ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00709228Updated Jan 26, 2015Results posted

Study of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Infected With HCV LVL G1 and Effect of Peg-Intron Plus Rebetol Treatment (Study P04793)

An observational study in Hepatitis C, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-01-26.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (part of Merck & Co., Inc) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
496
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine the relapse rate at 24 weeks follow up in Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Low Viral Load (HCV LVL G1) patients treated for 24 weeks with Peg Intron and Rebetol who are Hepatitis C Virus-Ribonucleic Acid (HCV-RNA) negative at treatment week 4 and week 24. To determine the proportion of patients (%) with sustained virological response at 24 weeks post follow up treatment.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 500 patients from about 100 sites to be identified as HCV LVL G1 patients

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatitis C

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hepatitis C

2,356 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 101 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 496 is above the median of 245 across 574 observational studies indexed under Hepatitis C.

Browse Hepatitis C studies →

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,159 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 497 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 369 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

primary care clinic

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willingness to participate
  • 18 years or older, either gender, any race
  • Must have Hepatitic C Virus Low Viral Load [LCV LVL] (positive, but \<600,000 IU/mL on the assay used by the individual study site. Only Hepatitis C Virus-Ribonucleic acid/quantitative polymerase chain reaction [HCV-RNA/qPCR] assays with results in IU/ml are acceptable) AND been diagnosed with Genotype 1
  • Subject considered suitable for treatment per local label
  • Investigator considers suitable and subject consents to be treated

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not show negative polymerase chain reaction [PCR] at week 4
  • Pregnant women or those who plan to become pregnant or sexual partners of women who plan to become pregnant
  • Subject does not qualify based on contra-indication, special warning, special population, and/or pregnancy \& lactation section of the Summary of Product Characteristics [SmPC]
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
496 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • PegIntron plus Rebetol

    Those with chronic Hepatitis C infected with HCV LVL G1

    Drug: PegIntron · Drug: Rebetol

Interventions

  • 1.5 ug/kg/week

    Also known as: SCH 054031

  • 800-1200 mg/day

    Also known as: SCH 18908

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of HCV LVL G1 Participants Who Relapsed

    Relapse was defined as undetectable Hepatitis C virus-ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) at End of Treatment, but detectable HCV-RNA at Follow-up Week 24.

    Time frame: Week 24 of follow-up

07

Results

Posted Feb 22, 2010

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePegIntron Plus Rebetol
Started496
Completed164
Not completed332
Withdrew: Not treated14
Withdrew: Eligibility criteria not met281
Withdrew: Adverse events2
Withdrew: Discontinued treatment14
Withdrew: Did not enter follow-up4
Withdrew: Discontinued follow-up5
Withdrew: Disease progression1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up6
Withdrew: Non-compliance5

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of HCV LVL G1 Participants Who Relapsed

Relapse was defined as undetectable Hepatitis C virus-ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) at End of Treatment, but detectable HCV-RNA at Follow-up Week 24.

Time frame:
Week 24 of follow-up
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of HCV LVL G1 Participants Who Relapsed
ParticipantsPegIntron Plus Rebetol
Number of HCV LVL G1 Participants Who Relapsed16
Statistical analysis
  • PegIntron Plus Rebetol · Simple proportion: 0.097 · 95% CI 0.06 to 0.15

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PegInton Plus Rebetol—11/482 (2.3%)0/482 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventPegInton Plus Rebetol
PERICARDITISCardiac disorders1/482
VERTIGOEar and labyrinth disorders1/482
HYPOTHYROIDISMEndocrine disorders1/482
PANCREATITISGastrointestinal disorders1/482
ABSCESS NECKInfections and infestations1/482
MULTIPLE INJURIESInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/482
ACUTE PSYCHOSISPsychiatric disorders1/482
AGGRESSIONPsychiatric disorders1/482
PERSONALITY DISORDERPsychiatric disorders1/482
SUICIDE ATTEMPTPsychiatric disorders1/482

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PegIntron Plus Rebetol
Mean37.8 ± 10.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PegIntron Plus Rebetol
Female68
Male102
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Craxi A, Koutsounas S, Ogurtsov P, Chemello L, Maticic M, Torras J, Diago M, Tartaglione MT, Witthoeft T, Yu X, Faruqi R, Chaudhri E, Pedicone LD, Zuckerman E. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus weight-based ribavirin for 24 weeks in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 with low viral load who achieve rapid viral response. J Viral Hepat. 2012 Feb;19(2):e120-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01515.x. Epub 2011 Sep 19. PubMed 22239509 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2006, a primary completion of Nov 2008 and a completion of Nov 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Feb 2010, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 23, 2008
First posted
Jul 3, 2008
Start
May 2006
Primary completionActual
Nov 2008
CompletionActual
Nov 2008
Results first posted
Feb 22, 2010
Last update
Jan 26, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00709228
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 3, 2008
Start date
May 2006
Primary completion
Nov 2008
Completion
Nov 2008
Results posted
Feb 22, 2010
Last update
Jan 26, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion