CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01790776SONO-URETHRAUpdated Jan 26, 2023

Diagnosis of Urethral Stricture With Sono-urethrography vs Conventional Urethrography (SONO-URETHRA)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Urografin 30% and NaCl 0,9 % in aqua in Urethral Stricture Disease, sponsored by University Hospital, Ghent. Withdrawn at 1 site in Belgium. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-26.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Ghent · Phase 3, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Conventional urethrography is the standard diagnostic evaluation for patients with a suspicion of urethral stricture. The radiation dose of this examination is 5-9 mSV. Sono-urethrography was introduced in 1988 (McAninch et al. , J Urol 1988); the diagnostic accuracy of sono-urethrography is equal compared to conventional urethrography, with even a better measurement of stricture length and degree of spongiofibrosis with sono-urethrography. However, sono-urethrography remained underused among urologists and radiologists.

Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups:

Group A: conventional urethrography Group B: sono-urethrography In case sono-urethrography is inconclusive or of poor quality, a conventional urethrography will be performed.

The radiation dose in the two groups will be measured. The stricture length and location will be recorded and compared with the perioperative findings in order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. The complications of the procedure(s) will be recorded with a questionnaire directly after and two weeks after the conventional or sono-urethrography.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urethral Stricture Disease

Keywords

  • urethrography
03

In context

Urethral Stricture

68 studies on the registry are indexed under Urethral Stricture; 23 are open to participants now.

Browse Urethral Stricture studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Ghent is the lead sponsor of 665 studies on the registry; 156 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a suspicion of urethral stricture disease for which an indication of imaging of the urethra exists.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transsexual patients.
  • Patients with perineostomy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional urethrography

    Current golden standard.

    Radiation: Urografin 30%

  • Experimental
    Sono-urethrography

    Experimental urethrography, which could be followed by conventional urethrography if the results are inconclusive.

    Radiation: NaCl 0,9 % in aqua

Interventions

  • RadiationUrografin 30%

    Urografin 30% (Natrium amidotrizoas 10G, Megalumin, Amidotrizoas 65G, Natrii calcii edetas, water for injection 250 ml, with 146 mg iodium/ml). The tip of a bladder catheter is placed at the external urethral meatus and fixed at this location. The solution (urografin 30 %) is instilled.

  • RadiationNaCl 0,9 % in aqua

    The tip of a bladder catheter is placed at the external urethral meatus and fixed at this location. The solution (NaCl 0,9 % in aqua) is instilled. If the result is inconclusive, urografin 30 % will be instilled.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Radiation dose during diagnostic intervention.

    The radiation dose will be measured with a dosimeter.

    Time frame: During urethrography.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of sono-urethrography vs conventional urethrography.

    The results of sono-urethrography and conventional urethrography will be compared with the intraoperative situation (place stricture, length stricture); contrast allergy and complications are scored with a questionnaire.

    Time frame: Immediately and 2 weeks after urethrography

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ghent University Hospital
    Ghent, 9000, Belgium
08

References and documents

Related links

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01790776
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Ghent
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 13, 2013
Start date
Feb 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Last update
Jan 26, 2023

Study contacts

Nicolaas Lumen, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · University Hospital, Ghent

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion