ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01763151Updated Jan 10, 2013

Comparison of Toric IOL Implantation and Opposite Clear Corneal Incision During Cataract Surgery to Correct Corneal Astigmatism

A Phase 4 interventional study of toric IOL and IOL combined with opposite clear corneal incision (OCCI) in Cataract and Corneal Astigmatism, sponsored by Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery. Completed at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-01-10.

Sponsored by Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

With increasing demands of patients concerning refractive outcome after cataract surgery, toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) that correct corneal astigmatism have been introduced more widely to cataract surgery. Originally toric IOLs were used mainly for patients with high degrees of astigmatism, especially after corneal surgical procedures such as penetrating keratoplasty. Since a couple of years, toric IOLs are available from numerous manufacturers to correct lower amounts of astigmatism which are much more prevalent with about 30% having a corneal astigmatism of 0.75D or more in the cataract population. This should result in less spectacle dependence of patients due to the astigmatic correction.

The alternative method to reduce corneal astigmatism as part of cataract surgery is to make incisions on the steeper axis of the cornea such as limbal relaxing incisions or an additional clear corneal incision opposite (OCCI) to the main cataract opening. These techniques are in use since more than 2 decades and are widely used in clinical routine. As with toric IOLs, precise alignment of the cuts with the axis of astigmatism is essential. The disadvantage of the incisional techniques is the variability of the effect between patients since it depends on factors such as the extent of scaring of the cuts after surgery as well as corneal thickness. The main advantage is the simplicity of the technique and the lower cost.

Aim of this study is to compare toric IOL implantation and opposite clear corneal incision during cataract surgery to correct corneal astigmatism.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cataract
  • Corneal Astigmatism

Keywords

  • cataract surgery, astigmatism, opposite clear corneal incision, toric IOL, IOL rotational stability
03

In context

Cataract

1,726 studies on the registry are indexed under Cataract; 230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is below the median of 80 across 1,171 interventional studies indexed under Cataract.

Browse Cataract studies →

Lead sponsor

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Cataract
  • Age 21 and older
  • Regular corneal astigmatism 1.0 up to 2.5 D
  • written informed consent prior to surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Relevant other ophthalmic diseases such as: pseudoexfoliation, glaucoma, traumatic cataract corneal scars, and other co-morbidity that could affect capsule bag stability ( e.g. Marfan syndrome)
  • Irregular corneal astigmatism on corneal topography
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    toric IOL

    aspherical, toric acrylic IOL (Lentis L-312T, Oculentis, Germany)

    Device: toric IOL

  • Active comparator
    IOL combined with opposite clear corneal incision (OCCI)

    aspherical, acrylic IOL with OCCI

    Procedure: IOL combined with opposite clear corneal incision (OCCI)

Interventions

  • Devicetoric IOL

    implantation of an aspheric, toric, acrylic IOL during cataract surgery

  • ProcedureIOL combined with opposite clear corneal incision (OCCI)

    aspherical, acrylic IOL with opposite clear corneal incision during cataract surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative residual astigmatism

    Time frame: 9 months post-operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA)

    Time frame: 9 months post-operatively

Other outcomes

  1. postoperative IOL rotation

    Time frame: 3 months and 9 months post-operatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Hanusch Hospital
    Vienna, 1140, Austria
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2010, a primary completion of Aug 2012 and a completion of Dec 2012. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 6, 2013
First posted
Jan 8, 2013
Start
Sep 2010
Primary completionActual
Aug 2012
CompletionActual
Dec 2012
Last update
Jan 10, 2013
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 10, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01763151
Lead sponsor
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery
Responsible party
Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA (MD, MBA, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 8, 2013
Start date
Sep 2010
Primary completion
Aug 2012
Completion
Dec 2012
Last update
Jan 10, 2013
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion