CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01544725Updated Mar 31, 2026

Ketamine-propofol Versus Ketamine Alone for Procedural Sedation in Adults

A Phase 4 interventional study of Procedural sedation with ketamine-propofol combination and Procedural sedation with ketamine alone in Fracture and Dislocation, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Using Ketamine for procedural sedation in adults is often uncomfortable for emergency physicians because of the significant proportion of patients experimenting recovery agitation. The investigators believe that combining propofol to ketamine, the proportion of recovery agitation will be significantly lowered.

The objectives of this double-blinded, randomized controlled trial are to compare the proportion of recovery agitation in adults receiving procedural sedation with ketamine-propofol versus ketamine alone, and to compare the proportion of other classical procedural sedation side-effects and parameters such as respiratory depression, hypotension, sedation duration, time of recovery, procedural failures, and levels of satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fracture
  • Dislocation

Keywords

  • Procedural sedation
  • Ketamine-propofol
  • Ketamine
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years and older
  • indication of procedural sedation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergy to propofol or ketamine
  • alcohol or drug intoxication
  • altered mental status
  • ASA physical status score > 2
  • hemodynamic unstability
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ketamine-propofol

    Drug: Procedural sedation with ketamine-propofol combination

  • Active comparator
    Ketamine alone

    Drug: Procedural sedation with ketamine alone

Interventions

  • DrugProcedural sedation with ketamine-propofol combination

    K= Kétamine P= Propofol RSS= Ramsay Sedation Score At t0: 0.5 mg/kg of K (0.1 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml K) followed by 0.5 mg/k of P (0.1 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml P). At t0 + 4 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (RSS of 4 or 5): 0.25 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml K) followed by 0.25 mg/kg of P (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml P). At t0 + 8 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (RSS of 4 or 5): 0.25 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml K) followed by 0.25 mg/kg of P (0.05 ml/kg of 5 mg/ml P). At t0 + 12 min, if maximal doses have been reached (1 mg/kg of K + 1 mg/kg of P) but the optimal sedation has not been obtained, the procedural sedation will be recorded as a failure in the analysis, and the patient will receive another procedural sedation product (at the discretion of the caregiver).

  • DrugProcedural sedation with ketamine alone

    K= Ketamine I= Intralipid placebo At t0: 1 mg/kg of K (0.1 ml/kg of 10 mg/ml K), followed by 0.1 ml/kg of I (physical placebo of propofol in the other arm). At t0 + 4 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (Ramsay Sedation Score of 4 or 5): 0.5 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 10 mg/ml K), followed by 0.05 ml/kg of I. At t0 + 8 min, if needed to obtain an optimal sedation (Ramsay Sedation Score of 4 or 5): 0.5 mg/kg of K (0.05 ml/kg of 10 mg/ml K), followed by 0.05 ml/kg of I. At t0 + 12 min, if maximal doses have been used (2 mg/kg of K) but the optimal sedation has not been obtained, the procedural sedation will be recorded as a failure in the analysis, and the patient will receive another procedural sedation product (at the discretion of the caregiver).

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of recovery agitation

    Patient will be followed during the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection

    Time frame: Recovery agitation is noted after procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time from first injection to optimal sedation

    Time frame: Patient will be followed during the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection (30 minutes)

  2. Proportion of respiratory depression

    Patient will be followed during the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection

    Time frame: respiratory depression is assessed during procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)

  3. Proportion of arterial hypotension

    Patient will be followed during the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection

    Time frame: Hypotension is assessed during procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)

  4. Proportion of vomiting

    Patient will be followed duriong the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection

    Time frame: vomiting is assessed after procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)

  5. Recovery time

    Patient will be followed duriong the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection

    Time frame: Recovery time is assessed after procedural sedation for each patient (30 minutes)

  6. Proportion of procedural failures

    Patient will be followed duriong the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection

    Time frame: Procedural failure is noted for each patient if it's happened (30 minutes)

  7. Level of patient's satisfaction

    Patient will be followed during the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection

    Time frame: after procedural sedation, patient's satisfaction is recorded (30 minutes)

  8. Level of care giver's satisfaction

    Patient will be followed during the procedural sedation, for an average time of thirty minutes after the first injection

    Time frame: after procedural sedation, care giver's satisfaction is recorded (30 minutes)

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpital St Roch
    Nice, 06006, France
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Lemoel F, Contenti J, Giolito D, Boiffier M, Rapp J, Istria J, Fournier M, Ageron FX, Levraut J. Adverse Events With Ketamine Versus Ketofol for Procedural Sedation on Adults: A Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;24(12):1441-1449. doi: 10.1111/acem.13226. Epub 2017 Jul 14. PubMed 28493642 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01544725
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 6, 2012
Start date
Apr 2012
Primary completion
Jan 2016
Completion
Jan 2016
Last update
Mar 31, 2026

Study contacts

Fabien LEMOEL, MD
principal investigator · CHU de Nice, FRANCE
Jacques LEVRAUT, PD, MD
study director · CHU de Nice, FRANCE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion