CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01031563Updated Jul 2, 2017

Risk Perception in Drug-Dependent Adults With and Without Schizophrenia

An observational study in Cocaine Dependence, Cannabis Dependence and Schizophrenia, sponsored by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-02.

Sponsored by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
120
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

  • Several studies of risk perception have demonstrated a common bias known as unrealistic optimism, in which individuals feel they are less likely than other people to experience unpleasant or harmful events in their lives, but more likely to experience pleasant or beneficial events.
  • Previous research has indicated that individuals with schizophrenia have less of a sense of unrealistic optimism about adverse events than individuals without schizophrenia. However, research on risk perception in schizophrenia is sparse, primarily reporting on behaviors and decisions in the laboratory that likely are influenced by risk perception.
  • Risk perception among substance users may be viewed in two separate categories: perception of vulnerability to adverse events and perception of vulnerability to negative outcomes associated with substance use. Research in both areas has yielded mixed results. Researchers are interested in studying the connections among schizophrenia, addiction, and risk perception in order to develop better drug use prevention and treatment programs for people with and without schizophrenia.

Objectives:

  • To compare unrealistic optimism bias in people with and without schizophrenia and/or drug dependence, and its association with actual risky behavior.

Eligibility:

  • Individuals between 18 and 64 years of age who fall into one of the following study categories:
  • diagnoses of both drug dependence (marijuana or cocaine) and schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder
  • diagnosis of drug dependence only (marijuana or cocaine)
  • diagnosis of schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder only
  • healthy volunteers with no history of drug use or serious mental disorder

Design:

  • The study will require a single visit to the research center for a 5- to 6-hour session.
  • Participants will complete questionnaires on medical and behavioral history, complete tests of thinking skills like memory and attention, complete a brief computerized decision-making task, and answer questions about risk perception.
  • Participants will also provide urine samples and breath carbon monoxide measurements to test for recent use of tobacco and other substances.
Read the detailed description

Background:

Several studies of risk perception have demonstrated a common bias known as unrealistic optimism', in which individuals feel they are less likely than other people to experience unpleasant or harmful events in their lives, but more likely to experience pleasant or beneficial events. In a previous study, we showed that unrealistic optimism about adverse events in patients with schizophrenia was lower than in healthy controls.

Objective:

To compare unrealistic optimism bias in people with and without schizophrenia and/or drug dependence, and its association with actual risky behavior.

Study Population:

Adults with current diagnosis (DSM-IV criteria) of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (n = 24), with current drug dependence (cannabis or cocaine) (n = 24), with both schizophrenia and drug dependence (n = 24), or healthy, non-drug-using controls (n = 24).

Study Design:

Subjects will have a single study visit, at which their psychiatric and substance use histories, current substance use (urine drug testing, expired breath CO), risk perception, risk-taking/impulsivity, sensation-seeking, insight, history of risky behavior, and cognitive function will be assessed.

Outcome Measures:

Scores on Risk Perception Questionnaire, Balloon Analog Risk Task, short form self-report assessments of risk perception, risk-taking/impulsivity and sensation-seeking, Revised Life Orientation Scale, Self-Mastery Scale, Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised, NORC DSM-IV Screen for Gambling Problems.

Benefit:

There is no direct benefit to subjects from study participation. Future benefits to society might be better understanding of risk perception biases associated with co-occurring substance abuse and schizophrenia, leading to development of more effective prevention and treatment programs and improved processes for obtaining informed consent.

Risks:

This study poses minimal risk to subjects, primarily boredom or anxiety from taking questionnaires and psychological tests and embarrassment from giving an observed urine specimen for drug testing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cocaine Dependence
  • Cannabis Dependence
  • Schizophrenia

Keywords

  • Risk Taking
  • Schizophrenia
  • Drug Abuse/Dependence
  • Comorbidity
  • Impulsivity
  • Drug Abuse
03

In context

Cocaine-Related Disorders

415 studies on the registry are indexed under Cocaine-Related Disorders; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 24 across 27 observational studies indexed under Cocaine-Related Disorders.

Browse Cocaine-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is the lead sponsor of 388 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (42%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

  • Participants in three patient groups will have a current diagnosis of schizophrenia (or schizoaffective disorder), drug dependence, or both. Healthy comparison participants will be free of either diagnosis. Psychiatric diagnoses will be based on DSM-IV criteria as determined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID; First et al 1997), which will be administered in either a computerized version or in the standard interview format. Participants in all four groups will be 18-64 years old, of either gender and of any race/ethnicity. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria for the participant groups are as follows:

    1. Group 1: Drug dependence with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

      Inclusion: Drug dependence; schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

      Exclusions: mood disorder; obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)

    2. Group 2: Drug dependence without schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

      Inclusion: Drug dependence.

      Exclusions: schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder; mood disorder; OCD.

    3. Group 3: Schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder without drug dependence

      Inclusion: DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

      Exclusions: mood disorder; OCD; use of illegal drugs more than 3 times in the previous month.

    4. Group 4: Healthy comparison participants

      Exclusions: Any DSM-IV Axis I diagnosis (except simple phobia); use of illegal drugs more than 3 times in the previous month.

    5. Exclusions for all groups: History of neurological disease/condition (unrelated to schizophrenia or drug dependence) with ongoing cognitive sequelae; physical limitations (e.g., with hearing, vision or movement) that would prevent performance of computerized tasks; documented mental retardation.
    6. Substances of choice among drug-dependent participants (Groups 1 and 2) must be marijuana, cocaine or both (the commonest illegal drugs of abuse among patients with schizophrenia).
05

Study design

Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)
06

Study locations

1 site
  • Maryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC) 55 Wade Avenue
    Catonsville, Maryland 21228, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Marsch LA, Bickel WK, Badger GJ, Quesnel KJ. The anatomy of risk: a quantitative investigation into injection drug users' taxonomy of risk attitudes and perceptions. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;15(2):195-203. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.2.195. PubMed 17469943 ↗
  • Prentice KJ, Gold JM, Carpenter WT Jr. Optimistic bias in the perception of personal risk: patterns in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;162(3):507-12. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.507. PubMed 15741467 ↗
  • Cherpitel CJ. Alcohol, injury, and risk-taking behavior: data from a national sample. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993 Aug;17(4):762-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00837.x. PubMed 8214410 ↗
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01031563
Lead sponsor
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Collaborators
University of Maryland
First posted
Dec 14, 2009
Start date
Aug 18, 2009
Completion
May 3, 2012
Last update
Jul 2, 2017

Study contacts

Elliot Stein, Ph.D.
principal investigator · National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion