CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01502982CRY-04Updated Sep 30, 2014

Dose Dense Chemotherapy and Rituximab for Young High Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients (CRY-04)

A Phase 2 interventional study of R-CHOEP14x6+HD-AraC+HD-Mtx in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, sponsored by Nordic Lymphoma Group. Completed at 4 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-09-30.

Sponsored by Nordic Lymphoma Group · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose is to test whether dose densified chemoimmunotherapy followed by central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis for young high risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients is feasible and could improve time to treatment failure and reduce the risk of CNS relapses. Six courses of rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide-vincristine-prednison (R-CHOEP) given in two weeks intervals with the support of G-CSF is followed by one course of high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and high dose cytarabine (HD-Ara-C). The results will be compared to a historical Nordic study.

Read the detailed description

Pathology:

Patients may be included on the bases of the histological diagnosis of the local pathologist. The specimen will be reviewed by a central pathologist in each country

Treatment:

All patients receive CHOEP-14 with rituximab x 6 with the support of G-CSF followed by high dose cytarabine i.v. and high dose methotrexate i.v.Intrathecal (i.t.) CNS prophylaxis in combination with chemotherapy is not to be given, but i.t. methotrexate may be given once after initial liquid sampling. Radiotherapy will be given at the discretion of the individual centres.

Investigations before, during and after treatment:

The disease status will be assessed prior to treatment start, after 3 cycles of CHOEP + rituximab and after completion of the treatment schedule. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) using F18 deoxyglucose may be performed after fulfillment of treatment. Persistent, suspected lymphoma tissue should whenever possible be confirmed with a biopsy, otherwise the patient will be regarded as PR and second line therapy will be considered (see schematic outline).

Clinical and radiological (CT) assessment are performed at pretreatment and subsequently on sites initially involved, and bone marrow biopsy if initially involved

  • After the 3rd course
  • After the last course (within one month) of chemotherapy (biopsy if indicated)
  • After radiotherapy (for patient given radiotherapy as part of the primary treatment)

Clinical follow-up:

  • 4x per year during the first and second year of follow-up
  • 2x per year during the third, fourth and fifth year of follow-up

Radiological investigations at follow up:

-CT after 6, 12 and 24 months of sites initially involved. CT abdomen in all cases after 12 and 24 months. X-ray of the thorax (if CT thorax is performed) after 6, 12 and 24 months

02

Conditions studied

  • Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Keywords

  • DLBCL
  • high risk
  • young
03

In context

Lymphoma

5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 40 across 4,508 interventional studies indexed under Lymphoma.

Browse Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Nordic Lymphoma Group is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 - \< 65 years.
  2. Histology verified according to the WHO classification and with CD20 positivity by immunhistochemistry or flow cytometry:

    • Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with subgroups except posttransplantation-, Burkitt-like- and primary CNS lymphomas and cases with leptomeningeal lymphoma involvement. Morphologically discordant lymphomas (most often follicular lymphoma and diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma in different biopsy specimens, e.g. lymphatic gland and bone marrow) and transformed lymphomas are not to be included.
    • Follicular lymphomas grade III The diagnosis made by the local pathologist of the participating centre will be accepted for registration
  3. Patients in at least stage II with age adjusted IPI score of 2 or 3:

    Stage III /IV and elevated LDH and/or WHO performance status 2 - 3 Stage II and elevated LDH and WHO performance status 2 - 3.

  4. Previously untreated.
  5. Performance status \< 4 (Appendix 2).
  6. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe cardiac disease: cardiac function grade 3-4 (Appendix 2) or Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) \< 45% (based on MUGA scintigraphy or echo Doppler cardiography).
  2. Impaired liver, renal or other organ function not caused by lymphoma, which will interfere with the treatment schedule.
  3. Pregnancy.
  4. Men and women of reproductive potential not agreeing to use an acceptable method of birth control during treatment and for six months after completion of treatment.
  5. Patients with other severe medical problems and with an expected short survival for non-lymphoma reasons.
  6. Known HIV positivity.
  7. Present or previous cancer except basal cell carcinoma and cervical carcinoma in situ.
  8. Uncontrolled infectious disease.
  9. Psychiatric or mental disorder which make the patient unable to give an informed consent and/or adhere to the protocol.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Chemoimmunotherapy

    Drug: R-CHOEP14x6+HD-AraC+HD-Mtx

Interventions

  • DrugR-CHOEP14x6+HD-AraC+HD-Mtx

    rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 1 cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 day 1 doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 day 1 vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 day 1 etoposide 100mg/m2 days 1,2,3 Prednison 100 mg days 1,2,3,4,5 cycle repeated six times every two weeks followed by HD-AraC 3g/m2x4 and HD-mtx 3 g/m2 HD-AraC 3g/m2x4 times every 12 h

    Also known as: R-CHOEP14x6, HD-MTXx1, HD-AraCx1

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to treatment failure

    Interval between the registration date and the date of documented progression or lack of response, first relapse, death for any reason or discontinuation/change of therapy because of toxicity, whichever occurs first. Otherwise, patients will be censored at the last date they were known to be alive. For patients not responding at any time point on study treatment, TTF is defined as 1 day.

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with adverse events

    Grade 2-4 hematological and non-hematological adverse events according to the WHO Common Toxicity Criteria as specified in the protocol

    Time frame: Treatment period (5 years)

  2. Clinical response rate

    Number of patients with complete and partial responses, stable or progressive disease after 3 courses and the end of treatment period

    Time frame: Treatment period (5 years)

  3. Time to progression

    Time from registration to the date of disease progression. Otherwise, the patients are censored at the last date of follow up. Patients still alive in a complete response or lost to follow-up are censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Patients who die due to causes other than lymphoma are censored at the date of death

    Time frame: 5 years

  4. Overall survival

    Time from the registration date to the date of death. Patients still alive or lost to follow-up are censored at the last date they were known to be alive.

    Time frame: 5 years

  5. Incidence of CNS relapse

    Time frame: Treatment period (5 years)

  6. Molecular factors important for clinical outcome

    Time frame: Treatment period (5 years)

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Odense University Hospital
    Odense, Denmark
  • Helsinki University central Hospital
    Helsinki, Finland
  • Oslo University Hospital
    Oslo, Norway
  • Lund University Hospital
    Lund, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Autio M, Leivonen SK, Bruck O, Mustjoki S, Meszaros Jorgensen J, Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML, Beiske K, Holte H, Pellinen T, Leppa S. Immune cell constitution in the tumor microenvironment predicts the outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Haematologica. 2021 Mar 1;106(3):718-729. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.243626. PubMed 32079690 ↗
  • Taskinen M, Louhimo R, Koivula S, Chen P, Rantanen V, Holte H, Delabie J, Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML, Bjorkholm M, Fluge O, Pedersen LM, Fjorden K, Jerkeman M, Eriksson M, Hautaniemi S, Leppa S. Deregulation of COMMD1 is associated with poor prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 13;9(3):e91031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091031. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24625556 ↗
  • Holte H, Leppa S, Bjorkholm M, Fluge O, Jyrkkio S, Delabie J, Sundstrom C, Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML, Erlanson M, Kolstad A, Fossa A, Ostenstad B, Lofvenberg E, Nordstrom M, Janes R, Pedersen LM, Anderson H, Jerkeman M, Eriksson M. Dose-densified chemoimmunotherapy followed by systemic central nervous system prophylaxis for younger high-risk diffuse large B-cell/follicular grade 3 lymphoma patients: results of a phase II Nordic Lymphoma Group study. Ann Oncol. 2013 May;24(5):1385-92. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds621. Epub 2012 Dec 17. PubMed 23247661 ↗
  • Riihijarvi S, Nurmi H, Holte H, Bjorkholm M, Fluge O, Pedersen LM, Rydstrom K, Jerkeman M, Eriksson M, Leppa S. High serum vascular endothelial growth factor level is an adverse prognostic factor for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with dose-dense chemoimmunotherapy. Eur J Haematol. 2012 Nov;89(5):395-402. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12005. Epub 2012 Sep 14. PubMed 22882209 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 30, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01502982
Lead sponsor
Nordic Lymphoma Group
Collaborators
Amgen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 2, 2012
Start date
Nov 2004
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
May 2014
Last update
Sep 30, 2014

Study contacts

Harald Holte, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Oslo University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion