CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01202747Updated Dec 6, 2011Results posted

Evaluation of Screening Methods for Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of LipiFlow System in Chalazion and Dry Eye Syndromes, sponsored by TearScience, Inc.. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-12-06.

Sponsored by TearScience, Inc. · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective is to evaluate the feasibility of using additional screening methods to optimize effectiveness outcomes with the LipiFlow System for application of heat and pressure therapy in adult patients with chronic cystic conditions of the eyelids, including meibomian gland dysfunction, also known as evaporative dry eye or lipid deficiency dry eye, and chalazia. The screening methods include diagnostic expression of the meibomian glands and interferometry assessment of the tear film.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chalazion
  • Dry Eye Syndromes

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 191 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 60 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

TearScience, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Meibomian gland dysfunction
  • Dry Eye symptoms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ocular surgery, ocular injury or ocular Herpes infection within past 3 months
  • Active ocular infection
  • Active ocular inflammation or recurrent inflammation within past 3 months
  • Moderate to severe allergic conjunctivitis
  • Severe eyelid inflammation
  • Eyelid abnormalities that affect lid function
  • Ocular surface abnormalities that may compromise corneal integrity
  • Systemic disease conditions or medications that cause dry eye
  • Use of other treatments for meibomian gland dysfunction or dry eye
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Participation in another ophthalmic clinical trial within past 30 days
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LipiFlow Treatment

    Treatment with LipiFlow device

    Device: LipiFlow System

Interventions

  • DeviceLipiFlow System

    In-office treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Association Between Screening Methods (Meibomian Gland Expression) and Treatment Effectiveness Outcomes (Total Meibomian Gland Score)

    Analysis of association between Baseline Meibomian Gland Expression Score and Total Meibomian Gland Score at 4 Weeks. Success was defined by demonstration of a statistically significant (p\<0.05) association between the screening method and outcome. Meibomian gland expression sum scores range from 0 to 60 with a higher score reflecting less meibomian gland dysfunction. Total meibomian gland scores range from 0 to 45 with a higher score reflecting less meibomian gland dysfunction.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 Weeks

07

Results

Posted Dec 6, 2011

Participant flow

A total of 50 subjects (100 eyes) were enrolled at 3 investigational sites between 10/03/2010 and 11/15/2010.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLipiFlow Treatment
Started50
Completed49
Not completed1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1

Outcome measures

PrimaryAssociation Between Screening Methods (Meibomian Gland Expression) and Treatment Effectiveness Outcomes (Total Meibomian Gland Score)

Analysis of association between Baseline Meibomian Gland Expression Score and Total Meibomian Gland Score at 4 Weeks. Success was defined by demonstration of a statistically significant (p\<0.05) association between the screening method and outcome. Meibomian gland expression sum scores range from 0 to 60 with a higher score reflecting less meibomian gland dysfunction. Total meibomian gland scores range from 0 to 45 with a higher score reflecting less meibomian gland dysfunction.

Time frame:
Baseline and 4 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Correlation coefficient
Association Between Screening Methods (Meibomian Gland Expression) and Treatment Effectiveness Outcomes (Total Meibomian Gland Score)
Correlation coefficientLipiFlow Treatment
Association Between Screening Methods (Meibomian Gland Expression) and Treatment Effectiveness Outcomes (Total Meibomian Gland Score)0.4816
Statistical analysis
  • LipiFlow Treatment · Regression, Linear · p = 0.0005 (p\<0.05 considered statistically significant)

Adverse events

Collected over 4 Weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
LipiFlow Treatment—0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)LipiFlow Treatment
Mean49.8 ± 15.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LipiFlow Treatment
Female35
Male15
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Hoffman Estates, Illinois, United States
  • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Winchester, Massachusetts, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 6, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01202747
Lead sponsor
TearScience, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2010
Start date
Sep 2010
Primary completion
Jan 2011
Completion
Jan 2011
Results posted
Dec 6, 2011
Last update
Dec 6, 2011

Study contacts

Christy Stevens, OD
study director · TearScience

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion