CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01903967PITUIGENEUpdated Jan 23, 2017

Identification of GENEtic Markers of Aggressiveness and Malignancy by Array Comparative Genomic Hybrization Analysis (CGH)

An observational study in Pituitary Tumors, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-23.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
213
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Recent studies estimate that the prevalence of pituitary adenomas is approximately 1/1500 persons. Pituitary tumours are usually considered as benign. However, local invasion is reported in 35-40% of pituitary adenomas; resistance to medical treatment or recurrence leading to multimodal therapy is reported in about 15% of cases. These tumours are considered as aggressive pituitary tumours and present a distinct biological and clinical entity with continued growth despite multimodal therapy, including surgery and radiotherapy (McCormack et al., 2011). Whilst these tumours have malignant potential, the term of pituitary carcinoma is strictly reserved for those rare tumours (0.2%) with demonstrated craniospinal or systemic metastases (Heaney, 2011).

Pituitary aggressive and malignant tumours are very difficult to control and ultimately prove to be lethal. It was suggested that early aggressive treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy) may control progression and occurrence of metastases. However, these therapeutic options are associated with important side effects limiting their use and the prediction of pituitary tumor behaviour remains a challenge. At the diagnosis, clinical signs are not specific and the results concerning proliferative factors (Ki-67 and P53), putative oncogenes (PTTG) conflict from one series to another.

In a case-control retrospective study of a cohort of 410 patients (HYPOPRONOS), we validated a prognostic pathological classification based on histological and radiological data (J. Trouillas 2012 in preparation). Tumours were classified into 3 grades: grade 1= non-invasive tumour, grade 2= invasive tumour and grade 3 = aggressive-invasive tumor with the combination of radiological signs of invasion and 2 of 3 signs of increased proliferation (Ki-67 index>3%, number of mitoses>2 per 10 fields at 400X, P53 nuclear detection).

It is now widely accepted that cancer is a clonal disease, which arises from a single normal cell and progresses thanks to the accumulation of DNA alterations (Sanson et al., 2011). To identify the role of these DNA alterations, we conducted array CGH analysis limited to 13 prolactin pituitary tumours, from frozen fragments, and identified allelic loss of chromosome 11 associated with aggressiveness and malignancy (Wierinckx et al., 2011).

To confirm these encouraging results we propose to conduct a study on a large series of tumours, fixed and embed, and to be correlated the results to clinical data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pituitary Tumors

Keywords

  • Pituitary
  • CGH array
  • Tumor
03

In context

Pituitary Neoplasms

175 studies on the registry are indexed under Pituitary Neoplasms; 48 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 213 is above the median of 150 across 71 observational studies indexed under Pituitary Neoplasms.

Browse Pituitary Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,826 studies on the registry; 439 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients presenting a pituitary tumour, including PRL, GH, ACTH and LH/FSH, operated on by transsphenoidal route between 1990 and 2008 with at least 5 years of follow-up

Inclusion criteria

  • Only patient with complete clinical, radiological and hormonal data available during yearly follow-up will be included.
  • Preoperative MRI will be used to classify the tumour as invasive, and postoperative MRI will be collected to confirm recurrence or progression of the tumour.
  • Presence of tumour fragments fixed in Holland-Bouin's fluid or Neutral Buffered Formalin fixative available for aCGH analysis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who underwent systematic post-operative radiotherapy.
  • Patient presenting Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) or aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) mutation since mechanism of tumorigenesis are different to sporadic pituitary tumours.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
213 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • "Control" Group

    Patients cured with no evidence of disease up to 5 years will be the controls.

  • "Case" Group

    Patients, in recurrence or progression before 5 years will be the cases

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. DNA alterations associated with the prognosis of pituitary tumours.

    To identify and quantify the genomic DNA alterations associated with the prognosis of pituitary tumours.

    Time frame: At least 5 years of follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon - Groupement Hospitalier Est
    Lyon, 69003, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lasolle H, Raverot G. Letter to the Editor From Helene Lasolle and Gerald Raverot: "USP8 and TP53 Drivers Are Associated With CNV in a Corticotroph Adenoma Cohort Enriched for Aggressive Tumors". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jul 13;106(8):e3285-e3286. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab217. No abstract available. PubMed 33822961 ↗
  • Lasolle H, Alix E, Bonnefille C, Elsensohn MH, Michel J, Sanlaville D, Roy P, Raverot G, Bardel C. Centralization errors in comparative genomic hybridization array analysis of pituitary tumor samples. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2018 Jun;57(6):320-328. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22534. Epub 2018 Mar 9. PubMed 29460398 ↗

Related links

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 23, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01903967
Lead sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 19, 2013
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Jan 2017
Completion
Jan 2017
Last update
Jan 23, 2017

Study contacts

Gérald RAVEROT, PhD - MD
principal investigator · Hospices Civils de Lyon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion