ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT00917007Updated Oct 25, 2021

Measurement of Carboxyhemoglobin by Gas Chromatography as an Index of Hemolysis

An observational study in ABO Incompatibility, Hemolytic Disease of Newborn and Neonatal Jaundice, sponsored by State University of New York - Upstate Medical University. Withdrawn at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 28 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-25.

Sponsored by State University of New York - Upstate Medical University · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
PI no longer at institution
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
Up to 28 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to more accurately measure the amount of true red blood cell breakdown (hemolysis) in newborn babies with potentially problematic blood type mismatch with their mothers (ABO incompatibility), and to examine how the true level of red blood cell destruction relates to other laboratory tests obtained in newborns with jaundice.

A better understanding of the true amount of red blood cell destruction that is caused by blood type mismatch, as well as how it relates with other laboratory tests ordered for ABO incompatibility and red blood cell destruction, would help avoid unnecessary testing, treatment and prolonged hospital stays in such babies.

Read the detailed description

Clinically severe jaundice due to ABO incompatibility can occur when infants with blood type A or B are born to mothers with type O blood. An estimated 20 percent of pregnancies are ABO incompatible, but only a very small proportion of blood type A or B babies born to O type mothers develop overt ABO hemolytic disease. Despite the relative rarity of ABO hemolytic disease, it is common practice among pediatricians and family practice physicians to perform routine blood typing and antibody screening on all newborns born to type O mothers.

A very accurate and reliable laboratory measure of red blood cell destruction is the plasma carboxyhemoglobin level (COHb). COHb levels can be determined using a minute amount of blood, obtained at the same time the newborn's heel is pierced to obtain blood for the mandatory newborn screen (performed on all newborns prior to discharge) in order to avoid an additional invasive procedure.

Our hope is to determine whether routine blood typing and anti-globulin testing of infants born to type O mothers is necessary, or if these tests should instead be obtained only in the context of significant visible jaundice. This would help clarify the proper management of a very common problem in the newborn, and minimize the potential for subjecting infants of type O mothers to unnecessary blood tests, unwarranted treatment, and prolonged hospitalizations.

02

Conditions studied

  • ABO Incompatibility
  • Hemolytic Disease of Newborn
  • Neonatal Jaundice
  • Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia

Keywords

  • ABO incompatibility
  • hemolysis
  • jaundice
  • hyperbilirubinemia
  • newborn
03

In context

Jaundice, Neonatal

110 studies on the registry are indexed under Jaundice, Neonatal; 28 are open to participants now.

Browse Jaundice, Neonatal studies →

Lead sponsor

State University of New York - Upstate Medical University is the lead sponsor of 157 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (36%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 28 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

healthy term newborn infants of mothers with type O blood type

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • written
  • mother blood type O
  • mother Rh +
  • healthy infants
  • ≥37 wks gestation
  • ≥ 2500 gm birth weight
  • Apgar ≥5 at 1 and 5 minutes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • major anomalies
  • infants evaluated for sepsis or infants with transitional respiratory problems requiring >6 hrs observation in the NICU
  • significant birth trauma with continued bruising and/or sequestration of blood still evident at the time of discharge
  • known perinatal blood loss with hemodynamic consequences such as persistent tachycardia, need for fluid boluses or supplemental oxygen
  • neonatal anemia with \<13.5g/dL
  • known family history of hereditary hemolytic disease such as G6PD deficiency, hereditary spherocytosis or hereditary elliptocytosis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • ABO compatible
  • ABO incompatible, antiglobulin positive
  • ABO incompatible, antiglobulin negative
06

Study locations

2 sites
  • Crouse Hospital
    Syracuse, New York 13210, United States
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
    Syracuse, New York 13210, United States
07

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 2009, a primary completion of Nov 2010 and a completion of Nov 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 8, 2009
First posted
Jun 10, 2009
Start
Jun 2009
Primary completionActual
Nov 2010
CompletionActual
Nov 2010
Last update
Oct 25, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00917007
Collaborators
New York State Department of Health, Laboratory Alliance of Central New York, Stanford University
First posted
Jun 10, 2009
Start date
Jun 2009
Primary completion
Nov 2010
Completion
Nov 2010
Last update
Oct 25, 2021

Study contacts

Richard H Sills, MD
principal investigator · SUNY Upstate Medical Univeristy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion