CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01008553Updated Jul 25, 2013Results posted

A Confirmatory Study of Fentanyl in Participants With Post-herpetic Neuralgia, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome or Postoperative Pain Syndrome

A Phase 3 interventional study of Fentanyl and Placebo in Postherpetic Neuralgia, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS) and Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.. Completed at 90 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-07-25.

Sponsored by Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
258
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fentanyl in opioid-naive participants with post-herpetic neuralgia, complex regional pain syndrome or post-operative pain syndrome who cannot obtain a sufficient analgesic effect by the treatment of non-opioid analgesics (drug used to control pain).

Read the detailed description

This is a multi-center (conducted in more than one center), double-blind (neither the participant nor the physician knows the assigned study drug), randomized (participants assigned study drug by chance), withdrawal study in opioid-naive participants with post-herpetic neuralgia (intense, typically intermittent pain along the course of a nerve caused by the varicella zoster virus), complex regional pain syndrome or post-operative pain syndrome. The study will consist of titration period (10-29 days) and double-blind period (12 weeks) and the visits will include Day 5-7, 8, 15, 22, 29 in titration period and Day 2-4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71 and 85 in double-blind period. All the eligible participants will receive one-day adhesive transdermal patch (patch containing a drug that is put on the skin so the drug will enter the body through the skin) of either fentanyl at the dose ranging from 12.5 to 50 microgram/hour or matching placebo. Efficacy will be evaluated primarily by time to withdrawal due to insufficient analgesic efficacy. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postherpetic Neuralgia
  • Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS)
  • Postoperative Pain

Keywords

  • Postherpetic Neuralgia
  • Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS)
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Fentanyl
  • Patch, transdermal
  • Opioid analgesics
03

In context

Neuralgia

1,287 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 256 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 258 is above the median of 52 across 973 interventional studies indexed under Neuralgia.

Browse Neuralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. is the lead sponsor of 122 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants whose pain because of post-herpetic neuralgia, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) or post-operative pain syndrome is continuing for at least 12 weeks prior to informed consent
  • Participants who are continuously taking a non-opioid analgesic at the normal highest dose or more for at least 14 consecutive days prior to informed consent, or at a certain dose (except the use on an as-needed base) on consecutive days or participants who are continuously taking an analgesic adjuvant with a certain dosage and administration (except the use on an as-needed base) for at least 14 consecutive days prior to informed consent
  • Participants showing insufficient therapeutic efficacy of the non-opioid analgesic currently being used, and to requiring a continuous opioid analgesic as per the Investigator or Sub-investigator
  • Participants with an average pain intensity of 50 millimeter or more on the Visual Analog Scale in 24-hour daily living prior to informed consent
  • Participants who can be hospitalized to the 4th day after the initiation of titration period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who had an operation that may affect the assessment within 30 days before informed consent
  • Participants whose main cause of the pain to be assessed is considered attributable to psychogenic pain (physical pain that is caused, increased, or prolonged by mental, emotional, or behavioral factors)
  • Participants with asthma, bradyarrhythmia (slow irregular heart beat) and severe respiratory function disorders
  • Participants complicated with hepatic dysfunction such as fulminant hepatitis (inflammation of the liver) and liver cirrhosis (serious liver disorder in which connective tissue replaces normal liver tissue, and liver failure often occurs), or renal impairment such as nephritic syndrome, acute renal failure, and chronic renal failure
  • Participants with a history of hypersensitivity to fentanyl and other opioid analgesics
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
258 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fentanyl (Titration period)

    One-day adhesive transdermal patch (patch containing a drug that is put on the skin so the drug will enter the body through the skin) containing fentanyl (JNS020QD) applied to chest, abdomen, upper arm and thigh and replaced every day, starting at the dose of 12.5 microgram per hour (mcg/hr) for at least first 2 days, which will be increased by 12.5 mcg/hr at one time based on the medical examination of number of rescue treatments and visual analog scale (VAS) score of the participants. The dose will be increased up to maximum of 50 mcg/hr. The treatment will continue for 10-29 days and then the eligible participants from this group will be randomly assigned to either of the two groups in the double-blind period.

    Drug: Fentanyl

  • Experimental
    Fentanyl (Double-blind period)

    Participants meeting the pre-defined criteria for transfer from titration period to double-blind period and randomly assigned to fentanyl group, will be administered one-day adhesive transdermal patch containing fentanyl, applied to chest, abdomen, upper arm and thigh and replaced every day, the dose of which will be same as the final application dose in the titration period (in the range of 12.5 to 50 mcg/hr). The treatment will be continued for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Fentanyl

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo (Double-blind period)

    Participants meeting the pre-defined criteria for transfer from titration period to double-blind period and randomly assigned to placebo group, will be administered one-day adhesive transdermal placebo patch indistinguishable from fentanyl in appearance, applied to chest, abdomen, upper arm and thigh and replaced every day. The dose of fentanyl (from titration period) will be gradually decreased to prevent withdrawal symptoms and the dose of the matching placebo will be gradually increased up to same dose as the final application dose in the titration period (in the range of 12.5 to 50 mcg/hr). The treatment will continue for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugFentanyl

    One-day adhesive transdermal patch containing fentanyl 12.5 to 50 mcg/hr applied to chest, abdomen, upper arm and thigh and replaced every day.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo patch indistinguishable from one-day adhesive transdermal patch containing fentanyl 12.5 to 50 mcg/hr applied to chest, abdomen, upper arm and thigh and replaced every day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic Efficacy

    Time from start of double-blind (researchers and participants were unaware of the treatment) period to withdrawal because of insufficient analgesic efficacy based on any of the pre-defined discontinuation criteria was noted.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 85 (double-blind period) and Day 92 (discontinuation of the study)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Titration Period

    The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a "100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale" by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered "No pain at all", and the right margin (100 mm) was considered "Severer pain than this is inconceivable". The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of Screening period and during 3 days before the end of titration period was reported.

    Time frame: Day 12-14 (Screening period) and Day 27-29 (Titration period)

  2. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind Period

    The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a "100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale" by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered "No pain at all", and the right margin (100 mm) was considered "Severer pain than this is inconceivable". The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of titration period and during 3 days before the end of double-blind period was reported.

    Time frame: Day 27-29 (Titration period) and Day 83-85 (double-blind period)

  3. Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration Period

    The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: "Extremely satisfied", "Satisfied", "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", "Dissatisfied" and "Dissatisfied very much". The results were reported as Category 1 = At least "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", which included participants with general evaluation of "Extremely satisfied" to "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", and Category 2 = At least "Satisfied", which included participants with general evaluation of "Extremely satisfied" to "Satisfied".

    Time frame: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

  4. Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period

    The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: "Extremely satisfied", "Satisfied", "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", "Dissatisfied" and "Dissatisfied very much". The results were reported as Category 1 = At least "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", which included participants with general evaluation of "Extremely satisfied" to "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", and Category 2 = At least "Satisfied", which included participants with general evaluation of "Extremely satisfied" to "Satisfied".

    Time frame: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

  5. Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Titration Period

    If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary.

    Time frame: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

  6. Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind Period

    If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary.

    Time frame: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

  7. Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Titration Period

    The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions \[questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 \[questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)\]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain.

    Time frame: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

  8. Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind Period

    The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions \[questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 \[questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)\]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain.

    Time frame: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

  9. Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Titration Period

    The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.

    Time frame: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

  10. Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind Period

    The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.

    Time frame: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

  11. Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Titration Period

    Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective.

    Time frame: Day 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

  12. Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period

    Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective.

    Time frame: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

07

Results

Posted Jul 25, 2013

Participant flow

Period 1 (Titration Period)
Participant flow — Period 1 (Titration Period)
MilestoneFentanyl (Titration Period)Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Placebo (Double-blind Period)
Started25800
Completed16300
Not completed9500
Withdrew: Physician decision200
Withdrew: Adverse event3300
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject600
Withdrew: Determined to increase dosage300
Withdrew: Not satisfied criteria to enter period 25000
Withdrew: Not appropriate for this study100
Period 2 (Double-Blind Period)
Participant flow — Period 2 (Double-Blind Period)
MilestoneFentanyl (Titration Period)Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Placebo (Double-blind Period)
Started08479
Completed04728
Not completed03751
Withdrew: Physician decision012
Withdrew: Adverse event0144
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject022
Withdrew: Impossible to perform required tests010
Withdrew: Insufficient analgesic efficacy014
Withdrew: Rescue drugs increased more than 1 times003
Withdrew: More than 3 times a day rescue treatment001
Withdrew: More than 15mm increase in mean vas01835

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic Efficacy

Time from start of double-blind (researchers and participants were unaware of the treatment) period to withdrawal because of insufficient analgesic efficacy based on any of the pre-defined discontinuation criteria was noted.

Time frame:
Day 1 up to Day 85 (double-blind period) and Day 92 (discontinuation of the study)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic Efficacy
DaysFentanyl (Double-blind Period)Placebo (Double-blind Period)
Time From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic EfficacyNA (NA to NA)45.0 (16.0 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Fentanyl (Double-blind Period) vs Placebo (Double-blind Period) · Log Rank · p = 0.0003
SecondaryPain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Titration Period

The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a "100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale" by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered "No pain at all", and the right margin (100 mm) was considered "Severer pain than this is inconceivable". The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of Screening period and during 3 days before the end of titration period was reported.

Time frame:
Day 12-14 (Screening period) and Day 27-29 (Titration period)
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Titration Period
mmFentanyl (Titration Period)
Baseline (n=258)73.5 ± 12.81
Last 3 days in titration period (n=257)39.5 ± 20.02
SecondaryPain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind Period

The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a "100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale" by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered "No pain at all", and the right margin (100 mm) was considered "Severer pain than this is inconceivable". The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of titration period and during 3 days before the end of double-blind period was reported.

Time frame:
Day 27-29 (Titration period) and Day 83-85 (double-blind period)
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind Period
mmFentanyl (Double-blind Period)Placebo (Double-blind Period)
Baseline (n=84, 79)30.1 ± 11.5027.5 ± 11.23
Last 3 days in double-blind period (n=83, 79)29.6 ± 21.7137.1 ± 20.19
SecondaryNumber of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration Period

The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: "Extremely satisfied", "Satisfied", "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", "Dissatisfied" and "Dissatisfied very much". The results were reported as Category 1 = At least "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", which included participants with general evaluation of "Extremely satisfied" to "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", and Category 2 = At least "Satisfied", which included participants with general evaluation of "Extremely satisfied" to "Satisfied".

Time frame:
Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration Period
ParticipantsFentanyl (Titration Period)
Day 1, Category 1 (n=258)85
Day 1, Category 2 (n=258)15
Day 29/Final evaluation, Category 1 (n=257)220
Day 29/ Final evaluation, Category 2 (n=257)146
SecondaryNumber of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period

The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: "Extremely satisfied", "Satisfied", "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", "Dissatisfied" and "Dissatisfied very much". The results were reported as Category 1 = At least "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", which included participants with general evaluation of "Extremely satisfied" to "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", and Category 2 = At least "Satisfied", which included participants with general evaluation of "Extremely satisfied" to "Satisfied".

Time frame:
Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period
ParticipantsFentanyl (Double-blind Period)Placebo (Double-blind Period)
Day 1, Category 1 (n=84, 79)8279
Day 1, Category 2 (n=84, 79)6167
Day 85/Final evaluation, Category 1 (n=84, 78)6956
Day 85/Final evaluation, Category 2 (n=84, 78)4932
SecondaryNumber of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Titration Period

If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary.

Time frame:
Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)
Reported as:
Mean · Treatments per day
Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Titration Period
Treatments per dayFentanyl (Titration Period)
Day 1 (n=258)0.1 ± 0.41
Day 29/Final evaluation (n=258)0.5 ± 0.72
SecondaryNumber of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind Period

If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary.

Time frame:
Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)
Reported as:
Mean · Treatments per day
Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind Period
Treatments per dayFentanyl (Double-blind Period)Placebo (Double-blind Period)
Day 1 (n=84, 79)0.1 ± 0.330.1 ± 0.47
Day 85/Final evaluation (n=84, 79)0.4 ± 0.680.7 ± 0.86
SecondaryBrief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Titration Period

The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions \[questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 \[questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)\]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain.

Time frame:
Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Titration Period
Units on a scaleFentanyl (Titration Period)
Day 1 (n=258)5.8 ± 1.66
Day 29/Final evaluation (n=257)3.9 ± 1.88
SecondaryBrief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind Period

The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions \[questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 \[questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)\]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain.

Time frame:
Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind Period
Units on a scaleFentanyl (Double-blind Period)Placebo (Double-blind Period)
Day 1 (n=84, 79)3.3 ± 1.643.1 ± 1.47
Day 85/Final evaluation (n=84, 79)3.5 ± 2.273.7 ± 1.98
SecondaryShort-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Titration Period

The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.

Time frame:
Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Titration Period
Units on a scaleFentanyl (Titration Period)
Day 1, Physical Component Score (n=258)23.1 ± 16.67
Day 1, Mental Component Score (n=258)41.7 ± 9.75
Day 29/Final, Physical Component Score (n=257)26.0 ± 17.55
Day 29/Final, Mental Component Score (n=257)45.8 ± 9.77
SecondaryShort-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind Period

The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.

Time frame:
Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind Period
Units on a scaleFentanyl (Double-blind Period)Placebo (Double-blind Period)
Day 1, Physical Component Score (n=84, 79)28.0 ± 16.9729.4 ± 16.98
Day 1, Mental Component Score (n=84, 79)47.3 ± 9.2247.7 ± 8.89
Day 85/Final, Physical Component Score (n=84, 79)29.9 ± 17.3927.6 ± 16.24
Day 85/Final, Mental Component Score (n=84, 79)47.1 ± 11.0747.2 ± 9.61
SecondaryNumber of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Titration Period

Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective.

Time frame:
Day 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Titration Period
ParticipantsFentanyl (Titration Period)
Effective214
Ineffective44
SecondaryNumber of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period

Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective.

Time frame:
Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period
ParticipantsFentanyl (Double-blind Period)Placebo (Double-blind Period)
Day 1, Effective (n= 84, 79)8479
Day 1, Ineffective (n= 84, 79)00
Day 85/Final evaluation, Effective (n= 84, 79)7047
Day 85/Final evaluation, Ineffective (n= 84, 79)1432

Adverse events

Collected over From Screening period up to the Follow-up period. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fentanyl (Titration Period)—13/258 (5%)231/258 (89.5%)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)—8/84 (9.5%)71/84 (84.5%)
Placebo (Double-blind Period)—4/79 (5.1%)56/79 (70.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 27
Most frequent serious events
EventFentanyl (Titration Period)Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Placebo (Double-blind Period)
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/2580/841/79
Drug interactionGeneral disorders0/2580/841/79
Drug withdrawal syndromeGeneral disorders0/2580/841/79
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2580/841/79
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/2581/840/79
Pancreatic carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/2581/840/79
Arteriosclerosis obliteransVascular disorders0/2581/840/79
Gastric ulcer haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/2581/840/79
Urinary retentionRenal and urinary disorders0/2581/840/79
Renal impairmentRenal and urinary disorders0/2581/840/79
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 186
Most frequent other events
EventFentanyl (Titration Period)Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Placebo (Double-blind Period)
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders124/25812/8410/79
SomnolenceNervous system disorders118/25812/845/79
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders103/25812/8410/79
DizzinessNervous system disorders52/2586/843/79
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders17/2585/849/79
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders25/2585/841/79
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders17/2587/844/79
MalaiseGeneral disorders12/2587/844/79
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations12/2585/846/79
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders13/2585/840/79

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(Years)Fentanyl (Titration Period)
Mean66.5 ± 13.89
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Fentanyl (Titration Period)
Female124
Male134
08

Study locations

90 sites
  • Aichi, Japan
  • Amagasaki, Japan
  • Asahikawa N/A, Japan
  • Asahikawa, Japan
  • Bunkyo, Japan
  • Chigasaki, Japan
  • Chuo, Japan
  • Ebetsu, Japan
  • Fujieda, Japan
  • Fujisawa, Japan
  • Fukuoka N/A, Japan
  • Fukuoka, Japan
  • Hakodate, Japan
  • Hamamatsu, Japan
  • Hatsukaichi, Japan
  • Higashi-Kitami, Japan
  • Hiratsuka, Japan
  • Hirosaki, Japan
  • Hiroshima N/A, Japan
  • Hiroshima, Japan
  • Ichikawa N/A, Japan
  • Ikeda, Japan
  • Isesaki, Japan
  • Itabashi-Ku, Japan
  • Izumo N/A, Japan
  • Izumo, Japan
  • Kakegawa, Japan
  • Kanazawa, Japan
  • Kasama, Japan
  • Kasuga, Japan
  • Kawasaki N/A, Japan
  • Kita-Gun, Japan
  • Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Kitamoto, Japan
  • Kobe, Japan
  • Kochi, Japan
  • Koga, Japan
  • Komatsu, Japan
  • Koshigaya, Japan
  • Kyoto, Japan
  • Maebashi N/A, Japan
  • Maebashi, Japan
  • Matsumoto, Japan
  • Meguro, Japan
  • Miki N/A, Japan
  • Miki, Japan
  • Minato, Japan
  • Miyazaki, Japan
  • Moriguchi, Japan
  • Morioka, Japan
  • Nagasaki, Japan
  • Nagoya N/A, Japan
  • Nagoya, Japan
  • Niihama, Japan
  • Nishinomiya, Japan
  • Obihiro, Japan
  • Ohmura, Japan
  • Ohta-Ku, Japan
  • Ohtsu N/A, Japan
  • Ohtsu, Japan
  • Okayama, Japan
  • Onomichi, Japan
  • Osaka, Japan
  • Saga, Japan
  • Sakai, Japan
  • Sapporo, Japan
  • Sendai, Japan
  • Setagaya, Japan
  • Shigenobu N/A, Japan
  • Shimotsuga, Japan
  • Shinagawa, Japan
  • Suita N/A, Japan
  • Suita, Japan
  • Suzaka, Japan
  • Tamaho N/A, Japan
  • Tokushima N/A, Japan
  • Tokyo N/A, Japan
  • Tokyo, Japan
  • Ube N/A, Japan
  • Ube, Japan
  • Urayasu N/A, Japan
  • Ureshino, Japan
  • Wakayama, Japan
  • Yachiyo, Japan
  • Yamaguchi, Japan
  • Yamanashi, Japan
  • Yokohama N/A, Japan
  • Yokohama, Japan
  • Yonago N/A, Japan
  • Yubari, Japan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Arai T, Kashimoto Y, Ukyo Y, Tominaga Y, Imanaka K. Two placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal studies to evaluate the fentanyl 1 day patch in opioid-naive patients with chronic pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Dec;31(12):2207-18. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1092127. Epub 2015 Oct 19. PubMed 26359327 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 25, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01008553
Lead sponsor
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2009
Start date
Dec 2008
Primary completion
Mar 2010
Completion
Mar 2010
Results posted
Jul 25, 2013
Last update
Jul 25, 2013

Study contacts

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Japan Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion