An observational study in Arteriosclerosis of Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Graft, sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-28.
Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Observational
The objectives of the study are two-fold:
It is hypothesized that the mean 5 year patency rate of the radial artery graft harvested endoscopically will be equal to or have greater patency than the radial artery graft harvested via the conventional/open technique. It is further hypothesized that patient quality of life will be similar amongst patients having had the open vs. endoscopic radial artery graft during CABG surgery.
After patient consent and REB approval from The University of Western Ontario (REB # 11054) we conducted a Randomized Controlled Trial between 2005-2007 of endoscopic vs. conventional harvesting of the radial artery in CABG patients at the London Health Sciences Centre. A total of 118 patients were randomized to either A) conventional/open harvesting of the radial artery, n=59 or B) endoscopic harvesting of the radial artery, n=59. Post-operative study objectives measured were arm wound infection rate, assessment of arm pain, arm edema, mobilization, patient satisfaction, and histological assessment of the radial artery. Objectives were measured during the patients' course in-hospital and at 1week by telephone interview. At 6 weeks patient underwent a final clinic assessment post-surgery.
Our intent is to perform follow-up angiography and MPS-MIBI at the 5 year mark post surgery on the 118 patients previously involved in our RCT, to assess open vs. endoscopic radial artery graft performance. The study will be divided into three phases: Phase I - Patient Recruitment (4 months), Phase II - Patient Assessment with CTA, MPS-MIBI and Questionnaires (16 months) and Phase III - Data Analysis and Conclusions (4 months).
Phase I - Chart Review and Patient Recruitment (4 Months) Charts will be reviewed on all of the open and endoscopically harvested radial artery grafts used during CABG surgery from the above specified time points. Patient demographics and operative notes, as well as perioperative and postoperative complications will be reviewed. Hospital admissions, documented cardiac events and any subsequent deaths not previously documented will be recorded. Any additional pertinent data from the chart review will be entered into a study specific Microsoft Excel file maintained by a single qualified research assistant.
All living CABG surgery patients will then be contacted and their participation in the study requested. Patients will receive an initial request by mail, with an informative letter signed by the principal investigator outlining the purpose of the study, what participation in the study involves, and the specific aims of the cardiac team at the conclusion of the study. A follow-up phone call will be done within 3-weeks of mailing the letter to go over the content and answer any questions that patients may have.
Phase II - Patient Assessment via CTA, MPS-MIBI and Questionnaires (16 Months)
CABG surgery patients from the previous RCT that agree to be a part of the study will have arrangements made for them to travel to LHSC. Patients will undergo a structured half-day (approximately 4-6 hours) at the hospital consisting of the following:
Completion of two validated health related quality of life questionnaires
Coronary CTA and Rest and Stress MPS-MIBI will be used for evaluating radial artery graft patency. Potential risks associated with CTA and both MPS-MIBI tests will be discussed with each patient prior to performing the procedure. This discussion will include the following:
As CTA is an x-ray test, it sends radiation through the body. Although the amount of radiation for each scan is small, it can accumulate and damage body cells over time with repeated exposure. Contrast material carries a slight risk of causing an allergic reaction to the contrast material or dye. During the Rest and Stress MPS-MIBI, a radioactive tracer (MIBI) is used to take pictures of the heart. This tracer is injected into the bloodstream and travels to the heart muscle through the coronary arteries. Pictures are then taken of the heart to determine coronary artery disease and the perfusion images at rest and stress help identify regions of myocardial infarction as well as help determine the hemodynamic significance of any coronary stenoses. MPS also gives an estimate of the left ventricular ejection fraction. Signed consent will be obtained prior to each procedure. Contrast will be injected into the coronary arteries and the vein grafts and CTA and MPS-MIBI images obtained.
EVALUATING RADIAL ARTERY GRAFT PATENCY All coronary artery and radial artery graft CTAs and MPS-MIBIs will be performed and graded by Nuclear Medicine physicians. Following the patency determination, the patients will be contacted by Dr.Bob Kiaii (cardiac surgeon) and told their results.
Radial artery graft patency will be determined using the grading system of Fitzgibbons and associates:
Grade A Excellent graft with unimpaired run-off, patent graft Grade B Stenosis reducing caliber of proximal, distal anastomosis or trunk to \<50% of the grafted coronary artery. This will be divided into flow limiting and non-flow limiting stenosis Grade O Occlusion
QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRES To assess quality of life 5 years after undergoing CABG surgery and participating in our RCT, each patient will self-administer two validated health-related quality of life questionnaires while on site at LHSC. The two questionnaires to be used are the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Licensing and user registration permitting use of these questionnaires will be obtained online from Cardiovascular Outcomes Inc. (SAQ) and Quality Metric (SF-36) prior to their distribution and use.
SEATTLE ANGINA QUESTIONNAIRE The SAQ is a 19-item, well standardized self-administered questionnaire shown to be a valid measure of quality of life in patients suffering from coronary artery disease. The disease-specific questionnaire measures five clinically important dimensions of health in coronary artery disease patients: physical limitations, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction and disease perception. The SAQ has shown to be more sensitive to clinical change in coronary artery disease in comparison to more generic quality of life questionnaires.
36-ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY The SF-36 is a 36-item, generic quality of life questionnaire for measuring patient's general health status. Also well-standardized and self-administered, the SF-36 measures eight health concepts: physical conditioning, role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, bodily pain, and general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality and general health perceptions. It also includes an indication of perceived change in health. The questionnaire has proven relevant across age, disease process and treatment group.
Using a disease-specific questionnaire and a general health questionnaire in combination will more aptly categorize the overall impact of the CABG surgery on patient quality of life. The effects of CABG surgery both in regards to cardiovascular function as well as outside systems will be better understood.
317 studies on the registry are indexed under Arteriosclerosis; 33 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 118 is below the median of 330 across 99 observational studies indexed under Arteriosclerosis.
Browse Arteriosclerosis studies →London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's is the lead sponsor of 352 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The patient population consists of patients that have previously participated in our RCT from 2005-2007 with an open or endoscopically harvested radial artery graft used as a bypass conduit. We are following them for 5-year follow up.
Patients will be included if they:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients are excluded if they are:
Radial artery graft patency
Grade A Excellent graft with unimpaired run-off, patent graft Grade B Stenosis reducing caliber of proximal, distal anastomosis or trunk to \<50% of the grafted coronary artery. This will be divided into flow limiting and non-flow limiting stenosis Grade O Occlusion
Time frame: Mean 5 years
Ischemia present in other coronary artery territories
Areas of decreased perfusion identified by MPS-MIBI scanning in the context of CT - angiographic results
Time frame: Mean 5 years
Identification of left ventricular ejection fraction at rest and stress
Related in percentage of blood ejected as a fraction of left ventricular end diastolic volume
Time frame: Mean 5 years
Quality of life post CABG via the two questionnaires; the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.
Numerical score based on the questionnaire scoring scales
Time frame: Mean 5 years
Stenosis present in other coronary arteries / grafts
Based on CT - angiographic results. Grade A: unimpaired run-off, patent graft Grade B Stenosis reducing caliber of proximal, distal anastomosis or trunk to \<50% of the grafted coronary artery. This will be divided into flow limiting and non-flow limiting stenosis Grade O Occlusion
Time frame: Mean 5 year
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's