CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01414777Updated Mar 24, 2022

Intravenous Ondansetron to Attenuate the Hypotensive, Bradycardic Response to Spinal Anesthesia in Healthy Parturients

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of ondansetron and placebo in Hypotension and Pregnancy, sponsored by University of Virginia. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-24.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The investigators hypothesize that given prophylactically, intravenous ondansetron will attenuate the drop in blood pressure and heart rate frequently seen after spinal anesthesia.

Eighty-six American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II in preoperative patient assessment, parturients age of 18 to 45 years scheduled to undergo elective caesarean section will be enrolled.

Patients will be randomized to 2 groups: the ondansetron group, receiving 8 mg intravenous ondansetron diluted in 10 mL of saline; or the placebo group, who were administered 10 mL of saline given 5 minutes prior to performing the spinal anesthetic. Investigational Pharmacy will randomize and dispense study drug.

Baseline measurements of vital signs will be taken. Otherwise standard management will then be used:

  • Patients must be NPO for 8 hours
  • Pulse oximetry, EKG monitoring, noninvasive blood pressure at a minimum of every 3 minutes, more frequently if decided by the provider.
  • Standard lumbar puncture in a sitting position the L3-L4 or L4-L5
  • Whitacre pencil-point, 25 gauge
  • Injectate: 2 mL of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine, 100 mcg preservative free morphine, 20 mcg fentanyl
  • Immediately after completing the subarachnoid injection, patients will be laid supine with left lateral uterine displacement

The sensory level of anesthesia will be assessed in the standard fashion every five minutes using ice. The motor component will tested using the Bromage scale for spinal anesthesia (0, no paralysis; 1, inability to lift the thigh [only knee/feet]; 2, inability to flex the knee [only feet]; 3, inability to move any joint in the legs).

Read the detailed description

Over the last 30 years, regional anesthesia has emerged as the method of choice for elective caesarean section because it avoids risks involved in managing the airway of the parturient and has the added significant benefit of mother being awake for the birth of her child. Indeed, this changing practice patterns is thought to have lead to a significant drop in anesthesia related maternal morbidity and mortality.

At the same time, regional anesthesia is associated with both minor and significant risk.

Most common among these effects is hypotension and bradycardia, occurring in 33% and 13% of cases, respectively. In the pregnant patient, supine positioning required for surgery is associated hypotension due to aortocaval compression by the gravid uterus in 8% of patients, even without spinal anesthesia. During caesarean section, the combination of these factors can lead to hypotension include decreased placental blood flow, impaired fetal oxygenation and fetal acidosis. Maternal symptoms of low blood pressures include nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and decreased consciousness. This situation has lead to dozens of publications seeking to prevent or minimize the hypotensive response.

Hypotension after a spinal is initially due to a blockade of sympathetic fibers leading to a drop in systemic vascular resistance. Spinal-induced bradycardia is multifactorial but is in part due to the Bezold-Jarisch Reflex (BJR). This reflex is mediated by serotonin receptors within the wall of the ventricle in response to systemic hypotension. These receptors, the 5HT3 subtype, cause an increase efferent vagal signaling when bound by serotonin released during hypovolemic states, clinically leading to bradycardia and further hypotension.

Ondansetron, a widely used anti-emetic and serotonin antagonist, has been safely used to blunt the BJR, resulting in less bradycardia and hypotension first in animals and later in humans undergoing spinal anesthesia. ,

Use During Pregnancy:

The FDA labels ondansetron as a class B. Studies in pregnant rats and rabbits at doses up to 70 times higher than clinically used doses revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to ondansetron. There are, however, few prospective studies in pregnant women. Nevertheless, the drug is widely used has a long safety history for use in pregnancy and during anesthesia for caesarean section.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypotension
  • Pregnancy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • c-section
  • Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for C-section
03

In context

Hypotension

1,003 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypotension; 173 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 68 is below the median of 80 across 675 interventional studies indexed under Hypotension.

