ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01456780ZvLUpdated Aug 1, 2017Results posted

Efficacy of Zylet vs. Lotemax for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Inflammation/MGD/Blepharitis

A Phase 4 interventional study of Loteprednol/tobramycin and Loteprednol in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Posterior Blepharitis, sponsored by Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-01.

Sponsored by Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase IV, single site, randomized, double masked, parallel control clinical trial of 60 subjects to investigate the variance of efficacy between Lotemax® and Zylet® for treatment of ocular surface inflammation due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Efficacy will be measured by in-vivo confocal microscopy, corneal fluorescein staining, grading of meibomian gland dysfunction and validated ocular symptom assessment questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

Posterior blepharitis is a common chronic eyelid condition that is described as generalized inflammation of the posterior lid margin and associated with inflammation of the ocular surface and with symptoms of burning, irritation, and discomfort. Posterior blepharitis is associated with various disorders of the meibomian glands, known collectively as meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). It is associated either with obstruction and inflammation of the meibomian glands or, less commonly, atrophy of the meibomian glands.

Clinically, MGD often presents with inspissated meibomian glands, oily tear film, as well as inflammation and vascularization of the meibomian gland orifices. Papillary hypertrophy of the tarsal conjunctiva and corneal punctate epitheliopathy are often present, and there are prominent associations with dermatoses, such as acne rosacea, seborrhoeic dermatitis, and atopic dermatitis. Evidence from several sources suggests that MGD of sufficient extent and degree is associated with a deficient tear lipid layer, an increase in tear evaporation, and the occurrence of an evaporative dry eye. In fact MGD is considered to be the most common cause of evaporative dry eye. Individuals with MGD often complain of significant discomfort, including burning, itching, irritation, and photophobia. They may also have other associated symptoms of dry eye and may be plagued by blurred vision, gradual contact lens intolerance. Furthermore, these patients may become functionally handicapped by the negative impact of dry eye on their crucial daily activities such as working, reading, using computer, and driving.

Despite the high incidence of posterior blepharitis, there is currently no consistently effective treatment for this condition and it still remains a therapeutic challenge. Posterior blepharitis has traditionally been managed with eyelid hygiene, topical antibiotics (erythromycin or bacitracin ointments), oral tetracyclines (tetracycline, doxycycline, or minocycline) and corticosteroids which are often time consuming, frustrating, and frequently ineffective or variably effective.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of topical loteprednol (corticosteroid) vs. the combination of loteprednol and tobramycin (corticosteroid and antibiotic) against an artificial tear. It is critical to determine to what extent the addition of an antibiotic to a topical steroid can enhance the therapeutic efficacy of the treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
  • Posterior Blepharitis

Keywords

  • Meibomian gland dysfunction
  • Blepharitis
  • Dry Eye
  • Ocular Inflammation
  • MGD
  • Zylet
  • Lotemax
  • Artificial Tear
03

In context

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

172 studies on the registry are indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 138 interventional studies indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Browse Meibomian Gland Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary is the lead sponsor of 100 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (54%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Has not worn contact lenses, except for bandage contact lens or rigid gas permeable lens, for at least 2 weeks prior to the study and agrees to not wear contact lenses during study
  • Patient is in generally good \& stable overall health
  • Minimum corneal fluorescein staining of 4 in at least one eye
  • OSDI score >22
  • The patient must have a diagnosis of posterior blepharitis
  • A negative urine pregnancy test result for women of
  • Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate (hormonal or barrier method of birth control) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation.
  • Normal lid position and closure
  • Ability to understand and provide to participate in this study
  • Willingness to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or ocular pemphigoid
  • History of eyelid surgery
  • Intra-ocular surgery or ocular laser surgery within 3 months
  • History of microbial keratitis, including herpes
  • Active ocular allergies
  • Corneal epithelial defect > 1mm2
  • Any change in use of topical anti-inflammatories, such as , Restasis, or NSAID within the past 2 weeks
  • Any change in dosage of tetracycline compounds (tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline) within the past two weeks
  • Use of isotretinoin (Accutane) within the past 6 months
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Signs of current infection, including fever and current treatment with antibiotics
  • Active liver, renal, or hematologic disease
  • The use of any other drug
  • Individuals with a known history of glaucoma, individuals with IOP >22 Hg in either eye and individuals with a known family history of glaucoma in primary (first degree) relatives (ie. mother, father, sibling or child)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Zylet

    Subject randomized to this arm will be treated with Zylet (Loteprednol/tobramycin), twice a day, for 4 weeks. Zylet is a combination of loteprednol and tobramycin. Loteprednol is in a class of drugs called corticosteroids. Loteprednol inhibits processes in the body that cause inflammation. Tobramycin is an antibiotic.

    Drug: Loteprednol/tobramycin

  • Active comparator
    Lotemax

    Subject randomized to this arm will be treated with Lotemax, twice a day, for 4 weeks. Lotemax is also known as loteprednol. Loteprednol is in a class of drugs called corticosteroids. Loteprednol inhibits processes in the body that cause inflammation.

    Drug: Loteprednol

  • Placebo comparator
    B+L Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Drop

    Subject randomized to this arm will be treated with B+L Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Eye Drops (Artificial Tears), twice a day, for 4 weeks.

    Drug: B+L Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Drop

Interventions

  • DrugLoteprednol/tobramycin

    Drug pages: Loteprednol Etabonate · Tobramycin

    Zylet (loteprednol/tobramycin) drops, 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks.

    Also known as: Zylet

  • Eye drops, 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks

    Also known as: Lotemax

  • DrugB+L Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Drop

    Bausch + Lomb (B+L) Advanced Eye Relief Lubricant Drop (Artificial Tears), 1 drop twice a day for 4 weeks.

    Also known as: artificial tears

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ocular Surface Disease Index

    OSDI is a 12-question survey used to measure the symptoms of dry eye disease. Each of the 12 individual questions rate one symptom on a 0-4 scale, with 4 meaning that the symptom is present all of the time and 0 meaning the symptom is present none of the time. The overall ODSI score is calculated by adding all of the values from the 12 questions, multiplying that value by 25, and dividing the resulting value by the number of questions answered. This results in an overall scale that ranges from 0-100, with 100 being severe dry eye symptoms and 0 being no dry eye symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 4 Time Point

  2. Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score

    Questionnaire given to patients to assess the frequency of dry eye symptoms. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analogue Scale technique to quantify the frequency of the patient's dry eye symptoms. Change is quantified from baseline to week 4. The range of the SANDE frequency scale is 0-100, with 0 being the minimum level of frequency of dry eye symptoms and 100 being the maximum level of frequency of dry eye symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 4 Time Point

  3. Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score

    Questionnaire given to patients to assess the severity of dry eye symptoms. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analogue Scale technique to quantify the severity of the patient's dry eye symptoms. Change is quantified from baseline to week 4. The range of the SANDE severity scale is 0-100, with minimum level of severity of dry eye symptoms and 100 being the maximum level of severity of dry eye symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 4 Time Point

  4. Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score

    Corneal Fluorescein Staining is used to assess the level of corneal epitheliopathy that is related to dry eye disease. The CFS scale ranges from 0 to 15 scale, with 0 representing the minimum level of corneal epitheliopathy and 15 representing the maximum level of corneal epitheliopathy.

    Time frame: Week 4 Time Point

07

Results

Posted Jun 19, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant Drops
Started202020
Completed171720
Not completed330
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up330

Outcome measures

PrimaryOcular Surface Disease Index

OSDI is a 12-question survey used to measure the symptoms of dry eye disease. Each of the 12 individual questions rate one symptom on a 0-4 scale, with 4 meaning that the symptom is present all of the time and 0 meaning the symptom is present none of the time. The overall ODSI score is calculated by adding all of the values from the 12 questions, multiplying that value by 25, and dividing the resulting value by the number of questions answered. This results in an overall scale that ranges from 0-100, with 100 being severe dry eye symptoms and 0 being no dry eye symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 4 Time Point
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Ocular Surface Disease Index
units on a scaleZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant Drops
Ocular Surface Disease Index56.6 ± 22.446.4 ± 24.848.4 ± 18.9
PrimarySymptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score

Questionnaire given to patients to assess the frequency of dry eye symptoms. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analogue Scale technique to quantify the frequency of the patient's dry eye symptoms. Change is quantified from baseline to week 4. The range of the SANDE frequency scale is 0-100, with 0 being the minimum level of frequency of dry eye symptoms and 100 being the maximum level of frequency of dry eye symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 4 Time Point
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score
units on a scaleZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant Drops
Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score65.9 ± 28.951.7 ± 23.350.5 ± 24.3
PrimarySymptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score

Questionnaire given to patients to assess the severity of dry eye symptoms. The questionnaire utilizes a 100 mm horizontal Visual Analogue Scale technique to quantify the severity of the patient's dry eye symptoms. Change is quantified from baseline to week 4. The range of the SANDE severity scale is 0-100, with minimum level of severity of dry eye symptoms and 100 being the maximum level of severity of dry eye symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 4 Time Point
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score
units on a scaleZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant Drops
Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score64.5 ± 25.854.4 ± 20.251.2 ± 22.0
PrimaryCorneal Fluorescein Staining Score

Corneal Fluorescein Staining is used to assess the level of corneal epitheliopathy that is related to dry eye disease. The CFS scale ranges from 0 to 15 scale, with 0 representing the minimum level of corneal epitheliopathy and 15 representing the maximum level of corneal epitheliopathy.

Time frame:
Week 4 Time Point
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score
units on a scaleZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant Drops
Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score6.3 ± 4.25.0 ± 3.34.8 ± 3.2

Adverse events

Collected over 4 Weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Zylet0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)2/20 (10%)
Lotemax0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)1/20 (5%)
Bausch & Lomb Lubricant Drops0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)2/20 (10%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant Drops
Eye PainEye disorders1/200/200/20
BlurrinessEye disorders1/201/200/20
Excess TearingEye disorders1/200/200/20
RednessEye disorders1/200/200/20
HeadacheEye disorders0/200/201/20
ShinglesEye disorders0/200/201/20
DrynessEye disorders0/201/200/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant DropsTotal
Mean55 ± 1352 ± 1257 ± 1255 ± 13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant DropsTotal
Female891532
Male98522
Ocular Surface Disease Index
Ocular Surface Disease Index(units on a scale)ZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant DropsTotal
Mean59.7 ± 18.052.0 ± 22.657.0 ± 21.356.3 ± 20.6
Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score
Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Frequency Score(units on a scale)ZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant DropsTotal
Mean77.8 ± 14.260.9 ± 19.468.1 ± 17.868.9 ± 18.3
Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score
Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Severity Score(units on a scale)ZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant DropsTotal
Mean67.0 ± 19.858.1 ± 19.664.2 ± 19.563.2 ± 19.6
Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS)
Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS)(units on a scale)ZyletLotemaxBausch & Lomb Lubricant DropsTotal
Mean6.8 ± 2.66.6 ± 2.56.1 ± 2.06.5 ± 2.3
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 1, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01456780
Responsible party
Reza Dana, MD (Principal Investigator, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 21, 2011
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Jun 2017
Results posted
Jun 19, 2017
Last update
Aug 1, 2017

Study contacts

Reza Dana, MD, MPH, MSc
principal investigator · Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Loteprednol Etabonate · Tobramycin

Start the discussion