CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00901108Updated Feb 25, 2016

Trabectome Versus Trabeculectomy With Mitomycin C in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Trabectome-IOL and Trab-IOL in Open Angle Glaucoma, sponsored by University of Alberta. Terminated at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-25.

Sponsored by University of Alberta · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Slow study recruitment and lack of clinical equipoise over time
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Trabectome versus Trabeculectomy with adjunctive Mitomycin C, combined with cataract surgery, in patients with open angle glaucoma.

Read the detailed description

Background: Trabeculectomy with adjunctive use of Mitomycin C (Trab MMC) is the standard incisional procedure to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in adults with open angle glaucoma (OAG). Trab MMC has been shown to effectively lower IOP, however, it can be associated with a number of serious complications, such as hypotony maculopathy, choroidal effusion or hemorrhage, and endophthalmitis, as well as less serious complications that may affect vision related quality of life such as bleb dysesthesia.

A newer technology, referred to as the Trabectome (NeoMedix Corp., San Juan Capistrano, CA), removes an arc of trabecular meshwork and inner wall of Schlemm's canal with microcautery and appears to lower IOP effectively with fewer and less serious complications than Trab MMC. However, more studies are needed to determine the long term safety and efficacy of this relatively new procedure.

In addition, for OAG patients with visually significant cataracts, either Trab MMC or Trabectome can be combined with cataract surgery.

Study Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of Trabectome versus Trab MMC, in combination with cataract extraction by phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implant, for control of IOP in OAG, including pseudoexfoliative glaucoma.

Methods: Single center, single surgeon, prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 52 eligible participants, 26 per study arm would need to be recruited for 90% power. One eye per study patient will be enrolled and randomized to Trabectome combined with cataract surgery (Trabectome-IOL) or Trab MMC combined with cataract surgery (Trab-IOL).

Postoperative visits will take place at the discretion of the surgeon but will include at least visits at day 1, week 1, and months 1, 3, 6, and 12. Postoperative glaucoma medications will be added in a stepped regimen as appropriate, along with additional laser or surgical procedures if needed.

Current Study Status: The clinical trial was terminated early due to slow recruitment and clearer indications for each technique over time leading to lack of clinical equipoise essential for patient randomization/recruitment. This had been discussed and agreed upon with our data safety monitoring board. A total of 19 participants were recruited with followup to one year. Study analysis is pending.

02

Conditions studied

  • Open Angle Glaucoma

Keywords

  • open angle glaucoma
  • trabectome
  • trabeculectomy
  • cataract
03

In context

Glaucoma

1,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma; 231 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 65 across 1,272 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma.

Browse Glaucoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alberta is the lead sponsor of 800 studies on the registry; 168 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 40-85 years
  2. Open angle glaucoma (including pseudo exfoliative glaucoma)
  3. Open angles (≥ Shaffer grade II)
  4. Inadequately controlled IOP requiring surgical intervention
  5. Visually significant cataract
  6. Willing to complete quality of life questionnaires
  7. Capable of informed consent and available for at least 1 year follow-up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any form of angle closure glaucoma
  2. Secondary open angle glaucomas
  3. Absence of clear angle landmarks on gonioscopy
  4. Other ocular disease that may affect assessments of visual acuity, visual field, or accurate tonometry
  5. Previous angle surgery or filtering procedure
  6. Steroid use within the preceding 3 months
  7. Presence of significant co-morbidities
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Trabectome-IOL

    Combined Trabectome and cataract extraction with intraocular lens insertion

    Procedure: Trabectome-IOL

  • Active comparator
    Trab-IOL

    Combined Trabeculetomy with Mitomycin C and cataract extraction with intraocular lens insertion

    Procedure: Trab-IOL

Interventions

  • ProcedureTrabectome-IOL

    Trabectome removes an arc of trabecular meshwork and inner wall of Schlemm's canal to enhance aqueous outflow through natural drainage pathways. Trabectome will be done first, followed by cataract surgery because Trabectome requires a clear view through the cornea using a goniolens, and this view may be compromised after cataract surgery.

  • ProcedureTrab-IOL

    Trabeculectomy bypasses the normal aqueous outflow channels of the eye and creates an external filtration pathway (called a filtering bleb) for aqueous to drain and be reabsorbed back into the circulation. Mitomycin C is an agent used during this procedure to decrease scar formation around the new passage. Cataract surgery will be done first, followed by Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean IOP at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Surgical complication rates

    Time frame: intraoperative and postoperative up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean difference in IOP from baseline to 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Mean IOP at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Quality of life measures

    Time frame: preoperative and postoperative at 6 and 12 months

  4. Mean number of glaucoma medications

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Visual acuity

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Need for additional laser (excluding suture lysis) and surgical interventions

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Royal Alexandra Hospital
    Edmonton, Alberta T5H 3V9, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hu K, Shah A, Virgili G, Bunce C, Gazzard G. Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open-angle glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD011693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011693.pub3. PubMed 33580495 ↗
  • Hu K, Gazzard G, Bunce C, Wormald R. Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with Trabectome for open angle glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 15;(8):CD011693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011693.pub2. PubMed 27526051 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 25, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00901108
Lead sponsor
University of Alberta
Responsible party
Karim Damji (Professor, University of Alberta) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 13, 2009
Start date
Nov 2009
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Oct 2015
Last update
Feb 25, 2016

Study contacts

Karim F Damji, MD FRCSC MBA
principal investigator · University of Alberta

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion