ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT00870064PROOFUpdated Jul 1, 2026

The Treatment of Type I Open Fractures in Pediatrics

An interventional study of Formal Operative Treatment and Emergency Department Treatment in Fractures, Open, sponsored by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.

Sponsored by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2010; still recruiting 16 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Open fractures are frequently encountered in orthopaedics. Treatment usually calls for a formal, operative procedure in which the bone is exposed, foreign tissue is debrided and the wound is irrigated. While this is the current standard of care, not all open fractures are equal. In retrospective studies, centers are reporting less aggressive operative management for open fractures may result in equal results without the time and expense of the operative theater. The investigators propose a prospective, randomized trial of children with type I open fractures to evaluate whether formal operative treatment is necessary. The investigators' hypothesis is that minor open fractures can be safely treated in the emergency room with irrigation, closed reduction and home antibiotics without an increased risk of infection or other complications. Children who meet the study criteria will be randomized into two treatment arms - formal operative management (OR) and emergency department (ED) management. Outcomes from each group will be evaluated and compared, including rate of infection, number of return visits to the operating room, time to union, and other complications.

Read the detailed description

Fractures in which bone has been exposed to the outside world through an associated skin injury, known as open fractures, are frequently encountered in orthopaedics. Traditionally, treatment calls for a formal, operative treatment in which the bone is exposed, foreign tissue is debrided and the wound is irrigated. The bone itself, depending on the age of the patient, fracture location and stability is then treated by the appropriate method of casting or internal fixation. However, while this is the current standard of care for all open fractures, not all open fractures are the same and can differ in terms of the bone involved, energy causing the injury and the skeletal maturity of the patient. Children, for example, have a thick periosteum which may diminish the rate of infection and decrease the time to healing. In addition, the protocol of operative debridement was introduced at the same time as widespread antibiotic use. It is not known whether the mechanical operative management or antibiotic use has resulted in improved outcomes. In retrospective studies, centers are reporting emergency department management alone may result in equal results without the time and expense of the operative theater.

The investigators propose a prospective, randomized trial of children with type I open fractures to evaluate whether formal operative treatment is necessary. The investigators hypothesize that minor open fractures in children can be safely treated in the emergency room with irrigation, closed reduction and home antibiotics without an increased risk of infection or other complications. If the inclusion criteria is met and informed consent is obtained, children will be randomized into two treatment arms - formal operative management (OR) and emergency department (ED) management. Children randomized to the OR arm will be taken to the OR within 24 hours for irrigation and debridement and appropriate bone management. Children in the ED arm will have a washout in the emergency room under conscious sedation, a closed reduction and home antibiotics. Both wounds will be examined at interval follow up periods for signs of infection. Outcomes evaluated will include the rate of infection, the number of return visits to the operating room, the time to bone healing, and other complications. This is a pilot study with the plan of eventually being a multicenter study evaluating open fracture care in children.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fractures, Open

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Surgical Procedures, Operative
  • Fractures, Open
  • Fracture Fixation
03

In context

Fractures, Open

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Open; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 90 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Open.

Browse Fractures, Open studies →

Lead sponsor

Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 180 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • open fracture amenable to treatment by closed reduction
  • low energy mechanism of injury (e.g., falls from less than 10 feet, bicycle accidents)
  • wound less than 1cm in length and the bone not visualized through the skin

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • open fracture not amenable to treatment by closed reduction
  • open fracture that would typically require operative reduction and fixation
  • high energy mechanism of injury (e.g., struck by vehicle, motor vehicle accidents, fall from height greater than 10 feet)
  • wound greater than 1cm in length
  • gross contamination of wound
  • open fractures involving hands or feet (the current standard of care to treat open injuries involving hands or feet is only emergency room management)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Formal Operative Treatment

    Children randomized to the formal operative management arm will be taken to the Operating Room within 24 hours for irrigation and debridement and appropriate bone management.

    Procedure: Formal Operative Treatment

  • Other
    Emergency Department Treatment

    Children in the Emergency Department Treatment arm will have a washout in the emergency room under conscious sedation, a closed reduction and home antibiotics.

    Procedure: Emergency Department Treatment

Interventions

  • ProcedureFormal Operative Treatment

    Children randomized to the OR arm will be taken to the OR within 24 hours for irrigation and debridement and appropriate bone management.

  • ProcedureEmergency Department Treatment

    Children in the ED arm will have a washout in the emergency room under conscious sedation, a closed reduction and home antibiotics.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of infection

    1\. Do patients with type one open fractures treated in the emergency department with irrigation have a non-inferior rate of infections compared to those treated in the operating room with formal irrigation and debridement? The response variable will be the presence of an infection in children with open fractures.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to bone healing

    2\. Do patients with type I open fractures who are treated nonoperatively have a non-inferior time to bone healing when compared to those treated operatively? The response variable will be time to clinical and radiographic fracture healing.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  2. Return visits to OR

    Number of return visits to the operating room

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yang EC, Eisler J. Treatment of isolated type I open fractures: is emergent operative debridement necessary? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 May;(410):289-94. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000063795.32430.4c. PubMed 12771843 ↗
  • Iobst CA, Tidwell MA, King WF. Nonoperative management of pediatric type I open fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 Jul-Aug;25(4):513-7. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000158779.45226.74. PubMed 15958906 ↗
  • Doak J, Ferrick M. Nonoperative management of pediatric grade 1 open fractures with less than a 24-hour admission. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):49-51. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181901c66. PubMed 19098646 ↗
  • Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jun;58(4):453-8. PubMed 773941 ↗
  • Grimard G, Naudie D, Laberge LC, Hamdy RC. Open fractures of the tibia in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Nov;(332):62-70. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199611000-00009. PubMed 8913146 ↗
  • Haasbeek JF, Cole WG. Open fractures of the arm in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Jul;77(4):576-81. PubMed 7615601 ↗
  • Skaggs DL, Kautz SM, Kay RM, Tolo VT. Effect of delay of surgical treatment on rate of infection in open fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000 Jan-Feb;20(1):19-22. PubMed 10641682 ↗
  • Jones BG, Duncan RD. Open tibial fractures in children under 13 years of age--10 years experience. Injury. 2003 Oct;34(10):776-80. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(03)00031-7. PubMed 14519359 ↗
  • Jones IE, Williams SM, Dow N, Goulding A. How many children remain fracture-free during growth? a longitudinal study of children and adolescents participating in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. Osteoporos Int. 2002 Dec;13(12):990-5. doi: 10.1007/s001980200137. PubMed 12459942 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00870064
Collaborators
Provincial Health Services Authority British Columbia, University of Mississippi Medical Center, MultiCare Mary Bridge Children's Hospital & Health Center, Yale New Haven Health System Center for Healthcare Solutions, University of New Mexico Carrie Tingley Hospital, IWK Health Centre, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital Colorado, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Morristown Medical Center, NYUMC-Hospital for Joint Diseases, Children's Medical Center Dallas, Johns Hopkins University, Orthopaedic Institute for Children, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Children's Hospital of Orange County
Responsible party
Joseph Janicki (MD, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 26, 2009
Start date
Mar 2010
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 1, 2026

Study contacts

Jamie K Burgess, PhD, CCRP
Contact
jburgess@luriechildrens.org
312-227-6531
Michelle S Adzido, MA
Contact
madzido@luriechildrens.org
312-227-2492
Joseph (Jay) A Janicki, MD, MS
principal investigator · Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion