CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01251666HeMOUpdated Sep 3, 2012

Comparison of Hemoccult, Magstream and OC-Sensor Faecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening

A Phase 3 interventional study of Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by University Hospital, Caen. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-09-03.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Caen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19,797
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
50 Years to 74 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood test (FOBT) is a high public health priority. The interest of guaiac tests (G-FOBT) is limited by their poor sensitivity, while the superiority of I-FOBT in comparison with G-FOBT is now established. Nevertheless automated quantitative I-FOBTs have not been compared, and the optimal number of samples and threshold is not yet fixed. The aim of this study is to compare the performances of the 2 more well-known I-FOBTs with automated analyzers (magstream by Fujirebio, and OC Sensor by Eiken) for different positivity thresholds and numbers of samples in general average risk population. Patients will performed a two samples Magstream, a two samples OC Sensor and Hemoccult II. In case of a positive test, a colonoscopy will be performed. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of cancer and advanced neoplasias will be compared between tests using ratio of sensitivities (RSN) and ratio of false positives (RFP) according to number of samples and positivity threshold.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • Screening
  • Average-risk population
  • faecal occult blood tests
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,599 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19,797 is above the median of 77 across 4,123 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Caen is the lead sponsor of 505 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 50 to 74 years
  • Informed consent signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent digestive symptoms
  • Complete colonoscopy less than 5 years ago
  • Personal history of colorectal cancer or colorectal adenoma or colonic disease requiring regular colonoscopy surveillance
  • Familial history of colorectal cancer in a first degree next of kin before 65 years, or two cases in first degree next of kin.
  • Severe extra-intestinal disease
  • Screening ill-timed (ex. depression)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
19,797 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Magstream + Oc Sensor + Hemoccult II

    Each patient will perform all three tests: * Magstream: 2 samples (each on a different stool) * OC Sensor: 2 samples (each on a different stool) * Hemoccult II: 6 samples (2 samples per stool, on 3 different stools) Each test will be considered as positive if at least one sample is positive (cutoff for Magstream 55 ng/ml and for OC Sensor 150 ng/ml). Screening will be considered as positive if at least one of the three tests is positive, leading to a colonoscopy

    Other: Colonoscopy

Interventions

  • OtherColonoscopy

    Colonoscopy if at least one of the faecal occult blood tests is positive (blinded to each test result)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ratio of sensitivities (RSN) for detection of advanced neoplasias

    Advanced neoplasias included invasive cancers and high-risk adenomas (larger than 1 cm or with high grade dysplasia). RSN is the ratio of the true positives of two tests. True positives for one test are patients positive for the test, with targeted lesion (here advanced neoplasias). RSN will be calculed between immunochemical tests, and for each immunochemical test in reference to gaiac test.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after faecal occult blood test (FOBT) (At the time of colonoscopy)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ratio of False Positives (RFP) for detection of invasive cancers

    RFP is related to specificity. False positives of one test are patients with a positive test but without targeted lesions (here invasive cancers). RFP will be calculed between immunochemical tests, and for each immunochemical test in reference to gaiac test.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after FOBT (At the time of colonoscopy)

  2. RFP for detection of advanced neoplasias

    RFP is related to specificity. False positives of one test are patients with a positive test but without targeted lesions (here advanced neoplasias). RFP will be calculed between immunochemical tests, and for each immunochemical test in reference to gaiac test.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after FOBT (At the time of colonoscopy)

  3. Relative Receiver Operating Characteristics(ROC) curves

    Relative ROC curves plots RSN according to RFP (similar to ROC curve). Relative ROC curves will be compared in reference to gaiac test, according to number of samples analysed for each immunochemical test, and the way they are analysed.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after FOBT (At the time of colonoscopy)

  4. Detection rate of invasive cancer

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after FOBT (At the time of colonoscopy)

  5. Detection rate of advanced neoplasias

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after FOBT (At the time of colonoscopy)

  6. Cost-effectiveness analysis

    It will take into account number of samples and threshold

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after FOBT (At the time of colonoscopy)

  7. Predictive positive value for detection of invasive cancers

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after FOBT (At the time of colonoscopy)

  8. Predictive value for detection of advanced neoplasias

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after FOBT (At the time of colonoscopy)

  9. Positivity rate

    Time frame: Immediate (At the time of FOBT)

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • ADECA
    Moulins, 03007, France
  • Adoc18 - Irsa
    St Doulchard, 18230, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Raginel T, Puvinel J, Ferrand O, Bouvier V, Levillain R, Ruiz A, Lantieri O, Launoy G, Guittet L. A population-based comparison of immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology. 2013 May;144(5):918-25. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.042. Epub 2013 Feb 1. PubMed 23376426 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01251666
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Caen
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute, France, Ligue contre le cancer, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 2, 2010
Start date
Jun 2008
Primary completion
Jun 2012
Completion
Aug 2012
Last update
Sep 3, 2012

Study contacts

Guy LAUNOY, MD-PhD
study director · University Hospital, Caen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion