A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Methotrexate Injectable Solution and Placebo in Erosive Hand Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.
Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment
Randomized study comparing the structural efficacy of methotrexate versus placebo in digital osteoarthritis
- Digital osteoarthritis (IPD and IPP) according to ACR criteria (with an X-ray of the hands taken less than 3 months ago, showing at least 3 joints with digital osteoarthritis KL>=2) and symptomatic for more than three months
Exclusion Criteria:
Drug: Methotrexate Injectable Solution
Drug: Placebo
Injection of methotrexate every week during 12 month
The placebo consists of a 0.9% solution of sodium chloride (NaCl) in sterile distilled water for injection. This solution was chosen as the placebo. Injection every week during 12 month.
Structural lesion
The progression of structural damage between M0 and M12, the worsening of digital osteoarthritis in a joint, will be defined by the change in stage of the Verbruggen-Veys score. The Verbruggen-Veys anatomical scoring system for hand osteoarthritis, which evaluates the radiographic progression of interphalangeal joints. This scale classifies each joint into five stages (N, S, J, E, R) reflecting increasing severity of structural damage. Progression is defined as a transition to a more advanced stage between M0 and M12. As this is a categorical ordinal scale rather than a continuous numerical score, there are no minimum or maximum numerical values. However, higher stages correspond to more severe structural damage and thus a worse outcome.
Time frame: 12 months
Function
Hand function will be assessed using the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN). The AUSCAN is a validated patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates pain, stiffness, and physical function in hand osteoarthritis. The function subscale consists of 9 items, each scored on a Likert scale. The total function score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating worse functional impairment. Changes in the AUSCAN function score between baseline (M0) and 12 months (M12) will be analyzed.
Time frame: 12 months
Effectiveness of the treatment on pain
The effectiveness of the treatment on pain will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, a validated patient-reported outcome measure. The VAS consists of a 100 mm horizontal line, where 0 mm indicates "no pain" and 100 mm indicates "worst imaginable pain". The outcome will be expressed as the mean pain score (in millimeters) and the change in pain score from baseline (M0) at each time point (M3, M9, and M12). Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity and therefore a worse outcome.
Time frame: 12 months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice