CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00716599Updated Jul 16, 2008

Training in Fever Case Management With Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) for Malaria in Uganda

An interventional study of training in use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria in Malaria and Fever, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 1 site in Uganda. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-07-16.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14,000
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Malaria remains one of the most devastating infectious diseases in the world. Despite the potential for serious adverse outcomes with each episode of malaria, most cases in endemic areas are diagnosed on clinical grounds alone. Even the simple technique of light microscopy, the gold standard for malaria diagnosis, is inaccessible to most individuals in resource-poor malarious areas. New diagnostic methods that are practical for limited health-care settings are urgently needed. Immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria are easy to use, require little infrastructure or expertise, show good accuracy, and are increasingly advocated for routine use in malaria-endemic areas. A major challenge now is to implement RDTs effectively in typical African clinical settings. We plan to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of a training curriculum incorporating RDT use in peripheral government health centers in Uganda. Results from this study will provide evidence for scale-up of RDT implementation in Uganda, as planned by the Uganda Ministry of Health from mid-2008, as well as in other sub-Saharan African countries.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of a basic training program incorporating RDTs, as compared with standard-of-care presumptive treatment, for the management of patients who present with suspected malaria at peripheral health centers in Uganda. Our hypothesis is that training in fever case management and RDT use will allow health center staff to reduce unnecessary antimalarial prescriptions without compromising patient outcomes, compared with the current practice of presumptive antimalarial therapy for all febrile patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malaria
  • Fever

Keywords

  • malaria
  • diagnosis
  • rapid diagnostic test
  • rapid diagnostic tests
  • fever case management
  • training
  • fever case management in malaria-endemic areas
03

In context

Malaria

1,299 studies on the registry are indexed under Malaria; 86 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14,000 is above the median of 220 across 1,027 interventional studies indexed under Malaria.

Browse Malaria studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • all outpatients at participating health centers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14,000 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Health centers continue with standard-of-care empiric case management

  • Experimental
    RDT training

    Health centers randomly selected to receive training and RDTs, for use in routine patient case management

    Device: training in use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria

Interventions

  • Devicetraining in use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria

    training program and introduction of RDTs for use in case management of patients presenting for routine care at government health centers

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare changes in the proportion of patients prescribed any antimalarial therapy between health centers with and without an RDT training intervention.

    Time frame: point of care

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare changes in the proportion of patients with an inadequate response to initial therapy between health centers with and without an RDT training intervention.

    Time frame: 5 days after initial clinic visit

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Uganda Malaria Surveillance Project
    Kampala, Uganda
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00716599
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
Exxon Mobil, Makerere University, Uganda Malaria Surveillance Project, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
First posted
Jul 16, 2008
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Jun 2008
Completion
Jul 2008
Last update
Jul 16, 2008

Study contacts

Heidi Hopkins, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion