CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01085357COMPASSUpdated May 15, 2017Results posted

Study of an Implantable Device for Lowering Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

An interventional study of Cataract Surgery and CyPass Micro-Stent in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) and Cataract, sponsored by Transcend Medical, Inc.. Completed. Open to participants aged 45 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-15.

Sponsored by Transcend Medical, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
897
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CyPass Implant for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with glaucoma who undergo cataract surgery.

Read the detailed description

This study is a modified and expanded protocol based on acceptable safety results from an earlier feasibility study. The trial is conducted using a 3:1 randomization (treatment to control) in which patients are screened for eligibility, randomized at time of surgery and followed for 24 months postoperatively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)
  • Cataract

Keywords

  • Glaucoma
  • Glaucoma device
  • Glaucoma surgery
  • Intraocular pressure
03

In context

Glaucoma

1,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma; 231 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 897 is above the median of 65 across 1,272 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma.

Browse Glaucoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Transcend Medical, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Preoperative Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG)
  • Mean diurnal unmedicated IOP of 21 - 33 mmHg
  • Normal anterior chamber angle anatomy at site of implantation
  • Operable age-related cataract

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of more than 3 ocular hypotensive medications (combination medications count as 2 medications)
  • Significant risk associated with washout of ocular hypotensive medication
  • Previous glaucoma surgery (with exception of laser treatments to the trabecular meshwork)
  • Previous corneal surgery
  • Clinically significant ocular pathology, other than cataract and glaucoma
  • Diagnosis of acute angle closure, traumatic, congenital, malignant, uveitic, pseudoexfoliative, pigmentary or neovascular glaucoma
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
897 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CyPass Micro-Stent + Cataract Surgery

    Subjects receive the CyPass Micro-Stent at the conclusion of their cataract surgery

    Procedure: Cataract Surgery · Device: CyPass Micro-Stent

  • Active comparator
    Cataract Surgery Only

    Subjects do not receive the CyPass Micro-Stent at the conclusion of their cataract surgery

    Procedure: Cataract Surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureCataract Surgery

    Cataract Surgery involves the removal of the natural lens, which has become clouded (called a cataract), and insertion of an artificial lens (called an intraocular lens). This procedure is done through a small surgical incision in the eye.

  • DeviceCyPass Micro-Stent

    The CyPass Micro-Stent is a small tube with a through-lumen designed to redirect aqueous fluid from the front to the back of the eye. The CyPass is implanted in the eye after completion of cataract surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Eyes With ≥ 20% Decrease in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline to the Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Non-responder Imputation for Missing Data

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A reduction in IOP from baseline indicates an improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Proportion of eyes is reported as a percentage. Non-responders include subject eyes for which, prior to the relevant outcome time point: 1) Use of ocular hypotensive medication was not terminated; 2) IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedure was performed; 3) CyPass was explanted; or 4) CyPass was repositioned. IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedures include: Iridotomy, iridectomy, trabeculectomy, glaucoma shunt implantation, argon laser trabeculoplasty, selective laser trabeculoplasty, or other surgery that would affect IOP. Subject eyes for which CyPass implantation was attempted but not completed were treated as non-responders.

    Time frame: Baseline; Month 24 postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in IOP Between Baseline and Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Baseline Value Imputation for Missing Data

    IOP was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A negative value indicates an improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Proportion of eyes is reported as a percentage. Baseline IOP was used for subject eyes for which, prior to the relevant outcome time point: 1) Use of ocular hypotensive medication was not terminated; 2) IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedure was performed; 3) CyPass was explanted; or 4) CyPass was repositioned. IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedures include: Iridotomy, iridectomy, trabeculectomy, glaucoma shunt implantation, argon laser trabeculoplasty, selective laser trabeculoplasty, or other surgery that would affect IOP. Subject eyes for which CyPass implantation was attempted but not completed were treated as non-responders.

    Time frame: Baseline; Month 24 postoperative

  2. Proportion of Eyes With Postoperative IOP ≥ 6 and ≤ 18 mmHg, as Measured by Goldmann Tonometry, at the Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Non-responder Imputation for Missing Data

    IOP was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Proportion of eyes is reported as a percentage. Non-responders include subject eyes for which, prior to the relevant outcome time point: 1) Use of ocular hypotensive medication was not terminated; 2) IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedure was performed; 3) CyPass was explanted; or 4) CyPass was repositioned. IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedures include: Iridotomy, iridectomy, trabeculectomy, glaucoma shunt implantation, argon laser trabeculoplasty, selective laser trabeculoplasty, or other surgery that would affect IOP. Subject eyes for which CyPass implantation was attempted but not completed were treated as non-responders.

    Time frame: Month 24 postoperative

07

Results

Posted Oct 20, 2016

Participant flow

Subjects were screened and randomized at 24 investigative sites located in the United States.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCyPass Micro-Stent + Cataract SurgeryCataract Surgery Only
Started374131
Completed355125
Not completed196
Withdrew: Adverse event11
Withdrew: Subject decision43
Withdrew: Investigator decision11
Withdrew: Death111
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up20

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportion of Eyes With ≥ 20% Decrease in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline to the Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Non-responder Imputation for Missing Data

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A reduction in IOP from baseline indicates an improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Proportion of eyes is reported as a percentage. Non-responders include subject eyes for which, prior to the relevant outcome time point: 1) Use of ocular hypotensive medication was not terminated; 2) IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedure was performed; 3) CyPass was explanted; or 4) CyPass was repositioned. IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedures include: Iridotomy, iridectomy, trabeculectomy, glaucoma shunt implantation, argon laser trabeculoplasty, selective laser trabeculoplasty, or other surgery that would affect IOP. Subject eyes for which CyPass implantation was attempted but not completed were treated as non-responders.

Time frame:
Baseline; Month 24 postoperative
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Proportion of Eyes With ≥ 20% Decrease in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline to the Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Non-responder Imputation for Missing Data
percentage of eyesCyPass Micro-Stent + Cataract SurgeryCataract Surgery Only
Proportion of Eyes With ≥ 20% Decrease in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline to the Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Non-responder Imputation for Missing Data72.558.0
SecondaryMean Change in IOP Between Baseline and Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Baseline Value Imputation for Missing Data

IOP was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. A negative value indicates an improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Proportion of eyes is reported as a percentage. Baseline IOP was used for subject eyes for which, prior to the relevant outcome time point: 1) Use of ocular hypotensive medication was not terminated; 2) IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedure was performed; 3) CyPass was explanted; or 4) CyPass was repositioned. IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedures include: Iridotomy, iridectomy, trabeculectomy, glaucoma shunt implantation, argon laser trabeculoplasty, selective laser trabeculoplasty, or other surgery that would affect IOP. Subject eyes for which CyPass implantation was attempted but not completed were treated as non-responders.

Time frame:
Baseline; Month 24 postoperative
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Mean Change in IOP Between Baseline and Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Baseline Value Imputation for Missing Data
mmHgCyPass Micro-Stent + Cataract SurgeryCataract Surgery Only
Mean Change in IOP Between Baseline and Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Baseline Value Imputation for Missing Data-7.0 ± 4.53-5.3 ± 3.95
SecondaryProportion of Eyes With Postoperative IOP ≥ 6 and ≤ 18 mmHg, as Measured by Goldmann Tonometry, at the Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Non-responder Imputation for Missing Data

IOP was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in mmHg. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Proportion of eyes is reported as a percentage. Non-responders include subject eyes for which, prior to the relevant outcome time point: 1) Use of ocular hypotensive medication was not terminated; 2) IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedure was performed; 3) CyPass was explanted; or 4) CyPass was repositioned. IOP-affecting secondary surgical procedures include: Iridotomy, iridectomy, trabeculectomy, glaucoma shunt implantation, argon laser trabeculoplasty, selective laser trabeculoplasty, or other surgery that would affect IOP. Subject eyes for which CyPass implantation was attempted but not completed were treated as non-responders.

Time frame:
Month 24 postoperative
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Proportion of Eyes With Postoperative IOP ≥ 6 and ≤ 18 mmHg, as Measured by Goldmann Tonometry, at the Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Non-responder Imputation for Missing Data
percentage of eyesCyPass Micro-Stent + Cataract SurgeryCataract Surgery Only
Proportion of Eyes With Postoperative IOP ≥ 6 and ≤ 18 mmHg, as Measured by Goldmann Tonometry, at the Hypotensive Medication-free 24-month Postoperative Examination Using Non-responder Imputation for Missing Data61.243.5

Adverse events

Collected over An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury or any untoward clinical sign occurring in a study subject, whether or not related to the CyPass device. AEs were collected from time of consent to study exit (Month 24 postoperative).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CyPass Micro-Stent + Cataract Surgery—53/374 (14.2%)101/374 (27%)
Cataract Surgery Only—13/131 (9.9%)39/131 (29.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 66
Most frequent serious events
EventCyPass Micro-Stent + Cataract SurgeryCataract Surgery Only
PneumoniaInfections and infestations4/3742/131
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders0/3742/131
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/3740/131
Knee arthroplastySurgical and medical procedures3/3741/131
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders2/3741/131
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/3741/131
DeathGeneral disorders0/3741/131
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations0/3741/131
Hip fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/3741/131
Breast cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/3741/131
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCyPass Micro-Stent + Cataract SurgeryCataract Surgery Only
BCVA loss => 10 letters read at/after 3 month postoperative visitEye disorders33/37420/131
Worsening in visual field MD by => 2.5 dB as compared with preoperativeNervous system disorders25/37413/131
AC cell and flare requiring steroid treatment at/after 30 days postoperativeEye disorders32/3745/131
Worsening in any ocular symptom by ≥ 2 points to severe/very severe at/after 3 months postoperativeEye disorders21/3744/131
Secondary ocular surgical interventionEye disorders20/3747/131

Baseline characteristics

All randomized participants (Intent-to-Treat)

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CyPass Micro-Stent + Cataract SurgeryCataract Surgery OnlyTotal
Mean70.3 ± 8.4570.2 ± 8.1770.3 ± 8.37
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CyPass Micro-Stent + Cataract SurgeryCataract Surgery OnlyTotal
Female19772269
Male17759236
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ianchulev T, Lane S, Masis M, Lass JH, Benetz BA, Menegay HJ, Price FW, Lin S. Corneal Endothelial Cell Density and Morphology After Phacoemulsification in Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataracts: 2-Year Results of a Randomized Multicenter Trial. Cornea. 2019 Mar;38(3):325-331. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001826. PubMed 30614901 ↗
  • Vold S, Ahmed II, Craven ER, Mattox C, Stamper R, Packer M, Brown RH, Ianchulev T; CyPass Study Group. Two-Year COMPASS Trial Results: Supraciliary Microstenting with Phacoemulsification in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataracts. Ophthalmology. 2016 Oct;123(10):2103-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032. Epub 2016 Aug 6. PubMed 27506486 ↗
  • Jampel HD, Chon BH, Stamper R, Packer M, Han Y, Nguyen QH, Ianchulev T. Effectiveness of intraocular pressure-lowering medication determined by washout. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 1;132(4):390-5. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.7677. PubMed 24481483 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01085357
Lead sponsor
Transcend Medical, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 11, 2010
Start date
Sep 2009
Primary completion
Mar 2015
Completion
Mar 2015
Results posted
Oct 20, 2016
Last update
May 15, 2017

Study contacts

Vice President of Medical Affairs
study chair · Transcend Medical, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion