CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00958217Updated Mar 24, 2016Results posted

Intervention for Veterans With Depression, Substance Disorder, and Trauma

An interventional study of Cognitive Processing Therapy-Modified (CPT-M) and Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT) in Depressive Symptoms, Substance-related Disorders and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-24.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
154
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare two different types of psychotherapy for Veterans with depression, addiction, and a past traumatic experience. Everyone in the study will receive 12 weeks of group cognitive behavioral therapy focused on depression and addiction, followed by 12 weeks of individual psychotherapy sessions. For the second 12 weeks, half of the people will receive a review of the initial therapy, and half will receive a cognitive behavioral therapy focused on trauma. Everyone will complete research interviews every 3 months for a total of 18 months.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to evaluate whether a second disorder-specific intervention improves longer term (up to 18 months) treatment outcomes for male and female Veterans with co-occurring depression and alcohol/substance disorders and trauma history (with or without PTSD diagnosis). This 4 years randomized two-group design uses repeated assessments at baseline and every 3 months for a total of 12 months. The investigators are providing their recently developed integrated intervention for comorbid depression and substance disorders for the initial 12 weeks in group format (Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Phase I). After the 12 week group intervention, participants will be randomized to receive either a review of the initial intervention in individual sessions, or a trauma-specific intervention, Cognitive Processing Therapy, with integrated addiction treatment components. Length, duration, and setting of both interventions will be the same, and all participants will meet with the program psychiatrist for medication appointments. No medications are under study and no placebo is used; medications will be prescribed using standard VA protocol. Research assessments will document diagnosis, recent substance use, depression and PTSD symptoms, medication adherence, and life stress.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depressive Symptoms
  • Substance-related Disorders
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorders

Keywords

  • Depressive symptoms
  • Substance-related disorders
  • Posttraumatic stress disorders
  • Psychotherapy
03

In context

Substance-Related Disorders

2,124 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance-Related Disorders; 393 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 154 is above the median of 108 across 1,727 interventional studies indexed under Substance-Related Disorders.

Browse Substance-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Veterans 18 years of age and older living in the San Diego, California area
  • Who are able to attend in-person therapy sessions
  • Have depression, alcohol or substance addiction, and a past traumatic experience

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-veterans
  • Individuals with schizophrenia or severe memory impairment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
154 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cognitive Processing Therapy-Modified

    12 individually delivered sessions of Cognitive Processing Therapy-Modified (CPT-M) provided once weekly following initial group delivery of 12 sessions of Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

    Behavioral: Cognitive Processing Therapy-Modified (CPT-M)

  • Active comparator
    Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

    12 individually delivered sessions of Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT) once weekly following initial group delivery of 12 sessions of ICBT

    Behavioral: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT)

  • No intervention
    Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy

    All participants were enrolled in an initial group-delivered Integrated Cognitive Therapy Group, consisting of 12 sessions over approximately 12 weeks prior to randomization to one of the study individually delivered interventions (CPT-M or ICBT). Individuals who were no longer participating in the study at the end of group sessions were not randomized.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Processing Therapy-Modified (CPT-M)

    Psychotherapy that focuses on thoughts associated with traumatic experiences with the goal of developing skills to reduce trauma-related symptoms. We have modified this therapy to include substance relapse prevention skills, reduce depression and substance relapse. CPT-M was delivered in individual 1-hour sessions once weekly.

  • BehavioralIntegrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT)

    Psychotherapy that focuses on thoughts and behaviors associated with depression with the goal of developing skills to reduce depression symptoms. We have integrated substance relapse prevention skills. ICBT was delivered in individual 1-hour sessions once weekly.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Depression Symptoms Were Assessed With the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

    Depression symptoms were assessed using a structured clinical interview assessment consisting of 21 items. Depression symptoms experienced in the past week are rated on a 0 (none) to 4 (most severe) scale. The total score is summed from the item scores and range from 0 (none) to 84 (most severe). We tested whether treatment group interacted with time in order to examine whether trajectories of symptom scores differed across treatment conditions. Linear mixed effects models were used to ascertain trajectories of total scores from randomization through end of study (6 timepoints across approximately 15 months). This analytic approach was advantageous in that it provided examination of change in depression across all quarterly assessments. Models were estimated with maximum likelihood methods. Total score at the time of randomization is reported in Data Table and coefficient estimates for trajectories are reported in Statistical Analysis.

    Time frame: Assessed quarterly; trajectories analyzed total scores from randomization through end of study (6 timepoints covering approximately 15 months)

  2. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms

    The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Civilian version (PCL-C) is a 17 item self-report checklist of PTSD symptoms experienced in the past month rated on a 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely) scale; total score is summed from the item scores and range from 17 (none) to 85 (most severe). . Civilian version was selected as it allows for a variety of trauma types. Scores above 50 are considered clinical levels. We tested whether treatment group interacted with time to examine whether trajectories of symptom scores differed across treatment conditions. Linear mixed effects models were used to ascertain trajectories of total scores. This analytic approach was advantageous in that it provided examination of change in PTSD across all quarterly assessments. Models were estimated with maximum likelihood methods. Total score at the time of randomization is reported in Data Table and coefficient estimates for trajectories are reported in Statistical Analysis.

    Time frame: Assessed quarterly; trajectories analyzed total scores from randomization through end of study (6 timepoints covering approximately 15 months)

  3. Timeline Followback

    The Timeline Followback is a calendar-assisted structured interview that assesses the frequency of alcohol and drug use on a daily basis and the quantity of alcohol use. Summary proportion of days abstinent were calculated at each time point. Trajectory analyses examine two substance use outcomes: probability of any alcohol or drug use on a given day and probability of heavy drinking (5 or more drinks consumed in a day) on a given day. Trajectories of substance use (any alcohol or drug use on a particular day) and heavy drinking (\>5 drinks on a particular day) were modeled as dichotomous outcomes, using logit links to predict the probability of substance use or heavy drinking on a particular day. Data Table reports starting proportion of days abstinent at time of randomization.

    Time frame: Assessed quarterly; trajectories analyzed from randomization through end of study (covering approximately 15 months)

07

Results

Posted Mar 24, 2016

Participant flow

Veterans referred to a VA dual diagnosis outpatient clinic who were diagnosed with depressive disorder, substance use disorder, and had a history of trauma (with and without a posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis) were recruited from December 2009 through October 2012.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm 1: Cognitive Processing Therapy- ModifiedArm 2: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Started6162
End of treatment5657
Completed3737
Not completed2425
Withdrew: Death21
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject43
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1719
Withdrew: Moved out of area11
Withdrew: Inpatient hospitalization01

Outcome measures

PrimaryDepression Symptoms Were Assessed With the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

Depression symptoms were assessed using a structured clinical interview assessment consisting of 21 items. Depression symptoms experienced in the past week are rated on a 0 (none) to 4 (most severe) scale. The total score is summed from the item scores and range from 0 (none) to 84 (most severe). We tested whether treatment group interacted with time in order to examine whether trajectories of symptom scores differed across treatment conditions. Linear mixed effects models were used to ascertain trajectories of total scores from randomization through end of study (6 timepoints across approximately 15 months). This analytic approach was advantageous in that it provided examination of change in depression across all quarterly assessments. Models were estimated with maximum likelihood methods. Total score at the time of randomization is reported in Data Table and coefficient estimates for trajectories are reported in Statistical Analysis.

Time frame:
Assessed quarterly; trajectories analyzed total scores from randomization through end of study (6 timepoints covering approximately 15 months)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Depression Symptoms Were Assessed With the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
units on a scaleArm 1: Cognitive Processing Therapy- ModifiedArm 2: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Depression Symptoms Were Assessed With the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.31.92 ± 12.3728.85 ± 12.25
Statistical analysis
  • Arm 1: Cognitive Processing Therapy- Modified vs Arm 2: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy · Linear Mixed Effects Models · p = <.05 (P-values based on likelihood ratio tests for the significance of the first and second order trajectory parameters. Primary tests compared curvilinear trajectories of the two treatment groups.) · 2nd order effects of time (2 slope: 33We gauged sampling error with 95% confidence bands.
PrimaryPosttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms

The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Civilian version (PCL-C) is a 17 item self-report checklist of PTSD symptoms experienced in the past month rated on a 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely) scale; total score is summed from the item scores and range from 17 (none) to 85 (most severe). . Civilian version was selected as it allows for a variety of trauma types. Scores above 50 are considered clinical levels. We tested whether treatment group interacted with time to examine whether trajectories of symptom scores differed across treatment conditions. Linear mixed effects models were used to ascertain trajectories of total scores. This analytic approach was advantageous in that it provided examination of change in PTSD across all quarterly assessments. Models were estimated with maximum likelihood methods. Total score at the time of randomization is reported in Data Table and coefficient estimates for trajectories are reported in Statistical Analysis.

Time frame:
Assessed quarterly; trajectories analyzed total scores from randomization through end of study (6 timepoints covering approximately 15 months)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms
units on a scaleArm 1: Cognitive Processing Therapy- ModifiedArm 2: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms58.4 ± 12.455.5 ± 14.2
Statistical analysis
  • Arm 1: Cognitive Processing Therapy- Modified vs Arm 2: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy · Linear Mixed Effects Models · p = <.05 · Second order effect of time (2 slopes): 57.0We gauged sampling error with 95% confidence bands.
PrimaryTimeline Followback

The Timeline Followback is a calendar-assisted structured interview that assesses the frequency of alcohol and drug use on a daily basis and the quantity of alcohol use. Summary proportion of days abstinent were calculated at each time point. Trajectory analyses examine two substance use outcomes: probability of any alcohol or drug use on a given day and probability of heavy drinking (5 or more drinks consumed in a day) on a given day. Trajectories of substance use (any alcohol or drug use on a particular day) and heavy drinking (\>5 drinks on a particular day) were modeled as dichotomous outcomes, using logit links to predict the probability of substance use or heavy drinking on a particular day. Data Table reports starting proportion of days abstinent at time of randomization.

Time frame:
Assessed quarterly; trajectories analyzed from randomization through end of study (covering approximately 15 months)
Reported as:
Mean · proportion of days abstinent
Timeline Followback
proportion of days abstinentArm 1: Cognitive Processing Therapy- ModifiedArm 2: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Timeline Followback.84 ± .26.81 ± .30
Statistical analysis
  • Arm 1: Cognitive Processing Therapy- Modified vs Arm 2: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy · Linear Mixed Effects Model · p = <.05 · Second order effect of time (2 slopes): .43We gauged sampling error with 95% confidence bands.
  • Arm 1: Cognitive Processing Therapy- Modified vs Arm 2: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy · Linear Mixed Effects Model · p = <.05 · Second order effect of time (2 slopes): .26We gauged sampling error with 95% confidence bands.

Adverse events

Collected over 4 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm 1: Cognitive Processing Therapy- Modified—15/61 (24.6%)25/61 (41%)
Arm 2: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy—19/62 (30.6%)55/62 (88.7%)
ICBT Prior to Randomization—10/23 (43.5%)1/20 (5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventArm 1: Cognitive Processing Therapy- ModifiedArm 2: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral TherapyICBT Prior to Randomization
Inpatient psychiatric admission for suicidal ideation/behaviorsPsychiatric disorders6/6110/623/23
Death - unknown causeGeneral disorders1/610/623/23
Inpatient admission for alcohol/drug treatmentPsychiatric disorders4/611/621/23
Medical inpatient admission - infectionInfections and infestations1/613/620/23
Medical inpatient admission - alcohol relatedGastrointestinal disorders1/612/621/23
Medical inpatient admission - surgeryGastrointestinal disorders0/610/621/23
Emergency Dept visit - intoxicationPsychiatric disorders0/610/621/23
Death - liver diseaseHepatobiliary disorders1/610/620/23
Medical inpatient admission - assault injuriesInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/610/620/23
Death - hit by motor vehicleInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/611/620/23
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventArm 1: Cognitive Processing Therapy- ModifiedArm 2: Integrated Cognitive Behavioral TherapyICBT Prior to Randomization
Urgent Care, MedicalGeneral disorders15/6132/620/20
Arrest/jail/legalPsychiatric disorders6/6110/621/20
Outpatient surgeryGeneral disorders1/6110/620/20
Urgent Care, PsychiatricPsychiatric disorders3/613/620/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm 1: CPT-MArm 2: ICBTTotal
Mean47.2 ± 12.147.3 ± 11.947.3 ± 12.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm 1: CPT-MArm 2: ICBTTotal
Female6814
Male5554109
PTSD Current diagnosis
PTSD Current diagnosis(participants)Arm 1: CPT-MArm 2: ICBTTotal
with PTSD diagnosis5150101
without PTSD diagnosis101222
08

Study locations

1 site
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego
    San Diego, California 92161, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Siegel EY, Haller M, Cui R, Trim RS, Tate SR, Norman SB. Examining changes in negative mood regulation expectancies, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and substance use following integrated cognitive-behavioral therapy. Subst Abus. 2017 Oct-Dec;38(4):468-472. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2017.1342736. Epub 2017 Jun 20. PubMed 28632462 ↗
  • Cui R, Haller M, Skidmore JR, Goldsteinholm K, Norman S, Tate SR. Treatment Attendance Among Veterans With Depression, Substance Use Disorder, and Trauma. J Dual Diagn. 2016;12(1):15-26. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2016.1146384. PubMed 26828770 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00958217
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 13, 2009
Start date
Dec 2009
Primary completion
May 2014
Completion
May 2014
Results posted
Mar 24, 2016
Last update
Mar 24, 2016

Study contacts

Susan Tate, PhD
principal investigator · VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego/University of California, San Diego

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion