CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01705587FiX-ITUpdated Dec 12, 2017Results posted

Fracture (FX) Improvement With Teriparatide: FiX-IT Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of teriparatide in Osteoporosis and Atypical Femoral Fracture, sponsored by Susan L. Greenspan. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-12.

Sponsored by Susan L. Greenspan · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This open label comparison study examines the hypothesis that teriparatide given immediately following repair of an atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral shaft fracture will enhance healing and improve bone mineral density compared to delayed treatment (after six months) with teriparatide or no treatment with teriparatide (patients who refuse therapy or for whom teriparatide is contraindicated). Patients with up-front teriparatide in addition will have greater quality of life measures and less pain compared to those with delayed or no therapy.

Read the detailed description

Up to 24 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who have been on bisphosphonate therapy for one year or more at any point prior to fracture and have sustained an atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal fracture will be enrolled. Subjects randomized to the two intervention arms will self-administer a daily SQ injection of the study medication for 12 months. The primary objective is to demonstrate greater radiologic evidence of healing at 10 weeks in patients on immediate teriparatide compared to those on delayed teriparatide who receive therapy six months after fracture. Secondary end points include (1) radiologic healing at 2, 6, 24, and 46 weeks; (2) increased bone density at 6 and 12 months as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, contralateral hip, and femoral neck; (3) quality of life improvements at 10 weeks and 6 months as assessed by quality of life questionnaire and pain score; and (4) differences in biochemical markers of bone turnover in patient with upfront therapy compared to patients with delayed therapy and patients who refuse therapy or for whom teriparatide is contraindicated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoporosis
  • Atypical Femoral Fracture

Keywords

  • osteoporosis
  • atypical femoral fractures
  • prior bisphosphonate treatment
  • postmenopausal women
  • bone loss
03

In context

Osteoporosis

1,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis; 212 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 95 across 1,133 interventional studies indexed under Osteoporosis.

Browse Osteoporosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Susan L. Greenspan is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • postmenopausal women
  • with osteoporosis who have been on bisphosphonate therapy for one year or more (all bisphosphonates will be included such as alendronate, risdedronate, ibandronate, or zoledronic acid).
  • Patients will also be included if they are on glucocorticoids or other medications known to affect bone mineral metabolism as these are often found in patients with these types of fractures.
  • sustain an atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral shaft fracture as defined by the the 2010 ASBMR task force. An atypical fracture must include all of the following: (1) a location in the femur distal to lesser trochanter; (2) no trauma or minimal trauma as a fall; (3) transverse or short oblique configuration; (4) noncomminuted; and (5) complete fracture extends through both cortices and may be associated with a medial spike; incomplete fractures involve only the lateral cortex. Patients who have an incomplete fracture can be included if they fall into the 2010 ASBMR task force definition.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • men
  • children
  • those who have had radiation therapy
  • Paget's disease
  • treatment with teriparatide for two year in the past
  • metastatic bone disease
  • active cancer
  • hypercalcemia
  • hyperparathyroidism
  • metabolic disease other than osteoporosis
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Immediate teriparatide

    Open label teriparatide given immediately following surgical repair of fracture

    Drug: teriparatide

  • Experimental
    Delayed teriparatide

    Open label teriparatide given six months following surgical repair of fracture

    Drug: teriparatide

Interventions

  • Drugteriparatide

    20 microgram once-daily subcutaneous injection

    Also known as: Forteo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Radiologic Evidence of Bone Healing

    The radiologic indices of fracture healing included (1) cortical continuity on two of four cortices, (2) persistence of alignment, (3) decreased conspicuity of fracture line, and (4) increased callus formation. For each of these indices, healing was graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 = no change (less than 25%), 2 = minimum healing (25-50%), 3 = moderate healing (50-75%), and 4 = complete healing (greater than 75%). A composite score was calculated by summing the subscale scores for the 4 indices. Composite score scale ranged from 4 to 16 with higher scores indicating more complete healing. The primary grading was performed by a radiologist with expertise in musculoskeletal radiology, then independently repeated by a second radiologist, both of whom were blinded to the study allocation.

    Time frame: 6, 12 months of treatment

  2. Radiologic Evidence of Healing

    Number of participants with persistence of alignment as determined by a radiologist.

    Time frame: at 10 weeks for immediate teriparatide group

Secondary outcomes

  1. Radiologic Healing

    Time frame: at 2, 6, 24, and 48 weeks

  2. Increased Bone Density

    Percent change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, contralateral hip, distal 1/3 radius, and femoral neck

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 months

  3. Quality of Life Improvements

    Assessed by quality of life questionnaire (SF-36). There are 8 subscales each ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Time frame: at 12 months

  4. Difference in Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover

    upfront therapy group compared to delayed therapy group and no therapy group

    Time frame: intervals over 12-18 months depending on treatment group

07

Results

Posted Dec 12, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneImmediate TeriparatideDelayed Teriparatide
Started76
Completed75
Not completed01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryRadiologic Evidence of Bone Healing

The radiologic indices of fracture healing included (1) cortical continuity on two of four cortices, (2) persistence of alignment, (3) decreased conspicuity of fracture line, and (4) increased callus formation. For each of these indices, healing was graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 = no change (less than 25%), 2 = minimum healing (25-50%), 3 = moderate healing (50-75%), and 4 = complete healing (greater than 75%). A composite score was calculated by summing the subscale scores for the 4 indices. Composite score scale ranged from 4 to 16 with higher scores indicating more complete healing. The primary grading was performed by a radiologist with expertise in musculoskeletal radiology, then independently repeated by a second radiologist, both of whom were blinded to the study allocation.

Time frame:
6, 12 months of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Radiologic Evidence of Bone Healing
units on a scaleImmediate TeriparatideDelayed Teriparatide
6 mo12.6 ± 0.611.2 ± 1.3
12 mo15.4 ± 0.413.2 ± 1.2
PrimaryRadiologic Evidence of Healing

Number of participants with persistence of alignment as determined by a radiologist.

Time frame:
at 10 weeks for immediate teriparatide group
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Radiologic Evidence of Healing
ParticipantsImmediate TeriparatideDelayed Teriparatide
Radiologic Evidence of Healing54
SecondaryRadiologic Healing
Time frame:
at 2, 6, 24, and 48 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryIncreased Bone Density

Percent change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, contralateral hip, distal 1/3 radius, and femoral neck

Time frame:
at 6 and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage change in BMD
Increased Bone Density
percentage change in BMDImmediate TeriparatideDelayed Teriparatide
Spine-PA (6 months)2.1 ± 1.5-0.6 ± 1.3
Spine-PA (12 months)2.8 ± 2.05.4 ± 2.8
Total Hip (6 months)-1.6 ± 1.5-0.8 ± 0.7
Total Hip (12 months)-0.3 ± 1.81.5 ± 2.7
Femoral Neck (6 months)-1.8 ± 2.1-2.7 ± 1.0
Femoral Neck (12 months)-2.5 ± 3.0-1.9 ± 3.6
Distal 1/3 Radius (6 months)-0.6 ± 1.9-0.7 ± 1.1
Distal 1/3 Radius (12 months)-1.9 ± 1.7-6.1 ± 2.1
SecondaryQuality of Life Improvements

Assessed by quality of life questionnaire (SF-36). There are 8 subscales each ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame:
at 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life Improvements
units on a scaleImmediate TeriparatideDelayed Teriparatide
Physical functioning49.3 ± 6.565.0 ± 20.3
Physical health limitations48.2 ± 9.168.8 ± 21.2
Emotional health limitations75.0 ± 9.172.9 ± 19.7
Energy/Fatigue54.5 ± 7.459.4 ± 15.0
Emotional well-being80.7 ± 4.170.0 ± 9.1
Social functioning92.9 ± 4.665.6 ± 23.6
Pain72.9 ± 9.759.4 ± 21.2
General health66.1 ± 6.267.2 ± 12.1
SecondaryDifference in Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover

upfront therapy group compared to delayed therapy group and no therapy group

Time frame:
intervals over 12-18 months depending on treatment group

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Immediate Teriparatide0/7 (0%)3/7 (42.9%)5/7 (71.4%)
Delayed Teriparatide0/6 (0%)2/6 (33.3%)5/6 (83.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventImmediate TeriparatideDelayed Teriparatide
elective back surgerySurgical and medical procedures0/71/6
Ewings SarcomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/71/6
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/70/6
Abnormal coagulation profileBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/70/6
HematomaGeneral disorders1/70/6
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent other events
EventImmediate TeriparatideDelayed Teriparatide
thigh painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/72/6
deep vein thrombosisVascular disorders0/71/6
gingivitisGeneral disorders0/71/6
periodontal gum surgerySurgical and medical procedures0/71/6
allergic rhinitisImmune system disorders0/71/6
coronary artery diseaseVascular disorders0/71/6
cardiac catheterizationSurgical and medical procedures0/71/6
dizzinessGeneral disorders0/71/6
varicella zosterInfections and infestations0/71/6
FallMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/70/6

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Immediate TeriparatideDelayed TeriparatideTotal
Mean78.0 ± 8.66069.8 ± 8.08574.2 ± 9.094
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Immediate TeriparatideDelayed TeriparatideTotal
Female7613
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Immediate TeriparatideDelayed TeriparatideTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White7411
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pittsburgh, Osteoporosis Prevention & Treatment Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 12, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01705587
Lead sponsor
Susan L. Greenspan
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh, Eli Lilly and Company
Responsible party
Susan L. Greenspan (Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 12, 2012
Start date
Dec 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Results posted
Dec 12, 2017
Last update
Dec 12, 2017

Study contacts

Susan L. Greenspan, MD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion