CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00711568Updated Apr 1, 2013

A Clinical Trial of Magnetic Stimulation in Depression

A Phase 2 interventional study of Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and Sham rTMS in Depression, sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-04-01.

Sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether repetitive high field transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left or right frontal lobes is beneficial for the treatment of depression that is refractory to antidepressant medication.

Read the detailed description

Despite the utility of modern psychotropic medications, depression remains a medical problem with major societal impact. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective somatic treatment for depression. However, ECT has disadvantages, including risks attendant with general anesthesia and significant cognitive side effects (e.g. confusion and memory loss). An effective but safer somatic therapy for depression could help many patients.

The brain can be stimulated non-invasively by using time-varying magnetic fields to induce electrical currents within the cerebral cortex, a technique known as transcranial magnetic stimulation. Preliminary investigations have provided promising evidence of improved mood associated with high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of left prefrontal cortex in patients with medication-resistant major depression. However, the role of stimulus laterality in the effects of prefrontal rTMS have not been tested systematically. Furthermore, previous studies have likely been confounded by inadequate patient blinding and by a lack of standardization of psychotropic medication treatment. Therefore, we propose to use a carefully controlled clinical trial to directly test the hypothesis that the effects of prefrontal rTMS on mood are related to the laterality of magnetic stimulation. We also intend to improve blinding in comparison to previous studies by: 1) employing a parallel-group study design comparing real and simulated rTMS, as opposed to a crossover study design; 2) using specially constructed sham magnetic coils which can be placed directly on the scalp surface, to more effectively simulate rTMS; and 3) using trains of weak electrical impulses to simulate the cutaneous scalp stimulation associated with rTMS. We will minimize confounding effects of medications and antidepressant withdrawal by: 1) requiring that all patients have fail a monitored clinical trial of an SSRI or other comparable antidepressant prior to rTMS; and 2) continuing pharmacological treatment of depression during the rTMS phase of the trial. Demonstration of therapeutic efficacy of rTMS in this rigorously controlled clinical trial would provide a foundation for further investigation and development of this novel potential treatment modality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression

Keywords

  • depression
  • magnetic stimulation
03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is below the median of 84 across 6,720 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs is the lead sponsor of 658 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients will meet DSM-IV criteria for Major Depressive Episode (without psychotic features).
  • All patients will have a total score of 18 or higher and a score of at least 3 on item number 1 of the 24 item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D).
  • All patients will have failed to respond to at least two separate trials of treatment for at least 4 weeks with therapeutic dosages of antidepressant medication (including at least one SSRI) or will have been intolerant of at least three different antidepressant medications (including at least one SSRI).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient medications will be reviewed prior to enrollment in this study. Patients taking medications that may lower seizure threshold (e.g. metronidazole) will be excluded if the particular medication cannot be stopped or altered without affecting the patient's routine medical care.
  • History of neurological illness, epilepsy or seizure disorder, intracranial tumor, or major head trauma leading to loss of consciousness of any length.
  • Evidence of central nervous system disease based on baseline complete neurological examination, EEG and contrast-enhanced computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain.
  • History of implanted pacemaker or medication pump, metal plate in skull, or metal objects in the eye or skull.
  • Axis II diagnosis of Cluster A (paranoid, schizoid, or schizotypal) or Cluster B (antisocial, borderline, histrionic, or narcissistic) personality disorder.
  • Axis II diagnosis of mental retardation.
  • History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, other functional psychosis, rapid-cycling bipolar illness, or alcohol or drug abuse within the past year.
  • Need for rapid clinical response due to conditions such as inanition, psychosis, or suicidality (defined as suicide attempt during the current major depressive episode or having a specific plan for committing suicide).
  • A medical condition that is not well controlled, such as diabetes or hypertension, or concomitant medical or nutritional problems necessitating hospitalization.
  • Patients taking anticonvulsant mood stabilizers (e.g. carbamazepine, valproic acid).
  • Patients otherwise unable to grant informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1

    Left dorsolateral frontal 20 Hz TMS delivered for 2 seconds every 30 seconds for a total of 2000 stimuli

    Procedure: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) · Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator

  • Experimental
    Arm 2

    Right dorsolateral frontal 20 Hz TMS delivered for 2 seconds every 30 seconds for a total of 2000 stimuli

    Procedure: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) · Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator

  • Sham comparator
    Arm 3

    Left or right dorsolateral frontal 20 Hz sham TMS delivered for 2 seconds every 30 seconds for a total of 2000 stimuli

    Procedure: Sham rTMS

Interventions

  • ProcedureRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

    20 Hz rTMS delivered for 2 seconds (40 stimuli) every 30 seconds for a total of 2000 stimuli (25 minutes)

  • ProcedureSham rTMS

    20 Hz sham rTMS delivered to L or R frontal region for 2 seconds (40 stimuli) every 30 seconds for a total of 2000 stimuli

  • DeviceRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator

    Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hamilton Depression Scale

    Time frame: Baseline x 2, end of treatment, one week, one month and 3 months post-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Beck Depression Inventory

    Time frame: Baseline x 2, end of treatment, one week, one month and 3 months post-treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Triggs WJ, McCoy KJ, Greer R, Rossi F, Bowers D, Kortenkamp S, Nadeau SE, Heilman KM, Goodman WK. Effects of left frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation on depressed mood, cognition, and corticomotor threshold. Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Jun 1;45(11):1440-6. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00031-1. PubMed 10356626 ↗
  • Nadeau SE, Bowers D, Jones TL, Wu SS, Triggs WJ, Heilman KM. Cognitive effects of treatment of depression with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2014 Jun;27(2):77-87. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000031. PubMed 24968008 ↗
  • Nadeau SE, Davis SE, Wu SS, Dai Y, Richards LG. A pilot randomized controlled trial of D-cycloserine and distributed practice as adjuvants to constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(9):885-95. doi: 10.1177/1545968314532032. Epub 2014 Apr 26. PubMed 24769437 ↗
  • Triggs WJ, Ricciuti N, Ward HE, Cheng J, Bowers D, Goodman WK, Kluger BM, Nadeau SE. Right and left dorsolateral pre-frontal rTMS treatment of refractory depression: a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. 2010 Aug 15;178(3):467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Jun 18. PubMed 20643486 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00711568
Lead sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Collaborators
University of Florida
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 9, 2008
Start date
Oct 2001
Primary completion
Aug 2007
Completion
Dec 2007
Last update
Apr 1, 2013

Study contacts

Stephen E. Nadeau, MD BS BS
principal investigator · North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion