An observational study in Neuroblastoma, sponsored by Children's Oncology Group. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-17.
Sponsored by Children's Oncology Group · Observational
RATIONALE: Studying samples of tumor tissue from patients with cancer in the laboratory may help doctors learn more about changes that occur in RNA and predict how patients will respond to treatment. It may also help doctors find better ways to treat cancer.
PURPOSE: This research trial studies gene expression in predicting outcomes in samples from patients with high-risk neuroblastoma.
OBJECTIVES:
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
RNA samples extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue are analyzed for gene signature expression levels by nCounter™ Analysis System and correlated with published microarray expression data. Results are then used to develop a refined gene-expression-profile classifier of ultra high-risk neuroblastoma.
634 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuroblastoma; 122 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 100 is below the median of 121 across 79 observational studies indexed under Neuroblastoma.
Browse Neuroblastoma studies →Children's Oncology Group is the lead sponsor of 447 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.
Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 11 (92%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Neuroblastoma patients treated at the University of Chicago, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Children's Memorial Hospital, or Texas Children's Hospital.
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Linear correlation between the nCounter™ Analysis System and the expression data obtained in microarray platforms
nCounter™ Analysis System and microarray platforms equally predictive of outcome in the high-risk group of neuroblastoma patients
No study locations are listed for this record.
The record gives a start of Jan 2012, a primary completion of May 2016 and a completion of May 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.