An interventional study of Evolux and Tecnis Eyhance in Cataract, sponsored by Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery. Recruiting at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 105 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-04.
Sponsored by Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science
Comparison of the clinical performance of two enhanced monofocal IOLs with similar design.
In modern cataract surgery the aim of the procedure is not just the restoration of vision but to also achieve some spectacle independence. Bilateral implantation of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOL) aiming for emmetropia lead to high patient satisfaction levels in distance vision but leave patients dependent on spectacles in intermediate and near vision tasks.
To achieve high levels of spectacle independence the most commonly used option are multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL). These MIOLs use either a refractive or diffractive optical design, a combination of both or segmented asymmetric optics. Usually, the characteristic diffractive ring patterns are incorporated on the posterior surface of an IOL, whereas the anterior lens surface remains purely refractive. However, a portion of patients experience problems with positive dysphotopsia symptoms such as halos and glare. Other potentially negative aspects of MIOLs are pupil size dependency and loss of light energy to higher order diffraction which can lead to reduced contrast sensitivity. In clinical studies diffractive lenses resulted in a better outcome in terms of optical quality, better contrast sensitivity and positive dysphotopsia phenomena than refractive multifocal lenses.
A newer concept of IOLs are non-diffractive enhanced range of vision (EROV) IOLs, sometimes also referred to as EDOF IOLs. The EROV IOLs with the least compromise concerning quality of vision are the group of so called enhanced monofocal IOL, also sometime referred to as monofocal plus IOL. These IOLs should result in better intermediate vison and provide contrast sensitivity and dysphotopsia results comparable to standard monofocal IOLs. These IOLs may be more adequate to meet the expectations of many presbyopic cataract patients, who were used to have a good distance vision and who were wearing spectacles when performing near vision tasks before surgery.
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of a newer enhanced monofocal IOL (Evolux) with a standard enhanced monofocal IOL, the Tecnis Eyhance.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient will receive the Enova IOL during cataract surgery
Device: Evolux
Patient will receive the Tecnis Ehance IOL during cataract surgery
Device: Tecnis Eyhance
Evolux, enhanced monofocal IOL
Tecnis Eyhance, enhanced monofocal IOL
Monocular intermediate visual acuity
Monocular intermediate visual acuity at 66 cm will be measured using ETDRS charts
Time frame: 24 months
Monocular distance visual acuity
Monocular distance visual acuity at 4 meters will be measured using ETDRS charts
Time frame: 24 months
Monocular near visual acuity
Monocular near visual acuity at 40 cm will be measured using ETDRS charts
Time frame: 24 months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery