ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06600178STRONGUpdated Sep 9, 2026

Study Targeting Myocardial Perfusion and Symptom Relief in Women With SGLT2 Inhibitors (STRONG)

A Phase 1 interventional study of Brenzavvy (bexagliflozin), 20 mg Oral Tablet and Placebo in Angina Patients With Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Microvascular Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (CMD), sponsored by University of Virginia. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Phase 1, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to that Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors treatment will improve Coronary Microvascular Disease with anginal symptoms associated with non-obstructive coronary disease in women. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Aim 1: Test the hypothesis that Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors treatment improves coronary microvascular disease in women with no evidence of epicardial obstructive coronary artery disease.

Aim 2: Test the hypothesis that Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors treatment improves angina symptoms and other quality of life measurements associated with the improvement of CFR.

AIM 3: Identify the effect of Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition on inflammation pathways and markers of systemic Research will compare Brezavvy to placebo

Participants will:

  • Take study drug or placebo for 12 weeks
  • Stress Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
  • 12 lead electrocardiograms
  • Complete questionnaires
Read the detailed description

Cardio microvascular disease is defined as epicardial and/or microvascular endothelial and/or non-endothelial dysfunction that limits myocardial perfusion, most often detected as reduced coronary flow reserve (CFR). CFR, which is calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to resting absolute myocardial blood flow, indicates the myocardium's ability to increase flow in response to stress or vasodilation. Because the coronary microcirculation is beyond the resolution of invasive or non-invasive coronary angiography, direct interrogation of coronary microvascular function is necessary to establish the diagnosis of CMD.

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) studies have shown that even in visually normal PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, impaired CFR adds essential prognostic value. In addition, abnormalities in the microcirculation could explain inducible myocardial ischemia beyond the effects of epicardial coronary obstruction and identify individuals with a high risk of MACE. In patients with very low CFR (\<1.6), women showed a higher frequency of non-obstructive CAD, whereas men showed a higher frequency of severely obstructive CAD (P=0.002). A differential effect on outcomes between women and men is noted in individuals with very low CFR (CFR \<1.6) (hazard estimated from the linear interaction of CFR and sex in the final model, model P = 0.001, interaction P=0.04). High-resolution CMR stress perfusion imaging can quantify CFR both globally and between the endocardium and epicardium. A multicenter study of 1049 patients with suspected and known CAD showed that lower myocardial stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and CFR by CMR perfusion mapping were associated with death and MACE independent of other clinical risk factors, even in patients who had normal qualitative perfusion and no known obstructive CAD. Recently developed in-line automated CMR myocardial perfusion mapping has been shown to be reproducible and comparable with PET, and can be easily combined into clinical workflows. Normal CFR ranges values in this study are comparable to prior studies by other techniques that have ranged from 2.7±0.3 to 4.2±1.0. A prior study has shown an CFR threshold of 2.19 with excellent specificity for detecting CMD with a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI: 83% to 99%), specificity of 72% (95% CI: 52% to 87%), accuracy of 85% (95% CI: 75% to 92%), positive predictive value of 82% (95% CI: 72% to 89%), and negative predictive value of 91% (95% CI: 72% to 98%).

The potential mechanisms of CMD appear to be heterogeneous. The novel link between Inflammation and coronary vasomotion abnormalities is further supported by the findings that coronary vasoconstriction in response to acetylcholine (ACh) in patients with early CAD was greater in coronary artery segments with than without macrophage infiltration and vasa vasorum proliferation in an additive manner, indicating an important role of inflammation and vasa vasorum proliferation in the pathogenesis of CAD. Moreover, significant associations among endothelium-independent CMD, many inflammatory biomarkers and cardiac diastolic dysfunction were noted in women with angina but no flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis, further supporting the role of systemic Inflammation in both CMD and HFpEF, as well as providing insights into potential mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of HFpEF.

Although small trials have suggested benefits from angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, aspirin, and statins, there is a lack of appropriately designed clinical outcome trials to inform evidence based therapeutic based on mechanism strategies. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), a new class of drug approved for the treatment of diabetes, have been shown to have a significant impact on cardiovascular events. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that SGLT2i reduces MACE, prevents heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. Many of these findings were unanticipated and have stimulated substantial mechanistic research to improve the understanding of this class of drug. New recommendations suggest using SGLT2i in symptomatic patients with chronic HF to reduce hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality, regardless of type 2 diabetes. The exact underlying mechanisms underlying these effects, however, remain largely unknown.

In preclinical models of myocardial infarction, Brezavvy has demonstrated attenuation of cardiac fibrosis and improved cardiac function and remodeling. Furthermore, empagliflozin has been shown to improve coronary microvascular function and increase cardiac output in mice, as evidenced by increased coronary blood flow and fractional ventricular area change as demonstrated by ultrasound imaging. Preclinical data has proposed a variety of mechanisms by which SGLT2is can potentially attenuate microvascular and endothelial dysfunction, including nitric oxide production, oxidative stress, Inflammation, mitochondrial function, cell viability, adverse vasoactive paracrine factors from adipose tissue, among others. In vivo studies have documented that SGLT2 inhibitors attenuate endothelial dysfunction by suppressing Inflammation. Steven et al. reported a reduction in the expression of inflammatory molecules such as interferon- γ, cyclooxygenase-2, and inducible NO synthase after SGLT2 inhibition. In a similar manner, Brezavvy is also reported to reduce several circulating inflammatory markers. Additionally, in vitro studies have reported suppression of TNF α. Previous studies showed that SGLT2 inhibition reduced circulating levels of C-C motif chemokine 2 (CCL2), IL-6, and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)α in ApoEdeficient mice. However, the impact of SGLT2 inhibition on systemic markers of Inflammation has not been assessed in humans.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT Women's ischemic heart disease (IHD) differs from men's, and women have a unique phenotype of less calcified lesions and more non-obstructive disease. A significant number of patients with symptoms do not have obstructive coronary artery stenosis. This condition is termed ANOCA. Patients with ANOCA have a high symptom burden and reduced quality of life. Patients with ANOCA report frequent time missed from work and work limitations, suggesting a substantial economic impact as reported by the group at UVA. One proposed mechanism contributing to ANOCA is CMD. There is an increasing recognition that CMD is more prevalent in women. There are no randomized, controlled outcome trials testing treatment strategies tailored to different pathways that have not been performed; therefore, the proposed studies are consistent with an unmet urgent need for new novel therapies to target the microcirculation, specifically in women with suspected or confirmed ischemic heart disease, especially when young, who have less atherosclerosis than men and less prevalence of obstructive CAD. Measuring myocardial blood flow quantitatively with stress CMR is a particular expertise of the Cardiovascular Imaging Center at the University of Virginia (UVA) and our research group.

SGLT2i are a class of drugs approved for treating diabetes. However, they have been shown to benefit cardiovascular events significantly. Many of these findings were unanticipated and have stimulated substantial mechanistic research to improve the understanding of this class. However, recent studies show that possible mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit are unlikely to be related to improved glycemic control. These benefits included reduced systemic inflammation. Therefore, in this proposal, the impact of SGLT2i on systemic Inflammation and how it improve coronary microvascular function seen in animal models will be studied.

INNOVATION This study will focus on a novel study population and a novel therapy. Women under investigation for myocardial ischemia are more likely to have non-obstructive CAD, and here, CMD is relevant. Targeting symptomatic women with ischemia and non obstructive CAD is clearly an urgent need. This group of patients with a disabling problem also incurs healthcare costs similar to many with obstructive CAD. CMD has historically been under-recognized and under-treated. Accordingly, in recent years, CMD has generated substantial interest in the clinical and basic science research community.

Innovative diagnostic method. Traditionally, the non-invasive diagnosis of CMD has been dominated by PET imaging. Quantitative high-resolution CMR to quantify coronary myocardial blood flow and myocardial resistance are being developed to diagnose CMD and add a novel additional component to our project and will allow us to explore a potential clinical indication to monitor possible therapies for CMD. At present, the management strategy for patients with ANOCA and CMD remains unclear due to the absence of randomized trials comparing therapies to reduce adverse cardiac events, and available data are limited to cohort studies. There are no therapeutic options specifically to treat CMD. Our study will test whether SGLT2i therapy improves coronary blood flow and quality of life in women with ANOCA. Results will also contribute to understanding this novel drug class's mechanistic effect in microvascular disease and other major disease states such as insulin resistance.

OVERALL STUDY DESIGN This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is designed to evaluate coronary flow reserve and quality of life after therapy with SGLT2i compared to placebo in symptomatic women with non-obstructive CAD (ANOCA) and CMD. Recruited women (n=150 total) will be clinically stable, with angina or equivalent symptoms, with no evidence of obstructive epicardial CAD (stenosis \< 50%) by invasive catheterization or coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or FFR/CT-FFR \< 0.8 within the previous two years, and CMD diagnosis defined by CFR \<2 by CMR. They will meet the appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria detailed in Table 1. The study population will include patients both with and without type 2 diabetes, as the benefits of SGLT2i appear to be independent of the glycemic effect. Figure 4. Overall study design. Study participants will receive background standard of care, with 75 receiving SGLT2i and 75 receiving placebo treatment for 12 weeks. Participants will undergo two stress CMR studies, including baseline, 12 weeks post-treatment, and three blood draws at baseline, at six and 12 weeks post-SGLT2i treatment. All 150 participants will undergo questionnaires to measure quality of life using the following questionnaires: Risk factors of Cardiovascular Disease in Women, EQ-5D-3L, Duke Activity Status Inventory, Modified Morisky Medicine Scale, Seattle Angina Questionnaires, Rose dyspnea score, GAD 7, and PHQ8 metrics at baseline, 6 weeks and at 12 weeks post-treatment.

After eligibility screening, informed consent, and randomization procedures by the study team, participants will follow up at 6, and 12 weeks and other testing as described later in the protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Angina Patients With Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
  • Coronary Microvascular Disease
  • Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (CMD)

Keywords

  • Angina
  • ANOCA
  • Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
  • CMD
  • Non-Obstructive CAD
  • Chest Pain in Women
03

In context

Microvascular Angina

111 studies on the registry are indexed under Microvascular Angina; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 79 across 63 interventional studies indexed under Microvascular Angina.

Browse Microvascular Angina studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 675 studies on the registry; 138 are open to participants now.

Of its 61 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 42 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Female sex.

      • Age ≥18 years.
      • Willing and able to provide written .
      • Signs and symptoms of suspected ischemia prompted referral for further evaluation by cardiac catheterization or CCTA within two years of consent.
      • No evidence of obstructive epicardial CAD (stenosis \<50%) of a major epicardial vessel or an FFR ≤0.80 by invasive catheterization or CCTA. Patients who have not undergone cardiac catheterization of CT angiogram within the last 2 years for chest pain can be scheduled for a screening CT angiogram of the coronary arteries to confirm eligibility.
      • Diagnosis of CMD defined by CFR \< 2 by CMR
      • Never on SGLT2i

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy \<40% or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
  • History of congestive heart failure, severe pulmonary disease, liver disease
  • History of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within previous 30 days
  • Stroke within the last 180 days or intracranial hemorrhage at any time.
  • Severe valvular disease
  • \<3 years, due to non-cardiovascular comorbidity.
  • Pregnancy or women who are breast-feeding
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Symptomatic hypotension or systolic BP >95 mmHg on 2 consecutive measurements
  • Active requiring treatment at the time of visit
  • Severe ( \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2 by CKD-EPI), unstable, or rapidly progressing renal disease at the time of randomization
  • History of recurrent UTI/bladder/kidney infections
  • Asthma with ongoing wheezing
  • Known or suspected broncho-constrictive or bronchospastic lung disease (ARDS, emphysema)
  • Greater than first degree heart block
  • Implanted cardiac device
  • Profound sinus bradycardia (heart rate \<40 beats per minute)
  • Atrial fibrillation or supraventricular arrhythmias at time of imaging
  • Known intolerance of nitrates (other than hypotension)
  • History of reaction to iodinated contrast agents
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Drug Group

    Brenzavvy (bexagliflozin), 20 mg Oral Tablet

    Drug: Brenzavvy (bexagliflozin), 20 mg Oral Tablet

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Group

    placebo tablet

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Coronary Flow Reserve

    Coronary flow reserve is calculated as the ratio of hyperemic myocardial blood flow to the resting myocardial blood flow using cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, Deswal A, Drazner MH, Dunlay SM, Evers LR, Fang JC, Fedson SE, Fonarow GC, Hayek SS, Hernandez AF, Khazanie P, Kittleson MM, Lee CS, Link MS, Milano CA, Nnacheta LC, Sandhu AT, Stevenson LW, Vardeny O, Vest AR, Yancy CW; ACC/AHA Joint Committee Members. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 May 3;145(18):e895-e1032. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063. Epub 2022 Apr 1. PubMed 35363499 ↗
  • Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, Boehme AK, Buxton AE, Carson AP, Commodore-Mensah Y, Elkind MSV, Evenson KR, Eze-Nliam C, Ferguson JF, Generoso G, Ho JE, Kalani R, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Levine DA, Lewis TT, Liu J, Loop MS, Ma J, Mussolino ME, Navaneethan SD, Perak AM, Poudel R, Rezk-Hanna M, Roth GA, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Thacker EL, VanWagner LB, Virani SS, Voecks JH, Wang NY, Yaffe K, Martin SS. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jan 26. PubMed 35078371 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 27 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 3, 2024
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
StartActual
Jul 15, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 29, 2029
Last update
Sep 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06600178
Responsible party
Patricia Rodriguez Lozano (Principal Investigator, University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Jul 15, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 29, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Patricia Rodriguez-Lozano, MD
Contact
PR3GG@uvahealth.org
434-982-1058
Shuo Wang
Contact
VJR7CE@uvahealth.org
4349821058
Patricia Rodriguez-Lozano, MD
principal investigator · Uni

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bexagliflozin

Start the discussion