CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03820947Updated Aug 25, 2026Results posted

VenaSeal Spectrum: Global Post-Market Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of VenaSeal™ System and Endothermal Ablation (ETA) in Venous Reflux, sponsored by Medtronic Endovascular. Terminated at 32 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Sponsored by Medtronic Endovascular · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Follow-up of the VenaSeal vs. Endothermal Ablation and Venous Leg Ulcer studies was concluded early due to increased evidence of safety and effectiveness of VenaSeal in published literature and to reduce burden to investigators and sites.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
506
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Global, Post-Market, Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial of the VenaSeal™ Closure System vs. Surgical Stripping or Endothermal Ablation (ETA) for the Treatment of Early and Advanced Stage Superficial Venous Disease

Read the detailed description

The study is designed with two randomized studies and one single arm study.

Two randomized studies are for CEAP 2-5 subjects:

  1. VenaSeal vs. Surgical Stripping Study (outside of the United States only)
  2. VenaSeal vs. ETA Study

The single arm study is for CEAP 6 subjects with active venous leg ulcers (VLU):

1. VLU Study

02

Conditions studied

  • Venous Reflux

Keywords

  • Venous reflux
  • Venous leg ulcer
  • Varicose Veins
  • Chronic Venous Insufficiency
  • VenaSeal
  • Endothermal Ablation
  • Surgical Stripping
  • Radiofrequency Ablation
  • Laser Ablation
  • Great Saphenous Vein (GSV)
  • Small Saphenous Vein (SSV)
  • Anterior Accessory Saphenous Vein
  • Venous Reflux Disease (VRD)
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient is ≥18 years of age
  2. Patient has venous reflux in superficial truncal vein(s) (e.g., GSV, SSV, accessory saphenous veins) with CEAP 2 (symptomatic) or CEAP 3, 4a, 4b, 5, 6, appropriate for treatment, as confirmed by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS)
  3. Eligibility for treatment:

    • VenaSeal vs ETA Study: Patient is eligible for treatment with the VenaSeal™ system and ETA
    • VenaSeal vs Surgical Stripping Study: Patient is eligible for treatment with the VenaSeal™ system and surgical stripping
    • VLU Study: patients should be eligible for treatment with the VenaSeal™ system
  4. Treatable refluxing segment of target vein(s) 10 cm in length or longer
  5. Patient has a target vein diameter of ≥3 mm throughout the intended treated segment of the target vein as measured by DUS while patient is standing
  6. Patient is willing and capable of complying with specified follow-up evaluations at the specified times
  7. Patient has an ability to understand the requirements of the study and to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has a known history of allergic sensitivities (including but not limited to cyanoacrylate adhesives), or any other condition, which in the opinion of the investigator may make the patient more susceptible to cyanoacrylate adhesive hypersensitivity
  2. Patient has known deep vein obstruction in the target limb, as identified by the site's standard of care
  3. Patient has abnormal pulse exam or Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) \<0.8
  4. Patient has acute superficial thrombophlebitis
  5. Patient requires any non-target vein treatments in the contralateral or ipsilateral limb, or any other surgical procedure up tp 30 days pre-procedure and through 3 months post-procedure
  6. Patient has any co-morbid conditions, which in the investigator's opinion may interfere with the patient's compliance with study visits and procedures, or may confound interpretation of study data (e.g., congestive heart failure Class III and IV, non-ambulatory patients, severe hepatic dysfunction, life expectancy \< 1 year)
  7. Instructions for Use (IFU) contraindications:

    • VenaSeal vs. ETA Study: Patient has VenaSeal™ system and/or ETA product's IFU contraindication(s)
    • VenaSeal vs Surgical Stripping Study: Patient has surgical stripping and/or VenaSeal™ system IFU contraindication(s)
    • VLU Study: Patient has VenaSeal™ system IFU contraindication(s)
  8. Patient is non-ambulatory
  9. Patient is a female of childbearing potential who may be pregnant or breastfeeding at the time of the index procedure
  10. Patient belongs to a vulnerable population per investigator's judgment or patient has any kind of disorder that compromises his/her ability to give written informed consent and/or to comply with study procedures
  11. Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or device study when the data collected could be conflicting or biased due to participation in another study
  12. Patient has documented COVID-19 infection currently or within the past 3 months. Patient is not completely recovered from past COVID-19 infection, per physician's discretion.
  13. VLU Study: Patient has target ulceration identified to be of non-venous etiology, as confirmed by the independent core laboratory
  14. VLU Study: Patient has target circumferential ulceration that cannot be captured in a single photograph (any ulcer curvature around the leg that goes out of sight)
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
506 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Randomized study VenaSeal™ System versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ System

    CEAP 2-5 subjects will be randomized to VenaSeal™ System vs. ETA

    Device: VenaSeal™ System

  • Active comparator
    Randomized study VenaSeal™ System versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA

    CEAP 2-5 subjects will be randomized to VenaSeal™ System vs. ETA

    Device: Endothermal Ablation (ETA)

  • Experimental
    Randomized study VenaSeal™ System versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ System

    CEAP 2-5 subjects will be randomized to VenaSeal™ System vs. Surgical Stripping

    Device: VenaSeal™ System

  • Active comparator
    Randomized study VenaSeal™ System versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping

    CEAP 2-5 subjects will be randomized to VenaSeal™ System vs. Surgical Stripping

    Procedure: Surgical Stripping

  • Experimental
    Single arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System

    CEAP 6 active leg ulcer subjects will not be randomized to a comparator, all subjects will be treated with VenaSeal™ System

    Device: VenaSeal™ System

Interventions

  • DeviceVenaSeal™ System

    The VenaSeal™ System is the non-tumescent, non-thermal, non-sclerosant device that uses a proprietary medical adhesive delivered endovenously to close the vein.

  • DeviceEndothermal Ablation (ETA)

    ETA includes EVLA that uses laser or RFA that uses radiofrequency heating to close the vein. Heat is applied in both EVLA and RFA therapies to close the vein. Subject can be treated with either EVLA or RFA if randomized to ETA arm per site's standard practice.

    Also known as: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)

  • ProcedureSurgical Stripping

    Surgical stripping involves stripping (removal) of the diseased vein via surgical procedures.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.

    Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - early (VenousTSQe). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher peri-procedural venous treatment satisfaction.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.

    Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - early (VenousTSQe). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher peri-procedural venous treatment satisfaction.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.

    Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - status (VenousTSQs). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher venous treatment satisfaction.

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.

    Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - status (VenousTSQs). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher venous treatment satisfaction.

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Each Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure.

    Elimination of clinically relevant superficial truncal disease in each target vein at the time of index procedure as measured by the percentage of target vein length successfully treated.

    Time frame: Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment

  6. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Each Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure.

    Elimination of clinically relevant superficial truncal disease in each target vein at the time of index procedure as measured by the percentage of target vein length successfully treated.

    Time frame: Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment

  7. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Primary Endpoint: Time to Ulcer Healing, Calculated Through Healing Confirmation and Verified by an Independent Core Laboratory Through 12 Months.

    Time to ulcer healing reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 12 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as a percentage of participants with ulcer healing through 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.

    Anatomic closure of the primary target superficial truncal vein, defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system and ETA procedures. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 6 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure through 6 months.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.

    Anatomic closure of the primary target superficial truncal vein, defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system, or the absence of refluxing or residual primary target vein after surgical stripping procedures. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 6 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure through 6 months.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.

    Anatomic closure of the primary target superficial truncal vein, defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 6 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure through 6 months.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.

    Time to return to work reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to work through 30 days.

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.

    Time to return to work reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to work through 30 days.

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.

    Time to return to work reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to work through 30 days.

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Primary Target Vein at 30 Days, and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.

    For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system or ETA it is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure at 30 days and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months.

    Time frame: 30 days and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

  8. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Primary Target Vein at 30 Days, and 12 Months.

    Anatomic closure of the primary target superficial truncal vein, defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system, or the absence of refluxing or residual primary target vein after surgical stripping procedures. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days and 12 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure through 30 days and 12 months.

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months

  9. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Primary Target Vein at 30 Days, and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.

    For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system it is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure tat 30 days, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months

  10. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Target Vein at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.

    For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system or ETA this is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins with anatomic closure through 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

  11. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Target Vein at 30 Days, and 6, 12 Months.

    Anatomic closure of target superficial truncal vein defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system, or the absence of refluxing or residual primary target vein after surgical stripping procedures. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins with anatomic closure through 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months.

    Time frame: 30 days, 6, 12 months

  12. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Target Vein at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.

    For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system this is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins with anatomic closure at 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months.

  13. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.

    For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system or ETA this is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm.

    Time frame: Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment

  14. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.

    Defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system, or the absence of refluxing or residual vein after surgical stripping procedures.

    Time frame: Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment

  15. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.

    For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system this is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm.

    Time frame: Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment

  16. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 12 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.

    Time frame: 12 months

  17. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.

    Time frame: 60 months

  18. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 12 Months.

    As measured by the time between the index procedure and the first reintervention procedure. Time to reintervention was reported by using the event free Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 12 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins without a reintervention through 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

  19. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Adverse Events (AEs) Occurring in the Target Limb, Evaluated From Index Procedure Through 12 Months.

    Hypersensitivity to VenaSeal™ adhesive, Phlebitis, Granuloma, Endovenous glue induced thrombosis (EGIT) or endovenous heat induced thrombosis (EHIT), Symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) events.

    Time frame: 12 months

  20. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Adverse Events (AEs) Occurring in the Target Limb, Evaluated From Index Procedure Through 12 Months.

    Hypersensitivity to VenaSeal™ adhesive, Phlebitis, Granuloma, Endovenous glue induced thrombosis (EGIT), Symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) events.

    Time frame: 12 months

  21. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Adverse Events (AEs) Occurring in the Target Limb, Evaluated From Index Procedure Through 12 Months.

    Hypersensitivity to VenaSeal™ adhesive, Phlebitis, Granuloma, Endovenous glue induced thrombosis (EGIT), Symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) events.

    Time frame: 12 months

  22. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Additional Events Evaluated Through 12 Months.

    Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), Serious adverse events (SAEs).

    Time frame: 12 months

  23. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Number and Type of Adjunctive Treatments Conducted Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure.

    Time frame: 12 months

  24. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Number and Type of Adjunctive Treatments Conducted Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure.

    Time frame: 12 months

  25. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Number and Type of Adjunctive Treatments Conducted Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure.

    Time frame: 12 months

  26. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization Related to the Target Limb VRD.

    Determined by the number of healthcare visits conducted, and other health-related resources utilized (e.g., home healthcare services) between study visits through 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

  27. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Procedures, Tests and Treatment of AEs Related to the Treatment Modality or Index Procedure Through 12 Months.

    Time frame: 12 months

  28. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.

    Time to return to normal activities reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to normal activities through 30 days.

    Time frame: 30 days

  29. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.

    Time to return to normal activities reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to normal activities through 30 days.

    Time frame: 30 days

  30. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.

    Time to return to normal activities reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to normal activities through 30 days.

    Time frame: 30 days

  31. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Intra-procedural and Post-procedural Pain at the Index Procedure, and 7 Days and 30 Days.

    Determined by using numeric rating scale (NRS) with a scale of 0-10, with '0' indicating no pain and '10' indicating worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Intra-procedure, post-procedure (on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment), 7 days and 30 days

  32. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Intra-procedural and Post-procedural Pain at the Index Procedure, and 7 Days and 30 Days.

    Determined by using numeric rating scale (NRS) with a scale of 0-10, with '0' indicating no pain and '10' indicating worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Intra-procedure, post-procedure (on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment), 7 days and 30 days

  33. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Intra-procedural and Post-procedural Pain at the Index Procedure, and 7 Days and 30 Days.

    Determined by using numeric rating scale (NRS) with a scale of 0-10, with '0' indicating no pain and '10' indicating worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Intra-procedure, post-procedure (on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment), 7 days and 30 days

  34. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in Venous Disease Symptoms at 7 and 30 Days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

    Measured by the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS) and subject self-reporting. rVCSS score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating severe venous disease. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 7 and 30 days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months

  35. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in Venous Disease Symptoms at 7 and 30 Days, and at 6, 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

    Measured by the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS) and subject self-reporting. rVCSS score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating severe venous disease. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 7 and 30 days, and at 6 and 12 months

  36. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in Venous Disease Symptoms at 7 and 30 Days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

    Measured by the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS) and subject self-reporting. rVCSS score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating severe venous disease. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 7 and 30 days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months

  37. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) Score at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

    The total score ranges from 0-100 points, with '0' point indicating the best quality of life and '100' points indicating worst quality of life. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 30 days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

  38. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in AVVQ Score at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

    The total score ranges from 0-100 points, with '0' point indicating the best quality of life and '100' points indicating worst quality of life. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6 and 12 months

  39. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in AVVQ Score at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

    The total score ranges from 0-100 points, with '0' point indicating the best quality of life and '100' points indicating worst quality of life. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 30 days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months

  40. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

    EQ-5D Index scale from \<0 to 1.0 (\<0 worse than dead, 0 is dead and 1.0 is full health). The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

  41. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

    EQ-5D Index scale from \<0 to 1.0 (\<0 worse than dead, 0 is dead and 1.0 is full health). The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6 and 12 months

  42. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

    EQ-5D Index scale from \<0 to 1.0 (\<0 worse than dead, 0 is dead and 1.0 is full health). The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

  43. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

    The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better general health perception. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6 and 12 months

  44. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

    The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better general health perception. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6 and 12 months

  45. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

    The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better general health perception. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6 and 12 months

  46. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in the Venous Dependent Quality of Life (VenousDQoL) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

    The Generic VenousDQOL score was calculated as the average of the Quality of Life scores measured on an interval from +3 (Excellent) to -3 (Extremely Bad). The outcome measure data reports the responses at the different time points compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  47. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the Venous Dependent Quality of Life (VenousDQoL) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6, 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

    The Generic VenousDQOL score was calculated as the average of the Quality of Life scores measured on an interval from +3 (Excellent) to -3 (Extremely Bad). The outcome measure data reports the responses at the different time points compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6, 12 months

  48. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the Venous Dependent Quality of Life (VenousDQoL) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

    The Generic VenousDQOL score was calculated as the average of the Quality of Life scores measured on an interval from +3 (Excellent) to -3 (Extremely Bad). The outcome measure data reports the responses at the different time points compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

  49. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Provider Experience Will be Assessed Post-index Procedure, Evaluating Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure.

    Measured by a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 0-5, with 5 indicating the best outcome (extremely satisfied with the treatment).

    Time frame: Post-index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment

  50. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Provider Experience Will be Assessed Post-index Procedure, Evaluating Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure.

    Measured by a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 0-5, with 5 indicating the best outcome (extremely satisfied with the treatment).

    Time frame: Post-index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment

  51. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Provider Experience Will be Assessed Post-index Procedure, Evaluating Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure.

    Measured by a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 0-5, with 5 indicating the best outcome (extremely satisfied with the treatment).

    Time frame: Post-index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment

  52. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.

    Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - early (VenousTSQe). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher peri-procedural venous treatment satisfaction.

    Time frame: 30 days

  53. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.

    Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - status (VenousTSQs). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher venous treatment satisfaction.

    Time frame: 30 days

  54. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure as Measured by the Percentage of Target Veins Successfully Treated.

    Elimination of clinically relevant superficial truncal disease in each target vein at the time of index procedure as measured by the percentage of target vein length successfully treated.

    Time frame: Post-index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment

  55. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.

    Time frame: 60 months

  56. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization Related to the Target Limb VRD.

    Determined by the number of healthcare visits conducted, and other health-related resources utilized (e.g., home healthcare services) between study visits through 60 months

    Time frame: 60 months

  57. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization Related to the Target Limb VRD.

    Determined by the number of healthcare visits conducted, and other health-related resources utilized (e.g., home healthcare services) between study visits through 60 months.

    Time frame: 60 months

  58. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Procedures, Tests and Treatment of AEs Related to the Treatment Modality or Index Procedure Through 60 Months.

    Time frame: 60 months

  59. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Procedures, Tests and Treatment of AEs Related to the Treatment Modality or Index Procedure Through 60 Months.

    Time frame: 60 months

  60. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Time to Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months.

    As measured by the time between the index procedure and the first reintervention procedure. Time to reintervention was reported by using the event free Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 60 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins without a reintervention through 60 months.

    Time frame: 60 months

  61. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months.

    As measured by the time between the index procedure and the first reintervention procedure. Time to reintervention was reported by using the event free Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 60 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins without a reintervention through 60 months.

    Time frame: 60 months

  62. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Ulcer Recurrence on the Target Limb Following Ulcer Healing Through 60 Months.

    Time to ulcer recurrence reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 60 months, expressed as a percentage. Ulcer recurrence could only occur after the initial ulcer had completely healed.

    Time frame: 60 months

  63. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Ulcer Free Time, Calculated as Days Between Initial Ulcer Healing and First Ulcer Recurrence, as Applicable, Through 60 Months.

    As measured by the time between initial ulcer healing and the first ulcer recurrence.

    Time frame: 60 months

  64. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Ulcer Healing Rate, as Measured by the Percentage of the Ulcer Area Healed, Through 24 Months.

    Ulcer healing rate, as measured by the percentage of the ulcer area healed, according to an independent core laboratory through 24 months or until ulcer healing has been confirmed. This was assessed by overall number of wound care utilizations, and also by different wound care treatments subtypes.

    Time frame: 24 months

  65. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization and Routine Wound Care Treatments Between Study Visits Through 60 Months.

    Determined by the number of ulcer wound care treatments utilized between study visits through 60 months.

    Time frame: 60 months

  66. Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Additional Events Evaluated Through 60 Months.

    Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), Serious adverse events (SAEs).

    Time frame: 60 Months

  67. Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Additional Events Evaluated Through 60 Months.

    Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), Serious adverse events (SAEs).

    Time frame: 60 Months

06

Results

Posted Sep 4, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Early termination of the Randomized study VenaSeal™ System versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA) and Single arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study leading to small numbers of subjects analyzed at 36 (only for the VLU Study), 48 and 60 months.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETARandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical StrippingSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Started1361395353125
7 days1311264843125
30 days1311234643123
6 months1291204642108
12 months125117454299
24 months1131100091
36 months1051040047
48 months41450011
60 months43001
Completed2340381
Not completed1341361315124
Withdrew: Physician decision02105
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1816399
Withdrew: Procedure not attempted02100
Withdrew: Other exit13860
Withdrew: Death010018
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up13110011
Withdrew: Study termination1021010081

Outcome measures

PrimaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.

Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - early (VenousTSQe). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher peri-procedural venous treatment satisfaction.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.30.8 ± 4.2229.6 ± 4.73
PrimaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.

Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - early (VenousTSQe). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher peri-procedural venous treatment satisfaction.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.29.3 ± 4.9425.0 ± 6.24
PrimaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.

Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - status (VenousTSQs). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher venous treatment satisfaction.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.31.8 ± 5.1232.1 ± 4.95
PrimaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.

Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - status (VenousTSQs). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher venous treatment satisfaction.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.30.1 ± 6.3928.3 ± 5.58
PrimaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Each Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure.

Elimination of clinically relevant superficial truncal disease in each target vein at the time of index procedure as measured by the percentage of target vein length successfully treated.

Time frame:
Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment
Reported as:
Mean · % of vein length
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Each Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure.
% of vein lengthRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Primary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Each Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure.92.4 ± 13.4091.1 ± 11.85
PrimaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Each Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure.

Elimination of clinically relevant superficial truncal disease in each target vein at the time of index procedure as measured by the percentage of target vein length successfully treated.

Time frame:
Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment
Reported as:
Mean · % of vein length
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Each Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure.
% of vein lengthRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Primary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Each Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure.69.9 ± 19.9368.2 ± 25.82
PrimarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Primary Endpoint: Time to Ulcer Healing, Calculated Through Healing Confirmation and Verified by an Independent Core Laboratory Through 12 Months.

Time to ulcer healing reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 12 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as a percentage of participants with ulcer healing through 12 months.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Primary Endpoint: Time to Ulcer Healing, Calculated Through Healing Confirmation and Verified by an Independent Core Laboratory Through 12 Months.
percentage probabilitySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Primary Endpoint: Time to Ulcer Healing, Calculated Through Healing Confirmation and Verified by an Independent Core Laboratory Through 12 Months.85.2
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.

Anatomic closure of the primary target superficial truncal vein, defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system and ETA procedures. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 6 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure through 6 months.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.93.993.5
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.

Anatomic closure of the primary target superficial truncal vein, defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system, or the absence of refluxing or residual primary target vein after surgical stripping procedures. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 6 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure through 6 months.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.97.992.9
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.

Anatomic closure of the primary target superficial truncal vein, defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 6 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure through 6 months.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.
percentage probabilitySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Key Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of the Primary Target Superficial Truncal Vein at 6 Months.87.3
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.

Time to return to work reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to work through 30 days.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.97.997.6
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.

Time to return to work reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to work through 30 days.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.89.076.5
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.

Time to return to work reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to work through 30 days.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.
percentage probabilitySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Key Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Work as Reported by the Patient.85.7
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Primary Target Vein at 30 Days, and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.

For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system or ETA it is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure at 30 days and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months.

Time frame:
30 days and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Primary Target Vein at 30 Days, and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
30 days95.495.2
12 months86.689.3
24 months84.084.7
36 months84.080.8
48 months82.978.9
60 months82.9—
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Primary Target Vein at 30 Days, and 12 Months.

Anatomic closure of the primary target superficial truncal vein, defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system, or the absence of refluxing or residual primary target vein after surgical stripping procedures. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days and 12 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure through 30 days and 12 months.

Time frame:
30 days, 12 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Primary Target Vein at 30 Days, and 12 Months.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
30 days97.997.7
12 months95.792.9
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Primary Target Vein at 30 Days, and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.

For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system it is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of primary target veins with anatomic closure tat 30 days, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months

Time frame:
30 days, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Primary Target Vein at 30 Days, and 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.
percentage probabilitySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
30 days91.9
12 months82.3
24 months78.0
36 months75.1
48 months69.0
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Target Vein at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.

For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system or ETA this is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins with anatomic closure through 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Target Vein at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
30 days95.794.6
6 months93.593.1
12 months86.689.0
24 Months84.284.7
36 months84.281.0
48 months83.278.3
60 months83.2—
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Target Vein at 30 Days, and 6, 12 Months.

Anatomic closure of target superficial truncal vein defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system, or the absence of refluxing or residual primary target vein after surgical stripping procedures. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins with anatomic closure through 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months.

Time frame:
30 days, 6, 12 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Target Vein at 30 Days, and 6, 12 Months.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
30 days98.097.8
6 months98.093.2
12 months96.093.2
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Target Vein at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.

For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system this is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. Time to lack of anatomic closure was reported by using the Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins with anatomic closure at 30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months.
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Anatomic Closure of Target Vein at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months.
percentage probabilitySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
30 days93.6
6 months89.1
12 months85.2
24 months81.0
36 months78.7
48 months73.8
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.

For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system or ETA this is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm.

Time frame:
Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment
Reported as:
Count of units · Target Veins
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.
Target VeinsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.136129
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.

Defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm after VenaSeal™ system, or the absence of refluxing or residual vein after surgical stripping procedures.

Time frame:
Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment
Reported as:
Count of units · Target Veins
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.
Target VeinsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.4944
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.

For subjects treated with the VenaSeal™ system this is defined as DUS showing vein closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm.

Time frame:
Post Index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment
Reported as:
Count of units · Target Veins
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.
Target VeinsSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Technical Success of Each Target Vein Immediately Post-index Procedure.147
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 12 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.
Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · reintervention per vein-years
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 12 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.
reintervention per vein-yearsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 12 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.0.060
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.
Time frame:
60 months
Reported as:
Number · reintervention per vein-years
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.
reintervention per vein-yearsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.0.0140.002
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 12 Months.

As measured by the time between the index procedure and the first reintervention procedure. Time to reintervention was reported by using the event free Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 12 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins without a reintervention through 12 months.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 12 Months.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 12 Months.93.1100
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Adverse Events (AEs) Occurring in the Target Limb, Evaluated From Index Procedure Through 12 Months.

Hypersensitivity to VenaSeal™ adhesive, Phlebitis, Granuloma, Endovenous glue induced thrombosis (EGIT) or endovenous heat induced thrombosis (EHIT), Symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) events.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Adverse Events (AEs) Occurring in the Target Limb, Evaluated From Index Procedure Through 12 Months.
ParticipantsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Hypersensitivity to VenaSeal™ adhesive80
Phlebitis124
Granuloma10
EGIT/EHIT15
DVT01
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Adverse Events (AEs) Occurring in the Target Limb, Evaluated From Index Procedure Through 12 Months.

Hypersensitivity to VenaSeal™ adhesive, Phlebitis, Granuloma, Endovenous glue induced thrombosis (EGIT), Symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) events.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Adverse Events (AEs) Occurring in the Target Limb, Evaluated From Index Procedure Through 12 Months.
ParticipantsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Hypersensitivity to VenaSeal™ adhesive60
Phlebitis21
Granuloma00
EGIT00
DVT00
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Adverse Events (AEs) Occurring in the Target Limb, Evaluated From Index Procedure Through 12 Months.

Hypersensitivity to VenaSeal™ adhesive, Phlebitis, Granuloma, Endovenous glue induced thrombosis (EGIT), Symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) events.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Adverse Events (AEs) Occurring in the Target Limb, Evaluated From Index Procedure Through 12 Months.
ParticipantsSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Hypersensitivity to VenaSeal™ adhesive1
Phlebitis13
Granuloma2
EGIT3
DVT2
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Additional Events Evaluated Through 12 Months.

Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), Serious adverse events (SAEs).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Additional Events Evaluated Through 12 Months.
ParticipantsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE)00
Serious adverse events (SAEs)12
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Number and Type of Adjunctive Treatments Conducted Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure.
Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · adjunctive treatment per vein-years
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Number and Type of Adjunctive Treatments Conducted Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure.
adjunctive treatment per vein-yearsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Phlebectomy0.020.01
Sclerotherapy0.10.08
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Number and Type of Adjunctive Treatments Conducted Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure.
Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · adjunctive treatment per vein-years
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Number and Type of Adjunctive Treatments Conducted Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure.
adjunctive treatment per vein-yearsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Phlebectomy0.070
Sclerotherapy0.070.02
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Number and Type of Adjunctive Treatments Conducted Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure.
Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · adjunctive treatment per vein-years
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Number and Type of Adjunctive Treatments Conducted Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure.
adjunctive treatment per vein-yearsSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Sclerotherapy0.12
Phlebectomy0
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization Related to the Target Limb VRD.

Determined by the number of healthcare visits conducted, and other health-related resources utilized (e.g., home healthcare services) between study visits through 12 months.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · services utilized per person-years
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization Related to the Target Limb VRD.
services utilized per person-yearsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Inpatient Visits0.02100.0228
Hospital Outpatient Visits0.44090.1596
Clinic Visits0.08400.1824
Outpatient ER Visits0.02100.0228
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Procedures, Tests and Treatment of AEs Related to the Treatment Modality or Index Procedure Through 12 Months.
Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Procedures, Tests and Treatment of AEs Related to the Treatment Modality or Index Procedure Through 12 Months.
ParticipantsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Diagnostic Tests Performed: Computed Tomographic Venography00
Diagnostic Tests Performed: DUS42
Diagnostic Tests Performed: Intravascular Ultrasound00
Diagnostic Tests Performed: Magnetic Resonance Venography00
Diagnostic Tests Performed: Venogram00
Diagnostic Tests Performed: Other10
Actions Taken: Medication Change91
Actions Taken: Intervention Involving Target Limb/Vein22
Hospitalization11
Other Actions11
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.

Time to return to normal activities reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to normal activities through 30 days.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.98.596.8
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.

Time to return to normal activities reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to normal activities through 30 days.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.95.893.0
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.

Time to return to normal activities reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 30 days, expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the cumulative incidence probability as the percentage of participants returning to normal activities through 30 days.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.
percentage probabilitySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Return to Normal Activities as Reported by the Patients.80.9
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Intra-procedural and Post-procedural Pain at the Index Procedure, and 7 Days and 30 Days.

Determined by using numeric rating scale (NRS) with a scale of 0-10, with '0' indicating no pain and '10' indicating worst pain imaginable.

Time frame:
Intra-procedure, post-procedure (on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment), 7 days and 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Intra-procedural and Post-procedural Pain at the Index Procedure, and 7 Days and 30 Days.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Intra-procedure2.0 ± 2.132.7 ± 2.41
Post-procedure1.1 ± 1.351.2 ± 1.73
7 days1.1 ± 1.581.0 ± 1.40
30 days0.6 ± 1.050.7 ± 1.23
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Intra-procedural and Post-procedural Pain at the Index Procedure, and 7 Days and 30 Days.

Determined by using numeric rating scale (NRS) with a scale of 0-10, with '0' indicating no pain and '10' indicating worst pain imaginable.

Time frame:
Intra-procedure, post-procedure (on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment), 7 days and 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Intra-procedural and Post-procedural Pain at the Index Procedure, and 7 Days and 30 Days.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Intra-procedure1.6 ± 2.250.8 ± 1.95
Post-procedure1.5 ± 1.970.9 ± 2.00
7 days2.1 ± 2.242.2 ± 2.10
30 days1.5 ± 1.922.3 ± 2.39
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Intra-procedural and Post-procedural Pain at the Index Procedure, and 7 Days and 30 Days.

Determined by using numeric rating scale (NRS) with a scale of 0-10, with '0' indicating no pain and '10' indicating worst pain imaginable.

Time frame:
Intra-procedure, post-procedure (on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment), 7 days and 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Intra-procedural and Post-procedural Pain at the Index Procedure, and 7 Days and 30 Days.
score on a scaleSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Intra-procedure3.6 ± 2.88
Post-procedure2.3 ± 2.36
7 days2.1 ± 2.27
30 days1.8 ± 2.32
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in Venous Disease Symptoms at 7 and 30 Days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

Measured by the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS) and subject self-reporting. rVCSS score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating severe venous disease. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
7 and 30 days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in Venous Disease Symptoms at 7 and 30 Days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
7 days change from baseline-2.2 ± 2.76-1.4 ± 2.48
30 days change from baseline-3.4 ± 2.63-3.0 ± 2.72
6 months change from baseline-4.3 ± 2.53-3.6 ± 2.83
12 months change from baseline-3.9 ± 2.71-3.8 ± 2.95
24 months change from baseline-4.0 ± 2.73-3.8 ± 2.62
36 months change from baseline-3.9 ± 2.53-3.8 ± 2.48
48 months change from baseline-4.6 ± 3.33-4.8 ± 2.90
60 months change from baseline-4.5 ± 0.71-4.0 ± 1.00
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in Venous Disease Symptoms at 7 and 30 Days, and at 6, 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

Measured by the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS) and subject self-reporting. rVCSS score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating severe venous disease. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
7 and 30 days, and at 6 and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in Venous Disease Symptoms at 7 and 30 Days, and at 6, 12 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
7 days change from baseline-2.4 ± 1.90-1.6 ± 2.63
30 days change from baseline-3.2 ± 1.78-2.2 ± 2.45
6 months change from baseline-3.4 ± 1.79-3.0 ± 2.72
12 months change from baseline-3.6 ± 2.16-3.6 ± 2.56
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in Venous Disease Symptoms at 7 and 30 Days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

Measured by the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS) and subject self-reporting. rVCSS score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating severe venous disease. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
7 and 30 days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in Venous Disease Symptoms at 7 and 30 Days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
7 days change from baseline-3.3 ± 3.95
30 days change from baseline-5.6 ± 5.00
6 months change from baseline-8.7 ± 5.27
12 months change from baseline-9.0 ± 5.44
24 months change from baseline-8.9 ± 5.38
36 months change from baseline-9.5 ± 6.18
48 months change from baseline-10.4 ± 7.49
60 months change from baseline-16.0 ± NA
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) Score at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

The total score ranges from 0-100 points, with '0' point indicating the best quality of life and '100' points indicating worst quality of life. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
30 days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) Score at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
30 days change from baseline-5.4 ± 7.88-2.4 ± 8.01
6 months change from baseline-7.8 ± 7.77-5.9 ± 8.75
12 months change from baseline-8.0 ± 7.68-6.4 ± 10.05
24 months change from baseline-8.4 ± 8.52-6.8 ± 8.26
36 months change from baseline-8.7 ± 7.90-6.1 ± 9.34
48 months change from baseline-8.8 ± 10.23-8.3 ± 10.46
60 months change from baseline-5.0 ± 5.29-11.3 ± 12.44
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in AVVQ Score at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

The total score ranges from 0-100 points, with '0' point indicating the best quality of life and '100' points indicating worst quality of life. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6 and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in AVVQ Score at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
30 days change from baseline-4.7 ± 5.94-1.0 ± 8.89
6 months change from baseline-7.0 ± 6.26-7.7 ± 7.97
12 months change from baseline-7.3 ± 6.13-8.8 ± 6.62
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in AVVQ Score at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

The total score ranges from 0-100 points, with '0' point indicating the best quality of life and '100' points indicating worst quality of life. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
30 days, and at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in AVVQ Score at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
30 days change from baseline-8.1 ± 13.66
6 months change from baseline-13.4 ± 14.40
12 months change from baseline-15.4 ± 15.21
24 months change from baseline-12.0 ± 17.12
36 months change from baseline-12.7 ± 15.87
48 months change from baseline-12.9 ± 18.96
60 months change from baseline-25.9 ± NA
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

EQ-5D Index scale from \<0 to 1.0 (\<0 worse than dead, 0 is dead and 1.0 is full health). The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
30 days change from baseline0.10 ± 0.140.08 ± 0.15
6 months change from baseline0.09 ± 0.140.08 ± 0.18
12 months change from baseline0.08 ± 0.160.08 ± 0.15
24 months change from baseline0.08 ± 0.150.05 ± 0.15
36 months change from baseline0.09 ± 0.130.07 ± 0.14
48 months change from baseline0.12 ± 0.160.11 ± 0.16
60 months change from baseline0.09 ± 0.130.07 ± 0.08
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

EQ-5D Index scale from \<0 to 1.0 (\<0 worse than dead, 0 is dead and 1.0 is full health). The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6 and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
30 days change from baseline0.12 ± 0.190.15 ± 0.24
6 months change from baseline0.13 ± 0.190.13 ± 0.24
12 months change from baseline0.12 ± 0.220.14 ± 0.28
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

EQ-5D Index scale from \<0 to 1.0 (\<0 worse than dead, 0 is dead and 1.0 is full health). The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in EuroQoL Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
30 days change from baseline0.1 ± 0.24
6 months change from baseline0.1 ± 0.25
12 months change from baseline0.2 ± 0.25
24 months change from baseline0.1 ± 0.33
36 months change from baseline0.1 ± 0.24
48 months change from baseline-0.1 ± 0.33
60 months change from baseline0.2 ± NA
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better general health perception. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6 and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Physical Scale 30 days change from baseline2.5 ± 5.881.8 ± 5.43
Mental Scale 30 days change from baseline2.1 ± 9.350.9 ± 8.89
Physical Scale 6 months change from baseline2.9 ± 6.622.1 ± 5.50
Mental Scale 6 months change from baseline2.4 ± 9.771.3 ± 8.41
Physical Scale 12 months change from baseline3.1 ± 6.851.8 ± 5.90
Mental Scale 12 months change from baseline2.5 ± 8.651.0 ± 8.27
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better general health perception. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6 and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Physical Scale 30 days change from baseline3.0 ± 6.500.5 ± 6.42
Mental Scale 30 days change from baseline3.4 ± 9.182.1 ± 11.05
Physical Scale 6 months change from baseline3.2 ± 6.391.4 ± 6.15
Mental Scale 6 months change from baseline3.4 ± 8.211.6 ± 8.23
Physical Scale 12 months change from baseline3.7 ± 7.712.9 ± 7.08
Mental Scale 12 months change from baseline1.8 ± 11.550.2 ± 9.71
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better general health perception. The outcome measure data reports changes compared to baseline at the different time frames.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6 and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6 and 12 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Physical Scale 30 days change from baseline2.20 ± 7.17
Mental Scale 30 days change from baseline3.60 ± 12.13
Physical Scale 6 months change from baseline2.86 ± 7.77
Mental Scale 6 months change from baseline5.82 ± 10.67
Physical Scale 12 months change from baseline3.80 ± 8.23
Mental Scale 12 months change from baseline5.81 ± 11.63
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in the Venous Dependent Quality of Life (VenousDQoL) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

The Generic VenousDQOL score was calculated as the average of the Quality of Life scores measured on an interval from +3 (Excellent) to -3 (Extremely Bad). The outcome measure data reports the responses at the different time points compared to baseline.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Change in the Venous Dependent Quality of Life (VenousDQoL) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
30 days change from baseline0.3 ± 1.010.2 ± 0.97
6 months change from baseline0.4 ± 0.960.4 ± 1.10
12 months change from baseline0.4 ± 0.980.2 ± 1.02
24 months change from baseline0.1 ± 1.080.1 ± 0.96
36 months change from baseline0.2 ± 1.110.2 ± 0.90
48 months change from baseline0.1 ± 1.290.1 ± 0.96
60 months change from baseline1.0 ± NA—
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the Venous Dependent Quality of Life (VenousDQoL) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6, 12 Months Compared to Baseline.

The Generic VenousDQOL score was calculated as the average of the Quality of Life scores measured on an interval from +3 (Excellent) to -3 (Extremely Bad). The outcome measure data reports the responses at the different time points compared to baseline.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the Venous Dependent Quality of Life (VenousDQoL) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6, 12 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
30 days change from baseline0.5 ± 1.010.6 ± 1.36
6 months change from baseline0.6 ± 1.240.5 ± 1.38
12 months change from baseline0.5 ± 1.320.7 ± 1.71
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the Venous Dependent Quality of Life (VenousDQoL) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.

The Generic VenousDQOL score was calculated as the average of the Quality of Life scores measured on an interval from +3 (Excellent) to -3 (Extremely Bad). The outcome measure data reports the responses at the different time points compared to baseline.

Time frame:
30 days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Change in the Venous Dependent Quality of Life (VenousDQoL) Reported by the Patient at 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months Compared to Baseline.
score on a scaleSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
30 days change from baseline0.4 ± 1.10
6 months change from baseline0.4 ± 1.34
12 months change from baseline0.4 ± 1.27
24 months change from baseline0.4 ± 1.28
36 months change from baseline0.4 ± 1.22
48 months change from baseline-0.1 ± 0.78
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Provider Experience Will be Assessed Post-index Procedure, Evaluating Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure.

Measured by a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 0-5, with 5 indicating the best outcome (extremely satisfied with the treatment).

Time frame:
Post-index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Provider Experience Will be Assessed Post-index Procedure, Evaluating Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure.
ParticipantsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Extremely Satisfied7771
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Satisfied4952
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Neutral41
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Dissatisfied12
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Extremely Dissatisfied00
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Provider Experience Will be Assessed Post-index Procedure, Evaluating Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure.

Measured by a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 0-5, with 5 indicating the best outcome (extremely satisfied with the treatment).

Time frame:
Post-index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Secondary Endpoint: Provider Experience Will be Assessed Post-index Procedure, Evaluating Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure.
ParticipantsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Extremely Satisfied104
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Satisfied3827
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Neutral09
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Dissatisfied03
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Extremely Dissatisfied00
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Provider Experience Will be Assessed Post-index Procedure, Evaluating Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure.

Measured by a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 0-5, with 5 indicating the best outcome (extremely satisfied with the treatment).

Time frame:
Post-index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Provider Experience Will be Assessed Post-index Procedure, Evaluating Overall Satisfaction With the Procedure.
ParticipantsSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Extremely Satisfied62
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Satisfied57
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Neutral4
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Dissatisfied2
Physician Satisfaction with Procedure: Extremely Dissatisfied0
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.

Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - early (VenousTSQe). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher peri-procedural venous treatment satisfaction.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.
score on a scaleSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Peri-procedural Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated, Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQe) at 30 Days.28.1 ± 6.18
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.

Measured by a validated, patient-centered venous treatment satisfaction questionnaire - status (VenousTSQs). Total score ranges from 0-36, and a higher score means a higher venous treatment satisfaction.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.
score on a scaleSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Patient Satisfaction as Measured by a Validated Patient-centered Venous Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (VenousTSQs) at 30 Days.30.9 ± 4.87
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure as Measured by the Percentage of Target Veins Successfully Treated.

Elimination of clinically relevant superficial truncal disease in each target vein at the time of index procedure as measured by the percentage of target vein length successfully treated.

Time frame:
Post-index procedure, on the day of the procedure immediately following treatment
Reported as:
Mean · % of vein length
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure as Measured by the Percentage of Target Veins Successfully Treated.
% of vein lengthSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: Secondary Endpoint: Elimination of Clinically Relevant Superficial Truncal Disease in Target Vein at the Time of Index Procedure as Measured by the Percentage of Target Veins Successfully Treated.90.8 ± 13.21
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.
Time frame:
60 months
Reported as:
Number · reintervention per vein-years
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.
reintervention per vein-yearsSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months, Assessed at Each Follow-up Visit.0.028
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization Related to the Target Limb VRD.

Determined by the number of healthcare visits conducted, and other health-related resources utilized (e.g., home healthcare services) between study visits through 60 months

Time frame:
60 months
Reported as:
Number · services utilized per person-years
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization Related to the Target Limb VRD.
services utilized per person-yearsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Inpatient Visits0.00000.0023
Hospital Outpatient Visits0.08130.0593
Clinic Visits0.18020.1802
Outpatient ER Visits0.00880.0023
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization Related to the Target Limb VRD.

Determined by the number of healthcare visits conducted, and other health-related resources utilized (e.g., home healthcare services) between study visits through 60 months.

Time frame:
60 months
Reported as:
Number · services utilized per person-years
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization Related to the Target Limb VRD.
services utilized per person-yearsSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Inpatient Visits0.0776
Hospital Outpatient Visits0.4912
Clinic Visits5.9044
Outpatient ER Visits0.1228
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Procedures, Tests and Treatment of AEs Related to the Treatment Modality or Index Procedure Through 60 Months.
Time frame:
60 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Procedures, Tests and Treatment of AEs Related to the Treatment Modality or Index Procedure Through 60 Months.
ParticipantsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Diagnostic Test Performed: Computed Tomographic Venography00
Diagnostic Test Performed: DUS2412
Diagnostic Test Performed: Magnetic Resonance Venography00
Diagnostic Test Performed: Venogram00
Diagnostic Test Performed: Intravascular Ultrasound00
Diagnostic Test Performed: Other11
Actions Taken: Medication Change167
Actions Taken: Intervention Involving Target Limb/Vein60
Hospitalization01
Prolongation of Existing Hospitalization00
Other Actions32
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Procedures, Tests and Treatment of AEs Related to the Treatment Modality or Index Procedure Through 60 Months.
Time frame:
60 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Procedures, Tests and Treatment of AEs Related to the Treatment Modality or Index Procedure Through 60 Months.
ParticipantsSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Diagnostic Tests Performed: Computed Tomographic Venography1
Diagnostic Tests Performed: DUS18
Diagnostic Tests Performed: Magnetic Resonance Venography1
Diagnostic Tests Performed: Venogram0
Diagnostic Tests Performed: Intravascular Ultrasound0
Diagnostic Test Performed: Other10
Actions Taken: Medication Change18
Actions Taken: Intervention Involving Target Limb/Vein5
Hospitalization6
Prolongation of existing hospitalization1
Other Actions10
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Time to Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months.

As measured by the time between the index procedure and the first reintervention procedure. Time to reintervention was reported by using the event free Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 60 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins without a reintervention through 60 months.

Time frame:
60 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Time to Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months.
percentage probabilityRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
12 months97.6100
24 months96.7100
36 months95.8100
48 months95.898.6
60 months95.8—
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months.

As measured by the time between the index procedure and the first reintervention procedure. Time to reintervention was reported by using the event free Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimate at 60 months expressed as a percentage. The data values below represent the Kaplan-Meier survival probability as a percentage of target veins without a reintervention through 60 months.

Time frame:
60 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Reintervention of Any Target Vein (Including Primary Target Vein) Through 60 Months.
percentage probabilitySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
12 months97.2
24 months92.8
36 months88.3
48 months88.3
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Ulcer Recurrence on the Target Limb Following Ulcer Healing Through 60 Months.

Time to ulcer recurrence reported by using the cumulative incidence probability estimate of the event happening at 60 months, expressed as a percentage. Ulcer recurrence could only occur after the initial ulcer had completely healed.

Time frame:
60 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage probability
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Time to Ulcer Recurrence on the Target Limb Following Ulcer Healing Through 60 Months.
percentage probabilitySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
12 Months15.4
24 Months22.9
36 Months29.7
48 Months29.7
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Ulcer Free Time, Calculated as Days Between Initial Ulcer Healing and First Ulcer Recurrence, as Applicable, Through 60 Months.

As measured by the time between initial ulcer healing and the first ulcer recurrence.

Time frame:
60 months
Reported as:
Mean · days
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Ulcer Free Time, Calculated as Days Between Initial Ulcer Healing and First Ulcer Recurrence, as Applicable, Through 60 Months.
daysSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Ulcer Free Time, Calculated as Days Between Initial Ulcer Healing and First Ulcer Recurrence, as Applicable, Through 60 Months.346.60 ± 314.31
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Ulcer Healing Rate, as Measured by the Percentage of the Ulcer Area Healed, Through 24 Months.

Ulcer healing rate, as measured by the percentage of the ulcer area healed, according to an independent core laboratory through 24 months or until ulcer healing has been confirmed. This was assessed by overall number of wound care utilizations, and also by different wound care treatments subtypes.

Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Mean · % of area healed
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Ulcer Healing Rate, as Measured by the Percentage of the Ulcer Area Healed, Through 24 Months.
% of area healedSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Ulcer Healing Rate, as Measured by the Percentage of the Ulcer Area Healed, Through 24 Months.98.46 ± 10.92
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization and Routine Wound Care Treatments Between Study Visits Through 60 Months.

Determined by the number of ulcer wound care treatments utilized between study visits through 60 months.

Time frame:
60 months
Reported as:
Number · treatments utilizations per person-years
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Healthcare Utilization and Routine Wound Care Treatments Between Study Visits Through 60 Months.
treatments utilizations per person-yearsSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Overall Wound Cares1.49
Debridements0.55
Skin Grafts0.03
Dressing Changes1.38
Unna Boots0.25
Others0.08
SecondaryRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Additional Events Evaluated Through 60 Months.

Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), Serious adverse events (SAEs).

Time frame:
60 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): Secondary Endpoint: Additional Events Evaluated Through 60 Months.
ParticipantsRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA
Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE)20
Serious Adverse Event (SAE)1211
SecondarySingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Additional Events Evaluated Through 60 Months.

Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), Serious adverse events (SAEs).

Time frame:
60 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System: Secondary Endpoint: Additional Events Evaluated Through 60 Months.
ParticipantsSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE)2
Serious Adverse Event (SAE)55

Adverse events

Collected over from index procedure until end of follow-up, up to 60 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ System0/136 (0%)12/136 (8.8%)23/136 (16.9%)
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETA1/139 (0.7%)11/139 (7.9%)8/139 (5.8%)
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ System0/53 (0%)1/53 (1.9%)9/53 (17%)
Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical Stripping0/53 (0%)4/53 (7.5%)4/53 (7.5%)
Single Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System18/125 (14.4%)55/125 (44%)50/125 (40%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 102
Most frequent serious events
EventRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETARandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical StrippingSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/1360/1390/530/538/125
Septic ShockInfections and infestations0/1360/1390/530/538/125
Cardiac Failure CongestiveCardiac disorders0/1360/1390/530/536/125
DeathGeneral disorders0/1360/1390/530/536/125
HyponatraemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/1360/1390/530/533/125
Acute Kidney InjuryRenal and urinary disorders0/1360/1390/530/533/125
Acute Respiratory FailureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1360/1390/530/533/125
Skin UlcerSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1360/1390/530/533/125
Superficial Vein ThrombosisVascular disorders0/1360/1390/530/533/125
Human BiteInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1360/1390/531/530/125
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETARandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical StrippingSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ System
Skin UlcerSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1360/1390/530/5335/125
Venous RecanalisationVascular disorders6/1364/1392/530/5317/125
HypersensitivityImmune system disorders8/1361/1395/530/530/125
Peripheral Venous DiseaseVascular disorders2/1363/1391/534/535/125
Infected Skin UlcerInfections and infestations0/1360/1390/530/538/125
PhlebitisVascular disorders8/1360/1391/530/534/125
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/1361/1390/530/537/125

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETARandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical StrippingSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ SystemTotal
Mean57.0 ± 13.2057.2 ± 13.7060.3 ± 14.3961.5 ± 12.9667.9 ± 14.7660.7 ± 14.52
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETARandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical StrippingSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ SystemTotal
Female9178293348279
Male4052211677206
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETARandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical StrippingSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ SystemTotal
Not reportable per local laws or regulations67697455202
Subject declines to answer030003
Unknown000033
Black or African American110035
Chinese000000
Japanese000000
Korean131438410106
Native American or Alaska Native000000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific islander010001
White50425363163
Other Asian010012
Other000000
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index(kg/m2)Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETARandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical StrippingSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ SystemTotal
Mean26.4 ± 4.9227.9 ± 5.7725.8 ± 5.7724.2 ± 3.4132.4 ± 9.3528.1 ± 7.08
CEAP: Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological Classification
CEAP: Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological Classification(Participants)Randomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Endothermal Ablation (ETA): ETARandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: VenaSeal™ SystemRandomized Study VenaSeal™ System Versus Surgical Stripping: Surgical StrippingSingle Arm Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Study: VenaSeal™ SystemTotal
C0000000
C1000000
C2434822230136
C3615317180149
C4a2825129074
C4b4412011
C50911011
C60000125125
07

Study locations

32 sites
  • Yavapai Regional Medical Center
    Prescott Valley, Arizona 86314-2255, United States
  • PIMA Heart and Vascular
    Tucson, Arizona 85718, United States
  • Valley Vascular Surgical Associates
    Fresno, California 93701, United States
  • Vascular Care Connecticut
    Darien, Connecticut 06820, United States
  • Yale School of Medicine
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
  • Georgetown University Medical Center
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20007-2113, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Vascular Care Group
    Wellesley, Massachusetts 02482, United States
  • New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center
    New York, New York 10024, United States
  • OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43214, United States
  • Orion Medical
    Houston, Texas 77034, United States
  • Lake Washington Vascular
    Bellevue, Washington 98004-4623, United States
  • Sunshine Coast University Hospital
    Birtinya, 4575, Australia
  • Wollongong Hospital
    Wollongong, Australia
  • East Toronto Vascular Clinic
    Toronto, Ontario M4L 3Y3, Canada
  • CHU Dijon Bourgogne
    Dijon, DIjon Cedex 21079, France
  • Clinique du Parc
    Lyon, 69006, France
  • Clinique Pasteur
    Toulouse, France
  • Praxis fur Innere Medizin und Gefäβkrankheiten
    Halle, 06108, Germany
  • Ospedale Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico
    Milan, 20121, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova Ospendale Sant' Antonio
    Padova, 35127, Italy
  • Rijnstate - Locatie Arnhem
    Arnhem, 6815, Netherlands
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
  • Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital
    Seoul, 137-701, South Korea
  • Konkuk University Medical Center
    Seoul, 143-729, South Korea
  • Gangnam Severance Hospital
    Seoul, South Korea
  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Granada (Hospital Campus de la Salud)
    Granada, 18016, Spain
  • Sanitas Hospital Universitario La Zarzuela
    Madrid, 28023, Spain
  • Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Bedford, MK42 9DJ, United Kingdom
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - Addenbrooke's Hospital
    Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
  • West London Vascular and Interventional Centre
    Harrow, HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust - Charing Cross Hospital
    London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gohel M, Gibson K, Falvo N, Park SW, Kim JY, Hirsch T, O'Banion LA, Salkowski N, Ali A, Davies AH; VenaSeal Spectrum Investigators. Randomised Clinical Trials Comparing Cyanoacrylate Closure with Surgical Stripping and Endovenous Thermal Ablation for Chronic Venous Disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2026 May 26:S1078-5884(26)00465-X. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2026.05.005. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42203167 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 31, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 27, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03820947
Lead sponsor
Medtronic Endovascular
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 29, 2019
Start date
Feb 5, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 12, 2024
Completion
Nov 10, 2025
Results posted
Sep 4, 2025
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Study contacts

Kathleen Gibson, MD
principal investigator · Lake Washington Vascular, US
Manjit Gohel, MD
principal investigator · Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion