ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06221020Updated Aug 17, 2026

To Assess the Impact of theERAS Consensus on Patients With Endoscopic Pituitary Tumor Surgery

An observational study in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Pituitary Tumor and Postoperative Complications, sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-17.

Sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70
Ages
20 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) on patients with pituitary gland tumors.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) on patients with pituitary gland tumors. This study is particularly significant as ERAS has been a prominent focus in international medical treatment, emphasizing improved patient recovery and safety. The main questions it aims to answer are:

How does ERAS affect the effectiveness and prognosis of patients with pituitary gland tumors? Which specific inspection and evaluation items within the ERAS protocol genuinely assist patients? Participants in this study will undergo various ERAS protocols, including pre-operative to post-operative rehabilitation measures, pain management, surgical techniques, and early resumption of eating and activities. This comprehensive approach is designed to reduce complications, shorten hospital stays, and speed up patient recovery.

Additionally, this study will conduct a thorough statistical analysis to determine which aspects of the ERAS protocol are most beneficial. By comparing the outcomes of patients undergoing the ERAS protocol with those who do not, researchers aim to understand better the balance between ERAS and the Choosing Wisely initiative, which advocates for reducing unnecessary medical interventions.

This research is crucial in advancing medical knowledge and practice, particularly in managing pituitary gland tumors, and contributes to the broader goals of enhancing medical quality and patient safety.

02

Conditions studied

  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Pituitary Tumor
  • Postoperative Complications

Keywords

  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Pituitary tumor
  • Anesthesia Safety
  • Postoperative Complications
03

In context

Pituitary Neoplasms

200 studies on the registry are indexed under Pituitary Neoplasms; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is below the median of 163 across 74 observational studies indexed under Pituitary Neoplasms.

Browse Pituitary Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,096 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Pituitary tumors, primarily benign growths, develop in the pituitary gland situated in the sellar region. This gland plays a pivotal role in regulating vital body functions including growth, metabolism, and various hormonal functions. As these tumors enlarge, they may press on adjacent areas and impair the gland's functions, leading to symptoms like headaches, vision issues, and hormonal imbalances.

The principal treatment for pituitary tumors is surgery, aiming to excise the tumor from the brain's base. This procedure alleviates pressure on the pituitary gland and nearby structures, aiming to reinstate the gland's normal functionality.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of pituitary tumors
  • To sign a written form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with other malignant tumors
  • Severe infections, such as osteomyelitis, acute inflammation at the affected site, or open wounds at the treatment area
  • Pregnant women
  • Coagulation disorders or those taking anticoagulant medication
  • Other central nervous system disorders, alcohol addiction, other addictive drugs, or mental illness that may affect clinical assessment
  • Deemed unsuitable for surgical treatment or unable to comply with clinical evaluation upon assessment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Months
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with ERAS

    In the experimental group (Patients with ERAS), participants will undergo an assessment of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) consensus items. The experimental group will complete all the items on the ERAS forms as far as possible. All groups will undergo our routine preoperative evaluation for pituitary tumor surgery, such as cardiopulmonary function, hormone testing, vision and visual field examination, etc. The care during hospitalization and surgery will be the same as previously for patients with pituitary tumors, and the post-discharge outpatient follow-up will also be the same as for patients who have undergone pituitary tumor surgery.

    Diagnostic Test: Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool · Device: TIB Olfactory Test Device · Diagnostic Test: Apfel Score for Postoperative nausea and vomiting · Diagnostic Test: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification · Behavioral: Short Form-36 · Behavioral: World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) · Behavioral: BDI-II(Beck Depression Inventory-II) · Behavioral: ERAS Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire(ERAS-PSQ) · Behavioral: Quality of Recovery-40(QoR-40)

  • Patients with Regular

    In the control group (Patients with Regular), participants will only complete the routine items as before. All groups will undergo our routine preoperative evaluation for pituitary tumor surgery, such as cardiopulmonary function, hormone testing, vision and visual field examination, etc. The care during hospitalization and surgery will be the same as previously for patients with pituitary tumors, and the post-discharge outpatient follow-up will also be the same as for patients who have undergone pituitary tumor surgery.

    Diagnostic Test: Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool · Device: TIB Olfactory Test Device · Diagnostic Test: Apfel Score for Postoperative nausea and vomiting · Diagnostic Test: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification · Behavioral: Short Form-36 · Behavioral: World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) · Behavioral: BDI-II(Beck Depression Inventory-II) · Behavioral: ERAS Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire(ERAS-PSQ) · Behavioral: Quality of Recovery-40(QoR-40)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMalnutrition Universal Screening Tool

    The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) is a commonly used tool for assessing the nutritional status of adult patients. It is designed to identify early whether a patient is at risk of malnutrition or is already malnourished, enabling timely intervention and treatment. MUST includes three main assessment criteria: Body Mass Index (BMI): Degree of Weight Loss: This assesses the patient's weight change over the past three months, with grading based on the extent of weight loss. Effect of Illness on Dietary Intake: This evaluates the impact of illness on the patient's dietary intake, with grading based on the reduction in dietary intake. By combining the grades from these three assessment indicators, a final MUST score is obtained to determine the patient's nutritional status and level of risk. Based on the MUST score, patients can be categorized as low risk, medium risk, or high risk for malnutrition.

  • DeviceTIB Olfactory Test Device

    Olfactory testing is conducted on patients undergoing pituitary tumor surgery via nasal endoscopy using the TIB Olfactory Test Device (TIBSIT). This testing aims to compare olfactory (sense of smell) outcomes before and after the surgery. The olfactory tests are performed preoperatively and then again at the 3-month postoperative mark to assess any changes or impacts on the sense of smell due to the surgery.

  • Diagnostic testApfel Score for Postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Nausea and Vomiting Risk Scale: Apfel Score Risk Factors: Female; Smoking habit; History of postoperative nausea and vomiting or motion sickness; Use of opioid painkillers post-surgery (Each risk factor scores 1 point; minimum score is 0; maximum score is 4) Score Probability of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting 0 - 10% 1. \- 21% 2. \- 39% 3. \- 61% 4. \- 79%

  • Diagnostic testThe American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification

    ASA I: A normal, healthy patient with no systemic disease. ASA II: A patient with mild systemic disease. ASA III: A patient with severe systemic disease that limits activity but is not incapacitating. ASA IV: A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life. ASA V: A moribund patient not expected to survive without the operation. This project involves collecting data from adult patients aged 20 to 75 years old who are classified as ASA I to III grade.

  • BehavioralShort Form-36

    The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a widely used health assessment tool, extensively applied in both research and clinical practice. It is a concise yet comprehensive questionnaire designed to evaluate individuals' health status and quality of life. The SF-36 covers eight different dimensions of health, including physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional health, mental health, and health change. Each dimension is assessed through a series of questions that address aspects such as an individual's capabilities in daily life, symptoms, and emotional states. The SF-36 allows healthcare professionals and researchers to gain insights into a person's health and quality of life across these varied aspects. Additionally, SF-36 has undergone extensive testing and validation, proving to have good reliability and validity.

  • BehavioralWorld Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF)

    The World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) is a health-related quality of life assessment tool developed by the World Health Organization (WHO). It is designed to evaluate an individual's satisfaction with their life and overall health status. The WHOQOL-BREF is a condensed version of the original WHOQOL-100 questionnaire, intended to reduce the time required to complete it and enhance its applicability.

  • BehavioralBDI-II(Beck Depression Inventory-II)

    The BDI-II consists of 21 questions that assess the degree of depression by asking respondents about various depressive symptoms they have experienced. These symptoms include sadness, insomnia or oversleeping, changes in appetite, self-blame, self-disdain, loss of interest in daily activities, and more. Each question has four possible response options, allowing respondents to choose the answer that best fits their feelings. Scoring on the BDI-II ranges from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. Based on the scores, the severity of a respondent's depression can be classified into different levels, ranging from mild to severe. The purpose of using this scale is to help healthcare professionals assess a patient's depressive symptoms, monitor changes in condition, and evaluate the effectiveness of treatments.

  • BehavioralERAS Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire(ERAS-PSQ)

    The ERAS Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ERAS-PSQ) is a satisfaction survey specifically designed for patients who have undergone treatment following the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. This questionnaire aims to evaluate the patients' satisfaction and experience with the ERAS approach. Typically, it includes questions about various aspects of their treatment and care, such as pain management, the recovery process, the quality of nursing care, and communication with the medical team. The ERAS-PSQ is an important tool for assessing how well the ERAS protocols are received by patients and for identifying areas for improvement in patient care within the ERAS framework.

  • BehavioralQuality of Recovery-40(QoR-40)

    The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) is a widely used questionnaire designed to assess the quality of recovery after surgery. It comprises 40 questions that cover both physical and psychological aspects of a patient's recovery, such as pain, nausea, anxiety, dietary habits, and social functioning. The QoR-40 provides a comprehensive view of a patient's postoperative recovery, encompassing a range of factors crucial to understanding the effectiveness of surgical procedures and the overall patient experience during the recovery phase. This tool is instrumental in evaluating and improving post-surgical care and patient outcomes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surgical complications

    any complications associated with this operation

    Time frame: three months after operation

  2. Postoperative pain assessment

    describe postoperative Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessment; the minimum value is 0 (no pain) and maximum value is 10 (most pain)

    Time frame: During the hospitalization period, up to 24 weeks

  3. Postoperative vomiting assessment

    describe postoperative vomiting status; 0=no; 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe

    Time frame: During the postoperative period, up to 7 days

  4. Postoperative nausea assessment

    describe postoperative nausea status; 0=no; 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe

    Time frame: During the postoperative period, up to 7 days

  5. Reoperation during hospitalization

    Reoperation during hospitalization related to this surgery.

    Time frame: During the hospitalization period, the time from the first surgery to the reoperation is related to this surgical procedure, assessment up to 12 weeks.

  6. Length of hospital stay

    days of hospitalization related to this surgery.

    Time frame: The duration from the day of admission to the day of discharge, which is associated with this surgical procedure, assessment up to 12 weeks.

  7. Readmission within 30 days

    Readmission within 30 days related to this surgery.

    Time frame: within 30 days related to this surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Psychological stress- BDI-II

    using Beck Depression Inventory-II, assessment of Psychological stress before and after surgery

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Psychological stress- QoR-40

    using Quality of Recovery-40, assessment of Psychological stress before and after surgery

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Quality of life: Short Form-36

    assessment of Quality of life before and after surgery

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Quality of life: WHOQOL-BREF

    assessment of Quality of life before and after surgery

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. ERAS Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire

    assessment of Patient Satisfaction for this study

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06221020
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 24, 2024
Start date
Dec 12, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 17, 2026

Study contacts

Hung-Chen Wang, MD, PhD
Contact
m82whc@gmail.com
+886-975056287
Hung-Chen Wang, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion