ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07815444Updated Sep 11, 2026

Lipofilling in Operative Hand Fracture Treatment

An interventional study of Lipofilling in Operative Treatment of Proximal Phalanx Fractures and Related Tenolysis in Adhesions, Hand Fractures and Tenolysis, sponsored by Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

Hand fractures are a common clinical problem worldwide and account for a substantial economic burden and workload for experienced hand surgeons. With regard to metacarpal and phalangeal fractures, surgery might be indicated in case of dislocation and/or instability to restore functionality through closed or open reduction and adequate stabilization by fixation. Unfortunately, tendon adhesions after operative treatment of these hand fractures remain a common complication; especially after open reposition and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal phalanx (P1) fractures. This results in postoperative stiffness and thus decreased digital function. In case of insufficient digital function, tenolysis of the flexor and/or extensor tendons could be considered once the fracture is consolidated and competent hand therapy for at least 3 months seems ineffective. Several studies have focused on perioperative measures to prevent tendon adhesions and related stiffness after operative treatment of hand fractures avoiding tenolysis. These prophylactic measures include for example adhesion barriers, anti-adhesion membranes and adipofascial flaps, which could possibly improve the postoperative range of motion if further research is conducted. Only one of these studies, using an adipofascial flap as a tendon-gliding system after ORIF of P1 fractures, found a significant difference regarding postoperative range of motion. Related to the use of adipose tissue, lipofilling has been proven to be a promising technique in the treatment of scars/adhesions, especially in burn wounds. Recent studies even demonstrated the role of fat grafting in hand surgery, including scar management and tenolysis. Despite these promising results, no previous research has evaluated the use of perioperative lipofilling during surgical treatment of hand fractures or related tenolysis. Therefore, it might be that lipofilling could result in an improvement of postoperative motion and prevent and/or improve tenolysis due to providing a gliding surface for tendons.

Aim:

The aim of the two separate studies is as follows:

  1. To evaluate the effect of perioperative micronised lipofilling in patients with ORIF of P1 fractures on postoperative range of motion.
  2. To evaluate the effect of perioperative micronised lipofilling in patients with tenolysis after operative treatment of P1 fractures on postoperative range of motion.

Study design:

A double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Intervention:

Patients will either receive 1ml of subcutaneous micronised lipofilling or 1ml subcutaneous 0,9% NaCl around the operation site at the end of the ORIF or tenolysis.

Primary outcome measures:

  1. In case of an indication for ORIF of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed:

    * Preoperative

    • Total active motion (TAM) of the contralateral unaffected digit.

      * 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative

    • TAM of the operated digit and the contralateral unaffected digit.
  2. In case of tenolysis after operative treatment of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed:

    • Preoperative

      - TAM of the affected digit and the contralateral unaffected digit.

    • 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative

      • TAM of the operated digit and the contralateral unaffected digit.

Secondary outcome measures:

  1. In case of an indication for ORIF of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed:

    • Preoperative

      - Active range of motion (AROM) and passive range of motion (PROM) of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal (MCP-, PIP- and DIP) joint of the contralateral unaffected digit.

    • 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative

      - NRS-score of the abdominal donor site.

    • 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative

      • AROM and PROM of the MCP-, PIP- and DIP-joint of the operated digit and the contralateral unaffected digit;
      • MHQ-score.
    • 6 months postoperative

      - Radiographic union of the operated digit.

    • During the 6 months postoperative period

      • Postoperative complications, including infection, wound-related problems, and stiffness;
      • Number of secondary procedures, including tenolysis.
  2. In case of tenolysis after operative treatment of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed:

    • Preoperative

      • AROM and PROM of the MCP-, PIP- and DIP-joint of the affected digit and the contralateral unaffected digit;
      • MHQ-score.
    • 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative

      - NRS-score of the abdominal donor site.

    • 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative

      • AROM and PROM of the MCP-, PIP- and DIP-joint of the operated digit and the contralateral unaffected digit;
      • MHQ-score.
    • During the 6 months postoperative period - Postoperative complications, including infection, wound-related problems and stiffness.
02

Conditions studied

  • Adhesions
  • Hand Fractures
  • Tenolysis

Keywords

  • hand
  • fracture
  • surgery
  • operative treatment
  • adhesion
  • tenolysis
  • lipofilling
  • fat grafting
03

In context

Tissue Adhesions

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Tissue Adhesions; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 130 is above the median of 61 across 84 interventional studies indexed under Tissue Adhesions.

Browse Tissue Adhesions studies →

Lead sponsor

Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-65 years
  • Indication for one of the following surgical procedures:

    • ORIF due to a single radiologically proven P1 fracture
    • Secondary tenolysis due to limited digital function after former operative treatment of a P1 fracture
  • Able to read and speak Dutch
  • Mentally competent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aged below 18 or above 65 years
  • Concomitant tendinous or neurovascular injuries
  • Prior surgical interventions of the affected digit; other than operative fracture fixation in case of tenolysis
  • Prior pathology or surgical interventions of the contralateral digit
  • Less than 3 months of competent hand therapy in case of secondary tenolysis
  • A known psychiatric condition
  • A known systemic disease that will impair wound healing (e.g. diabetes mellitus, known atherosclerosis with an event that required hospitalization, collagen diseases, diseases of the skin, ).
  • Prednisone or other immunotherapy
  • Smoking
  • Pregnancy or active child wish
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
130 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lipofilling

    Perioperatively, 20ml of lipoaspirate will be manually harvested, under additional tumescent anesthesia of an area with a diameter of ca. 15cm, from the subdermal fat layer of the lower abdomen using Arthrex ACP double syringes (Arthrex®, ACP System, Naples, FL, USA) and disposable instruments of the Arthrex ACA-kit. After harvesting, the lipoaspirate will be centrifuged (Hettich centrifuge (1206-ART)) at a G-force of 960G, emulsified by using a connector piece between two luerlock syringes and centrifuged again, after being transferred back in to the Arthrex ACP double syringe, to process the micronized autologous fat for injection. In case of lipofilling, 1ml of the harvested and micronized autologous fat will be injected subcutaneous at the operation site after wound closure.

    Procedure: Lipofilling in Operative Treatment of Proximal Phalanx Fractures and Related Tenolysis

  • Placebo comparator
    NaCl

    Perioperatively, 20ml of lipoaspirate will be manually harvested, under additional tumescent anesthesia of an area with a diameter of ca. 15cm, from the subdermal fat layer of the lower abdomen using Arthrex ACP double syringes (Arthrex®, ACP System, Naples, FL, USA) and disposable instruments of the Arthrex ACA-kit. After harvesting, the lipoaspirate will be centrifuged (Hettich centrifuge (1206-ART)) at a G-force of 960G, emulsified by using a connector piece between two luerlock syringes and centrifuged again, after being transferred back in to the Arthrex ACP double syringe, to process the micronized autologous fat for injection. In case of the control group, 1ml of 0,9% NaCl will be injected subcutaneous at the operation site after wound closure.

    Procedure: Lipofilling in Operative Treatment of Proximal Phalanx Fractures and Related Tenolysis

Interventions

  • ProcedureLipofilling in Operative Treatment of Proximal Phalanx Fractures and Related Tenolysis

    Perioperatively, 20ml of lipoaspirate will be manually harvested, under additional tumescent anesthesia of an area with a diameter of ca. 15cm, from the subdermal fat layer of the lower abdomen using Arthrex ACP double syringes and disposable instruments of the Arthrex ACA-kit. After harvesting, the lipoaspirate will be centrifuged at a G-force of 960G, emulsified by using a connector piece between two luerlock syringes and centrifuged again, after being transferred back in to the Arthrex ACP double syringe, to process the micronized autologous fat for injection. In case of lipofilling, 1ml of the harvested and micronized autologous fat will be injected subcutaneous at the operation site after wound closure. The amount of micronized autologous fat is based on the expected available subcutaneous space after closing the wound. With regard to the control group, only 1ml of 0,9% NaCl will be injected subcutaneous at at the operation site after wound closure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Active Motion (TAM)

    1. In case of an indication for ORIF of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: \* Preoperative * Total active motion (TAM) of the contralateral unaffected digit. \* 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative * TAM of the operated digit and the contralateral unaffected digit. 2. In case of tenolysis after operative treatment of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: * Preoperative \- TAM of the affected digit and the contralateral unaffected digit. * 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative * TAM of the operated digit and the contralateral unaffected digit.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. AROM of MCP-, PIP- and DIP-joint

    1. In case of an indication for ORIF of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: \* Preoperative * Active range of motion (AROM) of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal (MCP-, PIP- and DIP) joint of the contralateral unaffected digit. \* 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative * AROM of the MCP-, PIP- and DIP-joint of the operated digit and the contralateral unaffected digit. 2. In case of tenolysis after operative treatment of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: * Preoperative \- AROM of the MCP-, PIP- and DIP-joint of the affected digit and the contralateral unaffected digit. * 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative * AROM of the MCP-, PIP- and DIP-joint of the operated digit and the contralateral unaffected digit. Unit of Measure: Degrees (°)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  2. PROM of MCP-, PIP- and DIP-joint

    1. In case of an indication for ORIF of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: \* Preoperative * Passive range of motion (PROM) of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal (MCP-, PIP- and DIP) joint of the contralateral unaffected digit. \* 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative * PROM of the MCP-, PIP- and DIP-joint of the operated digit and the contralateral unaffected digit. 2. In case of tenolysis after operative treatment of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: * Preoperative \- PROM of the MCP-, PIP- and DIP-joint of the affected digit and the contralateral unaffected digit. * 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative * PROM of the MCP-, PIP- and DIP-joint of the operated digit and the contralateral unaffected digit. Unit of Measure: Degrees (°)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  3. NRS-score of the abdominal donor site

    1. In case of an indication for ORIF of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: \* 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative \- Pain at the abdominal donor site using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Participants will rate their pain intensity on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain and therefore a worse outcome. 2. In case of tenolysis after operative treatment of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: * 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative * Pain at the abdominal donor site using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Participants will rate their pain intensity on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain and therefore a worse outcome. Unit of Measure: Points on a 0-10 scale.

    Time frame: From 2 weeks postoperative to the end of treatment at 6 months

  4. Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ)-score

    1. In case of an indication for ORIF of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: \* 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative \- Hand function and patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). The overall MHQ score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. 2. In case of tenolysis after operative treatment of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: * Preoperative \- Hand function and patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). The overall MHQ score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. * 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative * Hand function and patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). The overall MHQ score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Unit of Measure: Points on a 0-100 scale.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

  5. Radiographic union

    1\. In case of an indication for ORIF of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: \* 6 months postoperative \- Radiographic union of the operated digit.

    Time frame: 6 months postoperative

  6. Postoperative complications (and related secondary procedures)

    1. In case of an indication for ORIF of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: \* During the 6 months postoperative period * Postoperative complications, including infection, wound-related problems, and stiffness; * Number of secondary procedures, including tenolysis. 2. In case of tenolysis after operative treatment of P1 fractures the following parameters will be assessed: * During the 6 months postoperative period - Postoperative complications, including infection, wound-related problems and stiffness.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
    's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant 5223 GZ, Netherlands
    • Brigitte E.P.A. van der Heijden, M.Sc., M.D. Ph.D. · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07815444
Lead sponsor
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
Collaborators
Arthrex GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
Start date
Oct 19, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Bart C.J.M. de Vries, M.D.
Contact
bar.d.vries@jbz.nl
+31617005068
Brigitte E.P.A. van der Heijden, M.Sc., M.D. Ph.D.
principal investigator · Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion