ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01808560Updated Sep 4, 2018Results posted

Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Prior to Cataract Surgery

An interventional study of LipiFlow Pre-Treatment and LipiFlow Post-treatment in Blepharitis and Dry Eye Syndrome, sponsored by TearScience, Inc.. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 55 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-04.

Sponsored by TearScience, Inc. (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
55 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this pilot feasibility study is to assess whether treating meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) prior to cataract surgery helps promote meibomian gland function, visual quality and ocular comfort after cataract surgery.

Read the detailed description

This is a post-market, prospective, non-significant risk, open-label, randomized multi-center clinical trial evaluating treatment with the LipiFlow System in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction prior to planned bilateral cataract surgery. All subjects undergo examination to determine study eligibility and to capture the Baseline status prior to surgery. Subjects are randomized to receive LipiFlow treatment (Pre-treatment group) one month before cataract surgery or no LipiFlow treatment (Untreated Control group). Cataract surgery is performed on both eyes of each subject with the second eye surgery completed within two months of the first eye. All subjects are evaluated at one month and three months after cataract surgery on the second eye with comparison of the study endpoints between the Pre-treatment and Untreated groups. To facilitate subject recruitment, the Untreated Control group receives crossover LipiFlow treatment for MGD (Post-treatment group) three months after cataract surgery on the second eye.

02

Conditions studied

  • Blepharitis
  • Dry Eye Syndrome
03

In context

Blepharitis

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Blepharitis; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 60 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Blepharitis.

Browse Blepharitis studies →

Lead sponsor

TearScience, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before TearScience, Inc. became part of Johnson & Johnson.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 55 to 85 years of age
  • Must be able to comply with protocol including study randomization; completion of planned bilateral cataract surgery; no use of other MGD or dry eye treatments during the study; and attendance at all study visits
  • Meibomian gland dysfunction in both eyes based on total meibomian gland score
  • None to mild dry eye symptoms based on Ocular Surface Disease Index score
  • Tear film interferometry assessment of 100 units or less

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic disease conditions that causes dry eye
  • Use of systemic medications known to cause dry eye
  • Use of other MGD or dry eye treatments except for over the counter lubricants or dietary supplements
  • History of any of the following ocular conditions in the past 3 months: surgery, trauma, Herpes infection, recurrent inflammation, punctal plug insertion or punctal occlusion
  • Presence of any of the following active conditions: ocular infection, ocular inflammation, moderate to severe allergic conjunctivitis, severe eyelid inflammation, eyelid abnormality that affects lid function, or ocular surface abnormality that compromises corneal integrity
  • Participation in another ophthalmic drug or device trial in the past month
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LipiFlow Pre-treatment

    Subjects randomized to the LipiFlow Pre-Treatment group receive a 12-minute LipiFlow System treatment for MGD in both eyes one month prior to cataract surgery.

    Device: LipiFlow Pre-Treatment

  • No intervention
    Untreated Control

    Subjects randomized to the untreated control group receive no MGD treatment prior to cataract surgery.

  • Experimental
    LipiFlow Post-treatment

    Subjects in the untreated control group receive a 12-minute crossover treatment with the LipiFlow System in both eyes three months after cataract surgery.

    Device: LipiFlow Post-treatment

Interventions

  • DeviceLipiFlow Pre-Treatment

    The LipiFlow Thermal Pulsation System is intended for the application of localized heat and pressure therapy in adult patients with chronic cystic conditions of the eyelids, including meibomian gland dysfunction, also known as evaporative dry eye or lipid deficiency dry eye.

    Also known as: LipiFlow Thermal Pulsation System

  • DeviceLipiFlow Post-treatment

    The LipiFlow Thermal Pulsation System is intended for the application of localized heat and pressure therapy in adult patients with chronic cystic conditions of the eyelids, including meibomian gland dysfunction, also known as evaporative dry eye or lipid deficiency dry eye.

    Also known as: LipiFlow Thermal Pulsation System

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Total Meibomian Gland Score

    The primary endpoint is the mean change in total meibomian gland score in the Pre-treatment group compared to the Untreated group from Baseline after cataract surgery. Meibomian gland assessment was performed to evaluate the function of the meibomian glands based on the secretion characteristics from the gland orifices along the lower eyelid. Under a slit-lamp biomicrosope, the gland orifices were evaluated using a handheld instrument, Meibomian Gland Evaluator. This instrument provided a standardized method of applying the same amount of pressure and for each eye to ensure measurement consistency. A total of 15 glands were evaluated including five glands each in the temporal, central and nasal regions of the lower eyelid. For each gland, secretion characteristics were graded as 3 (clear liquid), 2 (cloudy liquid), 1 (inspissated/toothpaste consistency) and 0 (no secretion). The total meibomian gland score is the sum of the grades for all 15 glands with a range of 0 to 45.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months

    Assess for reduction in dry eye symptoms in symptomatic contact lens after LipiFlow treatment in comparison to an untreated control using Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire. It was defined as the mean change in SPEED score in the LF Treatment group compared to Control group from Baseline to 3 Months. The symptoms assessed are dryness, grittiness / scratchiness; soreness / irritation; burning / watering; and eye fatigue. Symptom frequency is on a scale of: 0 (never), 1(sometimes), 2 (often) and 3 (constant). Symptom severity is on a scale of: 0 (no problems), 1 (tolerable-not perfect but not uncomfortable), 2 (uncomfortable-irritating but does not interfere with my day), 3 (bothersome-irritating and interferes with my day) and 4 (intolerable-unable to perform my daily tasks). SPEED score is calculated as sum of frequency and severity scores for symptoms over a range from 0 to 28. A lower SPEED score represents less frequent and/or less severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months

    Dry eye symptoms assessed using the OSDI questionnaire are sensitivity to light, grittiness, pain or soreness, blurred vision and poor vision. The assessment considers the frequency that problems with the eyes limit performance in reading, driving at night, working with a computer or bank machine, and watching television. Also, the frequency that eyes feel uncomfortable is assessed in windy conditions, areas with low humidity, and air-conditioned areas. The frequency scale is: 0 (none of the time), 1 (some of the time), 2 (half of the time), 3 (most of the time) and 4 (all of the time). The subject can answer not applicable (N/A) if the subject did not experience the situation or condition in the past week. Total OSDI score is calculated as the sum of frequency scores for all symptoms multiplied by 25 and divided by the number of questions answered with a range from 0 to 100. A lower OSDI score represents less disability from dry eye symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery

  2. Mean Change in NEI-VFQ Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months

    The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) evaluates frequency or severity of a symptoms and the effect on activities of daily living. The questionnaire has an overall score and 12 subscale scores for general health, general vision, ocular pain, difficulty with near vision activities, difficulty with distance vision activities, social functioning limitations due to vision, mental functioning limitations due to vision, role limitations due to vision, dependency on others due to vision, driving difficulties, color vision and peripheral vision. The NEI-VFQ scores range from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating more symptoms or difficulty with activities of daily living. The questionnaire is scored by recoding responses to set values on a 0 to 100 scale such that the lowest value is set to 0 and the highest value is set to 100. The overall score is the average of vision subscale scores, excluding general health question.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery

  3. Mean Change in Number of MGYLS (Meibomian Glands Yielding Liquid Secretion)

    Meibomian gland assessment was performed to evaluate the function of the meibomian glands based on the secretion characteristics from the gland orifices along the lower eyelid at the visits. Under a slit-lamp biomicrosope, the gland orifices were evaluated using a handheld instrument, Meibomian Gland Evaluator, to apply gentle pressure along the eyelid margin. This instrument provided a standardized method of applying the same amount of pressure at each visit and for each eye to ensure measurement consistency. The number of meibomian glands yielding liquid secretion (MGYLS) (i.e., cloudy or clear liquid with a grade of 2 or 3) was counted out of the 15 glands assessed with a range of 0 to 15. A higher total meibomian gland score or higher number of MGYLS reflects less meibomian gland dysfunction.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery

  4. Mean Change in Tear Break-up Time (TBUT)

    The Investigator or designee measures tear break-up time (TBUT) under a slit-lamp biomicroscope following instillation of fluorescein dye in the eye using the Dry Eye Test (DET) method. Tear film break-up is defined as the first observed break-up of the tear film following the third blink. Using a stopwatch to record the time, start the stopwatch as soon as the subject opens his/her eyes after the third blink and stop the stopwatch when the first break-up of the tear film is observed. Any values recorded as greater than 20 seconds were converted to 20 seconds in the analysis. Three separate measurements were taken for each eye and were averaged for analysis. A higher tear break-up time indicates better tear film stability.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery

07

Results

Posted May 14, 2018

Participant flow

Randomization and Treatment Allocation
Participant flow — Randomization and Treatment Allocation
MilestoneLipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatment
Started18160
Completed18160
Not completed000
1-Month After Cataract Surgery
Participant flow — 1-Month After Cataract Surgery
MilestoneLipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatment
Started16130
Completed16130
Not completed000
3-Month After Cataract Surgery
Participant flow — 3-Month After Cataract Surgery
MilestoneLipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatment
Started17130
Completed17130
Not completed000
Crossover Treatment
Participant flow — Crossover Treatment
MilestoneLipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatment
Started0013
Completed0013
Not completed000
4-Month After Cataract Surgery
Participant flow — 4-Month After Cataract Surgery
MilestoneLipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatment
Started0013
Completed0013
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change in Total Meibomian Gland Score

The primary endpoint is the mean change in total meibomian gland score in the Pre-treatment group compared to the Untreated group from Baseline after cataract surgery. Meibomian gland assessment was performed to evaluate the function of the meibomian glands based on the secretion characteristics from the gland orifices along the lower eyelid. Under a slit-lamp biomicrosope, the gland orifices were evaluated using a handheld instrument, Meibomian Gland Evaluator. This instrument provided a standardized method of applying the same amount of pressure and for each eye to ensure measurement consistency. A total of 15 glands were evaluated including five glands each in the temporal, central and nasal regions of the lower eyelid. For each gland, secretion characteristics were graded as 3 (clear liquid), 2 (cloudy liquid), 1 (inspissated/toothpaste consistency) and 0 (no secretion). The total meibomian gland score is the sum of the grades for all 15 glands with a range of 0 to 45.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Change in Meibomian Gland Score
Mean Change in Total Meibomian Gland Score
Change in Meibomian Gland ScoreLipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatment
Mean Change in Total Meibomian Gland Score12.8 ± 9.91.9 ± 6.1—
SecondaryMean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months

Assess for reduction in dry eye symptoms in symptomatic contact lens after LipiFlow treatment in comparison to an untreated control using Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire. It was defined as the mean change in SPEED score in the LF Treatment group compared to Control group from Baseline to 3 Months. The symptoms assessed are dryness, grittiness / scratchiness; soreness / irritation; burning / watering; and eye fatigue. Symptom frequency is on a scale of: 0 (never), 1(sometimes), 2 (often) and 3 (constant). Symptom severity is on a scale of: 0 (no problems), 1 (tolerable-not perfect but not uncomfortable), 2 (uncomfortable-irritating but does not interfere with my day), 3 (bothersome-irritating and interferes with my day) and 4 (intolerable-unable to perform my daily tasks). SPEED score is calculated as sum of frequency and severity scores for symptoms over a range from 0 to 28. A lower SPEED score represents less frequent and/or less severe symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Change in SPEED Score
Mean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months
Change in SPEED ScoreLipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatment
Mean Change in Dry Eye Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months-3.4 ± 5.71.2 ± 5.4—
Other pre-specifiedMean Change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months

Dry eye symptoms assessed using the OSDI questionnaire are sensitivity to light, grittiness, pain or soreness, blurred vision and poor vision. The assessment considers the frequency that problems with the eyes limit performance in reading, driving at night, working with a computer or bank machine, and watching television. Also, the frequency that eyes feel uncomfortable is assessed in windy conditions, areas with low humidity, and air-conditioned areas. The frequency scale is: 0 (none of the time), 1 (some of the time), 2 (half of the time), 3 (most of the time) and 4 (all of the time). The subject can answer not applicable (N/A) if the subject did not experience the situation or condition in the past week. Total OSDI score is calculated as the sum of frequency scores for all symptoms multiplied by 25 and divided by the number of questions answered with a range from 0 to 100. A lower OSDI score represents less disability from dry eye symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Change in Total OSDI Score
Mean Change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months
Change in Total OSDI ScoreLipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatment
Mean Change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months-8.7 ± 22.32.0 ± 17.2—
Other pre-specifiedMean Change in NEI-VFQ Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months

The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) evaluates frequency or severity of a symptoms and the effect on activities of daily living. The questionnaire has an overall score and 12 subscale scores for general health, general vision, ocular pain, difficulty with near vision activities, difficulty with distance vision activities, social functioning limitations due to vision, mental functioning limitations due to vision, role limitations due to vision, dependency on others due to vision, driving difficulties, color vision and peripheral vision. The NEI-VFQ scores range from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating more symptoms or difficulty with activities of daily living. The questionnaire is scored by recoding responses to set values on a 0 to 100 scale such that the lowest value is set to 0 and the highest value is set to 100. The overall score is the average of vision subscale scores, excluding general health question.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Change in NEI-VFQ-25 Composite Score
Mean Change in NEI-VFQ Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months
Change in NEI-VFQ-25 Composite ScoreLipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatment
Mean Change in NEI-VFQ Questionnaire Score From Baseline at 3 Months11.6 ± 14.17.3 ± 10.8—
Other pre-specifiedMean Change in Number of MGYLS (Meibomian Glands Yielding Liquid Secretion)

Meibomian gland assessment was performed to evaluate the function of the meibomian glands based on the secretion characteristics from the gland orifices along the lower eyelid at the visits. Under a slit-lamp biomicrosope, the gland orifices were evaluated using a handheld instrument, Meibomian Gland Evaluator, to apply gentle pressure along the eyelid margin. This instrument provided a standardized method of applying the same amount of pressure at each visit and for each eye to ensure measurement consistency. The number of meibomian glands yielding liquid secretion (MGYLS) (i.e., cloudy or clear liquid with a grade of 2 or 3) was counted out of the 15 glands assessed with a range of 0 to 15. A higher total meibomian gland score or higher number of MGYLS reflects less meibomian gland dysfunction.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Change in Number of MGYLS
Mean Change in Number of MGYLS (Meibomian Glands Yielding Liquid Secretion)
Change in Number of MGYLSLipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatment
Mean Change in Number of MGYLS (Meibomian Glands Yielding Liquid Secretion)5.6 ± 4.81.0 ± 3.1—
Other pre-specifiedMean Change in Tear Break-up Time (TBUT)

The Investigator or designee measures tear break-up time (TBUT) under a slit-lamp biomicroscope following instillation of fluorescein dye in the eye using the Dry Eye Test (DET) method. Tear film break-up is defined as the first observed break-up of the tear film following the third blink. Using a stopwatch to record the time, start the stopwatch as soon as the subject opens his/her eyes after the third blink and stop the stopwatch when the first break-up of the tear film is observed. Any values recorded as greater than 20 seconds were converted to 20 seconds in the analysis. Three separate measurements were taken for each eye and were averaged for analysis. A higher tear break-up time indicates better tear film stability.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 Months post-surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Change in TBUT (in seconds)
Mean Change in Tear Break-up Time (TBUT)
Change in TBUT (in seconds)LipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatment
Mean Change in Tear Break-up Time (TBUT)1.4 ± 5.2-0.6 ± 3.0—

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
LipiFlow Pre-treatment0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)
Untreated Control0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)
LipiFlow Post-treatment0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)LipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatmentTotal
Mean71.9 ± 5.768.6 ± 6.4—70.4 ± 6.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatmentTotal
Female1312—25
Male54—9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)LipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatmentTotal
Hispanic or Latino10—1
Not Hispanic or Latino1716—33
Unknown or Not Reported00—0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)LipiFlow Pre-treatmentUntreated ControlLipiFlow Post-treatmentTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native01—1
Asian00—0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00—0
Black or African American10—1
White1715—32
More than one race00—0
Unknown or Not Reported00—0
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Chicago Cornea Consultants, Ltd.
    Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60169, United States
  • Jackson Eye
    Lake Villa, Illinois 60046, United States
  • Charles River Eye Associates
    Winchester, Massachusetts 01890, United States
  • Associated Eye Care
    Stillwater, Minnesota 55082, United States
  • Ophthalmology Consultants, Ltd.
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63131, United States
  • The May Eye Care Center
    Hanover, Pennsylvania 17833, United States
  • Carolina EyeCare Physicians, LLC
    Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2013, a primary completion of Jan 2015 and a completion of Jan 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in May 2018, 3 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 7, 2013
First posted
Mar 11, 2013
Start
Mar 2013
Primary completionActual
Jan 2015
CompletionActual
Jan 2015
Results first posted
May 14, 2018
Last update
Sep 4, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01808560
Lead sponsor
TearScience, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 11, 2013
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
Jan 2015
Completion
Jan 2015
Results posted
May 14, 2018
Last update
Sep 4, 2018

Study contacts

Christy Stevens, OD, MPH
study director · TearScience

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion