CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01282125Updated Mar 13, 2017

Nasal Obstruction in Sleep Apnea Patients Compared to the General Population

An observational study in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome and Nasal Obstruction, sponsored by Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Completed at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-13.

Sponsored by Norwegian University of Science and Technology · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
217
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Recent clinical findings of research at Trondheim University Hospital suggest that surgical correction of the nose septum in addition to volume reduction of the nose cavity may be beneficial in patients who suffer from both nose obstruction and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome(data not yet published).

This study aims to compare nose obstruction prevalence in sleep apnea patients and the general population

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome
  • Nasal Obstruction

Keywords

  • general population
  • prevalence
  • Norway
03

In context

Apnea

1,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 159 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 217 is above the median of 106 across 386 observational studies indexed under Apnea.

Browse Apnea studies →

Lead sponsor

Norwegian University of Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 487 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients: St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway Controls: Community sample, residents of Trøndelag, Norway

Inclusion criteria

  • ???

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ???
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
217 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • sleep apnea

    100 patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

  • controls

    100 subjects matching cases to age, sex, and body weight

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. patient reported nasal obstruction

    assessed by a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) and Sino Nasal Outcome Score(SNOT-20) questionnaire.

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. objective nasal obstruction

    measured by acoustical rhinometry and Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF).

    Time frame: 1 week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St Olavs Hospital Trondheim University Hospital
    Trondheim, 7020, Norway
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Moxness MH, Bugten V, Thorstensen WM, Nordgard S, Bruskeland G. A comparison of minimal cross sectional areas, nasal volumes and peak nasal inspiratory flow between patients with obstructive sleep apnea and healthy controls. Rhinology. 2016 Dec 1;54(4):342-347. doi: 10.4193/Rhino16.085. PubMed 27591949 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01282125
Lead sponsor
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Collaborators
Sorlandet Hospital HF
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 24, 2011
Start date
Dec 2010
Primary completion
Nov 2016
Completion
Nov 2016
Last update
Mar 13, 2017

Study contacts

Ståle S. Nordgård, MD PhD
principal investigator · Aleris/NTNU

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion