ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00720317Updated Sep 16, 2010

Diabetic Retinopathy and Sickle Trait

An observational study in Diabetic Retinopathy and Sickle Cell Trait, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-09-16.

Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
48
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To more clearly ascertain the relationship between ocular manifestations of sickle cell disease and diabetes, specifically; whether the presence of sickle cell trait exacerbates the disease progression of diabetic retinopathy.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this research study is to evaluate the relationship between sickle cell trait and the progression of diabetic retinopathy. People with diabetes have high blood sugar that damages small blood vessels. Damage to the blood vessels that supply the retina in the back of the eye is called diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic retinopathy is worse in African-Americans with diabetes, with earlier and more severe disease progression and common complications including vitreous hemorrhage - where these blood vessels in the eye leak - and retinal detachment - the separation of the nerves of the retina from the back of the eye which may lead to blindness. One explanation for this increased severity of diabetes in African-Americans is the presence of sickle cell disease, or even just sickle trait, which causes damage to red blood cells and blood vessels under conditions of stress; like low oxygen levels, or hyperglycemic acidosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Retinopathy
  • Sickle Cell Trait

Keywords

  • Diabetic Retinopathy
  • Sickle Cell Trait
  • Vision Loss
  • Eye disease
03

In context

Diabetic Retinopathy

778 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Retinopathy; 142 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is below the median of 172 across 263 observational studies indexed under Diabetic Retinopathy.

Browse Diabetic Retinopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 874 studies on the registry; 166 are open to participants now.

Of its 131 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

African-Americans with type II diabetes mellitus experience increased systemic vascular morbidity and mortality, even after adjustment for socioeconomic factors.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Self-identified African-American patients with diabetes will be identified from Dr Bowie's retina clinic at Storm Eye Institute.
  • These subjects are either being screened or treated for the progression of diabetic retinopathy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. We aim to screen African-American diabetic patients with retinopathy to ascertain whether sickle trait is present, and if so whether there is increased severity of diabetic retinopathy in the group with sickle trait.

    Time frame: One Year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of South Carolina, Storm Eye Institute
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2008, a primary completion of Jul 2010 and a completion of Jul 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 18, 2008
First posted
Jul 22, 2008
Start
May 2008
Primary completionActual
Jul 2010
CompletionActual
Jul 2010
Last update
Sep 16, 2010
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00720317
First posted
Jul 22, 2008
Start date
May 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2010
Completion
Jul 2010
Last update
Sep 16, 2010

Study contacts

Esther M. Bowie, MD
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina, Storm Eye Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion