CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00883246Updated Jun 4, 2019Results posted

Study of SilverHawk®/TurboHawk® in Lower Extremity Vessels (DEFINITIVE™ LE)

An interventional study of SilverHawk & TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System in Peripheral Arterial Disease, Claudication and Critical Limb Ischemia, sponsored by Medtronic Endovascular. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-04.

Sponsored by Medtronic Endovascular · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
800
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the intermediate and long-term effectiveness of stand-alone atherectomy treatment of peripheral arterial disease in the legs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peripheral Arterial Disease
  • Claudication
  • Critical Limb Ischemia

Keywords

  • PAD
03

In context

Peripheral Arterial Disease

1,543 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease; 282 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 800 is above the median of 73 across 1,067 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Browse Peripheral Arterial Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Medtronic Endovascular is the lead sponsor of 50 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Has a Rutherford Clinical Category Score of 1 - 6.
  • Has evidence of ≥ 50% stenosis or occlusion in the superficial femoral, popliteal, anterior tibial, posterior tibial and/or peroneal arteries, confirmed by angiography.
  • Has identifiable distal target vessel which upon completion of the intervention, is anticipated to provide re-constitution of blood flow to the foot.
  • Exchangeable guidewire must cross lesion(s), with ability of catheter to cross lesion.
  • Each discrete target lesion's length is ≤ 20 cm.
  • Reference vessel diameter is ≥ 1.5 mm and ≤ 7 mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Has surgical or endovascular procedure of the target vessel within 14 days prior to the index procedure.
  • Has any planned surgical intervention or endovascular procedure within 30 days after the index procedure.
  • Has had a previous peripheral bypass affecting the target limb.
  • Has end-stage renal disease defined as undergoing hemodialysis for kidney failure.
  • Has presence of severe calcification in target lesion(s).
  • Has in-stent restenosis of the target lesion.
  • Has an aneurysmal target vessel.
  • Has significant stenosis or occlusion of inflow tract that has not been revascularized prior to treatment of the target vessel.
  • Has perforation, dissection or other injury of the access or target vessel requiring additional stenting or surgical intervention prior to enrollment.
  • Has disease that precludes safe advancement of the SilverHawk/TurboHawk device to the target lesion(s).
  • Has had a previous amputation above the metatarsal line on the target limb.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
800 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Atherectomy

    All patients enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy.

    Device: SilverHawk & TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System

Interventions

  • DeviceSilverHawk & TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System

    Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.

    Also known as: SilverHawk (Atherectomy), TurboHawk (Atherectomy)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Patency Rate (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)

    The primary endpoint analysis for claudication subjects was primary patency rate at one year, defined by duplex ultrasound measurement of peak systolic velocity ratio ≤ 3.5 at the target lesion(s) with no clinically-driven reintervention within the treated segment in subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.

    Time frame: One year

  2. Amputation-Free Survival at 1 Year (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia RCC 4-6)

    The primary endpoint for CLI was amputation-free survival at one year, defined as freedom from a major, unplanned amputation of the target limb through the 1-year visit in subjects who have CLI (RCC 4 - 6) at time of enrollment.

    Time frame: One Year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Device Success (in All Patients Enrolled)

    Device success was defined as ≤ 30% residual stenosis following use of the SilverHawk device, as measured by angiography, without adjunctive endovascular interventions or periprocedural complications.

    Time frame: Immediately following use of the SilverHawk device

  2. Procedural Success (in All Patients Enrolled)

    Procedure success was defined as ≤ 30% residual stenosis following use of SilverHawk device and adjunctive endovascular interventions (if required) as measured by angiography without periprocedural complications.

    Time frame: Immediately following use of the SilverHawk and adjunctive devices

  3. Major Adverse Event Rate (in All Patients Enrolled)

    Major Adverse Event Rate (MAE) at 30 Days was defined as clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), major unplanned amputation of treated limb, or all-cause mortality within 30 days post procedure, as classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).

    Time frame: 30 Days

  4. Major Adverse Event Rate (in All Patients Enrolled)

    Major Adverse Event Rate at One Year was defined as clinically-driven target vessel revascularization, major unplanned amputation of the treated limb, or all-cause mortality within one year, as classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).

    Time frame: One Year

  5. Improvement in Walking Impairment Questionnaire Score (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)

    WIQ includes a measurement for walking distance, walking speed, and climbing stairs collected at baseline and one year, presented for subjects who have claudication. The Walking Improvement Questionnaire (WIQ) is a validated method to assess objective improvement in functional walking ability of subjects with intermittent claudication. Difficulty walking a distance was self-assessed at baseline by the patient (prior to treatment) and at the one year follow up visit. Speed and stair climbing ability were assessed by the treating physician. Scale ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), with larger numbers representing better outcomes. An increase in WIQ scores at 1 year represents an improvement over baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

  6. Improvement in Rutherford Clinical Category (in All Patients Enrolled)

    Change in RCC at One Year was assessed and percentage of subjects with an improvement in clinical status indicated by a decrease of one or more in RCC at one year compared to baseline, that is attributable to the treated limb (in cases of bilateral disease), was calculated.

    Time frame: 1 Year

  7. Ankle-Brachial Index (in All Patients Enrolled)

    Change in Ankle-Brachial Index at One Year was calculated and percentage of subjects with an increase (improvement) in the ankle-brachial index (ABI) at one year compared to baseline in subjects with compressible arteries and baseline ABI \< 0.9 was calculated.

    Time frame: 1 Year

  8. Secondary Patency (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)

    Secondary patency was defined as measured by duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio ≤ 3.5 maintained by repeat percutaneous intervention in subjects who have claudication; estimated as freedom from loss of patency by the Kaplan-Meier method at one year.

    Time frame: One Year

  9. Primary Patency (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia RCC 4-6)

    The primary patency for CLI was defined by duplex ultrasound measurement of peak systolic velocity ratio ≤ 3.5 at the target lesion(s) with no clinically-driven reintervention within the treated segment in subjects who have CLI at time of enrollment

    Time frame: One Year

  10. Amputation-Free Survival (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)

    Amputation-Free Survival in Claudicants at One Year was defined as freedom from a major, unplanned amputation of the target limb through the one year visit in subjects who have claudication at time of enrollment.

    Time frame: One Year

  11. Improvement in Wound Healing (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia and With Wounds RCC 5-6)

    Wound healing at three months was defined as a decrease of at least one Wagner Classification grade of the wound at three months compared to baseline in subjects who have Rutherford Clinical Category score of 5 or 6 at the time of enrollment.

    Time frame: 3 months

  12. Alternative Patency Rate (Peak Systolic Velocity ≤ 2.4) at 1 Year (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)

    Defined by the duplex ultrasound measurement of peak systolic velocity ration ≤ 2.4 at the target lesion (s) with no clinically-driven re- intervention with the treated segment in subjects who have claudication at time of enrollment.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted Oct 9, 2015
Limitations and caveats
The study's principal limitations include a lack of randomization and follow-up beyond 12 months.

Participant flow

Subjects with all severities of peripheral arterial disease were recruited for this single-arm study. Outcome measures may apply to all subjects or be specific to level of disease severity (ie subjects w/claudication RCC1-3, subjects w/critical limb ischemia RCC4 (no wounds) or RCC5-6 (with wounds)). These are specified in the Arm/Group titles.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAtherectomy
Started799
Completed626
Not completed173

Outcome measures

PrimaryPrimary Patency Rate (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)

The primary endpoint analysis for claudication subjects was primary patency rate at one year, defined by duplex ultrasound measurement of peak systolic velocity ratio ≤ 3.5 at the target lesion(s) with no clinically-driven reintervention within the treated segment in subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.

Time frame:
One year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of lesions by Kaplan Meier
Primary Patency Rate (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
percentage of lesions by Kaplan MeierClaudicant Subgroup
Primary Patency Rate (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)81.6
PrimaryAmputation-Free Survival at 1 Year (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia RCC 4-6)

The primary endpoint for CLI was amputation-free survival at one year, defined as freedom from a major, unplanned amputation of the target limb through the 1-year visit in subjects who have CLI (RCC 4 - 6) at time of enrollment.

Time frame:
One Year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects by Kaplan-Meier
Amputation-Free Survival at 1 Year (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia RCC 4-6)
percentage of subjects by Kaplan-MeierCLI Subgroup
Amputation-Free Survival at 1 Year (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia RCC 4-6)95.1
SecondaryDevice Success (in All Patients Enrolled)

Device success was defined as ≤ 30% residual stenosis following use of the SilverHawk device, as measured by angiography, without adjunctive endovascular interventions or periprocedural complications.

Time frame:
Immediately following use of the SilverHawk device
Reported as:
Number · percentage of Lesions
Device Success (in All Patients Enrolled)
percentage of LesionsAll Patients
Device Success (in All Patients Enrolled)70.5
SecondaryProcedural Success (in All Patients Enrolled)

Procedure success was defined as ≤ 30% residual stenosis following use of SilverHawk device and adjunctive endovascular interventions (if required) as measured by angiography without periprocedural complications.

Time frame:
Immediately following use of the SilverHawk and adjunctive devices
Reported as:
Number · percentage of lesions
Procedural Success (in All Patients Enrolled)
percentage of lesionsAll Patients
Procedural Success (in All Patients Enrolled)84.0
SecondaryMajor Adverse Event Rate (in All Patients Enrolled)

Major Adverse Event Rate (MAE) at 30 Days was defined as clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), major unplanned amputation of treated limb, or all-cause mortality within 30 days post procedure, as classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).

Time frame:
30 Days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Major Adverse Event Rate (in All Patients Enrolled)
percentage of patientsAll Patients
Major Adverse Event Rate (in All Patients Enrolled)1.6
SecondaryMajor Adverse Event Rate (in All Patients Enrolled)

Major Adverse Event Rate at One Year was defined as clinically-driven target vessel revascularization, major unplanned amputation of the treated limb, or all-cause mortality within one year, as classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).

Time frame:
One Year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Major Adverse Event Rate (in All Patients Enrolled)
percentage of patientsAll Patients
Major Adverse Event Rate (in All Patients Enrolled)20.9
SecondaryImprovement in Walking Impairment Questionnaire Score (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)

WIQ includes a measurement for walking distance, walking speed, and climbing stairs collected at baseline and one year, presented for subjects who have claudication. The Walking Improvement Questionnaire (WIQ) is a validated method to assess objective improvement in functional walking ability of subjects with intermittent claudication. Difficulty walking a distance was self-assessed at baseline by the patient (prior to treatment) and at the one year follow up visit. Speed and stair climbing ability were assessed by the treating physician. Scale ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), with larger numbers representing better outcomes. An increase in WIQ scores at 1 year represents an improvement over baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline and 1 Year
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Improvement in Walking Impairment Questionnaire Score (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
units on a scaleClaudicant Subgroup (Baseline)Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
Walking Distance Score19.9 ± 24.249.5 ± 38.0
Walking Speed Score20.3 ± 20.739.4 ± 28.8
Stair Climbins Score32.0 ± 31.053.9 ± 37.6
SecondaryImprovement in Rutherford Clinical Category (in All Patients Enrolled)

Change in RCC at One Year was assessed and percentage of subjects with an improvement in clinical status indicated by a decrease of one or more in RCC at one year compared to baseline, that is attributable to the treated limb (in cases of bilateral disease), was calculated.

Time frame:
1 Year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Improvement in Rutherford Clinical Category (in All Patients Enrolled)
percentage of patientsAll Patients
Improvement in Rutherford Clinical Category (in All Patients Enrolled)82.3
SecondaryAnkle-Brachial Index (in All Patients Enrolled)

Change in Ankle-Brachial Index at One Year was calculated and percentage of subjects with an increase (improvement) in the ankle-brachial index (ABI) at one year compared to baseline in subjects with compressible arteries and baseline ABI \< 0.9 was calculated.

Time frame:
1 Year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients improved
Ankle-Brachial Index (in All Patients Enrolled)
percentage of patients improvedAll Patients
Ankle-Brachial Index (in All Patients Enrolled)76
SecondarySecondary Patency (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)

Secondary patency was defined as measured by duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio ≤ 3.5 maintained by repeat percutaneous intervention in subjects who have claudication; estimated as freedom from loss of patency by the Kaplan-Meier method at one year.

