CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01575028Updated Aug 24, 2015Results posted

Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Versus Local Anesthetic for Lap Appendectomies

A Phase 2 interventional study of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine in Appendicitis, sponsored by Nationwide Children's Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-08-24.

Sponsored by Nationwide Children's Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The study was allowed to expire due to changes in standard care for the patient population within the NCH institution.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized comparison of 2 patient cohorts. One group of patients will receive a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. The second group will receive local anesthetic infiltration injected at the surgical site by the surgeon at the end of surgery for a laparoscopic appendectomy. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare post-operative pain relief in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy who have received either a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block or local anesthetic infiltration by the surgeon for analgesia to compare the most appropriate delivery of effective analgesia. In an effort to improve postoperative analgesia while limiting opioid-related adverse effects, there continues to be an increased use of multimodal techniques in infants and children.

Read the detailed description

The literature has clearly demonstrated that the effective treatment of postoperative pain in infants and children is challenging. Despite the recognition of the importance of postoperative analgesia and the potential adverse effects of postoperative pain, significant pain occurs during the postoperative period in both the inpatient and outpatients settings. Specifically, appendectomy is one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures and is associated with significant postoperative pain. Additionally, although the use of opioid analgesics is generally safe, adverse effects do occur thereby mandating the use of alternative analgesic techniques when feasible. In an effort to improve postoperative analgesia while limiting opioid-related adverse effects, there continues to be an increased use of multimodal techniques in infants and children. These can include TAP block as well as wound infiltration with local anesthetic. The efficacy of TAP blocks in the setting of laparoscopic appendectomy has been demonstrated in both adult and pediatric populations, however its efficacy in comparison to local anesthetic infiltration is unclear.

The TAP block was first described by McDonnell et al. in 2004 for pain control of procedures involving the anterior abdominal wall. The skin, muscles, and parietal peritoneum in this region are innervated by the T7 through L1 nerve roots. The authors described deposition of local anesthetic in the plane between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscle where the terminal branches of the T7 through L1 nerves lie. Since then, the TAP block has been shown to effectively provide analgesia for a variety of abdominal procedures. In 2007 an ultrasound guided approach was described by Hebbard et al. with a subsequent study concluding that an ultrasound guided TAP block provided superior analgesia than a blind technique.

The frequency of surgical appendectomy in both the inpatient surgical as well as the ambulatory setting justifies this comparison of effective analgesia. This study can certainly change the daily practice of the pediatric anesthesiologist in providing optimal care in patient and family satisfaction, as well as recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Appendicitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Transversus abdominis plane block
  • TAP block
  • Local anesthetic infiltration
  • Appendectomy
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy
03

In context

Appendicitis

412 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 62 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3 is below the median of 111 across 246 interventional studies indexed under Appendicitis.

Browse Appendicitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Nationwide Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 231 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA physical status I or II
  • Patients > 4 years of age
  • Weight less than or equal to 60 kg
  • Presenting for laparoscopic appendectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status > II
  • Patients \< 4 years of age
  • Weight greater than 60 kg
  • Patients presenting for ruptured appendectomy surgical procedures
  • Co-morbid diseases (cardiac, pulmonary (not including asthma), neurological disease)
  • Patients having concomitant procedures (circumcision, orchiopexy, etc.)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
3 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Local anesthetic infiltration injection

    Patients will receive local anesthetic infiltration injected at the surgical site by the surgeon at the end of surgery.

    Drug: Bupivacaine

  • Experimental
    Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block

    Patients will receive a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.

    Drug: Ropivacaine

Interventions

  • DrugRopivacaine

    The TAP block will be delivered with 0.2ml/kg of 0.2% Ropivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine bilaterally

  • DrugBupivacaine

    The local anesthetic at the incision sites will be injected by the surgeon.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-operative Pain Relief

    Prospectively compare post-operative pain relief in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy who have received either a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block or local anesthetic infiltration by the surgeon for analgesia.

    Time frame: 12 hours post-operatively

07

Results

Posted Jun 1, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLocal Anesthetic Infiltration InjectionTransversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block
Started21
Completed20
Not completed01
Withdrew: Physician decision01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPost-operative Pain Relief

Prospectively compare post-operative pain relief in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy who have received either a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block or local anesthetic infiltration by the surgeon for analgesia.

Time frame:
12 hours post-operatively

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Local Anesthetic Infiltration Injection—0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block—0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Local Anesthetic Infiltration InjectionTransversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) BlockTotal
<=18 years213
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Local Anesthetic Infiltration InjectionTransversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) BlockTotal
Mean13.425 ± 4.8719657227.36 ± 011.40 ± 4.91
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Local Anesthetic Infiltration InjectionTransversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) BlockTotal
Female011
Male202
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Local Anesthetic Infiltration InjectionTransversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) BlockTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White213
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Local Anesthetic Infiltration InjectionTransversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) BlockTotal
United States213
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • McDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):193-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000250223.49963.0f. Erratum In: Anesth Analg. 2007 May;104(5):1108. PubMed 17179269 ↗
  • Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Aug;35(4):616-7. No abstract available. PubMed 18020088 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01575028
Lead sponsor
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Responsible party
Tarun Bhalla, MD (Assistant Clinical Professor, Nationwide Children's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 10, 2012
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
Jul 2014
Results posted
Jun 1, 2015
Last update
Aug 24, 2015

Study contacts

Tarun Bhalla, MD
principal investigator · Nationwide Childrens

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion