CClinicalTrials.gg
Sign In
CompletedNCT01190618Updated Feb 16, 2017

Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal Prolapse Repair With Elevate

An observational study in Vaginal Prolapse, sponsored by Larry Sirls. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-16.

Sponsored by Larry Sirls · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
417
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes in patients having vaginal prolapse repair with the Elevate prolapse repair kit and compare these outcomes to patients who had a repair with Prolift. .

Read the detailed description

The investigators hypothesize that the less invasive Elevate mesh results in a shorter operative time, lower blood loss, complications, postoperative pain and earlier discharge from the hospital.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vaginal Prolapse
03

In context

Uterine Prolapse

111 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Prolapse; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 417 is above the median of 132 across 28 observational studies indexed under Uterine Prolapse.

Browse Uterine Prolapse studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Larry Sirls as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Women having vaginal repair with Elevate prolapse repair kit

Inclusion criteria

  • Women who have had a vaginal repair with Elevate prolapse repair kit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
417 participants (actual)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of Outcomes

    To evaluate outcomes in patients having vaginal prolapse repair with the Elevate prolapse repair kit and compare these outcomes to patients who had a repair with Profift.

    Time frame: 3 Months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • William Beaumont Hospital
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 16, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01190618
Lead sponsor
Larry Sirls
Responsible party
Larry Sirls (Principal Investigator, William Beaumont Hospitals) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 27, 2010
Start date
Aug 2010
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2016
Completion
Dec 31, 2016
Last update
Feb 16, 2017

Study contacts

Larry Sirls, MD
principal investigator · William Beaumont Hospitals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Other studies in this condition

Uterine Prolapse→

Start the discussion