ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01336803OsteosarcomaUpdated Dec 27, 2023Results posted

Differentiation of Bone Sarcomas and Osteomyelitis With Ferumoxytol-Enhanced MRI

A Phase 2 interventional study of Feraheme and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan in Bone Cancer, Chondrosarcoma and Ewing's Sarcoma, sponsored by Heike E Daldrup-Link. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-27.

Sponsored by Heike E Daldrup-Link · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
10 Years to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This pilot trial studies the differentiation of bone sarcomas and osteomyelitis with ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Imaging procedures that allow doctors to more accurately differentiate between malignant bone sarcomas and osteomyelitis may help in diagnosing patients correctly and may result in more timely treatment.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND; In this study, T1, T2, and T2* represent parameters of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

The T1 relaxation time, also known as the spin-lattice relaxation time, is a measure of how quickly the net magnetization vector (NMV) recovers to its ground state in the direction of B0. T1 is assessed immediately post-contrast. A T1-weighted image (T1WI ) is one of the basic pulse sequences in MRI and demonstrates differences in the T1 relaxation times of tissues. A T1WI relies upon the longitudinal relaxation of a tissue's net magnetization vector (NMV).

T2 is a time constant for the decay of transverse magnetization arising from natural interactions at the atomic or molecular levels, and be considered the "natural" or "true" T2 of the tissue. However, in any nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiment, transverse magnetization decays much faster than would be predicted by natural atomic and molecular mechanisms. Accordingly, T2 * is the time constant for the decay of transverse magnetization as observed in a tissue during a MRI scan, and be considered the"effective T2" (represented as T2*). T2* is always ≤ T2. In this study, T2 * is assessed after 24 hours.

OUTLINE:

Patients receive ferumoxytol intravenously (IV) and then undergo ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI up to 1 hour after infusion and up to 24 hours post-infusion.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

  • Establish magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics of bone sarcomas and osteomyelitis based on their ferumoxytol-enhancement on relatively early post-contrast T1-weighted images.
  • Establish MR imaging characteristics of bone sarcomas and osteomyelitis based on their ferumoxytol-enhancement on delayed postcontrast T2-weighted images.
  • Establish T2-weighted MR imaging characteristics of iron-labeled mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) in osteonecrotic bone over time, before and after surgical core decompression and bone marrow implantation.
  • Adding a second branch for patients who can not receive ferumoxytol but still getting the MRI exam. These patients will server as controls.
02

Conditions studied

  • Bone Cancer
  • Chondrosarcoma
  • Ewing's Sarcoma
  • Osteosarcoma
  • Rhabdomyosarcoma
  • Bone Necrosis
  • Bone Sarcoma
  • Osteomyelitis
03

In context

Bone Neoplasms

258 studies on the registry are indexed under Bone Neoplasms; 68 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 44 across 163 interventional studies indexed under Bone Neoplasms.

Browse Bone Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Heike E Daldrup-Link as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 10 to 21 years
  • Suspected or confirmed diagnosis of a bone sarcoma or osteomyelitis
  • with assent as appropriate.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  • to MRI
  • Presence of metal implants
  • Need for sedation or anesthesia
  • Claustrophobia
  • Hemosiderosis or hemochromatosis
  • History of allergic reactions to similar compounds will be obtained and patients with positive history of allergic reactions will be excluded from the study
  • Females who are pregnancy or nursing
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Feraheme

    Intravenous injection of Feraheme, 5 mg Fe/kg

    Drug: Feraheme · Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan

Interventions

  • 5 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) administration

    Also known as: ferumoxytol

  • ProcedureMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan

    Standard of Care magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using GE 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners/

    Also known as: Magnetic Resonance (MR) scan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. T2* Relaxation Time of Bone Sarcomas and Osteomyelitis Subjects

    Differentiation of bone sarcomas and osteomyelitis with ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was assessed as the difference of mean T2 \* relaxation time of bone sarcoma and osteomyelitis subjects. The outcome is reported as the difference of the mean T2 \* values, with standard deviation.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Differentiation of Bone Sarcomas Pre-ferumoxytol and Post-ferumoxytol Contrast

    Differentiation of bone sarcomas pre-ferumoxytol and post-ferumoxytol contrast was assessed by difference of mean T2 \* relaxation time pre-ferumoxytol and post-ferumoxytol contrast, in bone sarcoma subjects only.

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-Treatment-24 hours

  2. Differentiation of Lymphoma and Bone Sarcomas With Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI

    Differentiation of lymphoma from bone sarcoma was assessed as the difference of mean T2 \* relaxation time determined by ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI. .

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Differentiation of CD68-positive Tumor-associated Macrophages (TAM) in Lymphomas and Bone Sarcomas

    Differentiation of CD68-positive tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) between lymphoma and bone sarcoma was assessed as the difference of mean area density of CD68-positive TAM in those populations.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. Differentiation of CD163-positive Tumor-associated Macrophages (TAM) in Lymphomas and Bone Sarcomas

    Differentiation of CD163-positive tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) between lymphoma and bone sarcoma was assessed as the difference of mean area density of CD163-positive TAM in those populations.

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Results

Posted Jun 18, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFeraheme
Started21
Bone sarcoma10
Osteomyelitis4
Lymphoma7
Completed21
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryT2* Relaxation Time of Bone Sarcomas and Osteomyelitis Subjects

Differentiation of bone sarcomas and osteomyelitis with ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was assessed as the difference of mean T2 \* relaxation time of bone sarcoma and osteomyelitis subjects. The outcome is reported as the difference of the mean T2 \* values, with standard deviation.

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
T2* Relaxation Time of Bone Sarcomas and Osteomyelitis Subjects
millisecondsBone SarcomasOsteomyelitis
T2* Relaxation Time of Bone Sarcomas and Osteomyelitis Subjects7.3 ± 1.97.7 ± 1.9
SecondaryDifferentiation of Bone Sarcomas Pre-ferumoxytol and Post-ferumoxytol Contrast

Differentiation of bone sarcomas pre-ferumoxytol and post-ferumoxytol contrast was assessed by difference of mean T2 \* relaxation time pre-ferumoxytol and post-ferumoxytol contrast, in bone sarcoma subjects only.

Time frame:
Baseline and Post-Treatment-24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Differentiation of Bone Sarcomas Pre-ferumoxytol and Post-ferumoxytol Contrast
millisecondsBone Sarcomas Pre-ferumoxytol & Post-ferumoxytol Contrast
Pre-treatment13.80 ± 2.80
Post-treatment8.27 ± 2.12
SecondaryDifferentiation of Lymphoma and Bone Sarcomas With Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI

Differentiation of lymphoma from bone sarcoma was assessed as the difference of mean T2 \* relaxation time determined by ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI. .

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Differentiation of Lymphoma and Bone Sarcomas With Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI
millisecondsMean T2 * Relaxation Time for Lymphoma ParticipantsMean T2 * Relaxation Time for Bone Sarcoma Participants
Differentiation of Lymphoma and Bone Sarcomas With Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI14.83 ± 1.037.71 ± 0.60
SecondaryDifferentiation of CD68-positive Tumor-associated Macrophages (TAM) in Lymphomas and Bone Sarcomas

Differentiation of CD68-positive tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) between lymphoma and bone sarcoma was assessed as the difference of mean area density of CD68-positive TAM in those populations.

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of CD68-positive TAM
Differentiation of CD68-positive Tumor-associated Macrophages (TAM) in Lymphomas and Bone Sarcomas
Percentage of CD68-positive TAMMean Area Density of CD-68-positive TAM in LymphomaMean Area Density of CD-68-positive TAM in Bone Sarcomas
Differentiation of CD68-positive Tumor-associated Macrophages (TAM) in Lymphomas and Bone Sarcomas4.8 ± 1.26.1 ± 2.3
SecondaryDifferentiation of CD163-positive Tumor-associated Macrophages (TAM) in Lymphomas and Bone Sarcomas

Differentiation of CD163-positive tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) between lymphoma and bone sarcoma was assessed as the difference of mean area density of CD163-positive TAM in those populations.

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage area of CD163-positive TAM
Differentiation of CD163-positive Tumor-associated Macrophages (TAM) in Lymphomas and Bone Sarcomas
Percentage area of CD163-positive TAMMean Area Density of CD163-positive TAM in LymphomaMean Area Density of CD163-positive TAM in Bone Sarcoma
Differentiation of CD163-positive Tumor-associated Macrophages (TAM) in Lymphomas and Bone Sarcomas1.9 ± 1.59.4 ± 3.1

Adverse events

Collected over 24 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Feraheme0/21 (0%)0/21 (0%)1/21 (4.8%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventFeraheme
Allergic reactionImmune system disorders1/21

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Feraheme
<=18 years16
Between 18 and 65 years5
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Feraheme
Mean14.7 ± 4.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Feraheme
Female11
Male10
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Feraheme
Hispanic or Latino4
Not Hispanic or Latino16
Unknown or Not Reported1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Feraheme
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White19
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Feraheme
United States21
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2011 to primary completion in Jul 2014, 35 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2019, 4 years 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 12, 2011
First posted
Apr 18, 2011
StartActual
Aug 2011
Primary completionActual
Jul 2014
CompletionActual
Oct 2023
Results first posted
Jun 18, 2019
Last update
Dec 27, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01336803
Lead sponsor
Heike E Daldrup-Link
Responsible party
Heike E Daldrup-Link (Professor of Radiology (General Radiology), Stanford University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 18, 2011
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
Oct 2023
Results posted
Jun 18, 2019
Last update
Dec 27, 2023

Study contacts

Heike E Daldrup-Link, MD
principal investigator · Stanford University
Neyssa Marina, MD
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ferrosoferric Oxide

Start the discussion