ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00842829Updated Oct 1, 2012Results posted

Study of Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Assessment of Fentanyl Buccal Tablets Titration and Treatment in Opioid-Tolerant Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT) in Cancer Pain and Breakthrough Pain, sponsored by Cephalon. Terminated at 123 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-10-01.

Sponsored by Cephalon (part of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.) · Phase 4 and Interventional

Why this study was terminated
Recruitment stopped at the end of the recruitment timeframe
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
330
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is a common problem in patients with cancer. Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT) is used for the treatment of BTP in adults with cancer who are already receiving maintenance opioid therapy for chronic cancer pain. FBT treatment should be individually titrated to an effective dose that provides adequate analgesia and minimizes undesirable effects. To reach the safest effective dose for the individual patient as soon as possible, the dose titration process is critical. The aim of this study, conducted under pragmatic conditions in a large-scale population of cancer patients is to compare the proportion of patients reaching an effective FBT dose after titration starting with either a 100 mcg dose or a 200 mcg dose.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer Pain
  • Breakthrough Pain

Keywords

  • Breakthrough Cancer Pain
03

In context

Cancer Pain

310 studies on the registry are indexed under Cancer Pain; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 330 is above the median of 62 across 235 interventional studies indexed under Cancer Pain.

Browse Cancer Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Cephalon is the lead sponsor of 75 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Cephalon became part of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd..

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient is willing to provide written to participate in this study.
  • The patient can be either an out-patient or an in-patient.
  • The patient has a documented diagnosis of cancer.
  • The patient has stable background pain due to cancer.
  • The patient experiences up to 4 BTcP episodes per 24 hours.
  • As maintenance opioid therapy, the patient is currently taking 1 of the following: at least 60 mg of oral morphine/day, at least 25 mcg of transdermal fentanyl/hour, at least 30 mg of oxycodone/day, at least 8 mg of hydromorphone/day, of an equianalgesic dose of another opioid for a week or longer before administration of the first dose of study drug.
  • Women of , using a medically accepted, highly effective method of and agree to continued use of this method for the duration of the study.
  • The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug and to fill in study documents.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is without maintenance opioid therapy.
  • The patient has uncontrolled or rapidly escalating pain as determined by the investigator.
  • The patient has known or suspected , allergies, or other to the active drug or to any of the of the study drug.
  • The patient has respiratory depression or , or any other medical condition predisposing to respiratory depression.
  • The patient has medical or psychiatric disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data.
  • The patient is expected to have surgery during the study.
  • The patient is pregnant or lactating.
  • The patient has participated in a study involving an drug in the prior 30 days.
  • The patient has received a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days before the first treatment with study drug.
  • The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication/therapy (e.g., regional nerve block) that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or compliance with the study protocol, or compromise collected data.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
330 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FBT 100 mcg

    During the Titration Period, participants took fentanyl buccal tables (FBT) with a starting dose of 100 mcg until they reached an effective dose, with a maximum dose of 800 mcg and a maximum timeframe of 7 days. Participants who reached an effective dose entered the Open-label Treatment Period, whose length depended on how long was needed to treat up to 8 episodes of breakthrough pain (BTP) with FBT (maximum of 8 days). The length of the Continuation Period (when applicable) varied from country to country, up to until FBT was commercially available in that country.

    Drug: Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)

  • Active comparator
    FBT 200 mcg

    During the Titration Period, participants took fentanyl buccal tables (FBT) with a starting dose of 200 mcg until they reached an effective dose, with a maximum dose of 800 mcg and a maximum timeframe of 7 days. Participants who reached an effective dose entered the Open-label Treatment Period, whose length depended on how long was needed to treat up to 8 episodes of breakthrough pain (BTP) with FBT (maximum of 8 days). The length of the Continuation Period (when applicable) varied from country to country, up to until FBT was commercially available in that country.

    Drug: Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)

Interventions

  • FBTs were self-administered by participants via the oral mucosa. During the open-label dose titration period, participants used 1 to 4 tablets of the 100 mcg or 200 mcg strength to individually titrate upwards to an effective dose through the range of available strengths (i.e. 100, 200, 400, 600, or 800 mcg). For the open-label treatment and continuation periods, single dose tablets at the effective dose identified during the titration period were used. The maximum dose allowed per breakthrough pain (BTP) episode was 800 mcg. On any single day, participants were not to use FBT for more than 4 BTP episodes.

    Also known as: Fentora, CEP-25608, Fentanyl citrate, Effentora

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Reaching an Effective Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT) Dose As Assessed by the Participant During the Titration Period

    The effective dose was the dose that, for 2 consecutive break-through pain (BTP) episodes, provided adequate analgesia within the first 30 minutes after administration of study drug and that minimized undesirable effects. The assessment was performed by the participant and was reported in the titration-period diary. The next BTP episode was used to confirm the effective dose, and if confirmed, the effective dose was used for all following BTP episodes.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Meaningful Pain Relief As Assessed by Participants During the Treatment Period For Overall Breakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes

    Overall episode data analyzed all values of time to meaningful pain relief taken over all BTP episodes during the treatment period. If meaningful pain relief was not achieved within 60 minutes of FBT intake, or if rescue medication was taken, the event was censored. Meaningful pain relief was left to the judgment of participants, who used a stopwatch and recorded the time from treatment until pain relief in a patient diary.

    Time frame: approximately Day 8-15

  2. Number of Participants Reaching An Effective Dose As Assessed by the Participant During the Titration Period

    Number of participants for which an effective dose of FBT was reached as judged by each participant. The effective dose was the dose that, for 2 consecutive break-through pain (BTP) episodes, provided adequate analgesia within the first 30 minutes after administration of study drug and that minimized undesirable effects. The assessment was performed by the participant and was reported in the titration-period diary. The next BTP episode was used to confirm the effective dose, and if confirmed, the effective dose was used for all following BTP episodes.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 7

  3. Breakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes Requiring the Use of Rescue Medication During the Titration Period and the Treatment Period

    The number of breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes in which the participant did not obtain effective pain relief from study medication and took a rescue medication.

    Time frame: Days 1 to up to Day 7 (Titration Period); approximately Day 8 up to Day 15 (Treatment Period)

  4. Participant Assessment of Medication Performance During the Treatment Period

    Participants assessed the performance of FBT at 30 minutes and 60 minutes after dosing each episode during the treatment period. For each episode, the participant answered the question 'How well did your study medication perform in controlling the breakthrough pain episode?' on a 5-point Likert-type scale (poor=0, fair=1, good=2, very good=3, and excellent=4).

    Time frame: approximately Day 8-15

  5. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: General Activity

    Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses general activity.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  6. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Mood

    Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses mood.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  7. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Walking Ability

    Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses walking ability.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  8. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Normal Work

    Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses normal work.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  9. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Relations With Other People

    Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses relations with other people.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  10. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Sleep

    Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses sleep.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  11. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Enjoyment of Life

    Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses enjoyment of life.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  12. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire: Global Score

    Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. The Global Score is the sum of the subscales (total scale is 0-70). A negative change from baseline represents an improvement.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  13. Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Satisfied With BTP Treatment?) at the End of the Treatment Period

    Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Satisfied with the BTP Treatment?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

    Time frame: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  14. Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This BTP Medication Relieve Your Pain Quickly so You Can Get Back to Sleep?) at the End of the Treatment Period

    Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Does this BTP medication relieve your pain quickly so you can get back to sleep?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

    Time frame: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  15. Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This Medication Work Fast?) at the End of the Treatment Period

    Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Does this medication work fast?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

    Time frame: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  16. Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This Medication Provide Adequate Relief?) at the End of the Treatment Period

    Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Does this medication provide adequate relief?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

    Time frame: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  17. Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Is This Medication Easy to Take?) at the End of the Treatment Period

    Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Is this medication easy to take?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

    Time frame: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  18. Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Find This Medication Comfortable to Take in Public?) at the End of the Treatment Period

    Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Do you find this medication comfortable to take in public?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

    Time frame: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  19. Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Feel Safe Taking This Medication?) at the End of the Treatment Period

    Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Do you feel safe taking this medication?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

    Time frame: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  20. Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Understand the Instructions?) at the End of the Treatment Period

    Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Do you understand the instructions?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

    Time frame: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  21. Participant's Global Assessment of Ease of Use at the End of the Treatment Period

    Ease of use was assessed using the question 'Did you find this treatment easy/convenient to use for treatment of your breakthrough pain episodes?'. The answer was based on a 4-point numerical scale (0=Poor, 1=Fair, 2=Easy, 3=Very Easy). This assessment was performed at the end of the Treatment Period (or early termination).

    Time frame: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  22. Participant's Global Impression of Change at the End of the Treatment Period

    Global impression of change was assessed using the question 'Since the start of the study, my overall status is?'. The answer was based on a 7-point scale (1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse, and 7=Very much worse). This assessment was performed at the end of the Treatment Period (or early termination).

    Time frame: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

  23. Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Summarized by Treatment Period

    Participants with treatment-emergent adverse events are summarized by each treatment period. Relation to study drug was assessed by the investigator. The 'Any AE' category below includes serious adverse events.

    Time frame: Day 1-7 (Titration Period). Day 8-15 (Treatment Period), Days 16-688 (Continuation Period)

07

Results

Posted Sep 20, 2012

Participant flow

A total of 442 patients already receiving opioid maintenance therapy for chronic cancer pain and experiencing up to 4 BTP episodes per 24 hours (on average) were screened at 135 centers in 7 European countries.

Dose Titration Period
Participant flow — Dose Titration Period
MilestoneFBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT - Treatment and Continuation Periods
Started1561740
Titration safety analysis set1451670
Completed1301510
Not completed26230
Withdrew: Adverse event11100
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy410
Withdrew: Unstable persistent cancer pain100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject260
Withdrew: Other540
Withdrew: Non-compliance to study procedures110
Withdrew: Non-compliance to study drug210
Treatment Period
Participant flow — Treatment Period
MilestoneFBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT - Treatment and Continuation Periods
Started00281
Safety analysis set00223
Completed00218
Not completed0063
Withdrew: Adverse event0015
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy006
Withdrew: Unstable persistent cancer pain005
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0011
Withdrew: Consistently >4 btp episodes daily001
Withdrew: Protocol violation002
Withdrew: Other0018
Withdrew: Non-compliance to study procedures004
Withdrew: Unclear completion status001
Continuation Period
Participant flow — Continuation Period
MilestoneFBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT - Treatment and Continuation Periods
Started0088
Continuation safety analysis set0087
Completed0027
Not completed0061
Withdrew: Adverse event0032
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy006
Withdrew: Unstable persistent cancer pain003
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0010
Withdrew: Other007
Withdrew: Non-compliance to study procedures002
Withdrew: Non-compliance to study drug001

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Reaching an Effective Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT) Dose As Assessed by the Participant During the Titration Period

The effective dose was the dose that, for 2 consecutive break-through pain (BTP) episodes, provided adequate analgesia within the first 30 minutes after administration of study drug and that minimized undesirable effects. The assessment was performed by the participant and was reported in the titration-period diary. The next BTP episode was used to confirm the effective dose, and if confirmed, the effective dose was used for all following BTP episodes.

Time frame:
Day 1 up to Day 7
Reported as:
Number · percentage of treated participants
Percentage of Participants Reaching an Effective Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT) Dose As Assessed by the Participant During the Titration Period
percentage of treated participantsFBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration Period
Percentage of Participants Reaching an Effective Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT) Dose As Assessed by the Participant During the Titration Period75.281.2
Statistical analysis
  • FBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration Period vs FBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration Period · Mean difference (net): -6.3The upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval is equivalent to the upper bound of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Meaningful Pain Relief As Assessed by Participants During the Treatment Period For Overall Breakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes

Overall episode data analyzed all values of time to meaningful pain relief taken over all BTP episodes during the treatment period. If meaningful pain relief was not achieved within 60 minutes of FBT intake, or if rescue medication was taken, the event was censored. Meaningful pain relief was left to the judgment of participants, who used a stopwatch and recorded the time from treatment until pain relief in a patient diary.

Time frame:
approximately Day 8-15
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Meaningful Pain Relief As Assessed by Participants During the Treatment Period For Overall Breakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes
minutesFBT - Treatment Period
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Meaningful Pain Relief As Assessed by Participants During the Treatment Period For Overall Breakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes19.00 (12.00 to 30.00)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reaching An Effective Dose As Assessed by the Participant During the Titration Period

Number of participants for which an effective dose of FBT was reached as judged by each participant. The effective dose was the dose that, for 2 consecutive break-through pain (BTP) episodes, provided adequate analgesia within the first 30 minutes after administration of study drug and that minimized undesirable effects. The assessment was performed by the participant and was reported in the titration-period diary. The next BTP episode was used to confirm the effective dose, and if confirmed, the effective dose was used for all following BTP episodes.

