An interventional study of Dental anesthesia in Dental Pain, sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-08-29.
Sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Management of dental pain emergencies is a challenge for the clinician, particularly when pain is due to endodontic infection.
Tested hypothesis is intradiploic anesthesia is more effective and quicker than inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular molars anesthesia.
The aim of the study is the evaluation of Quicksleeper efficiency used in first intention versus inferior alveolar nerve block used in most current dental treatment.
Management of dental pain emergencies is a challenge for the clinician, particularly when pain is due to endodontic infection. Failure rate of local anesthesia highly increases with irreversible pulpitis or inflamed periradicular tissue.
Tested hypothesis is intradiploic anesthesia is more effective and quicker than inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular molars anesthesia (from teeth 35 up to 38 and from 45 up to 48).
The primary aim of the study is the evaluation of Quicksleeper efficiency used in first intention versus inferior alveolar nerve block used in most current dental treatment.
Four clinical situations are evaluated : pulpitis; periapical abcess; pulpal hyperemia; asymptomatic decayed tooth.
Evaluated parameters are : speed of sedation, ability of cure, additional anesthesia needed, total of needles and cartridges used, side effects. Time and validation of complete anesthesia is controlled by pulp tester.
Studied population is patients cared in restorative, endodontics department.
Pulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is randomly managed by inferior alveolar nerve block or Quicksleeper intraosseous anesthesia, among studied population (divided in 2 groups of 50 patients). Pulp-tester measures anesthesia minute by minute.
The comparison of study results to bibliography, guidelines and advantages for using mechanical Quicksleeper anesthesia system will be discussed.
140 studies on the registry are indexed under Toothache; 24 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 37 is below the median of 100 across 121 interventional studies indexed under Toothache.
Browse Toothache studies →Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille is the lead sponsor of 686 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Pulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is managed by Quicksleeper intraosseous anesthesia.
Procedure: Dental anesthesia
Pulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is managed by inferior alveolar nerve block.
Procedure: Dental anesthesia
Pulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is randomly managed among studied population and Pulp-tester measures anesthesia minute by minute.
To evaluate the Quicksleeper efficiency used in first intention versus inferior alveolar nerve block used in most current dental treatment.
Time frame: 2 years
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille