Calcium Removal Out of Lumen Gain as Assessed by IVUS

    The post-treatment percentage of calcium removal out of lumen gain at the maximum calcium ablation site. A positive value equates to reduction in calcium out of the lumen gain.

    Time frame: Post-balloon angioplasty

  2. Change in Minimum Lumen Area Percent Stenosis as Assessed by IVUS

    The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) minimum lumen area percent stenosis. A positive value equates to a decrease in lumen area percent stenosis.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty

  3. Change in Plaque Area as Assessed by IVUS

    The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) plaque area. A positive value equates to a decrease in plaque area.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty

  4. Change in Dense Calcium Area as Assessed by IVUS

    The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) dense calcium area. A positive value equates to a decrease in dense calcium area.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty

  5. Change in Necrotic Core Area as Assessed by IVUS

    The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) necrotic core area. A positive value equates to a decrease necrotic core area.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty

  6. Change in Fibrous Plaque Area as Assessed by IVUS

    The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) fibrous plaque area. A positive value equates to a decrease in fibrous plaque area.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty

  7. Change in Fibrofatty Plaque Area as Assessed by IVUS

    The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) fibrofatty plaque area. A positive value equates to a decrease in fibrofatty plaque area.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fractional Flow Reserve

    Fractional flow reserve (FFR) will be measured to assess hemodynamic function following each device procedure. During FFR, adenosine will be given through the femoral artery sheath or access catheter in two doses: 600 mcg and 1200 mcg. A higher FFR is presumed to correlate to better flow which may improve wound healing.

    Time frame: Post-orbital atherectomy (OA arm only) and post-balloon angioplasty (both arms)

07

Results

Posted Jan 24, 2019
Limitations and caveats
CLARITY I was a non-powered trial without a hypothesis test of a small number of patients.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOrbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon Angioplasty
Started2526
Completed1213
Not completed1313
Withdrew: Death32
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up65
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject46

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Calcium Removal Out of Lumen Gain as Assessed by IVUS

The post-treatment percentage of calcium removal out of lumen gain at the maximum calcium ablation site. A positive value equates to reduction in calcium out of the lumen gain.

Time frame:
Post-balloon angioplasty
Reported as:
Median · percentage of lumen gain
Percentage of Calcium Removal Out of Lumen Gain as Assessed by IVUS
percentage of lumen gainOrbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon Angioplasty
Percentage of Calcium Removal Out of Lumen Gain as Assessed by IVUS25.0 (11.1 to 42.9)0.0 (0.0 to 6.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Orbital Atherectomy System vs Balloon Angioplasty · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0220Data failed to meet the assumption for normality per the Shapiro-Wilk test.
PrimaryChange in Minimum Lumen Area Percent Stenosis as Assessed by IVUS

The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) minimum lumen area percent stenosis. A positive value equates to a decrease in lumen area percent stenosis.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty
Reported as:
Median · percent of minimum area stenosis
Change in Minimum Lumen Area Percent Stenosis as Assessed by IVUS
percent of minimum area stenosisOrbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon Angioplasty
Pre-Tx, minimum area stenosis (%)43.8 (37.6 to 62.4)45.2 (34.5 to 58.5)
Post-Tx, minimum area stenosis (%)36.4 (29.0 to 51.5)31.5 (26.5 to 45.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Orbital Atherectomy System vs Balloon Angioplasty · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.6228
PrimaryChange in Plaque Area as Assessed by IVUS

The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) plaque area. A positive value equates to a decrease in plaque area.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty
Reported as:
Median · area (mm^3/mm)
Change in Plaque Area as Assessed by IVUS
area (mm^3/mm)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon Angioplasty
Pre-Tx, plaque area (mm^3/mm)6.5 (4.7 to 8.2)6.0 (4.9 to 6.5)
Post-Tx, plaque area (mm^3/mm)6.3 (4.4 to 10.0)6.0 (5.6 to 7.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Orbital Atherectomy System vs Balloon Angioplasty · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.4528Data failed to meet the assumption for normality per the Shapiro-Wilk test.
PrimaryChange in Dense Calcium Area as Assessed by IVUS

The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) dense calcium area. A positive value equates to a decrease in dense calcium area.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty
Reported as:
Median · area (mm^3/mm)
Change in Dense Calcium Area as Assessed by IVUS
area (mm^3/mm)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon Angioplasty
Pre-Tx, dense calcium area (mm^3/mm)0.7 (0.2 to 1.5)1.0 (0.2 to 1.4)
Post-Tx, dense calcium area (mm^3/mm)0.4 (0.2 to 1.2)1.1 (0.2 to 1.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Orbital Atherectomy System vs Balloon Angioplasty · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.3573Data failed to meet the assumption for normality per the Shapiro-Wilk test.
PrimaryChange in Necrotic Core Area as Assessed by IVUS

The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) necrotic core area. A positive value equates to a decrease necrotic core area.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty
Reported as:
Median · area (mm^3/mm)
Change in Necrotic Core Area as Assessed by IVUS
area (mm^3/mm)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon Angioplasty
Pre-Tx, necrotic core area (mm^3/mm)0.7 (0.4 to 1.2)0.9 (0.4 to 1.2)
Post-Tx, necrotic core area (mm^3/mm)0.8 (0.3 to 1.0)1.0 (0.5 to 1.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Orbital Atherectomy System vs Balloon Angioplasty · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.6073Data failed to meet the assumption for normality per the Shapiro-Wilk test.
PrimaryChange in Fibrous Plaque Area as Assessed by IVUS

The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) fibrous plaque area. A positive value equates to a decrease in fibrous plaque area.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty
Reported as:
Median · area (mm^3/mm)
Change in Fibrous Plaque Area as Assessed by IVUS
area (mm^3/mm)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon Angioplasty
Pre-Tx, fibrous plaque area (mm^3/mm)1.7 (0.9 to 2.6)1.0 (0.6 to 2.0)
Post-Tx, fibrous plaque area (mm^3/mm)1.4 (0.9 to 3.3)0.9 (0.8 to 1.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Orbital Atherectomy System vs Balloon Angioplasty · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.2149Data failed to meet the assumption for normality per the Shapiro-Wilk test.
PrimaryChange in Fibrofatty Plaque Area as Assessed by IVUS

The pre- (Pre-Tx) and post-treatment (Post-Tx) fibrofatty plaque area. A positive value equates to a decrease in fibrofatty plaque area.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention, and post-balloon angioplasty
Reported as:
Median · area (mm^3/mm)
Change in Fibrofatty Plaque Area as Assessed by IVUS
area (mm^3/mm)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon Angioplasty
Pre-Tx, fibrofatty plaque area (mm^3/mm)0.2 (0.1 to 0.7)0.1 (0.0 to 0.3)
Post-Tx, fibrofatty plaque area (mm^3/mm)0.2 (0.1 to 1.0)0.1 (0.0 to 0.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Orbital Atherectomy System vs Balloon Angioplasty · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0579Data failed to meet the assumption for normality per the Shapiro-Wilk test.
SecondaryFractional Flow Reserve

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) will be measured to assess hemodynamic function following each device procedure. During FFR, adenosine will be given through the femoral artery sheath or access catheter in two doses: 600 mcg and 1200 mcg. A higher FFR is presumed to correlate to better flow which may improve wound healing.

Time frame:
Post-orbital atherectomy (OA arm only) and post-balloon angioplasty (both arms)
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio (proximal/distal pressure)
Fractional Flow Reserve
Ratio (proximal/distal pressure)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon Angioplasty
Post final OAS: FFR w/ 600 mcg adenosine0.83 ± 0.14NA ± NA
Post final OAS: FFR with 1200 mcg adenosine0.80 ± 0.12NA ± NA
Post final balloon: FFR w/ 600 mcg adenosine0.90 ± 0.130.75 ± 0.22
Post final balloon: FFR w/ 1200 mcg adenosine0.87 ± 0.100.76 ± 0.24
Statistical analysis
  • Orbital Atherectomy System vs Balloon Angioplasty · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.076
  • Orbital Atherectomy System vs Balloon Angioplasty · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.205

Adverse events

Collected over AEs were collected during the index-procedure through 12 months of follow-up.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Orbital Atherectomy System3/25 (12%)22/25 (88%)4/25 (16%)
Balloon Angioplasty3/26 (11.5%)17/26 (65.4%)8/26 (30.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 40
Most frequent serious events
EventOrbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon Angioplasty
Revascularization, non-index limbSurgical and medical procedures4/252/26
Minor amputation - pre-planned, index limbSurgical and medical procedures2/254/26
Revascularization, index limb (TLR)Surgical and medical procedures3/253/26
RecoilInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/253/26
Revascularization, index limb (non-TVR)Surgical and medical procedures1/253/26
Congestive Heart FailureCardiac disorders2/252/26
Death, unknown causeGeneral disorders2/251/26
Major amputation, index limb due to gangreneSurgical and medical procedures2/251/26
Minor amputation, index limb due to gangreneSurgical and medical procedures2/252/26
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/250/26
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventOrbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon Angioplasty
DissectionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/255/26
Vessel spasmInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/250/26
Access site bleedingInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/251/26
Lower extremity edemaGeneral disorders0/251/26
Pseudoaneurysm, access siteInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/251/26
Slow flowInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/251/26
Urinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disorders0/251/26

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon AngioplastyTotal
Mean65.3 ± 11.369.4 ± 12.467.4 ± 11.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon AngioplastyTotal
Female31215
Male221436
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon AngioplastyTotal
Hispanic or Latino639
Not Hispanic or Latino192342
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon AngioplastyTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American8816
White171835
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon AngioplastyTotal
United States252651
Number of treated lesions
Number of treated lesions(lesions)Orbital Atherectomy SystemBalloon AngioplastyTotal
Number262652
08

Study locations

8 sites
  • Arkansas Heart Clinic
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72211, United States
  • Northside Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States
  • Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation
    Davenport, Iowa 52803, United States
  • St. John Hospital and Medical Center
    Detroit, Michigan 48236, United States
  • Holy Name Medical Center
    Teaneck, New Jersey 07666, United States
  • Rex Hospital
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
  • Mission Research Institute
    New Braunfels, Texas 78130, United States
  • Sentara Vascular Specialists
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01941030
Lead sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 13, 2013
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
Jun 2015
Completion
Jun 2015
Results posted
Jan 24, 2019
Last update
Jul 18, 2023

Study contacts

Raymond Dattilo, M.D.
principal investigator · St. Francis Heart and Vascular Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion