ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01865604Updated Mar 16, 2016

Impact of tDCS on Cerebral Autoregulation

An interventional study of Anodal tDCS and Cathodal tDCS in Cerebral Microangiopathy, CADASIL and Migraine With Aura, sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-16.

Primary conditionCADASILRegistry: Cerebral Small Vessel DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
CADASIL
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name CADASIL, a narrower term within Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to investigate whether there is a polarity-specific influence of tDCS on cerebral vasomotor reactivity monitored by transcranial doppler sonography.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Microangiopathy
  • CADASIL
  • Migraine With Aura
  • ICA Stenosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

CADASIL Reclassified

33 studies on the registry are indexed under CADASIL; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 60 across 10 interventional studies indexed under CADASIL.

Browse CADASIL studies →

Lead sponsor

Charite University, Berlin, Germany is the lead sponsor of 857 studies on the registry; 129 are open to participants now.

Compared within CADASIL, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. severe cerebral Microangiopathy
  2. NOTCH3 carrier
  3. Migraine with aura (IHS Classification ICHD-II)
  4. Stenosis >80%, ECST-Criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • seizure disorder
  • history of severe alcohol or drug abuse, psychiatric illness like severe depression, poor motivational capacity
  • dementia

(1+2) history of stroke in past 3 months (3) migraine prophylaxis (4) contralateral stenosis >50%,

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Anodal tDCS

    anaodal transcranial direct current stimulation

    Device: Anodal tDCS

  • Active comparator
    Cathodal tDCS

    cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation

    Device: Cathodal tDCS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham tDCS

    no stimulation

    Device: sham tDCS

Interventions

  • DeviceAnodal tDCS
  • DeviceCathodal tDCS
  • Devicesham tDCS
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessed by transcranial Dopplersonography

    comparing cerebral vasomotor reactivity at baseline and after anodal/cathodal/sham stimulation

    Time frame: on 3 days within 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2012, a primary completion of Mar 2014 and a completion of Mar 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 18, 2012
First posted
May 31, 2013
Start
Apr 2012
Primary completionActual
Mar 2014
CompletionActual
Mar 2014
Last update
Mar 16, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 16, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01865604
Responsible party
Agnes Flöel (Prof. Dr. med. Agnes Floeel, Charite University, Berlin, Germany) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 31, 2013
Start date
Apr 2012
Primary completion
Mar 2014
Completion
Mar 2014
Last update
Mar 16, 2016

Study contacts

Agnes Flöel, Prof. MD
principal investigator · Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion