ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01240876Updated Jul 21, 2016

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Placulumab (CEP-37247) Administered by the Transforaminal Epidural Route for the Treatment of Patients With Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Associated With Disk Herniation

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of CEP-37247 and Placebo in Sciatica, sponsored by Cephalon. Completed at 24 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-21.

Sponsored by Cephalon (part of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.) · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CEP-37247 compared with placebo as assessed by the occurrence of adverse events, and the mean change in average pain intensity (API) in the affected leg.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sciatica

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sciatica
  • Pain
03

In context

Sciatica

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Sciatica; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 98 is above the median of 68 across 122 interventional studies indexed under Sciatica.

Browse Sciatica studies →

Lead sponsor

Cephalon is the lead sponsor of 75 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Cephalon became part of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd..

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Over the 4 days prior to the randomization visit, the patient has a mean score greater than or equal to 5 (of 10) for "Average Pain Over the Past 24 Hours" for the pain in the affected leg as assessed by the 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) captured in the electronic diaries. The patient must have valid (non-missing) data for at least 3 out of the 4 days, and the mean score must be at least 5 without rounding.
  • The patient has a current diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain must radiate into the leg in a dermatomal/myotomal distribution consistent with the diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain in the suspected involved nerve root. Based on history and medical records (if available), the duration of the current episode of pain must be between 6 and 52 weeks duration.
  • Diagnosis must be confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or existing computed tomography [CT] or MRI related to the symptoms present at screening) performed within 6 months prior to screening and demonstrating disk herniation at a location consistent with the clinical symptoms of radicular pain. Other incidental pathology is permitted as long as it is asymptomatic and believed not causal of the primary diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain at the specific spinal level as described below.
  • The patient must have at least 1 of the following: a positive straight leg raise (L5-S1), positive femoral stretch test (L3-L4), or other positive test result upon physical examination that is consistent with the presence of nerve root irritation at the nerve root suspected to be involved in the diagnosed lumbosacral radicular pain at screening.
  • Herniation must affect L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 and must be consistent with clinical presentation of the current episode of lumbosacral radicular pain as described above.
  • Patients with significant or progressive sensory impairment or motor impairment (such as foot drop) must be assessed on a case-by-case basis by the investigator, and must in each case receive written approval of the Sponsor prior to randomization.
  • There must be confirmation that the patient does not have an active tuberculosis infection at screening. The patient should have either a negative QuantiFERON®-TB Gold blood test or negative tuberculin skin test (TST) result at screening; however if QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or TST is positive, a chest radiogram may be used to determine whether a patient has an active infection.
  • The patient is willing to keep all analgesic medication and other therapy usage (such as physiotherapy, acupuncture, or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [TENS]) stable or decreased during the study and use only the rescue pain medication as needed and as specified by the protocol.
  • The patient is in good health (with the exception of the condition under study) as determined by a medical and psychiatric history, medical examination, , serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology.
  • Women of (ie, not surgically sterile or 2 years ), must use a medically accepted method of and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The patient:

  • has a documented history of an allergic reaction (hives, rash, etc.) or a intolerance to study drug or ingredients.
  • has a (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2.
  • the patient has an established history of a major psychiatric disorder, not controlled with medication or appears to have anxiety that would interfere with clinical pain scores or participation in the trial.
  • has clinically significant abnormalities in clinical chemistry, hematology or urinalysis, including serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase/ (AST) or serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than or equal to 3 times the upper limit of the reference range or an estimated (eGFR) less than or equal to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] study formula) at screening.
  • has received an intra-epidural injection for the treatment of the current episode of sciatica during the last 3 months prior to screening.
  • has significant pain unrelated to the disk herniation that would significantly compromise assessment of the radicular back and leg pain related to the disk herniation.
  • has radiologic evidence of disk herniation at more than 1 spinal level, and clinical evidence of lumbosacral radicular pain at more than 1 spinal nerve corresponding to the levels of the multiple disk herniations.
  • has received any drug within 30 days prior to screening, or is scheduled to receive an investigational drug other than blinded study drug during the course of this study.
  • has had lumbar or sacral back surgery related to the specific disk that is the cause of the radicular pain upon presentation to the study, or currently plans to undergo spine surgical intervention while in the study.
  • has received epidural corticosteroid injections in the back within 3 months of screening.
  • is involved in an ongoing worker's compensation claim, disability claim, or litigation related to any pain problem.
  • has any active infection that is not self-limiting and not resolved prior to study drug administration.
  • has a history of or evidence of malignancy or lymphoproliferative or neoplastic disease with the exception of successfully treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia within 5 years of the screening visit.
  • has a history of systemic fungal infection.
  • has a history of opportunistic infection within 3 months prior to screening.
  • has a history of known or suspected chronic infection, tuberculosis, virus (HBV), virus (HCV), or (HIV). The investigator will review all medical history (including medication history), and patients found to be HIV positive based on medical review are to be excluded from the study.
  • has a history of any demyelinating disease, including multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis.
  • has used anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor medication (anakinra [KINERET®, Biovitrum]) or anti-TNF medication (etanercept [ENBREL®, Amgen Inc.], infliximab [REMICADE®, Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.], or adalimumab [HUMIRA®, Abbott Laboratories], or any experimental TNF inhibitor) within the past year.
  • has a planned joint replacement surgery or a history of infected joint prosthesis or has received antibiotics for a suspected infection of a joint prosthesis if that prosthesis has not been removed or replaced.
  • has been given within 14 days of study drug administration.
  • has severe spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis (grade 2 or higher).
  • has coagulopathy.
  • is a pregnant or lactating woman (any women becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study).
  • has a history of diabetic neuropathy or peripheral neuropathy in the lower extremities.
  • has a history of any condition (not otherwise specified) known to be amenable to TNF inhibitors (e.g., Crohn's disease).
  • has a known allergy or idiosyncratic (atopic) reaction to contrast agent, local anesthetic, study drug, any ingredient listed as being present in a study formulation, or any other pain management compound likely to be prescribed in the study, including their metabolites (if applicable) or any ingredient listed as being present in their formulations.
  • has any clinically significant uncontrolled medical condition (treated or untreated).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(15)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CEP-37247

    Drug: CEP-37247

  • Placebo comparator
    Matching placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • 0.5-, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-mg doses of CEP-37247 will be administered by the transforaminal epidural route.

    Also known as: placulumab

  • DrugPlacebo

    Matching placebo vials will be filled with the buffered solution for CEP-37247.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of adverse events compared to placebo

    Time frame: throughout the 28-week double-blind treatment period

  2. Mean change in the weekly average of daily average pain intensity (API) in the affected leg on the 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11)

    The average pain intensity over the past 24 hours on the NRS-11 will be collected daily by electronic diary.

    Time frame: at week 4 compared with baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Weekly average of daily leg API score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries

    Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.

    Time frame: at each of the first 6 weeks

  2. Weekly average of daily back API score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries

    Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.

    Time frame: at each of the first 6 weeks

  3. Weekly average of daily worst leg pain score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries

    Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.

    Time frame: at each of the first 6 weeks

  4. Weekly average of daily worst back pain score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries

    Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.

    Time frame: at each of the first 6 weeks

  5. Patients with 30% and 50% reductions in average pain over the previous 24 hours as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)

    Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.

    Time frame: at 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 weeks

  6. Change in total Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score as well as subscale scores

    Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.

    Time frame: at 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 weeks

  7. Score on the Patient Global Impression of Change

    Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.

    Time frame: at 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 weeks

  8. Change in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score

    Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.

    Time frame: from baseline to weeks 4, 14, and 28

  9. Average daily amount of rescue medication used

    Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.

    Time frame: during each of the first 6 weeks of the 28-week double-blind treatment period

  10. Patients requiring a subsequent injection of epidural steroids

    Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.

    Time frame: up to 28 weeks after CEP-37247 treatment

  11. Patients requiring back surgery

    Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.

    Time frame: up to 28 weeks after CEP-37247 treatment

  12. Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by vital signs measurements

    Time frame: at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 (or early termination)

  13. Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by electrocardiogram (ECG) results

    Time frame: at week 4

  14. Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by clinical laboratory tests

    Time frame: at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 (or early termination)

  15. Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by physical examination

    Time frame: at weeks 4 and 28 (or early termination)

  16. Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by neurologic examination

    Time frame: at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 28 (or early termination)

  17. Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by concomitant medication usage

    Time frame: throughout the 28-week double-blind treatment period

  18. Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by immunogenicity tests

    Time frame: at weeks 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 (or early termination)

  19. Characterize the serum pharmacokinetics of CEP-37247 following epidural administration

    Time frame: Throughout the 28-week double-blind treatment period

07

Study locations

24 sites
  • Teva Investigational Site 22
    La Mesa, California, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 18
    Laguna Hills, California, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 19
    Pasadena, California, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 2
    Pasadena, California, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 14
    Orlando, Florida, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 5
    Sarasota, Florida, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 10
    Marietta, Georgia, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 13
    Marietta, Georgia, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 9
    Bloomington, Illinois, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 15
    Overland Park, Kansas, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 8
    Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 20
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 16
    Dayton, Ohio, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 21
    Eugene, Oregon, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 17
    Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 1
    Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 11
    North Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 6
    Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 4
    Orem, Utah, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 3
    Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Teva Investigational Site 103
    Caulfied South, Australia
  • Teva Investigational Site 102
    Malvern East, Australia
  • Teva Investigational Site 100
    North Terrace, Australia
  • Teva Investigational Site 101
    St. Leonards, Australia
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2011, a primary completion of Mar 2013 and a completion of Apr 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 10, 2010
First posted
Nov 15, 2010
Start
Jan 2011
Primary completionActual
Mar 2013
CompletionActual
Apr 2013
Results delay requested
May 8, 2014
Last update
Jul 21, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01240876
Lead sponsor
Cephalon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 15, 2010
Start date
Jan 2011
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Apr 2013
Last update
Jul 21, 2016

Study contacts

Sponsor's Medical Expert, Associate Director, Clinical Research, MD, PhD
study director · Cephalon
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Placulumab

Start the discussion