Browse Hypotension studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 653 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 41 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective Caesarean section
  • Consent to be in the study
  • Age 18-45
  • ASA 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Patients with known allergy to ondansetron will be excluded
  • Contraindications to spinal anesthetic

    • Known Coagulopathy (acquired e.g. anticoagulation or existing such as liver disease; using patient history, physical examination to determine bleeding risks, a platelet count under 100 or a PT INR over 1.4)
    • Severely altered anatomy (e.g. post surgical changes)
    • Existing neurological deficits (Women with a history of migraine or tension headache will be allowed to enroll. More severe conditions with daily life limiting symptoms will be excluded. Examples include epilepsy, pseudotumor cerebri, prior stroke with persistent neurologic deficits, or any motor or sensory neuropathy with existing deficits)
    • Skin infection overlying site
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ondansetron

    ondansetron 8 mg IV will be administered prior to placement of the spinal anesthesia

    Drug: ondansetron

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Ondansetron 8 mg IV or Placebo will be administered prior to placement of the spinal anesthestic

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Drugondansetron

    Ondansetron 8mg IV or placebo will be administered prior to placement of the spinal anesthetic

    Also known as: epidural

  • Drugplacebo

    placebo or ondansetron 8mg IV will be administered prior to placement of the spinal anesthetic

    Also known as: epidural

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability"

    hypotension \& bradycardia will be recorded from the placement of the spinal through the end of surgical c-section

    Time frame: day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. dosage of vasopressors administered

    vasopressors administered during surgery

    Time frame: day one

  2. number of episodes of nausea

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  3. occurrence & intensity of itching

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  4. pain scores reported by the patient

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  5. dosage of anticholinergics administered

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Virginia Health System
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hawkins JL. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;46(3):679-87. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200309000-00020. No abstract available. PubMed 12972749 ↗
  • Mhyre JM, Riesner MN, Polley LS, Naughton NN. A series of anesthesia-related maternal deaths in Michigan, 1985-2003. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jun;106(6):1096-104. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267592.34626.6b. PubMed 17525583 ↗
  • Lee LA, Posner KL, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Injuries associated with regional anesthesia in the 1980s and 1990s: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):143-52. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00023. PubMed 15220784 ↗
  • Liu SS, McDonald SB. Current issues in spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2001 May;94(5):888-906. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200105000-00030. No abstract available. PubMed 11388543 ↗
  • Jackson R, Reid JA, Thorburn J. Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Sep;75(3):262-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.3.262. PubMed 7547039 ↗
  • Kinsella SM, Lohmann G. Supine hypotensive syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):774-88. PubMed 8164943 ↗
  • Rout CC, Rocke DA. Prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1994 Spring;32(2):117-35. No abstract available. PubMed 8063445 ↗
  • Mathru M, Rao TL, Kartha RK, Shanmugham M, Jacobs HK. Intravenous albumin administration for prevention of spinal hypotension during cesarean section. Anesth Analg. 1980 Sep;59(9):655-8. PubMed 7191222 ↗
  • Dahlgren G, Granath F, Pregner K, Rosblad PG, Wessel H, Irestedt L. Colloid vs. crystalloid preloading to prevent maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Sep;49(8):1200-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00730.x. PubMed 16095463 ↗
  • Ueyama H, He YL, Tanigami H, Mashimo T, Yoshiya I. Effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on blood volume in the parturient undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1999 Dec;91(6):1571-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00006. PubMed 10598596 ↗
  • Riley ET, Cohen SE, Rubenstein AJ, Flanagan B. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: six percent hetastarch versus lactated Ringer's solution. Anesth Analg. 1995 Oct;81(4):838-42. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199510000-00031. PubMed 7574020 ↗
  • Campagna JA, Carter C. Clinical relevance of the Bezold-Jarisch reflex. Anesthesiology. 2003 May;98(5):1250-60. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00030. No abstract available. PubMed 12717149 ↗
  • Villalon CM, Centurion D. Cardiovascular responses produced by 5-hydroxytriptamine:a pharmacological update on the receptors/mechanisms involved and therapeutic implications. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2007 Oct;376(1-2):45-63. doi: 10.1007/s00210-007-0179-1. Epub 2007 Aug 17. PubMed 17703282 ↗
  • Veelken R, Sawin LL, DiBona GF. Epicardial serotonin receptors in circulatory control in conscious Sprague-Dawley rats. Am J Physiol. 1990 Feb;258(2 Pt 2):H466-72. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1990.258.2.H466. PubMed 2309912 ↗
  • Owczuk R, Wenski W, Polak-Krzeminska A, Twardowski P, Arszulowicz R, Dylczyk-Sommer A, Wujtewicz MA, Sawicka W, Morzuch E, Smietanski M, Wujtewicz M. Ondansetron given intravenously attenuates arterial blood pressure drop due to spinal anesthesia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2008.01.010. PubMed 18675744 ↗
  • Martinek RM. Witnessed asystole during spinal anesthesia treated with atropine and ondansetron: a case report. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Mar;51(3):226-30. doi: 10.1007/BF03019100. PubMed 15010403 ↗
  • FDA Prescribing Information. Web retrieved 7/8/2009 .http://www.fda.org
  • Tucker ML, Jackson MR, Scales MD, Spurling NW, Tweats DJ, Capel-Edwards K. Ondansetron: pre-clinical safety evaluation. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989;25 Suppl 1:S79-93. PubMed 2533905 ↗
  • Einarson A, Maltepe C, Navioz Y, Kennedy D, Tan MP, Koren G. The safety of ondansetron for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a prospective comparative study. BJOG. 2004 Sep;111(9):940-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00236.x. PubMed 15327608 ↗
  • Sullivan CA, Johnson CA, Roach H, Martin RW, Stewart DK, Morrison JC. A pilot study of intravenous ondansetron for hyperemesis gravidarum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;174(5):1565-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70607-5. PubMed 9065130 ↗
  • Kuscu NK, Koyuncu F. Hyperemesis gravidarum: current concepts and management. Postgrad Med J. 2002 Feb;78(916):76-9. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.916.76. PubMed 11807187 ↗
  • Asker C, Norstedt Wikner B, Kallen B. Use of antiemetic drugs during pregnancy in Sweden. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Dec;61(12):899-906. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0055-1. Epub 2005 Nov 18. PubMed 16328314 ↗
  • Phillips TW Jr, Broussard DM, Sumrall WD 3rd, Hart SR. Intraoperative oxygen administration does not reduce the incidence or severity of nausea or vomiting associated with neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2007 Oct;105(4):1113-7, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278626.54116.0e. PubMed 17898396 ↗
  • Siddik-Sayyid SM, Aouad MT, Taha SK, Azar MS, Hakki MA, Kaddoum RN, Nasr VG, Yazbek VG, Baraka AS. Does ondansetron or granisetron prevent subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery? Anesth Analg. 2007 Feb;104(2):421-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000253668.10453.de. PubMed 17242102 ↗
  • Yeh HM, Chen LK, Lin CJ, Chan WH, Chen YP, Lin CS, Sun WZ, Wang MJ, Tsai SK. Prophylactic intravenous ondansetron reduces the incidence of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jul;91(1):172-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00032. PubMed 10866907 ↗
  • Yazigi A, Chalhoub V, Madi-Jebara S, Haddad F, Hayek G. Prophylactic ondansetron is effective in the treatment of nausea and vomiting but not on pruritus after cesarean delivery with intrathecal sufentanil-morphine. J Clin Anesth. 2002 May;14(3):183-6. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00381-6. PubMed 12031749 ↗
  • Sarvela PJ, Halonen PM, Soikkeli AI, Kainu JP, Korttila KT. Ondansetron and tropisetron do not prevent intraspinal morphine- and fentanyl-induced pruritus in elective cesarean delivery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Feb;50(2):239-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00934.x. PubMed 16430549 ↗
  • Abouleish EI, Rashid S, Haque S, Giezentanner A, Joynton P, Chuang AZ. Ondansetron versus placebo for the control of nausea and vomiting during Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1999 May;54(5):479-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00798.x. PubMed 10995148 ↗
  • George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Serotonin receptor antagonists for the prevention and treatment of pruritus, nausea, and vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jul;109(1):174-82. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a45a6b. PubMed 19535708 ↗
  • Tang J, Wang B, White PF, Watcha MF, Qi J, Wender RH. The effect of timing of ondansetron administration on its efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit as a prophylactic antiemetic in the ambulatory setting. Anesth Analg. 1998 Feb;86(2):274-82. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199802000-00010. PubMed 9459232 ↗
  • Terkawi AS, Tiouririne M, Mehta SH, Hackworth JM, Tsang S, Durieux ME. Ondansetron Does Not Attenuate Hemodynamic Changes in Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Delivery Using Subarachnoid Anesthesia: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):344-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000274. PubMed 26066384 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01414777
Lead sponsor
University of Virginia
Responsible party
Mohamed Tiouririne, MD (Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 11, 2011
Start date
Nov 2009
Primary completion
Jun 2011
Completion
Jun 2011
Last update
Mar 24, 2022

Study contacts

Jordan Hackworth, MD
principal investigator · University of Virginia Anesthesiology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion