An interventional study of Personalized Dialysate Temperature in Kidney Diseases, End-Stage Kidney Disease and Hemodialysis, sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-29.
Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
People with failed kidneys need an artificial kidney machine (called dialysis) to remove toxins and extra fluid from the body. Most patients receive dialysis treatments at a hospital three times a week. During treatment, a patient's blood pressure may drop, causing dizziness and muscle cramping. Repeated drops in blood pressure can also injure the heart and brain. Over time, this can lead to heart attacks, strokes, and sometimes death due to cardiovascular causes. New research shows that cooling the temperature of the dialysis fluid (called dialysate) can reduce heart and brain injury. In most hospitals, all patients' dialysate temperature is set at 36.5 ºC (to match body temperature). In a study of 73 patients, we showed that reducing the dialysate temperature by 0.5 ºC below body temperature protected the heart and brain from injury [1,2]. We now want to test this simple, safe, low-cost intervention in a large study with \~7500 dialysis patients in Ontario. We can lower the dialysate temperature on dialysis machines in Ontario at no added cost. This intervention has the potential to reduce many hospitalizations and deaths in Ontario, and relieve suffering in patients with kidney failure.
Statement of the health problem or issue
Dialysis is a life-saving treatment for patients with kidney failure. However, over 20% of patients die within one year of starting dialysis from heart disease or stroke.
One reason that so many dialysis patients die from heart diseases and strokes may be related to the dialysis treatment itself. During dialysis, blood pressure often drops, and the flow of blood and oxygen to the heart and brain is reduced. Over time, this can cause significant damage to vital organs and result in heart attacks, strokes, and even death due to cardiovascular-related causes.
Our team was the first to show that the heart and brain become starved of blood and oxygen during dialysis. We and others have shown that lowering the temperature of dialysis (to just below the patient's own body temperature) improves blood flow and protects the heart and brain during dialysis. We will now determine if this method can prevent heart attacks and strokes in a large population of dialysis patients.
Objective of your project
The purpose of this study is to test the effect of outpatient hemodialysis centers randomized to (1) a personalized temperature-reduced dialysate protocol or (2) a standard-temperature dialysate protocol for 4 years on cardiovascular-related death and hospitalizations.
How will you undertake your work?
We will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial. Our study will include \~7500 dialysis patients in 84 dialysis centres across Ontario. The name of this study is MyTEMP. Patients in 42 of the 84 dialysis centres will be in the treatment group and they will receive personalized dialysis (0.5-0.9ºC below their measured body temperature). Patients in the other 42 centres will be in the control group and will receive standard dialysis at a fixed temperature of 36.5ºC. This study will last for four years. At the end of four years, we will compare the rate of cardiovascular-related deaths, heart attacks, strokes, and heart failure in the treatment and control groups.
What is unique/innovative about your project?
We usually need to study a large number of patients in a clinical trial to reliably understand the effects of treatment. Normally, a study with 7500 patients would cost more than $15 million dollars to conduct; however, our study will provide a reliable answer to the question being asked and cost less than $2 million. This is because we will use data that is already being collected by our healthcare system. For example, when a patient is hospitalized for a heart attack or stroke, this information is recorded in a secure healthcare database. We will be able to analyze these healthcare data at the end of the study (and link patient outcomes to the type of dialysis treatment received (i.e. treatment or control)). This innovative study design means that our study will be much larger (but cost much less) than a traditional clinical trial.
This pragmatic trial includes all patients who receive chronic in-centre hemodialysis patients in participating Ontario centres. High-risk patients with multiple comorbidities, including cognitive impairments or disabilities, who are often excluded from trials because of their high-risk status are eligible for participation in the MyTEMP trial. By including patients from a variety of medical, ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic backgrounds, the results of our trial should be broadly generalizable.
Currently, many patients worldwide receive hemodialysis with a dialysate temperature of 36.5ºC to 37.0ºC. Lowering the dialysate temperature below a core body temperature is a promising intervention that has the potential to reduce the risk of cardiovascular-related mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients on hemodialysis.
At four years of follow-up, our trial is powered to detect a minimum 20% hazard rate difference in the composite outcome of time to first cardiovascular-related mortality or hospitalization for major cardiovascular events among centres that use a temperature-reduced personalized hemodialysis protocol compared with centres that use a standard-temperature hemodialysis protocol.
This pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial has only two inclusion criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Dialysis centres randomized to the intervention arm will provide temperature-reduced personalized hemodialysis. A nurse will set the temperature of the dialysate to 0.5°C below each patient's body temperature measured just before starting the dialysis treatment. We are aware that some dialysis machines (e.g. Fresenius 5008) are only able to modify dialysate temperature by 0.5°C increments. For centres with those machines, the nurse will set the dialysate temperature 0.5 to 0.9 °C below each patient's body temperature (measured before starting the hemodialysis treatment) to a minimum of 35.5°C.
Other: Personalized Dialysate Temperature
Dialysis centres in the control group will provide usual care, which is standard dialysis using a fixed dialysate temperature of 36.5°C
Dialysis centres randomized to the intervention will provide temperature-reduced personalized hemodialysis. A nurse will set the temperature of the dialysate to 0.5°C below each patient's body temperature measured just before starting the dialysis treatment. We are aware that some dialysis machines (e.g. Fresenius 5008) are only able to modify dialysate temperature by 0.5°C increments. For centres with those machines, the nurse will set the dialysate temperature 0.5 to 0.9 °C below each patient's body temperature (measured before starting the hemodialysis treatment) to a minimum of 35.5°C.
Also known as: Individualized Dialysate Temperature
Composite outcome of cardiovascular-related mortality or major cardiovascular event
There are many challenges associated with selecting the primary endpoint in MyTEMP because of heterogeneity of the population, complexity of renal pathophysiology and its interaction with cardiovascular disease, and competing risks of non-cardiovascular-related death. Our primary outcome is a composite outcome of cardiovascular-related mortality or a hospitalization for non-fatal major cardiovascular event which is any of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or congestive heart failure. We chose a cause-specific death (i.e. cardiovascular) in our endpoint, in contrast to all-cause mortality, because non-cardiovascular causes of death are common in the hemodialysis population and the intervention is less likely to reduce the rate of such deaths. However, as a secondary outcome (see Secondary outcomes), we will also test the effect of personalized temperature-reduced dialysate temperature on all-cause mortality.
Time frame: Four Years
Key secondary outcome: Between-group mean difference in the intradialytic drop of systolic blood pressure.
A blood pressure drop is defined as the pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure minus the intradialytic nadir systolic blood pressure, where the greater the number (in the positive direction) the larger the drop.
Time frame: Four Years
Composite outcome of all-cause mortality or major cardiovascular event
Composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for a major cardiovascular event including: myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or congestive heart failure.
Time frame: Four Years
All-cause mortality
Time frame: Four Years
Hospitalization for non-fatal myocardial infarction
Time frame: Four Years
Hospitalization for non-fatal congestive heart failure
Time frame: Four Years
Hospitalization for non-fatal ischemic stroke
Time frame: Four Years
Cardiovascular-related mortality
Time frame: Four Years
Composite of All-Cause emergency department visits or all-cause hospitalizations (repeated measure)
Patients on hemodialysis are frequently hospitalized and account for 5% to 7% of healthcare expenditures in developed countries despite comprising a very small percentage of the general adult population. These patients have several characteristics that make them vulnerable to hospitalization and emergency department use, including multimorbidity, high rates cardiovascular and complications, and complex medication regimens. The historic hazard rate for emergency department visits was 1.05, all-cause hospitalization was 0.65, and the composite all-cause emergency department visits or hospitalizations over a 4-year period (from April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2017) for an open cohort was 1.22 events per person-year.
Time frame: Four Years
All-Cause emergency department visits (repeated measures)
Time frame: Four Years
All-cause hospitalizations (repeated measure)
Time frame: Four years
Hospital encounter with lower limb amputation
Patients on hemodialysis, especially those with diabetes, have a high incident rate of amputation. Amputations are associated with cardiovascular risk factors and likely linked to vascular injury caused by hemodialysis-induced ischemia, which complicates pre-existing arterial disease and diabetes related injury. We will compare the lower extremity amputation (excluding digit amputations) rate for the two groups. In separate analyses, we will estimate the amputation rate for subgroups of patients with diabetes, as well as those with and without a history of lower extremity amputation in the 10 years before the trial start date or the date entering the trial cohort for new patients starting MyTEMP after April 3rd, 2017.
Time frame: Four Years
Hospital encounter with a major fall or fracture
Many patients on dialysis are frail and prone to falling, which may also predispose them to suffer a fracture. Bone fractures are an important outcome and can result in morbidity, high economic costs, and mortality. Intra-dialytic hypotension might increase the rate and severity of falls after a hemodialysis session leading to additional fractures requiring hospitalizations. We will estimate the rate of fractures for both arms of the trial.
Time frame: Four Years
Intradialytic hypotension
Nadir systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg anytime during dialysis session when value prior to session was ≥ 90 mmHg, or ii) drop in systolic blood pressure ≥ 30 mmHg anytime during session from value prior to session.
Time frame: Four years
Intradialytic hypotension alternate definition #1
Systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg alone (only count if systolic blood pressure is ≥90 mmHg pre-dialysis).
Time frame: Four years
Intradialytic hypotension alternate definition #2
At least a 25% relative reduction in nadir systolic blood pressure from pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure or nadir \<90 mmHg (only count latter if not present pre-dialysis).
Time frame: Four years
Intradialytic hypotension alternate definition #3
At least a 25% relative reduction in nadir systolic blood pressure from pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure.
Time frame: Four years
Intradialytic hypotension alternate definition #4
A drop in nadir systolic blood pressure by ≥ 35 mmHg from pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure.
Time frame: Four years
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No — While data sharing agreements prohibit ICES from making the data publicly available, access may be granted to those who meet prespecified criteria for confidential access, available at www.ices.on.ca/DAS. The full dataset creation plan and underlying analytic code are available from the authors upon request, understanding that the programs may rely upon coding templates or macros that are unique to ICES.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute and Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's