Time frame:
Day 1 up to Day 7
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Reaching An Effective Dose As Assessed by the Participant During the Titration Period
participantsFBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration Period
100 mcg347
200 mcg3861
300 mcg (evaluated by mistake)11
400 mcg2342
600 mcg815
800 mcg510
Missing3631
SecondaryBreakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes Requiring the Use of Rescue Medication During the Titration Period and the Treatment Period

The number of breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes in which the participant did not obtain effective pain relief from study medication and took a rescue medication.

Time frame:
Days 1 to up to Day 7 (Titration Period); approximately Day 8 up to Day 15 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Number · BTP episodes
Breakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes Requiring the Use of Rescue Medication During the Titration Period and the Treatment Period
BTP episodesDuring Titration PeriodDuring Treatment Period
Breakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes Requiring the Use of Rescue Medication During the Titration Period and the Treatment Period102153
SecondaryParticipant Assessment of Medication Performance During the Treatment Period

Participants assessed the performance of FBT at 30 minutes and 60 minutes after dosing each episode during the treatment period. For each episode, the participant answered the question 'How well did your study medication perform in controlling the breakthrough pain episode?' on a 5-point Likert-type scale (poor=0, fair=1, good=2, very good=3, and excellent=4).

Time frame:
approximately Day 8-15
Reported as:
Number · BTP episodes
Participant Assessment of Medication Performance During the Treatment Period
BTP episodes30 Minutes60 Minutes
Excellent103144
Very good433584
Good712646
Fair428245
Poor10049
Missing35143
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: General Activity

Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses general activity.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: General Activity
units on a scaleFBT - Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: General Activity-1.0 ± 2.52
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Mood

Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses mood.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Mood
units on a scaleFBT - Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Mood-1.4 ± 2.55
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Walking Ability

Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses walking ability.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Walking Ability
units on a scaleFBT - Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Walking Ability-0.9 ± 2.29
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Normal Work

Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses normal work.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Normal Work
units on a scaleFBT - Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Normal Work-1.3 ± 2.61
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Relations With Other People

Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses relations with other people.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Relations With Other People
units on a scaleFBT - Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Relations With Other People-1.2 ± 2.50
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Sleep

Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses sleep.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Sleep
units on a scaleFBT - Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Sleep-1.4 ± 2.66
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Enjoyment of Life

Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. This subscale assesses enjoyment of life.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Enjoyment of Life
units on a scaleFBT - Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Enjoyment of Life-1.5 ± 2.77
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire: Global Score

Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. The Global Score is the sum of the subscales (total scale is 0-70). A negative change from baseline represents an improvement.

Time frame:
Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire: Global Score
units on a scaleFBT - Treatment Period
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire: Global Score-8.6 ± 13.47
SecondaryParticipant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Satisfied With BTP Treatment?) at the End of the Treatment Period

Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Satisfied with the BTP Treatment?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

Time frame:
approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Satisfied With BTP Treatment?) at the End of the Treatment Period
participantsFBT - Treatment Period
Very much64
Quite a bit92
Somewhat37
A little bit8
Not at all2
SecondaryParticipant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This BTP Medication Relieve Your Pain Quickly so You Can Get Back to Sleep?) at the End of the Treatment Period

Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Does this BTP medication relieve your pain quickly so you can get back to sleep?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

Time frame:
approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This BTP Medication Relieve Your Pain Quickly so You Can Get Back to Sleep?) at the End of the Treatment Period
participantsFBT - Treatment Period
Very much55
Quite a bit104
Somewhat27
A little bit13
Not at all3
SecondaryParticipant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This Medication Work Fast?) at the End of the Treatment Period

Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Does this medication work fast?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

Time frame:
approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This Medication Work Fast?) at the End of the Treatment Period
participantsFBT - Treatment Period
Very much63
Quite a bit88
Somewhat36
A little bit12
Not at all4
SecondaryParticipant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This Medication Provide Adequate Relief?) at the End of the Treatment Period

Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Does this medication provide adequate relief?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

Time frame:
approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This Medication Provide Adequate Relief?) at the End of the Treatment Period
participantsFBT - Treatment Period
Very much57
Quite a bit104
Somewhat35
A little bit5
Not at all2
SecondaryParticipant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Is This Medication Easy to Take?) at the End of the Treatment Period

Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Is this medication easy to take?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

Time frame:
approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Is This Medication Easy to Take?) at the End of the Treatment Period
participantsFBT - Treatment Period
Very much81
Quite a bit74
Somewhat31
A little bit9
Not at all8
SecondaryParticipant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Find This Medication Comfortable to Take in Public?) at the End of the Treatment Period

Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Do you find this medication comfortable to take in public?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

Time frame:
approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Find This Medication Comfortable to Take in Public?) at the End of the Treatment Period
participantsFBT - Treatment Period
Very much81
Quite a bit78
Somewhat26
A little bit10
Not at all8
SecondaryParticipant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Feel Safe Taking This Medication?) at the End of the Treatment Period

Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Do you feel safe taking this medication?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

Time frame:
approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Feel Safe Taking This Medication?) at the End of the Treatment Period
participantsFBT - Treatment Period
Very much96
Quite a bit88
Somewhat17
A little bit2
Not at all0
SecondaryParticipant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Understand the Instructions?) at the End of the Treatment Period

Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, "Do you understand the instructions?", were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much.

Time frame:
approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Understand the Instructions?) at the End of the Treatment Period
participantsFBT - Treatment Period
Very much107
Quite a bit81
Somewhat13
A little bit2
Not at all0
SecondaryParticipant's Global Assessment of Ease of Use at the End of the Treatment Period

Ease of use was assessed using the question 'Did you find this treatment easy/convenient to use for treatment of your breakthrough pain episodes?'. The answer was based on a 4-point numerical scale (0=Poor, 1=Fair, 2=Easy, 3=Very Easy). This assessment was performed at the end of the Treatment Period (or early termination).

Time frame:
approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participant's Global Assessment of Ease of Use at the End of the Treatment Period
participantsFBT - Treatment Period
Very easy67
Easy107
Fair28
Poor7
SecondaryParticipant's Global Impression of Change at the End of the Treatment Period

Global impression of change was assessed using the question 'Since the start of the study, my overall status is?'. The answer was based on a 7-point scale (1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse, and 7=Very much worse). This assessment was performed at the end of the Treatment Period (or early termination).

Time frame:
approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participant's Global Impression of Change at the End of the Treatment Period
participantsFBT - Treatment Period
Very much improved15
Much improved75
Minimally improved65
No change32
Minimally worse14
Much worse7
Very much worse0
SecondaryParticipants With Adverse Events (AE) Summarized by Treatment Period

Participants with treatment-emergent adverse events are summarized by each treatment period. Relation to study drug was assessed by the investigator. The 'Any AE' category below includes serious adverse events.

Time frame:
Day 1-7 (Titration Period). Day 8-15 (Treatment Period), Days 16-688 (Continuation Period)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Summarized by Treatment Period
participantsFBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT - Treatment PeriodFBT - Continuation Period
Any AE44744372
Any Serious AE812437
AE leading to discontinuation of study drug1119025
AE with a fatal outcome64329
AE considered related to study drug19351514

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment-emergent AEs from Day 1 up to day 688. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
FBT - All Doses and Study Periods—67/312 (21.5%)52/312 (16.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 80
Most frequent serious events
EventFBT - All Doses and Study Periods
Malignant neoplasm progressionNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)21/312
Renal failureRenal and urinary disorders5/312
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders4/312
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/312
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/312
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/312
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/312
Cardio-respiratory arrestCardiac disorders2/312
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders2/312
Intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders2/312
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventFBT - All Doses and Study Periods
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders30/312
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders23/312
SomnolenceNervous system disorders16/312

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)FBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodTotal
Mean59.5 ± 11.7260.1 ± 10.9759.8 ± 11.32
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)FBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodTotal
Female7178149
Male8596181
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)FBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodTotal
France162541
Spain262652
Poland384179
Ireland101
Germany323870
United Kingdom8715
Italy353772
Cancer Site
Cancer Site(participants)FBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodFBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration PeriodTotal
Breast313667
Colon/rectum152540
Colon/rectum + Pancreas/stomach + other101
Head/neck121224
Leukemia/lymphoma246
Myeloma549
Oesophageal426
Pancreas/stomach131124
Prostate81725
Lung262147
Other (not specified)394281
08

Study locations

123 sites
  • Investigational Site
    Bayonne, 64100, France
  • Investigational Site
    Bordeaux, 33075, France
  • Investigational Site
    Caen, 14033, France
  • Investigational Site
    Clichy, 92110, France
  • Investigational Site
    Grenoble, 38043, France
  • Investigational Site
    Le Chesnay, 78157, France
  • Investigational Site
    Le Kremlin Bicetre, 94275, France
  • Investigational Site
    Le Mans, 72018, France
  • Investigational Site
    Lorient, 58107, France
  • Investigational Site
    Montpellier, 34298, France
  • Investigational Site
    Nevers, 58033, France
  • Investigational Site
    Orleans, 45032, France
  • Investigational Site
    Paris, 75010, France
  • Investigational Site
    Paris, 75013, France
  • Investigational Site
    Paris, 75730, France
  • Investigational Site
    Pierre Benite, 69495, France
  • Investigational Site
    Poitiers, 86021, France
  • Investigational Site
    Rouen, 76031, France
  • Investigational Site
    Saint Herblain, 44805, France
  • Investigational Site
    Tarbes, 65000, France
  • Investigational Site
    Toulouse, 31059, France
  • Investigational Site
    Villejuif, 94800, France
  • Investigational Site
    Bad Honnef, 53604, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Bad Lippspringe, 33175, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Berlin, 10435, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Berlin, 13585, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Berlin, 14089, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Bohlen, 04564, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Bonn, 53111, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Duisburg, 47055, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Duisburg, 47166, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Erfurt, 99084, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Freiburg, 79108, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Geesthacht, 21502, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Greifenstein, 35753, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Herne, 44623, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Hildesheim, 31135, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Jena, 07747, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Kassel, 34117, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Leipzig, 04107, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Lohsa, 02999, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Lunen, 44534, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Mainz, 55131, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Mulhausen, 99974, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Munich, 80637, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Munich, 81377, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Neustadt, 01844, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Rostock, 18059, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Weiden, 92637, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Wurselen, 52146, Germany
  • Investigational Site
    Dublin, Ireland
  • Investigational Site
    Aquila, 67100, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Aviano, 33081, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Bari, 70120, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Brescia, 25123, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Cagliari, 9121, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Candiolo, 10060, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Caserta, 81100, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Cosenza, 87100, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Firenze, 50100, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Garbagnate Milanese, 20024, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Genova, 16128, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Lugo, 48022, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Milano, 20142, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Modena, 41100, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Napoli, 80131, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Palermo, 90146, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Piacenza, 29100, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Pisa, 56100, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Roma, 133, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Roma, 144, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Roma, 161, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Torino, 10126, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Torino, 10153, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Verona, 37024, Italy
  • Investigational Site
    Bielsko Biala, 43300, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Bydgoszcz, 85796, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Elblag, 82300, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Gdansk, 80208, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Gdansk, 80952, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Gliwice, 44101, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Lodz, 90251, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Poznan, 60245, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Poznan, 61866, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Puszczykowo, 62041, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Szczecin, 71730, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Szczecin, 71740, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Tychy, 43100, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Warszawa, 02781, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Wloclawek, 87800, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    Wroclaw, 53413, Poland
  • Investigational Site
    A Coruna, 15006, Spain
  • Investigational Site
    A Coruna, 15009, Spain
  • Investigational Site
    Barcelona, 08025, Spain
  • Investigational Site
    Barcelona, 08907, Spain
  • Investigational Site
    Bilbao, 48013, Spain
  • Investigational Site
    Cadiz, 11009, Spain

Showing the first 100 of 123 sites across 7 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00842829
Lead sponsor
Cephalon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2009
Start date
Jan 2009
Primary completion
May 2011
Completion
May 2011
Results posted
Sep 20, 2012
Last update
Oct 1, 2012

Study contacts

Sponsor's Medical Expert
study director · Cephalon Europe

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fentanyl

Start the discussion