Time frame:
One Year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of lesions
Secondary Patency (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
percentage of lesionsClaudicant Subgroup
Secondary Patency (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)93.5
SecondaryPrimary Patency (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia RCC 4-6)

The primary patency for CLI was defined by duplex ultrasound measurement of peak systolic velocity ratio ≤ 3.5 at the target lesion(s) with no clinically-driven reintervention within the treated segment in subjects who have CLI at time of enrollment

Time frame:
One Year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of lesions
Primary Patency (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia RCC 4-6)
percentage of lesionsCLI Subgroup
Primary Patency (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia RCC 4-6)74.1
SecondaryAmputation-Free Survival (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)

Amputation-Free Survival in Claudicants at One Year was defined as freedom from a major, unplanned amputation of the target limb through the one year visit in subjects who have claudication at time of enrollment.

Time frame:
One Year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients by Kaplan-Meier
Amputation-Free Survival (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
percentage of patients by Kaplan-MeierClaudicant Subjects
Amputation-Free Survival (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)99.6
SecondaryImprovement in Wound Healing (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia and With Wounds RCC 5-6)

Wound healing at three months was defined as a decrease of at least one Wagner Classification grade of the wound at three months compared to baseline in subjects who have Rutherford Clinical Category score of 5 or 6 at the time of enrollment.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Improvement in Wound Healing (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia and With Wounds RCC 5-6)
percentage of patientsCLI Subgroup
Improvement in Wound Healing (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia and With Wounds RCC 5-6)61.2
SecondaryAlternative Patency Rate (Peak Systolic Velocity ≤ 2.4) at 1 Year (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)

Defined by the duplex ultrasound measurement of peak systolic velocity ration ≤ 2.4 at the target lesion (s) with no clinically-driven re- intervention with the treated segment in subjects who have claudication at time of enrollment.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of lesions by Kaplan-Meier
Alternative Patency Rate (Peak Systolic Velocity ≤ 2.4) at 1 Year (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
percentage of lesions by Kaplan-MeierClaudicant Subgroup
Alternative Patency Rate (Peak Systolic Velocity ≤ 2.4) at 1 Year (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)77.5

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Patients4/799 (0.5%)410/799 (51.3%)41/799 (5.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 23
Most frequent serious events
EventAll Patients
OtherVascular disorders279/799
RestenosisVascular disorders170/799
Infection (not at access site)Infections and infestations48/799
Myocardial InfarctionVascular disorders17/799
Access site complicationVascular disorders16/799
Bleeding complicationsVascular disorders11/799
Arterial thrombosisVascular disorders9/799
renal failureRenal and urinary disorders8/799
SepsisInfections and infestations7/799
strokeVascular disorders7/799
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAll Patients
Arterial perforationVascular disorders41/799

Baseline characteristics

800 patients were enrolled, but 1 subject's data were excluded from all analyses due to an invalid informed consent, yielding a cohort of 799 analyzable subjects.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Atherectomy
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years259
>=65 years540
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Atherectomy
Mean70.1 ± 10.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Atherectomy
Female363
Male436
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Atherectomy
Europe107
United States692
Diabetes
Diabetes(participants)Atherectomy
Diabetes418
No Diabetes381
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • McKinsey JF, Zeller T, Rocha-Singh KJ, Jaff MR, Garcia LA; DEFINITIVE LE Investigators. Lower extremity revascularization using directional atherectomy: 12-month prospective results of the DEFINITIVE LE study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):923-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.006. PubMed 25147039 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00883246
Lead sponsor
Medtronic Endovascular
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2009
Start date
Apr 2009
Primary completion
Jun 2012
Completion
Jun 2012
Results posted
Oct 9, 2015
Last update
Jun 4, 2019

Study contacts

Lawrence Garcia, MD
principal investigator · St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tuft's University School of Medicine
James McKinsey, MD
principal investigator · The New York Presbyterian/Columbia University
Professor Thomas Zeller
principal investigator · Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion