A Phase 2 interventional study of BQ-123 and NaCl in Coronary Artery Disease and Aorto-coronary Bypass Grafting, sponsored by Medical University of Vienna. Status unknown at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-08-07.
Sponsored by Medical University of Vienna · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Background: Although selected cardiac surgery can be performed off-pump, the vast majority of cardiac surgical procedures today are performed with the support of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Blood cardioplegia is used to protect the heart during aortic cross-clamping. However, negative effects of myocardial hypoxia during surgery are often aggravated by ischemia/reperfusion injury. In addition, cardiopulmonary bypass leads to an inflammatory response including endothelial cell activation.
Comparable to the reperfusion injury following acute myocardial infarction resolved by percutaneous coronary intervention, the microcirculatory impairment observed after cardiac surgery may be caused by endothelin 1 (ET-1). ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide upregulated in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Short-term administration of the selective ETA receptor blocker BQ-123 was found safe in a pilot study including patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Hypothesis: Acute local ETA receptor blockade by intracoronary administered BQ-123 reduces myocardial injury.
Methods: BQ-123 will be administered in patients undergoing on-pump aorto-coronary bypass grafting to the left anterior descending coronary artery with the use a left inner mammary artery graft and at least one vein graft. Subjects will be randomized to receive the endothelin-A receptor blocker BQ-123 or placebo administered intracoronarily in combination with cardioplegia in a double-blind manner. The primary endpoint will be enzymatic infarct size.
Clinical perspective: The implementation of BQ-123 as an add-on pharmacologic therapy in cardiac surgery performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass could lead to improved tissue reperfusion and reduced ischemia/reperfusion injury, potentially impacting clinical long-term outcome.
Background: Although selected cardiac surgery can be performed off-pump, the vast majority of cardiac surgical procedures today are performed with the support of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Blood cardioplegia is used to protect the heart during aortic cross-clamping. However, negative effects of myocardial hypoxia during surgery are often aggravated by ischemia/reperfusion injury. In addition, cardiopulmonary bypass leads to an inflammatory response including endothelial cell activation.
Comparable to the reperfusion injury following acute myocardial infarction resolved by percutaneous coronary intervention, the microcirculatory impairment observed after cardiac surgery may be caused by endothelin 1 (ET-1). ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide upregulated in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Short-term administration of the selective ETA receptor blocker BQ-123 was found safe in a pilot study including patients with acute myocardial infarction. Patients with posterior-wall STE-ACS (n=57) were randomly assigned to receive intravenous BQ-123 at 400nmol/minute or placebo over 60 minutes, starting immediately prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). No side branch occlusions, bleeding complications or severe systemic hypotensive episodes occurred and all patients were alive at 30 days.
Hypothesis: Acute local ETA receptor blockade by intracoronary administered BQ-123 reduces myocardial injury.
Methods: BQ-123 will be administered in patients undergoing on-pump aorto-coronary bypass grafting to the left anterior descending coronary artery with the use a left inner mammary artery graft and at least one vein graft. After a 1:1 randomized pilot safety-phase with 30 patients administering half the dose, 90 subjects will be randomized to receive 15µmol BQ-123 dissolved in NaCl 0.9% or placebo (NaCl 0.9% ) administered intracoronarily in combination with cardioplegia in a double-blind manner. The primary endpoint will be enzymatic infarct size assessed by the area under the curve of myocard specific creatine kinase-MB isoform (CK-MB). Left ventricular ejection fraction, diastolic dysfunction and, perioperative echocardiography, postoperative levels of myeloperoxidase and matrixmetalloproteinase-9 activity as well as MACE will serve as secondary endpoints.
Clinical perspective: The implementation of BQ-123 as an add-on pharmacologic therapy in cardiac surgery performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass could lead to improved tissue reperfusion and reduced ischemia/reperfusion injury, potentially impacting clinical long-term outcome.
5,600 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 958 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 120 is close to the median of 123 across 3,438 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.
Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →Medical University of Vienna is the lead sponsor of 1,076 studies on the registry; 176 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting using the left mammary artery to the left anterior descendent artery and at least one vein graft due to coronary artery disease, aged 18 years and above.
Exclusion Criteria:
Drug: BQ-123
Drug: NaCl
BQ-123 (Clinalfa, Läufelfingen, Switzerland) Dosage: 15µmol in two equal amounts (7.5µmol); in the first and last cardioplegia Route: intracoronary
Also known as: Cyclo(-D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu) sodium salt
NaCl, Route: intracoronary
enzymatic infarct size
Time frame: 72h
Catecholamines
Time frame: 5h
Liver function
Time frame: 72h
catecholamine requirement
Time frame: 72h
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Medical University of Vienna