ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01594411IMPACT-PCPUpdated Jan 31, 2019Results posted

PCP Use of a Gene Expression Test (Corus CAD or ASGES) in Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis

An observational study in Chest Pain, Cardiovascular Diseases and Angina Pectoris, sponsored by CardioDx. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-31.

Sponsored by CardioDx · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
251
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, multi-center study examining the clinical impact of the Corus CAD (Age/Sex/Gene Expression score - ASGES) assay in approximately 250 evaluable subjects with no history of obstructive coronary artery disease who now present with chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms to a primary care physician (PCP) for evaluation.

Read the detailed description

In symptomatic patients with or without prior cardiac testing, the PCP will initially decide the subject's pretest probability for coronary artery disease (CAD) based on the subject's risk factors and quality of chest pain (typical or atypical), or anginal equivalent (e.g., jaw, arm pain, or unexplained shortness of breath) and consider the results of prior testing, if applicable. The initial questionnaire will capture the PCP's initial clinical impression and decision ('preliminary decision') on how to further evaluate and manage the patient. A Corus CAD (Age/Sex/Gene Expression score - ASGES) assay will be performed at the PCP's office. After the PCP has received the Corus CAD (ASGES) result (approximately 2-3 days later), the PCP will decide on the appropriate evaluation and management of the patient ('final decision') using the Corus CAD (ASGES) result in conjunction with his/her clinical impression and/or other clinical data available. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate whether the Corus CAD (ASGES) test results is associated with a change in the PCPs' diagnostic evaluation and management of patients as compared to their initial testing and treatment decisions.

Since it takes approximately two days for the physician to receive the result of the Corus CAD (ASGES), symptomatic subjects with unstable angina, or suspicion for myocardial infarction will be excluded from the study.

A follow-up phone call and a detailed questionnaire will be performed at 30 + 15 days, from the time of blood draw, to assess the triage decision, such as referral to any subspecialists (cardiologist, gastroenterologist, and pulmonologist), cardiac diagnostic tests performed, cardiac procedures performed, and results of these cardiac tests and procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chest Pain
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Angina Pectoris
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • CAD
  • CVD
  • CHD
  • Coronary Heart Disease

Keywords

  • Corus CAD
  • ASGES
  • Age/Sex/Gene Expression Score
  • Gene Expression
  • GES
  • CAD
  • CVD
  • CHD
  • Clinical Utility
  • Precision Medicine
  • Primary care
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Angina Pectoris
  • Chest Pain
  • Cardiovascular Disease
  • Coronary Heart Disease
  • IMPACT
  • IMPACT-PCP
03

In context

Chest Pain

388 studies on the registry are indexed under Chest Pain; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 251 is below the median of 500 across 167 observational studies indexed under Chest Pain.

Browse Chest Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

CardioDx is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

This is a prospective, multi-center study examining the clinical impact of the Corus CAD (Age/Sex/Gene Expression score - ASGES) assay in approximately 250 evaluable subjects with no history of obstructive coronary artery disease who now present with chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms to a primary care physician (PCP) for evaluation.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Stable chest pain, typical or atypical angina or anginal equivalent
  2. The patient has signed the appropriate Institutional Review Board approved Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of myocardial infarction
  2. Current Myocardial infarction (MI) or acute coronary syndrome.
  3. Current New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV congestive heart failure symptoms.
  4. Any previous coronary revascularization.
  5. Any individuals with :

    • Diabetes
    • Suspected unstable angina
    • Systemic infections
    • Systemic inflammatory conditions
  6. Any individuals currently taking:

    • Steroids
    • Immunosuppressive agents
    • Chemotherapeutic agents
  7. Any Major Surgery within 2 months
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
251 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • All subjects

    Subjects are enrolled at multiple participating primary care practices. The main inclusion criterion for enrollment is the occurrence of chest pain (or anginal equivalent) in a patient without known significant coronary artery disease (CAD) or a history of prior myocardial infarction.

    Diagnostic Test: Corus CAD

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCorus CAD

    Age/Sex/Gene Expression Score (ASGES)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Clinicians' Treatment Decision After Age/Sex/Gene Expression Score

    The primary objective was to assess whether the Age/Sex/Gene Expression Score (ASGES) altered clinicians' evaluations, defined by a change in patient management from preliminary to final decision. The change was prospectively defined as a downgrade or upgrade in intensity of the diagnostic plan based on the following hierarchical categories:(1) no further cardiac testing or treatment, (2) lifestyle changes or medical therapy, (3) stress testing (with or without imaging) or computed tomography/coronary angiography, or (4) invasive coronary angiography. The ASGES algorithm comprises expression values for 23 genes from peripheral blood cells in 6 terms, patient age, and sex. The changes in gene expression are quantified using an algorithm that generates a ASGES ranging from 1 to 40. A score \<=15 indicates a low risk of underlying obstructive coronary disease. The ASGES has a negative predictive value of 96% for ASGES \<=15 in a population referred to myocardial perfusion imaging.

    Time frame: pre- and post- gene expression testing results (on average 2-3 days to receive ASGES)

07

Results

Posted Apr 23, 2014
Limitations and caveats
Prospective design may have influenced the diagnostic strategy; but historical controls had a similar diagnostic strategy. Possible Selection bias; we believe these pts are typical of each practice. Appropriateness of care not evaluated

Participant flow

Subjects are enrolled at multiple participating primary care practices from site initiation (Apr-Jun 2012) thru January 2013.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Subjects With Corus CAD
Started251
Completed249
Not completed2
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Clinicians' Treatment Decision After Age/Sex/Gene Expression Score

The primary objective was to assess whether the Age/Sex/Gene Expression Score (ASGES) altered clinicians' evaluations, defined by a change in patient management from preliminary to final decision. The change was prospectively defined as a downgrade or upgrade in intensity of the diagnostic plan based on the following hierarchical categories:(1) no further cardiac testing or treatment, (2) lifestyle changes or medical therapy, (3) stress testing (with or without imaging) or computed tomography/coronary angiography, or (4) invasive coronary angiography. The ASGES algorithm comprises expression values for 23 genes from peripheral blood cells in 6 terms, patient age, and sex. The changes in gene expression are quantified using an algorithm that generates a ASGES ranging from 1 to 40. A score \<=15 indicates a low risk of underlying obstructive coronary disease. The ASGES has a negative predictive value of 96% for ASGES \<=15 in a population referred to myocardial perfusion imaging.

Time frame:
pre- and post- gene expression testing results (on average 2-3 days to receive ASGES)
Reported as:
Number · number of subjects
Change in Clinicians' Treatment Decision After Age/Sex/Gene Expression Score
number of subjectsNo Tests/TreatmentMedical TherapyStress TestInvasive Angiography
No Tests/Treatment pre-ASGES, ASGES <=15 (n=40)38110
NoTests/Treatment pre-ASGES, ASGES >15 (n=43)31390
Medical Therapy pre-ASGES, ASGES ,=15 (n=33)25710
Medical Therapy pre-ASGES, ASGES >15 (n=15)5271
Stress Tes pre-ASGES, ASGES <=15 (N=53)45530
Stress test pre-ASGES, ASGES >15 (n=65)56531
Invasive Coronary Angio pre-ASGES, AGES >=15 (n=1)1000
Invasive Coronary Angio pre-ASGES, ASGES >15 (n=1)1000
Statistical analysis
  • No Tests/Treatment · one-sided binomial with alpha level of 0 · p = <0.001

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Subjects—0/251 (0%)0/251 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Sequentially enrolled subjects meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria and have a resulted CORUS CAD test.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)All Subjects
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years182
>=65 years69
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Subjects
Mean56.2 ± 13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Subjects
Female140
Male111
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)All Subjects
United States251
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)All Subjects
Mean29.7 ± 6.7
Age/Sex/Gene Expression Score
Age/Sex/Gene Expression Score(unitless)All Subjects
Mean16 ± 10
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • John's Creek Primary Care
    Suwanee, Georgia 30024, United States
  • The Lipid Center
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809, United States
  • Carolina Family Healthcare
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, United States
  • Family Care Clinic
    Bonham, Texas 75418, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Herman L, Froelich J, Kanelos D, St Amant R, Yau M, Rhees B, Monane M, McPherson J. Utility of a genomic-based, personalized medicine test in patients presenting with symptoms suggesting coronary artery disease. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;27(2):258-67. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130155. PubMed 24610188 ↗
  • Ladapo JA, Herman L, Weiner BH, Rhees B, Castle L, Monane M, McPherson JA. Use of a blood test incorporating age, sex, and gene expression influences medical decision-making in the evaluation of women presenting with symptoms suggestive of obstructive coronary artery disease: summary results from two ambulatory care studies in primary care. Menopause. 2015 Nov;22(11):1224-30. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000443. PubMed 25828395 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01594411
Lead sponsor
CardioDx
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 9, 2012
Start date
Apr 2012
Primary completion
Jan 2013
Completion
Feb 2013
Results posted
Apr 23, 2014
Last update
Jan 31, 2019

Study contacts

May Yau, MS
study director · CardioDx

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion